A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

Obama 2012 bumper sticker. sm

Posted: Aug 25, 2011

Order one here...

http://my.barackobama.com/page/s/bumper-sticker-mobile-signon-main?source=20110824_jb_EMS

;

Thanks! - /NM

[ In Reply To ..]

Why? - Suffered enough - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Someone who cares about the people of the country. Someone who is intelligent. Someone who isn't only looking out for their own personal gain. Someone who will work for the people. Someone who will work with EVERYBODY no matter what party they belong to. Someone who won't call people that don't belong to their party "the enemy". Someone who will not falsely accuse others of being a racist. Someone who will follow their own rules. Someone who understands economics. Someone who even if they don't care, at least appears to care about the people.

Anyone who fits any of those criteria would be my choice.

I don't want someone who just "appears" to care...sm - Proud to support Obama

[ In Reply To ..]
about the American people. "Appears" indicates dishonesy, a liar just to get elected, untrustworthy. Obama will be my choice because I know he cares more about our country and doing what is right than about the fat cats on Wall Street and rich corporate-world shenanigans.

Then I see you don't want Obama - by your own message

[ In Reply To ..]
You admitted it yourself. You don't want someone who just "appears" to care.

Appears indicates dihonesty, a liar just to get elected, unstrustworthy. You just described Obama to a T.

Obama does not care about our country. He can sing a great song, heck I was even mesmerized by his speeches (which later found out someone else wrote for him). He's got a great speaking voice I give him credit for that. But his words and actions are two totally different things. Have you been awake the past 3 years.

Those 'fat cats on Wall Street" you mentioned. Guess who they support? Obama. Why? Because Obama is making them fatter (i.e. richer). Why do you think they are pouring millions into his campaign.

C'mon people wake up. Look at things from the outside. Stop devoting yourself to the party and look at the individual. Look at what they do versus what they say. More times than not it's two different things. No different with Obama. He has done nothing of what he promised during his campaign, except to blame Bush. "Well I can't start to fix the economy yet because it's Bush's fault. I can't get jobs back to the country because it's Bush's fault. I'm going to continue to make the rich get richer and that's Bush's fault. I'm not going to help the American people and that's Bush's fault". Oh yeah, and the all time favorite. Three years after he is in office "I can't do anything overnight ya know".

Proud to support Obama. Obama will be my choice. - What part of that do you not get? nm

[ In Reply To ..]

The part where you said you want - see message

[ In Reply To ..]
by your own words "Someone who doesn't just "appear" to care". The part where you said you don't want a "liar just to get elected", "untrustworthy". "Someone who cares about the country". So either you want someone like that or you want Obama. They are two totally different people. If you want Obama that's fine, nothing wrong with that. It just means you don't want someone who cares about the country or the people, just his image. You don't care if someone has any ideas about bringing jobs back to the people of the country, just how rich he will be. You don't care if he's a liar, because he has proven he is, and that you don't care that the fat cats in wall street are getting fatter (i.e. richer) because they are under his watch AND they are getting richer and contributing largely to his campaign to get him re-elected.

So, by your own words in you OP you don't want Obama. But if you do want Obama then you don't care about those things. Can't have it both ways. They are two totally different things.

What do you hope to accomplish with this silly back talk? - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
You can only speak for yourself. We get it. You don't like Obama. S/he does and has said so. Evidently, s/he feels exactly the opposite as you do. End of story, unless you feel the need to preach to the choir for hours on end. Nobody else is listening.

The same thing you do. You too can only speak for yourself - Not end of story

[ In Reply To ..]
No, evidently you don't get it. Luckily I see a lot of other posters feel the same way I do. For the past three years it's been bad. The rich on wall street are continuing to get richer. Nothing has "changed" (for them at least) AND they are supporting Obama so they can continue to get rich while we are the ones who suffer. All the promises of the rich paying more, their "fair share" he talked about and then doesn't do it. We are the ones who are paying. Maybe you like him because you are one of the rich who will get by. I and others are not. All the "dreams and hopes" we had. Yes, he convinced us to vote for him. He was supposed to be different. He was supposed to make a difference. He was supposed to stop all the crap that Bush/Cheney pulled. He was supposed to end the wars, help people get jobs back, get the debt down, work across the isles (i.e. work with everyone no matter what party they belonged to), etc, etc, etc. Sure he was a great speaker. Promised us the moon and a whole lot of hope. But the fact remains none of it came true. As the saying goes - he could talk the talk but not walk the walk. All his promises gone. Actually they never even came about, except to say he couldn't deliver on his promises because it was Bush's fault and "I can't do things overnight (3 years later still staying that). Meanwhile I and others keep struggling every day and nothing is getting better. No jobs, family still losing their houses. Nothing. In case you have not been in the country these past 3 years, its not getting better. There is NO hope. Unless you are rich, which I am not. Glad you are doing well and I wish you the best. So people can go ahead and keep their head in the sand and not care. But when the lies continue to pour out, it just really is irritating knowing the truth from the BS that is being regurgitated over and over again. When people cannot stand outside the box and look in and see things objectively and realize the truth, but instead wish to follow the pied piper I think that's bad. All I'm saying is everything the poster wrote that h/she wanted in the next president is not Obama, no matter how badly they want it to be. H/she is talking about two different people.

If, and that is a BIG "if", things turn around this next year. If he keeps some of his promises. If he hires people to help get the economy going. If the housing market evens out. If we see a definite improvement because of what Obama is doing I will vote for him again. Politics is not like what it used to be when Kennedy was president. I have not met a truthful politician yet, so no, Obama is not the first. I will have to say one of the reasons I am glad he is president is that Hillary is not. And that is definitely something to be very grateful for.

And just because you don't want to talk about it and look at the facts does not mean its the end of the story.

Utter nonsense. You need to rethink who's been trying - nd who's been obstructing.

[ In Reply To ..]
So you think the repugs have just been innocent bystanders all this time and have played no part in our current state of affairs? It's a rhetorical question. No need to fire off another broken record until you are willing to examine ALL the facts, which so far have been absent in your posts, as they are nothing more than emotional outbursts and one-sided opinion statements.

Did I say that? - No, I did not - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
The facts remain for the past 3 years (and longer of course) the Wall street fat cats have been getting fatter. Thanks to the Bush crew AND the Obama crew (and I'm sure the Clinton crew and before him).

You are purposely ignoring the facts that Wall street has been getting richer and richer with this current administration and pouring their money into his reelection.

You are the one who are ignoring the facts because you don't want them to be true.

I didn't mention anything bout the republicans in my post. This is not one of those "well if they did it why can't we" childish antic.

Since you won't examine ALL the facts and continue to live in some fantasy island idea that all democrats are good and care about the people and those rich nasty "repubs" well it's all their fault" then there is nothing more to say.

Try examining ALL the facts, not just the ones you like. Get out of loyalty to one party (which by the way they are all the same people running the show whether you want to believe that or not). Same rich getting richer under republicans are getting even more rich under democrats. Whether or not you want to believe makes no difference. I'm just tired of hearing the absolute BS that the liberal media keep feeding to their followers.

Wake up people!

Similar Messages:

May 16, 2012
with my son. It said Palin 2012. My son glanced at me and said "that has to be a joke." Not sure though. Anyone else seen one? ...

Oct 27, 2015
These new extremist Republicans don't use facts. They shout, turn red in the face, get angry, and avoid facts, because the facts don't agree with their agenda. If it can't fit on a bumper sticker, the new Republican party can't understand it. If it doesn't fit in a 10-second sound byte on TV, the new Republican party can't deal with it, because they don't deal with thoughtful understanding of the issues. I seriously long for the old Republican statesmen who ...

Nov 10, 2015
They never stop talking, but they never talk about anything of substance. If it's mean-spirited and fits on a bumper sticker, that's as much as they can deal with. Ask for more than that and you get more bumper-sticker mentality, more words, still no substance. ...

Apr 04, 2011
should have to produce their long-form birth certificate to run and lay this thing to rest once and for all. Trump did and he is not even running yet...lol. Seriously....this cycle and every cycle after it no matter WHO is running...birth certificate when you file. Period. Obama is going to look bad no matter which way he goes on it now....if he produces it, trying to explain why he stonewalled and trying to make the explanation sound adult; or stonewall again. Either way... Go a ...

Apr 11, 2011
See what you think. It's 205 pages. Can you hang in there that long to read it? ...

Jul 21, 2011
http://news.yahoo.com/poll-carries-warning-signs-obama-2012-213717802.html ...

Aug 23, 2012
Ryan is being falsely accused of this, but any blame goes to Obama: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/07/us/politics/federal-crime-statistics-to-expand-rape-definition.html http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/08/23/Actually-It-Was-Obama-Who-Redefined-Rape ...

Jun 21, 2014
The last two paragraphs are the most interesting. This is why Obama may go down in history as a liar-in-chief. This just proves how he is so incompetent. Too bad the double standard only works for Democrats and too bad the Democrats can't see truth even when it hits them on the head. President Obama took credit in 2012 for withdrawing all troops from Iraq. Today he said something different. June 19 President Obama surprised a few people during a news conference Thursday by clai ...

Oct 18, 2012
From US Weekly re. the night of the debate: Ann Romney was sporting a "short-sleeved crimped cotton silk dress by Oscar de la Renta" to the tune of $1,690. "Obama, 48, styled a shift dress and cropped jacket from Michael Kors' 2013 resort collection. The dress retails for $1,795 and the jacket is $1,495," which totaled $3,290. Not that this matters in the whole scheme of things; it just is a point of interest. I can't imagine paying that much for a dress/outfit. ...

Feb 08, 2011
National Review editor urges Jeb to run By: CNN Ticker Producer Alexander Mooney (CNN) – Fresh off putting Jeb Bush on the cover of his magazine this week, National Review Editor Rich Lowry is now actively urging the younger brother of the former president to seek the White House himself - now. Writing on the National Review’s website Monday, Lowry says it’s now or never for the popular former Florida governor who has already explicitly ruled at a 2012 bid, saying wait ...

Sep 14, 2011
http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/396584/september-13-2011/ron-paul-2012 ...

Feb 07, 2010
Hope this is true-it would sure make things easier for the dems! Palin says 'absurd' not to ponder presidential bid Former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin addresses attendees at the Na... WASHINGTON — Sarah Palin says it would be "absurd" for her not to consider running for president in 2012. The former Alaska governor and the Republican vice presidential nominee in 2008 says she will run for president if she believes it's rig ...

Feb 29, 2012
I'm to the point where we will either have a republican in the White House who doesn't have a clue or the cajones to do right by the American people....or we will have another 4 years of President Obama who has done very little but spend spend spend...which I grant that Bush started but Obama has taken it to a whole new level. I'm so discouraged by our choices and I just want it over with. I personally feel like nothing great will happen to our country either way the e ...

Nov 02, 2009
x ...

Oct 27, 2011
I am simply speechless. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20126778-503544/house-plans-only-109-workdays-in-2012/ ...

Oct 05, 2011
In the near-absence of any sign that Sarah Palin is actively considering a GOP primary campaign, the good folks at Conservatives4Palin come up with this alternative scenario to keep hope alive: [T]he possibility of an independent run does make sense and to delay the anouncement of her candidacy may simply be part of a bigger plan. Sarah Palin promised this to be a very unconventional election cycle. Creating a third party fits that narrative. ... Political parties always fear a rogue thi ...

Aug 29, 2012
...

Nov 09, 2012
took lessons from the past, sued early and often, and on Wednesday morning we knew who our new elected officials were. From Reuters: "Voting-rights advocates, along with the U.S. Department of Justice and some political party officials, tackled potential electoral problems early this election year. Judges blocked stringent voter ID laws, lifted registration restrictions and rejected limits on early voting. As a result, Election Day 2012 escaped the legal dramas of the past. While ...

Jan 15, 2013
Also, did you guys see the pictures of Beijing? Whether or not you believe global warming is man-made, this cannot go on. "Researchers from Nasa said it was the ninth warmest year while experts from another American agency said it was the tenth. Both teams said that temperatures would have been higher if it hadn't been for the the La Nina weather pattern that brought cooling to some regions. The scientists were equally certain that carbon dioxide was the principal drive ...

Feb 06, 2012
Please, pray: That Our Lord God strength the relationship between Dejan M. and me! That any barriers between us will be removed permanently and that we may have a lifetime of happpiness and love together! THAT GOD HELP DEJAN M. TO MAKE DISTANCE FROM PEOPLE WHO ENJOY IN DESTROYING RELATIONSHIPS (THAT GOES SPECIALLY FOR DAVID, SUZANA, ANJA) Thank you for all your prayers May God bless you always! Katarina from Belgrade in Serbia ...

Mar 25, 2011
Sen. Tom Coburn is an MD (general practitioner) and Senator from Oklahoma . and recognized as 'the conscience' of the US Senate. He is well respected on both 'sides of the aisle' & probably one of the few senators to actually read these 'bail-out' bills. (Google him for his background.) This takes a couple of minutes. It's from his speech in the Senate regarding the 2012 budget... "We are going in exactly the wrong direction. We ought to be standing ...

Nov 20, 2010
x ...

Apr 05, 2011
If you want the video, it's here: http://www.c-span.org/Events/Republicans-Unveil-Long-Term-Budget-Plan/10737420686-2/ If you want to read it, it's the link below. ...

Jun 26, 2011
Federal Spending (debt) or the Economy? ...

Aug 16, 2012
Okay, since I've seen BOTH sides use Politifact as a reference, I figured this might be interesting. There's plenty fun for all here...lol. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/elections/2012/us-president/?page=1 ...

Oct 16, 2012
Your tax dollars at work - some of the stupid spending. There are 10 pages, but I only copied a few as examples. To see the whole list, you must go to the link i posted and then go to the underlined words "Summary of Wastebook 2012" 3rd paragraph. Some aren't that stupid but I find the below are: Professional Sports Loophole (Taxes) $91 million: The NFL, NHL, and PGA all classify themselves as non-profit organizations. Taxpayers may be losing at least $89.9 million subsidizi ...

Nov 13, 2012
Election 2012 Marks the End of Evangelical Dominance in Politics By Jonathan Merritt And that just might help save the evangelical movement Jerry Falwell, seen giving a news conference in 1985 before a trip to the Philippines, urged the U.S. to offer aid to fight Communists insurgents in the country. (Reuters) Ever since Ronald Reagan was elected president in 1980, evangelicals have been a powerful political force. Jerry Falwell and his Moral Majority organization were credited ...

Apr 15, 2011
There are a bunch of people in the gallery that have been causing a commotion. The Chair is getting furious since this is dragging out longer than it's supposed to and has now stated and told the Capitol Police that prosecution may take place. What the heck is wrong with people nowadays? Disrupting a democratic process like this was never the American way. Respect for the process (not talking about the politicians) has to take place in an orderly way. Just because some don't like what ...

Nov 23, 2009
http://rawstory.com/2009/11/palin-2012-disaster-movie/ ...

Aug 18, 2011
http://news.yahoo.com/employees-beware-higher-healthcare-costs-ahead-184709897.html ...