A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
would become newly principled because this would cut their premium costs, as well as the insurance companies.' Just one more way for insurance to discriminate against women--if we allow it to happen.
See the article below for average costs of all (normal) methods of birth control. The figures on the left side of the ranges are what insured people pay now, the ones on the right the uninsured item cost what many, many more will pay if Romney is elected (assuming the drug companies don't grab the opportunity to raise prices on individual buyers.)
BTW, when people refer to the Blunt Amendment or Sandra Fluke, the subject is this--the notion that having to cover birth control (the same as Viagra is, say) would be a violation of the moral rights of employers. Our rights are at stake too, but not considered by those who want to shift these costs to women.
http://money.usnews.com/money/blogs/alpha-consumer/2012/03/05/the-real-cost-of-birth-control
;