A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
Well, I'm not a member of many message boards, but am a transcriptionist and post on the MT site some. This has to do with the Obama health law.
I'm not stating my political views here, just a question. My husband started going to the doc last year for his back right before or when his insurance (Blue Cross) took effect. He had not had insurance prior to that (at least not in a few years). The doc never did xrays or anything, just gave him prescriptions and took history and symptoms. So about several months later (about October or November of 2012), the doc orders an MRI (which shows multiple problems, may need surgery, etc.). Referred him to a neurosurgeon for a consultation. Went for that. The neurosurgeon ordered a CAT scan also, which was done. This was all under assumption insurance would cover. They come back and say they will not cover the MRI because it was preexisting and he didn't have have insurance cover within a certain time period before. So we have to pay it all. They went by the doctor's records that he had sent to the insurance company.
So we called the insurance company and they said yes, it's preexisting, we have to pay, final word. My husband goes back to the doctor and he says that the Obama law prohibits preexisting and they will have to pay for it. Appeal, I suppose. Is this doctor correct? I thought that would not go into effect into the next year or two. I don't know a lot about this kind of stuff. Does anyone know what we can do to possibly appeal this and get insurance to pay (especially if the preexisting condition can no longer be a reason for insurance not paying)? Or are we responsible for the whole thing as the insurance company insists? It is definitely our fault for not checking into this further before going and getting the MRI, etc., but we just assumed and since they took the insurance info and all . . .
Any kind advice is appreciated. :)
Thanks,
Broke MT :|
;