A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
From Us News, 09/27/2012.
Article by Peter Roff:
"Obama Supporters' Dirty Tricks to Win the Catholic Vote"
"On Wednesday Hudson also revealed that a group calling itself Catholics for Obama had been making push poll phone calls in support of the president's re-election bid. Among the questions being asked, he said, was "How can you support a 'Mormon' who does not believe in Jesus Christ?"
The phone banker making the call, which in this case went to a woman Hudson identifies as "the head of a pro-life committee at a parish I know" reportedly also asserted that "President Obama did not support abortion" and that Planned Parenthood "helps children get healthcare and prenatal care and does not promote abortion." In fact, the group is one of the nation's largest abortion providers.
[Editor's note: In response to this blog post, an Obama campaign spokesperson issued the following statement: "As a campaign, we have made it unequivocally clear that a candidate’s religion is out of bounds. The activity that is being attributed to the Obama Campaign and our Catholics For Obama program is categorically false. When we talk to voters about what’s at stake, we talk about Mitt Romney promising to repeal healthcare, slash education, and his support of an economic policy that pays for tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires with tax increases on the middle class."]
All this amounts to a whispering campaign that is both dishonest about the president's record on abortion and deviously attempts to divide the Catholic electorate on the issue of GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney's religion—something the Obama campaign has repeatedly promised it would not do. With the election getting closer, the comments and attacks are getting nastier. Some people, apparently, will do anything to hold on to power.
My thoughts: Hmmmm. If Obama is so far ahead in Ohio, why would any supporters feel the need to make calls such as these? Does the Obama campaign really have no hand in this or is this like the "Romney causes death of worker's wife" video that no one knew anything about and turns out, they certainly did, in particular Stephanie Cutter? No matter what campaign that girl is working for, I would not trust a word from her mouth.
;
Salon didn't state the law was REJECTED as you stated. They stated part of it was blocked.
Here is the Judge's quote:
"As a result, Simpson decided that for the November 6 election only, voters without appropriate photo ID could vote, but would no longer have to produce identification within six days, as their votes would be counted.”
"Rejected" and "decided for the Nov. 6 election ONLY" has two different meanings. In fact, in PA, if you read the PA DMV site I posted the other day, I think it stated that they could vote WITHOUT ID as a provisional vote until they received their true ID.
Please get your facts straight. Thanks.