A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

The Republican Strategy


Posted: Feb 19, 2010

It takes awhile to make sense of the entrails of the Republican Party, partly because they are just so toxic, but also because it's actually difficult to comprehend that an American political party can so deliberately sabotage its own government and nation.

But after observing their behavior and their policy of, "Just Say No" -- sometimes to their own suggestions, one can only surmise that they long ago left the business of governing and have instead agreed to a covert game plan of destruction while simultaneously playing an overt game of seduction with the American public. The seductive part of their plan is the one more familiar to the public -- constantly talk about what the people want to hear. No more taxes. Defend the country. Go Conservatives. Minimal government.
Meanwhile, the depth, width, and long range planning of the Republicans' dark strategy should have every American shaking with terror, especially since it is picking up momentum once again.

As I observe the constant aggressive and non-cooperative behavior of the Republican Senators that is so outlandish as to border on choreographed (if not near-treasonous), it's blatantly obvious that the long term Republican agenda is to sabotage this Democratic administration so successfully as to make it appear responsible for all the failures of the Bush administration while simultaneously preventing this administration from accomplishing anything on its own merit, even to the detriment of the good of this nation.

If their plan succeeds -- and it's certainly gaining ground, unfortunately -- the Republicans have a good chance of returning to the White House. How tragic for this nation to find itself returning to the dark days of "rule by fear". Just picture Cheney and Rove laughing behind the scenes. That one image alone should be enough of a reminder as to why the American people should wake up and recognize these political spell-casters for what they really are -- corporate loyalists with Fascist leanings.

That Republicans honor corporate loyalties over their loyalties to the Constitution are beyond question and these policies became publically official with the passing of the recent Supreme Court ruling last month. With that ruling, Republicans have succeeded in outsourcing our own government, as corporate interests are international as well as national. That ruling alone makes their Tea Party gatherings a real head scratcher, as the last folks in line for any Republican benefits are the common folk, which largely comprise their army of modern day Brown Shirt Tea Party hysterics.

If these people could only see through the real agenda of the Republicans, they would realize that they are merely being used as upstart noisemakers, no more than public distractions to create havoc for the Democrats. They actually believe that the Republicans are on their side, listening to their issues and protests when all the Republicans want them to do is make noise. Listening is not part of the Republican bargain. Don't they get that? Why don't these people remember the Bush/Cheney administration?

Bush and Cheney were the closest Americans ever came to being ruled by dictators. Don't these people get that the Republicans are against health care because they are fundamentally against any and all forms of assistance? If they could take away Social Security and Medicare, in all likelihood, they would. How is it possible that these Tea Party Brown Shirts do not understand that in supporting the Republicans, they are in fact supporting their own demise?

How soon these people forget that they have lost their jobs and homes and are continuing to lose both because of Republican de-regulation policies (among other policies) that the Republican House and Senate could have stopped - but didn't. Why? Because common folk do not and never will matter to the Republican Party any more than the Constitution does. Just review what the Bush/Cheney administration did to our Constitution for proof. They took a weedwacker to it. One more Republican administration and the coup will be complete. Wait until these Tea Party Brown Shirts gather and try protesting if -- God forbid -- the Republicans get back into office. They'll be met with police armed with weapons and the Patriot Act and that will be the end of those little social gatherings, or would they be called "uprisings" then?

Certainly the Clinton administration added to the deregulation debacle but let's face it, the inspiration and fuel behind these policies picked up steam under the Bush/Cheney administration. The Democrats have their own list of sins against the American system, to be sure, which is long and historic, without a doubt. But by comparison to the present agenda of the Republicans, the greatest crime that the Democrats are presently committing is that they are not doing the job that they were sent to Washington to do - which was to represent the Democratic agenda and take on those Republican bullies.
Next, we have Sarah Palin, one of the more covert schemes of the Republican agendas. What makes Sarah part of Republican covert strategy? Simple-Sarah doesn't even realize that she is being used by the Republican brain trust as their Vamp distraction - the poor thing. She actually thinks she has something to offer this country when, in fact, even her own party is probably laughing at her behind the scenes. She is the Republican Court Fool, an idiot mouthpiece who writes notes on her hands in order to get through an appearance and lacks the insight due to an over abundance of vanity and ambition to realize that her own party intends to toss her to the wolves as soon as her usefulness as a Vamp distraction is done. Anyone who doubts this has only to wait and see.
Now that the Republicans have good looking, smooth talking Scott Brown, they are not going to risk their money on Palin again. No way. As soon as they no longer need someone to make outlandish, ridiculous, uneducated, near-illiterate statements that cause controversy, they'll ship her back to the big A. Republicans are known for being ruthless but when it comes to Sarah, ruthless is fine with me.

That the Republican tactics are working is not surprising, though it is unfortunate. Given that the Democrats had the majority in both Houses and the White House, they still have acted like the minority party since Obama's swearing in, bullied by the Republicans, unable to get their policies and agendas passed. Compromise is one thing but the Democrats have turned compromise into an act of apology for winning this past election. As for those so-called Blue-Dog Democrats, why don't they just admit they lack the backbone to be anything at all? Lieberman certainly comes to mind.

One has to wonder if the browbeating the Democrats took under the Bush/Cheney years so battered them that they forgot how to stand up with dignity and represent their party. Or perhaps they are just old, useless cowards, incapable of doing battle any more or are they waiting for their President to end the politics of compromise and repeat the disrespect for Congress that Bush/Cheney turned into an art form? Perhaps it's a mixture of all the above. In the meantime, however, we are left with a blockade in Congress that has gone well past the critical point. How do we proceed?

As much as we Americans have this cultural tendency to want to detach from the past as quickly as possible and get on with a new future - in this case, in the form of a new Presidential administration -- sometimes such detachment lacks all wisdom. I heard a discussion among newscasters just the other day, for example, in which they bantered about whether the war in Afghanistan had "officially" become Obama's war, meaning, of course, that the nation could now shift all blame and anger from Bush for starting this massive debacle to Obama. These half journalists/half pundits decided that, indeed, the time had come to declare Afghanistan "Obama's War". If nothing else, such a decision would certainly get Republican support and fuel their much needed media controversies.
Surely the American public cannot and, in fact, should not be allowed to forget that this nightmare of a war begun under false pretenses by a president obsessed with oil and his ex-president father combined with a paranoid and devious former vice president is not just "one of those problems" another president just inherits and manages to resolve within a year. But that's exactly what suits the Republican agenda: Make this war look like Obama's failure, not ours. And while you're at it, make the economic crisis and the housing crisis look like they started with Obama instead of the truth -- that he inherited more Bush/Cheney crises that need years to resolve -- not one year.

No doubt President Obama has made several decisions in his first year that he would not make again now that he sees the consequences and now that he also realizes many in his own Congress want to see him go down. How tragic if not borderline treasonous is that? If his administration had chosen to investigate all the crimes of the Bush/Cheney administration in public view, perhaps that would have made these Republicans a bit more cooperative. But since that's just a pipe dream, maybe the Democrats should mirror some of the Republican strategy. When the Republicans say, "NO", the Democrats should yell back, "NO WAY". You are not getting the White House back and you are not turning this nation into a complete corporate state in which the Constitution is a thing of the past. The Republican creed of "less government" is in truth one of "corporate government". Their covert destructive policies need to be publically exposed again and again until even their Brown Shirt Tea Party minions can understand that this party is fundamentally dangerous to the future of this nation.

;

Thank you for posting this! - Greatly appreciated.

[ In Reply To ..]
Sometimes, when I try to explain to my friends what lunatics there are in the Democratic party, they don't believe me.

"Aw...surely NO ONE is THAT stupic?" they scoff.

Now I have a link so they can see for themselves. THANKS!

I know I am not that stupic!!!! nm - Anna

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

Considering your obvious..... - JTBB

[ In Reply To ..]
inability to express intelligible opinionations and/or spiculations, I wood think it in your best interest to seperate yourself from the notion of throwing stones.
Like you should talk. Most of us already know your - bias. Nice try JTBB. nm
[ In Reply To ..]
nm

This amounts to hate speech. - Get out of the gutter.

[ In Reply To ..]
One can scarcely credit that anyone would pass along junk like this, regardless of how it feeds their personal demons.

I feel sorry for you.

If the pubs had said that about the dems, you'd be - totally singing its praises.

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

Actually not. I think Democrats are - good for the country.

[ In Reply To ..]
They give everyone a good reason to vote Republican.
There is NO good reason to vote republican. - Sick Of It~
[ In Reply To ..]
Dems don't vote against their own best interests. That is the mark of a true republican.
There is EVERY reason to vote republican (or Independent or any other party) - but NEVER a democrat - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
And here are the reasons:

1. Pelosi.
2. Reid.
3. Franks.
4. Dodd.
5. Spending.
6. Waste.
7. Lying to Americans.
8. Obama.
9. The Constitution.
10. Second Amendment.

Those are only a few. There are hundreds and hundreds more.
Reasons to vote Repub - Anna
[ In Reply To ..]
No.
Negativity.
Inertia.
Standstill.
Conniving.
Karl Rove.
Dick Cha-hay-hay-ney.

Okay, if that is the way you are going to be - here you go
[ In Reply To ..]
1. Michael Steele.
2. Jim DeMint.
3. Dick Cheney.
4. Sarah Palin.
5. Rick Perry.
6. John Boehner.
7. Michelle Bachmann.
8. Mark Sanford.
9. Tom Tancredo.
10. Eric Cantor. --These are the just the hypocrites that I could come up with off the top of my head.
11. Lying to Americans.
12. The Constitution.
13. Bush.
14. War in Iraq.
15. Spending.
16. Waste.
17. Obstructionism.
18. Concern for personal wealth more important that needs or concerns of American citizens.

Those are only a few. There are hundreds and hundreds more. Do you really want to go tit for tat with this silliness???

As a matter of fact, this is too silly to continue - it was a cartoon. I am
[ In Reply To ..]
going back to work. Later.
It was a good cartoon! I liked it. -nm - Zircon
[ In Reply To ..]

Taking the middle - NJ

[ In Reply To ..]
Wingnuts won't take the blinders off, but the tactics laid out in your post are being scrutinized by middle America. The republican party fell off the edge. You can still hear them screaming all the way dooooooowwwwwnnnn.

NJ

Paying attention - much?

[ In Reply To ..]
Ask any Democrat pollster or politician. The last thing he'll tell you (before he hits the ground) is that it isn't the Republicans who are on the way dooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwn.

But let's suspend this debate until November, shall we? The only question then will be whether the Democrats actually lose control of both houses or just enough seats that they come to their senses and stop expanding government into every nook and cranny of American life.

If not...the outcome in 2012 is completely assured.

I also appreciate this post-for real - Colleen

[ In Reply To ..]
It seems to put into words in a way that I could not what my observations and feeling have been about both parties currently. Thanks for posting it.

What a long-winded bunch of hate spew - anony

[ In Reply To ..]
Huffington post...figures. This is why I will not read that site. I'd get better news from the National Enquirer. The first thing that touts it as a hate article (which you so gleefully post) is the very first paragraph stating the republican party is toxic. And the write got it so obviously wrong talking about the political party sabotaging it's own government and nation. That my dear is what is happening in the democratic party right now. The good democratic politicians are leaving and instead we are left with garbage, who is purposely destroying the government and the American way of life. They are surely going to be the downfall of their own party come election this year.

After reading that the rest of the article is not worth reading any further.

I have never seen so much hate spewed toward the republican party than when I come to this board. Seems like all the crats are trying to do is demonize a party while they don't take responsibility for the mistakes being made in their own party.

We have more than one party for a reason. While the crats would be perfectly happy with only the crats running the show and no other party but theirs, it proves that you have to look no further than the democrat party to find the ideology of communism/marxism/socialism. It is countries like China and Nazi Germany where one party rules. Why you want to transform our country into a communist state is beyond reproach.

This article you posted is nothing but a bunch of hate speech by the Huffington Post and shame on you for posting such a hateful article.

And for the poster who said the republican party fell off the edge....looks like you don't watch the news and keep up with the current events. The republican party is doing just fine. It's the democrat party that is going down and they are going down fast. They are all jumping ship and trying to get as far away from Obama and the other left-winger Nazis in their own party.

Yeah, well-the truth hurts. - Thats is the way it goes

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

Did you not read the post - It is not the truth - just a Huff-n-puff spew

[ In Reply To ..]
of hate and lies.

As Ripley would say - "Have IQs dropped sharply".
Actually, I did read it in it's entirety. I agree - with it. sm
[ In Reply To ..]
As far as IQ's go, I am not concerned about my intelligence, I know it is above average. However, I am concerned about about people who can read this and not acknowledge that there is at least some truth to it. This describes the repubs in office right now perfectly, and they depend on followers such as yourself putting on the blinders and making excuses for them. But then again, how can I expect you to be honest with us when you are following a party that has totally forgotten what honesty is (and BTW, there are some dems out there that I would also question in terms on honesty. The president is not one of them.) when you can not be honest with yourself.
So you agree with its entirety... - all that hate filled and lies....nice
[ In Reply To ..]
Nobody is making excuses for anyone, but you won't even take responsibility for the mess your party is making for the country.

How nice....NOT.
The majority of the problems we are facing - right now as a country
[ In Reply To ..]
are left over from Bush. I know you don't want to hear that, but it is the truth. Even my republican husband does not understand how folks like you can blame Obama for most of this mess. I saw nothing hate filled. I saw someone laying out the goals and current MO of the republican party, and it is the same way I see it, and many like me. Sorry you don't agree with me but whatever. I am entitled to my opinion, as are you, as uninformed and predictable as it may be. I am not hate-filled and I for one would love to be able to post something here that does not get instantly bombarded with nasty, name-calling, hateful posts acusing me of the same when all I did was agree.

I am going to work now. You go ahead and have your hissy-fit.
NOBODY has ever blamed Obama for Bush's mistakes - anony
[ In Reply To ..]
Once you can stop making things up then we can get down to business. Not once ever has anybody ever blamed Obama for the things he inherited. But your own party will not take responsibilities for the actions that Obama and this administration is making right now and you never will in the future. 3 years down the road you will always blame Bush for the mistakes Obama and this administration makes in the future.

Hate filled...we will start with the comment that the republican party is toxic. There are a lot of good republicans in office. Some bad ones too, but by no means is the republican party "toxic". With comments like that it lessens the quality of the article, and leads those to believe the rest of the article will be equally "toxic".

There are good and bad in both parties. If you are going to say one party is toxic you need to admit to the mistakes the other party makes and hence is also "toxic".

Everyone is entitled to their opinion. My mom and I disagree so much on politics. I don't love her any less. She has many other good qualities I love her for. I am sorry but I don't remember now what I wrote in my original post, but if I said you were hate filled I do apologize. Just gets my dander up when I hear one party demonizing the other when they don't take responsibility for the mistakes their own party makes. I myself don't care since I didn't vote because I didn't like any of the candidates. You can all blame whoever you want, but the truth remains whether you want to believe it or not.

Yes... Obama sure did inherit one HUGE HUGE HUGE mess from the previous administration, however....he is not doing anything to make it better. He is telling us one thing and doing the opposite. He is not doing anything to create jobs, he is continuing to allow companies to offshore. He has and is increasing the deficit. Sorry funding a project for Pelosi's marsh mouse and other pet projects that are so blatantly stupid like that you really truly cannot blame that one on Bush. Can you????

Okay...was that enough of a hissy-fit for you? LOL
Railing against the"untruths" in an opinion piece - COZ
[ In Reply To ..]
by members of the party that claims Obama is not a legitimate citizen and that Obama is a racist who hates white people -- that is truly, truly rich!
Choke on a gnat, swallow a horse fly.
It is not nice to assume - please provide proof - which you obviously will not be able to
[ In Reply To ..]
That I belong to the group you claim I do.

Assuming....now that's rich!

Choke on a gnat and swallow a horsefly? What are you 12? LOL Would be funny if it came from someone who doesn't assume things....if you know what I mean.

That's rich - you want to talk about hate-spewing? . . . - LMAO

[ In Reply To ..]
That obviously was the raison d'etre for the CPAC this year -- talk about a bunch of angry, hateful people all gathered in one place. It's absolutly despicable the hateful crap that was peddled at that low-life event. You must be real proud to be represented by the likes of The John Birch Society, and, of course, let's not forget the keynote speaker, the de facto mouthpiece for all this hatred -- closet Nazi himself, Glenn Beck! Your party of Hate is the one that is self-destructing -- they can't even get along amongst themselves -- doesn't bode for a very bright future . . .

The anger is boiling over because of Obama and the dems - ie: Pelosi. They are proving to

[ In Reply To ..]
be the worst in history. Look at poll numbers. Americans feel we are headed in wrong direction. They felt that way when Bush was leaving office, but Obama was going to inspire and turn it all round. HA! What a joke. I hope our country survives the total incompetence of Obama and his appointees. It is sad to see what is happening.
Wrong on all counts - Anna
[ In Reply To ..]
The anger is an accumulation of years of Washington corruption. Obama's just getting the brunt of it. He's a big boy, doncha worry your pretty little about him.
No you are wrong - see message
[ In Reply To ..]
Yes anger is an accumulation of years of WA corruption. This is not only in GW's years, but it also goes back to Billy Boy's administration. However, you are wrong that Dear Leader is just getting the brunt of it. He is getting it full swing because he and his administration is continuing on in the same path. He is making things worse.

But go ahead...keep worshipping and praying to him. We will all see how fed up people are with this administration come election this year.
Obama is clueless. Please dont try to defend him - Not worth it anymore.nm
[ In Reply To ..]
nm
But Nancy Pelosi said in 2006 that she was going to "drain the swamp." - Anon
[ In Reply To ..]
What happened? She's had over 3 years to do so and failed miserably.
sounds like you are tracking her - atresi
[ In Reply To ..]
very . . . . very . . . closely . . .
Like I don't have enough to do, trying to provide for my family, then follow Pelosi around! - Anon
[ In Reply To ..]
I clearly remember her saying she was going to clean out the corruption in Washington. Well, it's been 3 long years, Nancy, and we're still waiting.

I'm sure you think everything she does is fabulous, so don't know why I'm actually wasting my time trying to have a rational discussion with you.

Actually there is nobody who represents me - anony

[ In Reply To ..]
I do not know of one person in congress, the house, the senate, the white house (your fave P.O), the congressman of my own state or anyone in this country who represents me. I am not proud of any of them. There are angry hateful people on both sides of the coin including the person who wrote this hateful article who is obvious a left-winger nut case. You must be so proud this type of mentality represents you. How nice...NOT!

I do not know who the John Birch Society is, whether it's one person or a group of people or who the speakers of him/they are. So nice of you to Assume.

As for Glenn Beck...can't stand the guy. He gives me an absolute headache. Can't believe I used to listen to him and think he was good. After 3 months of not listening to him I happened to turn on his show while having lunch the other day. It was the day that the plane hit that building in Austin. I realized that after these months of not listening to him, he's still at nutso as he was when I stopped watching him. He said when he heard the news he felt like 911 again. I thought....really? Did he think 911 was commanded by a disgruntled American? The guy makes no sense whatsoever and rants on while acting like a child moving all these pictures of people around that he feels are "dangerous". Again...his opinion of whom "he" feels are dangerous (or whatever that word was that he used). Didn't quite listen very much.

So sorry, but you shouldn't assume I am in any party because I am not. I'm just sick of coming to read all the hatred and demonizing of the conservative party while you don't take responsibility for the destruction and ruin of the country that the party that represent you is causing.

I do need to make one correction to my post in which I said that I'd get better news from the National Enquirer than I would the Huff. I do take that back because I am reading some other articles in the huff regarding health care that I do find to be interesting and truthful. Its just the hateful writers who post absolute nonsense garbage filled with lies like the article originally posted that all of American could do without. You must be so proud to have them represent you.

Xlnt expose on the true evil of that political group. They - are not about building, only tearing things down.

[ In Reply To ..]
I believe they will most likely succeed in tearing down not only this presidency, but the whole multi-party system, and will bring us just that much closer to dictatorship. We're already halfway there - losing out middle class, and becoming a nation of mostly poor, with a few very rich, very powerful people at the top calling all the shots. I don't hold much hope for democracy in the US by the end of the 21st century.

Tearing things down, and making sure that all - of the wealth stays with

[ In Reply To ..]
the top 5%, and making sure that nothing happens to change this. Oh, and taking down President Obama. That is what this group is about.

Let's give you a magic button and see how YOU - would distribute the wealth.

[ In Reply To ..]
Go ahead. Tell us. Please note, we're not talking about distributing opportunity. We're talking about how YOU would take wealth away from some people and give it to other people.

Oh, yes - and this question too: Once you've taken it away from "A" and given it to "B", are you prepared to tax "B" at the same rate that you were taxing "A" (because "A" is covering almost 70% of the tax burden now and "B" is paying nothing, so you've got a little problem brewing).

HINT: These are trick questions. If you're smart, you won't answer.

You have just described the democratic party - They are the true evil in this country

[ In Reply To ..]
Because you did describe everything that the democrat party is doing I'm not sure where you stand.

1. Tearing down this presidency. That is exactly what the democrats are doing. They are fighting between themselves and they are bringing their own party down. Things were bad before, but at least there was a balance. Now there is no balance and things are worse than where we were at last year. Unemployment on the rise, no job creation, jobs continuing to go overseas, The SS (Napolitano's group) in full swing (absolutely no difference than the SS in WWII), the deficit has rose, the war continues and looking at a possible new war and no hopes to an end in this war. The wealthiest 5% in America continue to get richer. Big business under Bush continues to remain in power under Obama, taxes continue to go up. And I don't get it. He says "I will raise taxes $250K and under", but then when he does, you continue to defend and say he hasn't but facts are facts...our taxes are higher.

2. Bringing us closer to dictatorship. That is exactly what is going on now. People need to keep up with current events. The democrat party is running things now and we are getting closer to being a nation of mostly poor. That is the way they want it. However, Pelosi, Reid, Obama and all the wealthiest of wealthy politicians will never have to face what we do. They stopped representing the people years ago and now are only self serving and do only what is in the good for themselves.

I too agree that there is not much hope for democracy in the US, unless this next election we can bring the balance back to the house/senate by voting out a bunch of democrats and getting in more republican/independent that will work for the people.

There is no balance right now. The democrats have power and they are acting like children. They have absolutely no idea what the average American citizen is going through and they don't care. They have an open checkbook (i.e. our tax money) and they don't know how to curb spending. And they are granting backroom closed door deals with whoever they want doing anything for them just so they'll be re-elected. All they care about is power. They don't care about the people they are supposed to be representing. They are only concerned about their own power/wealth. They are not doing anything to stimulate the economy and they are doing nothing to create jobs. They are trying to do away with small business owners by taxing the heck out of them, so that everything in this country will be run by the government. They are threatened by free enterprise.

The true evil in this country lies in the democrat party and anyone who will not think for themselves, and only follow party line. Anyone who actually believes that spreading everyone's wealth among everyone else is in that group as well.

Meant "will not raise taxes" not will raise taxes - sorry

[ In Reply To ..]
no message.

If you mean tearing down Obama's nanny state - you got that dead right, sister. nm

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

Similar Messages:


Strategy - Good ArticleMay 24, 2010
This article is dated 5/24 and I don't see anything here regarding it.  I just read it and thought it was a pretty good analysis.  I do think campaigning against Bush is a wrong move.  Especially for someone who keeps claiming to be a forward thinker.  I've never heard this administration take blame for any of the decisions they are making.  Just whenever something they do backfires, their solution is to blame Bush.  I think Americans are smart enough and ...

Demeaning Campaign StrategyOct 02, 2012
Obama Campaign: “Vote Like Your Lady Parts Depend on It” Lady parts??!! Good grief - talk about disenfranchising the women's vote. Any woman who received this tweet/email must be totally insulted to be reduced to a Lady Parts. http://www.lifenews.com/2012/10/02/obama-campaign-vote-like-your-lady-parts-depend-on-it/ ...

Weird Democratic Strategy ...maybe? Jun 23, 2014
Has anyone else noticed the new Democrat strategy of trying to connect with the people in this country not making a million or more a year?  Hilary did the "we were broke when we left the White House" story and now Biden is thanking us for taking care of him? Nothing, and I mean absolutely nothing ANY politician does or says is not part of a grand scheme.  It just really angers me that they pretend to even start to know how it is to live paycheck to paycheck and want us to feel sorry ...

Dopehead Doesn't Have A Strategy Yet (sm)Aug 28, 2014
Same ole, same ole nothingness.  ISIL, ISIS, back and forth he went, always with his "range of options" or "array of options", oh, and BTW, who dresses him?  His tie didn't go with his brand spankin new suit. ...

One Of The Most Serious Deficits In Obama's ISIS Strategy.Mar 25, 2016
We all know that Obama has an almost pathological aversion to prisoners when it comes to terrorists. You don't get intel from dead bodies.  Capture is ALWAYS preferable, especially when it comes to people in high positions, to killing them with drones and special raids.  So, they're bragging about killing the ISIS "#2" guy.  Don't brag, Obama.  We've shown time and time again that these people are merely replaced.  If you'd captured him, I' ...

Trump’s Cheese In The Maze StrategyJun 20, 2017
Operation Overlord, the most successful amphibious invasion in history, was in no small part successful due to the most effective deception and disinformation campaign in history. The key to the Allies completely fooling the Germans as to the real location of the invasion (Normandy) as opposed to where Adolf Hitler thought the troops would land (Calais)—thus meaning all the German generals who wanted their jobs had to think that as well—was the Allies knew what Hitler believed and just playe ...

Administration Defense Strategy ‘dangerously’ UnderfundedAug 01, 2014
No frivolous spending here. No spending period. Typical. Excerpt: The Obama administration’s four-year defense strategy lacks funding needed for fulfilling global military missions and the U.S. military faces “high risk” in the world unless changes are made, according to a bipartisan report by a congressionally backed panel of defense experts. ...

Senate To Grill Administration On ISIS StrategyNov 11, 2014
President Obama, in that post-shellacking Nov. 5 press conference, said he was “going to begin engaging Congress over a new authorization to use military force (AUMF) against ISIL,” also known as Islamic State, and stop relying on law passed after 9/11 to justify the latest combat. It’s something he said he’d do nearly 18 months ago, but neither Obama nor Congress made a significant move. No hearings were held. But after the news conference — seven weeks after ...

Republican Dec 09, 2010
Pork appointed to chair appropriations committee. The Republicans want to redefine earmarks. ...

Republican YahoosJan 30, 2012
Well, nolw...that's interesting...so happens "us yahoos" have watched this Idiot in the White House send our country down a slippery slope straight to h___ in a hand-basket.  The "Annointed One", does not walk on water as some think, has never even operated a candy store and thinks he can run this country.  He's a slick one tho...not only is he incompetent, but surrounds himself with others who can't walk and chew gum at the same time...(i.e. Biden who gives new meaning ...

Are You A Democrat Or A Republican? Take This Dec 22, 2010
It's pretty cool. I answered 5 like a Democrat and 5 like a Republican so it said I'm Bi-Partisan, which I always thought, but wasn't really sure sometimes. lol. ...

Republican V ObamaJul 14, 2011
The newest Gallup poll. I didn't copy all the info here, but you can hop over here for more info on their survey methods, etc.  http://www.gallup.com/poll/148487/Republican-Candidate-Extends-Lead-Obama.aspx I know there are some who are going to jump all over this and trash Gallup, but I was wondering if it's possible that we could all agree on a couple of pollsters to carry us through the next 481 days?  Can we put a few pollsters out there and agree on their validity and m ...

Former Republican Kingpin Gets May 07, 2010
Former Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno gets two years in federal prison BY Kenneth Lovett AND Glenn Blain DAILY NEWS ALBANY BUREAU Thursday, May 6th 2010, 6:17 PM Dickstein/Times Unio Former Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno, once one of the state's kingmakers, was sentenced to two years in federal prison Thursday. ALBANY - Former Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno, once one the state's most feared powerbrokers, was sentenced to two years in feder ...

Republican StoopsApr 20, 2012
depending upon interpretation.  Both McCain and Palin have inserted dog references into their public comments this past day or 2.  Mccain at Unity event stated his bulldog was not on the menu.  Palin, in saying Secret Service scandal was all Mr. president's fault of course, also threw in a comment about not eating the dogs.  These are the revered leaders of the conservative party? Bow wow wow yippy aye yippy ay.   ...

Another Republican/TP Hypocrite. SmOct 11, 2012
WASHINGTON -- A pro-life, family-values congressman who worked as a doctor before winning election as a Tea Party-backed Republican had an affair with a patient and later pressured her to get an abortion, according to a phone call transcript obtained by The Huffington Post. The congressman, Rep. Scott DesJarlais of Tennessee, was trying to save his marriage at the time, according to his remarks on the call, made in September of 2000. And, according to three independent sources familiar ...

Another Republican Comes Out In SupportApr 02, 2013
Mark Kirk of Illinois says: When I climbed the Capitol steps in January, I promised myself that I would return to the Senate with an open mind and greater respect for others. Same-sex couples should have the right to civil marriage. Our time on this earth is limited, I know that better than most.  Life comes down to who you love and who loves you back-- government has no place in the middle.   ...

Republican ButthurtJan 21, 2015
Poor, poor Republicans. The mean old president didn't fold like they were sure he would. ...

And The Republican Nominee Will BeApr 21, 2015
Because the Koch Brothers say so!   It really should not be that hard to sway the Republican nomination with that many of them running. ...

As A Republican And After The Debate --Aug 06, 2015
I must say I was impressed with Bush and Rubio. Trump, though, was a joke.  I think his numbers are going to come down now. ...

Republican Insults--do They Think They Are In Jan 13, 2016
So Cruz states that Trump "embodies New York attitudes."     I don't live in New York, and don't particuarly identify with them, but I can see this for the divisive and insulting attitude that it was meant to be.      ...

Republican AgendaMar 14, 2017
Well they are nothing if not consistent.  Big tax breaks for the 1% and 24 million old, poor and disabled without insurance.   ...

Leader Of Republican PartyMar 01, 2012
demands women who use birth control paid by government must post videos of their sexual activity as payment.  Republican party members hiding to avoid condemning their powerful leader. Just despicable.  Stand up you ninnies.     ...

I Am A Moderate Republican. I Don't Hear Many...smFeb 27, 2012
people admitting to that these days.  The party lacks a candidate that is satisfactory to me.  Romney comes closest, but I don't like him either.  He may be the best option for moderates to reclaim the party.  Are there any other moderates out their that now feel disconnected from their party?  For me, I do feel totally disconnected and do not want to be associated with the radical element of the republican party.  I think I may be an independent now.  My ...

Last Night Republican DebateJan 27, 2012
Newt pretty much got the beat-down. Romney prepared and did not allow Newt to pull one of his stunts.  Romney said he would fire an exec who came to him and suggested they build a moon colony.  Newt needs to realize you reap what you sow.  Certain posters on this board should take note too.   ...

Who Won The Republican Debate Last Night?Sep 08, 2011
(See who is at the bottom) Which GOP candidate do you like best? msn.com 16 % Mitt Romney 48,249 votes 22 % Rick Perry 66,440 votes 5 % Michele Bachmann 13,633 votes 13 % Ron Paul 37,692 votes 5 % Other 14,386 votes 39 % None of them 115,772 votes ...

The Republican Sense Of HumorMar 28, 2012
Romney certainly has a lot of that sharp and scintillating legendary Republican sense of humor. Here is the very funny story Romney told today in Wisconsin. (Journal-Sentinel) "Romney’s story involved the time more than 50 years ago that his father, George, an American Motors executive, shut down a factory in Michigan and moved the work to Wisconsin. “Now later he decided to run for governor of Michigan, and so you can imagine that having closed the factory and moved all the produc ...

Sophisticated Republican TacticFeb 18, 2010
Last evening KO asked David Korn why it was that repubs were against anything Obama was for, even if the repubs had previously beenfor it.  Korn replied that the repubs were operating under very sophisticated "cootie" tactics - as in anything the president touches has cooties.  Chuckled heartedly at that.  also heard Sara P has dissed the tea baggers now that she has collected her$100,000 speaking fee.   ...

President Obama Vs The Known RepublicanJul 15, 2011
Apparently the Republican "Mr. Right" does not exist. The Quinnipiac University survey released Wednesday, indicates President Obama hitting 50% or above when pitted against every Republican candidate except former Massachusetts Gov. Romney, but President Obama still tops Romney 47% to 41%. ...

Attention Republican Constituents:Mar 26, 2010
Senator Scott Brown (R) of MA would like you to send him donations so he can successfully run against MSNBC's Rachel Maddow (who is not running for any kind of office). Scott Brown's plea for money: Friends, It’s only been a couple of months since I’ve been in office, and before I’ve even settled into my new job, the political machine in Massachusetts is looking for someone to run against me. And you’re not going to believe who they are  ...

A Day In The Life Of A Republican ConservativeJul 25, 2012
A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A REPUBLICAN Joe gets up at 6:00am to prepare his morning coffee. He fills his pot full of good clean drinking water because some liberal fought for minimum water quality standards. He takes his daily medication with his first swallow of coffee. His medications are safe to take because some liberal fought to insure their safety and work as advertised. All but $10.00 of his medications are paid for by his employers medical plan because some liberal union ...