A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
Not only will the IRS and Dept. of Health and Human Servies have this info, but the FBI, DHS, and any other agency they feel should have it.
________________________
A new 253-page Obamacare rule issued late Friday requires state, federal and local agencies as well as health insurers to swap the protected personal health information of anybody seeking to join the new health care program that will be enforced by the Internal Revenue Service.
Protected health information, or PHI, is highly protected under federal law, but the latest ruling from the Department of Health and Human Services allows agencies to trade the information to verify that Obamacare applicants are getting the minimum amount of health insurance coverage they need from the health "exchanges."
The ruling, explained on pages 72-73 of the book-thick guidance, does not mention any requirement that applicants first OK the release of their PHI. HHS already allows some exchange of PHI without an individual's pre-approval, especially when for a "government program providing public benefits." Officials said the swapping of information is simply meant to help figure the best insurance coverge of Obamacare users.
The new ruling surprised some congressional critics. "This sounds as if HHS will have access to protected health info to me," said one top Hill aide worried about how well the administration will protect that information.
Between 1996 HIPPA's PHI privacy and security guidelines and their expansion in the 2009 HI-TECH Act, GW Bush issued an executive order in 2004 that clearly expressed his concept of the role the federal government should assume in these endeavors. The order specifically allowed for the creation of a "subcabinet level position of health information technology coordinator that would report directly to the Secretary of HHS," at that time Tommy Thompson. HI-TECH provisions are merely an example of the legislative evolution of this initiative. In other words, that train left the station a long time ago.
Obamacare has been extensively debated in Congress and the national dialogue. It was passed in the House and Senate and by the president. It then withstood SCOTUS challenge. It's the law.
The cons exhaustive efforts to conflate the actions of a conservative GOP Cincinnati IRS office manager who requested guidelines for processing tax-exempt status applications submitted by known anti-tax political organizations into a (yawn) full-blown impeachable offense have been considerably impeded. Thanks to the recently publicized investigation transcripts, the emperor has no clothes as he stands before his committee, having been exposed as an evidence-tampering, cherry-picking control freak whose rules of so-called inquiry and disclosure inform us he's not playing with a full deck.
It comes as no surprise that these same cons, whose House reps have recently held their umpteenth OC repeal vote sham, are now trying to relate their phony scandal to ongoing efforts to dismantle the health care law, slated to go into effect next year. The appalling lengths they are willing to go to prevent implementation are only eclipsed by the transparent fear and loathing they display toward OC programs that just might actually be beneficial and cost effective in the delivery of access to health care to all Americans. They would be ill-advised to believe their latest ruse is going to bring success in their efforts to reverse the president's signature legislation.
http://www.managedcaremag.com/archives/0406/0406.news_launches.html
http://www.claritygrp.com/media/13028/hipaa_hitech_whitepaper_6.7.11_final.pdf
http://www.library.ca.gov/crb/08/08-013.pdf