A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
Against abortions then dont have one.
I am saying it is not my business to tell someone what to do with their body. Last I checked there are no forced abortions in the US. You think making abortions illegal will magically stop them...guess what it wont. I am more focused on reducing unwanted pregnancies in the first place. But psychotic men in this country and boy touching priests want to control that and do away with birth control which helps do just that.
Oh and FYI
Among the 39 areas that reported gestational age at the time of abortion for 2009 (Table 7), the majority (64.0%) of abortions were performed at ≤8 weeks' gestation, and 91.7% were performed at ≤13 weeks' gestation. Few abortions (7.0%) were performed at 14–20 weeks' gestation, and even fewer (1.3%) were performed at ≥21 weeks' gestation. Among the 30 reporting areas that provided data on gestational age every year during 2000–2009 (Table 8), the percentage of abortions performed at ≤13 weeks' gestation increased only slightly. However, within this gestational age range, a shift occurred toward earlier gestational ages, with abortions performed at ≤8 weeks' gestation increasing 12%. The percentage increase in abortions performed at ≤8 weeks' was greatest from 2000 to 2004 but continued from 2005 to 2009. Throughout the period of analysis, the percentage of abortions performed at >13 weeks' gestation remained low (<10%), and abortions performed at ≥16 weeks' gestation decreased 13%–22% from 2000 to 2009.
Among the subset of abortions performed at ≤13 weeks' gestation in 2009, 35.2% were performed at ≤6 weeks' gestation, and 34.6% were performed at 7–8 weeks' gestation (Table 9). Among the remaining abortions at ≤13 weeks' gestation, the percentage contribution was progress
I was recently burdened while in prayer
to sculpt a life-size scale model of a 12 week old
from conception Pre-born Baby
These tiny resin dolls can be used in schools & pregnancy
centers to educate
http://www.onetinylife.org/menu.htm
Here is an actual photo of a 12 week fetus.
Here is another:
Not only is the detailing if the doll's features ridiculous, but the scale is too. Here's another overly facially detailed replica, but at least it's actual size. As you can see, the Facebook hoax doll is nearly twice as large as an actual 12-week fetus. That doll is what NONE OF US looked like at 12 weeks in the womb (and I still can't believe I have to tell any medical professional this).
http://www.pregnancydietplanhq.com/12-week-fetus-and-pregnancy-ultrasound-and-week-12-pregnancy-symptoms/
As a poster in the DU thread I originally posted said: "The accuracy of the model is only relevant because 1) They are being dishonest and 2) They are springing an emotional response to sidestep the issues of right to choose and liberty to control one's own body and to plan one's own life trajectory."
No, TH, it's never good to use dishonesty for education. Not creationism (or "intelligent design," pfft) nor inaccurate fetus replicas nor any other folderol that the religious right will come up with to obfuscate the truth (let's talk about Texas textbooks and the subject of slavery, e.g.).
Below is a link to a real 12-week fetus in a human hand for more confirmation of how ludicrous the doll in the original post is in terms of size, etc. (and I keep calling it a "doll" rather than a model or a replica because to me it's neither of those in any sense and is as idealized as any doll is) This photo actually does somewhat deserve a warning for the squeamish (there's no blood involved, though), so I'll simply link it.