A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

I've just been reading up on HR 1386 (Bush Tax Cuts in 2001)


Posted: Aug 3, 2010

While I won't post the whole thing here, I will post some of it, as I don't know how long it would be on this board. Oh, and by the way, 12 dems voted for it, so it wasn't just a pub deal.

So, were the tax cuts so bad? Tell me these were just for rich people as so many believe. This is the problem with people nowadays. They hear one side of the story and believe and judge without finding out for themselves what is really going on in this country.

Those titles that I only posted the bold without explanations do not apply to most of us, so I left most of it out. Like I said, if you are reallyl interested, read the whole thing yourself.

Title I: Individual Income Tax Rate Reductions - Amends the Internal Revenue Code to establish, as of tax year 2001, a 10 percent individual tax bracket for each filing status applicable to the first: (1) $12,000 ($14,000 for 2008 and thereafter) of taxable income for the married filing jointly category; (2) $10,000 of taxable income for the head of household category; and (3) $6,000 ($7,000 for 2008 and thereafter) of taxable income for either the filing as unmarried or married filing separate return categories.

Phases in reductions, beginning in 2001, of the 28 percent, 31 percent, 36 percent, and 39.6 percent brackets. Reduces each rate by one percentage point annually (with an additional 1.6 percent decrease for the 39.6 percent category), so that for years 2006 and thereafter the rates for each category will be, respectively, 25 percent, 28 percent, 33 percent, and 35 percent.

Provides for a credit, payable to the extent practicable before October 1, 2001, of up to $600 for the married filing jointly category, $500 for the head of household category, and $300 for those filing a return as either unmarried or married filing separate.

(Sec. 102) Repeals, in stages beginning in 2006, the personal exemption phase out, making such repeal fully effective beginning in 2010.

Title II: Tax Benefits to Children - Phases in increases in the child tax credit, increasing it to $1,000 per child effective 2010. Allows the credit against the alternative minimum tax. Makes a portion of the credit refundable. Disregards as income any such refunds for purposes determining eligibility for any federally funded assistance program.

(Sec. 202) Extends permanently the adoption credit for children other than special needs children. Increases the maximum credit to $10,000 per eligible child, including special needs children. Extends permanently the exclusion from income for employer provided adoption assistance. Increases, to $150,000, the beginning point of the income phase out range.

(Sec. 204) Increases the maximum amount of employment related expenses taken into account when determining the dependent care credit (to $3,000 from $2,400 for one qualifying individual and to $6,000 from $4,800 for two or more qualifying individuals). Increases from 30 to 35 percent the applicable percentage used in determining such credit. Increases from $10,000 to $15,000 the beginning point of the credit phase down.

(Sec. 205) Establishes an employer-provided child care credit equal to the sum of 25 percent of qualified child care expenses and 10 percent of the qualified child care resource and referral expenditures. Caps such credits at $150,000 per year.

Title III: Marriage Penalty Relief - Phases in increases in the standard deduction for the married filing jointly category to provide that by 2009 such deduction shall be twice that of an individual filing a single return.

Title IV: Affordable Education Provisions - Subtitle A: Education Savings Incentives - Increases, from $500 to $2,000, the annual limit on contributions to education IRAs.

Subtitle B: Educational Assistance - Permanently extends the exclusion from gross income of employer provided educational assistance.

Subtitle C: Liberalization of Tax-Exempt Financing Rules for Public School Construction - Increases the amount by which certain governmental bonds used to finance public school capital expenditures may be exempted from specified arbitrage bond provisions.

Subtitle D: Other Provisions - Allows, until December 31, 2005, a limited tax deduction (up to $3,000 for 2002 and 2003, and $4,000 for 2004 and 2005) for qualified higher education tuition and related expenses for taxpayers with adjusted gross income not exceeding specified levels ($130,000 for the married category and $65,000 for others).

Title V: Estate, Gift, and Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Provisions - Subtitle A: Repeal of Estate and Generation-Skipping Transfer Taxes - Repeals, effective January 1, 2010, the estate and generation-skipping transfer taxes.

Subtitle B: Reductions of Estate and Gift Taxes - Phases down the estate and generation-skipping transfer taxes prior to repeal.

Phases down the gift tax and provides that beginning January 1, 2010, the maximum gift tax rate will be the maximum individual rate.

Subtitle C: Increase in Exemption Amounts - Increases: (1) from 2002 through 2009, the exemption equivalent of the unified credit and provides that such amount shall be the same as the GST (generation-skipping transfer tax) exemption amount; and (2) the lifetime gift exemption.

Subtitle D: Credit for State Death Taxes - Reduces the State death tax credit through 2004, repeals it beginning January 1, 2005, and replaces it with a deduction for such taxes.

Subtitle E: Carryover Basis at Death: Other Changes Taking Effect With Repeal - Repeals, effective January 1, 2010, current provisions relating to the basis of property acquired from a decedent.

Subtitle F: Conservation Easements - Subtitle G: Modifications of Generation-Skipping Tax -

Subtitle H: Extension of Time for Payment of Estate Tax -

Title VI: Pension and Individual Retirement Arrangement Provisions - Subtitle A: Individual Retirement Arrangement Provisions - Increases the Individual Retirement Account (IRA) annual dollar contribution limit to $3,000 for 2002 through 2004, $4,000 for 2005 through 2007, and $5,000 for 2008 and thereafter, with indexing in $500 increments thereafter. Provides, for individuals age 50 and older, that such limit shall be increased by $500 for 2002 through 2005 and by $1,000 for years 2006 and thereafter.

(Sec. 602) Deems certain voluntary employee contributions to accounts and annuities as IRAs rather than pension plans.

Subtitle B: Expanding Coverage - Increases annual benefit limits to $160,000 and annual contribution limits to $40,000. Increases, over five years, the annual contribution limits for 401 (k) and other employer-sponsored plan to $15,000. Sets indexes for inflation in various increments on such increased limits.

Subtitle C: Enhancing Fairness for Women - Allows individuals who are age 50 or older to make additional contributions to an applicable employer plan.

Subtitle D: Increasing Portability for Participants - Permits rollovers from and to various types of plans under the Code.

Subtitle E: Strengthening Pension Security and Enforcement -Increases, until repeal (2004), the current liability full funding limit.

Title VII: Alternative Minimum Tax - Increases the alternative minimum tax exemption amount: (1) by $4,000 for married couples filing a joint return and surviving spouses; and (2) by $2,000 for other filing categories.

To read the whole bill, go here:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d107:HR01836:@@@D&summ2=m&

;

While there were some peanuts tossed to the middle class, - the rich overwhelmingly benefitted from this.nm

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

Tell me something. If the top 10pct pay over 70pct of - all income taxes...what is fair to you?

[ In Reply To ..]
Its so out of proportion. I am not rich, not even close. Still, it is their money in the first place.. Why would anyone have any incentive nowadays to be successful and earn high pay when you know its going to be taken anyway? This is sad.

How about a link confirming these - numbers?

[ In Reply To ..]
nm
You dont need a link.. Google it...its everywhere! - TX
[ In Reply To ..]
What? Dont believe it? Its an undeniable fact.
I get conflicting numbers when I google it. - Where did you get your info?nm
[ In Reply To ..]
nm
Here ya go... gives details.. all interesting, but sixth - paragraph has info mentioned.nm
[ In Reply To ..]
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Nearly-half-of-US-households-apf-1105567323.html?x=0&.v=1

Can anyone tell me... - Zville MT

[ In Reply To ..]
what the child tax credit was before it was raised to $1000 per child?

Finally got time to do some research... - Zville MT

[ In Reply To ..]
Went back to 2000 because that was the first year we used the child tax credit. It was $500. 2001 was $600, 2002 was $600, and from 2003 on was $1,000. I'm guessing it will go back down to $500 again if the tax cuts expire (not sure, but am guessing).

Similar Messages:


TP Gets Its Wish--Thanks To Bush's Tax Cuts.Aug 05, 2011
Quote from S&P on downgrade: Compared with previous projections, our revised base case scenario now assumes that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, due to expire by the end of 2012,remain in place. We have changed our assumption on this because the majority of Republicans in Congress continue to resist any measure that would raise revenues, a position we believe Congress reinforced by passing the act. ...

If You Think Bush Tax Cuts Should Be Permanent, Aug 21, 2012
If you don't think they should be encoded for all future American generations, ad infinitum, then don't vote for Romney.  ...

Keeping Bush Tax Cuts Would Be Disastrous!Aug 02, 2010
If the deficit hawks are truly sincere, maybe they should listen to their own financial guru--Alan Greenspan. www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/01/alan-greenspan-extending_n_666549.html ...

Dems Considering Keeping Bush Tax CutsJul 22, 2010
Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear getting crushed in November’s election.  It could mean a big reprieve for families earning $250,000 and above annually.  President George W. Bush’s tax cuts will expire at the end of the year unless Congress acts to delay their sunset.  Some Democrats are now arguing forcefully that a delay is a win-win plan that would help the federal ...

Small Business Owners Demand Repeal Of Bush Tax CutsMay 04, 2011
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/04/small-business-owners-bush-tax-cuts-rich-repeal_n_857204.html I've always felt this way. Glad to see more people are coming to the conclusion that those tax cuts didn't help us as small business owners. My own business started down as customers had less money, and I got the tax cuts. Something just never seemed right about that. ...

Geithner: America Is Less Equal Today Partly Due To Bush Tax CutsAug 05, 2010
Shahien Nasiripour Shahien Nasiripour – Wed Aug 4, 6:09 pm ET The country is less equal today than it was just a decade ago thanks in part to the Bush tax cuts, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said Wednesday. "[T]he policies put in place by the previous administration, prior to this great recession, have left us with a terrible legacy of challenges," Geithner said during a discussion on fiscal policy at the Washington-based Center for American Progress. "And A ...

Remembrance September 11, 2001. Pray Nothing LikeSep 11, 2015
I'm sure we all remember where we were. ...

Bush Terror Czar Richard Clarke: Bush, Cheney Are War Criminals. Dec 10, 2014
. ...

Budget CutsApr 13, 2011
Salary of the US President...$400,000. Salary of retired US Presidents...$180,000. Salary of House/Senate...$174,000. Salary of Speaker of House...$223,500....Salary of Majority/Minority Leaders...$193,400..........Average US Salary...$33,000 to $77,000. HELLO! I think we found where some cuts should be made!  ...

Who Will Pay For The Tax Cuts For The Rich?Dec 07, 2010
Talk Box: Tax Cut Extension Would Lead to More Borrowing From China 12/7/10 at 01:50 AM // MSNBC's Chuck Todd reported that the framework deal President Obama seems to have reached with Republicans on extending the Bush tax cuts will result in a loss of revenue totaling nearly $450 billion in 2011, more than the cost of the 2009 stimulus while Countdown guest host Sam Seder investigated the huge amounts the U.S. will have to borrow from countries like China, Russia and th ...

Tax Cuts And Unemployment VotesDec 13, 2010
At 3:40 p.m., the vote was 54-6 in favor. They need 6 votes to pass. We shall see. Voting against it so far is Birgaman (D), Feingold (D), Leahy (D), Udal (D)l, Sanders(I) , and Gillibrand (D).     ...

Tax Cuts Against Human Nature?Dec 06, 2010
Extending the Bush tax cuts: Human nature? Of all the coverage of the debate over whether or not to extend the Bush tax cuts, and there is plenty today, given that the White House appears to be quietly giving ground to Republicans on extending the tax cuts temporarily, today's money quote comes via Howard Kurtz over at The Daily Beast. He quotes former President George W. Bush communications director Dan Bartlett as saying, "We knew that, politically, once you get [a tax cut] into la ...

What The Majority Of The People Want Re Tax CutsDec 03, 2010
"here’s what the public said about the Bush tax cuts, according to the exit polls last month: 40 percent said to continue ALL of the cuts, 36 percent said to continue them for families who earn less than $250,000 a year, and an additional 15 percent said to expire them for all. So a majority -- 51 percent -- backed either the Democratic position or wants all the cuts to expire." ...

House Vote Is Being Taken Right Now On Tax CutsDec 02, 2010
So far, 211 yea,  173 nay.  Mostly partisan votes. 13 dems Nay, 2 pubs yea. ...

For Those Who Think Tax Cuts Should Expire, Read ThisJul 26, 2010
Tax hikes for the rich: Can the economy afford them?  By Jeanne Sahadi, senior writerJuly 26, 2010: 3:15 AM ET   NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Would making the rich pay higher taxes next year hurt the economy? That question underlines one of the trickiest fiscal questions facing Washington policymakers: What to do about the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts, which are set to expire at the end of the year. President Obama wants to let the cuts lapse for joint tax filers who make at leas ...

Big Tax Cuts For Businesses At The Expense OfApr 26, 2017
Who cares about pollution as long as those businesses can make bigger profits and CEOs can get bigger bonuses.  ...

Probably More Layoffs And Benefit CutsJun 25, 2017
Under the Senate health care plan, employers will no longer be required to offer health insurance.  I am guessing the big transcription companies are already planning to use this to layoff employees--you know, "minimum wage is too high in your state, employee benefits too good in your state, now you want health insurance too?"   Given the choice of not being required to provide health insurance, "not being able to find MTs willing to work for a pittance," and offshoring to some foreig ...

Deep Pay Cuts At Bailed Out CompaniesOct 21, 2009
x ...

Spending Cuts - Please Note The ReasonsMar 08, 2011
The first links is the House Appropriations  document showing spending cuts and most show the reasons for the cuts. http://www.majorityleader.gov/uploadedfiles/FY2011_SUMMARY.pdf The second link shows the comparison from 2010 and the President's cuts. Note the differences on that. http://www.majorityleader.gov/uploadedfiles/FY2011CR_SUBCOM.pdf   The third link shows the cuts inacted in 2010 and those requested for 2011. http://www.majorityleader.gov/uploadedfiles/FY2011_CUTS ...

Tax Cuts Passed 277-148 And Reid/OmnibusDec 17, 2010
They worked late into the night to pass it. It will cost $858 billion but it gives everyone a "breather" for a while. Reid pulled the Omnibus bill off the table; i.e., just died. John McCain, Tom Coburn, and Jim DeMint were the reason because they wanted the bill read page per page. Guess Reid didn't want the people to know what was really in the bill.  I had forgotten some of the crap in there but thankfully, the John Murtha Foundation (biggest crook in PA) will not be funded, n ...

Alan Grayson On Tax Cuts For The RichDec 06, 2010
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/03/alan-grayson-fox-news-tax-cuts_n_791533.html Here's an excerpt: They want tax cuts for the rich because they want a tax cut for themselves. What do I mean by that? Let's take a look at the people who are really in charge, the ones who actually run the Republican party. Let's start with this gentleman here, the man with the cigar, Rush Limbaugh. Doesn't he look happy? According according to Newsweek, he makes $58.7 million a year, an ...

Harry Reid On GOP Budget Cuts: Let's Have A VoteMar 08, 2011
This is one article: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is promising an up-or-down vote on the $61 billion in budget cuts passed by House Republicans — just to show that version of the spending bill is “dead” – even if the upper chamber has to debate until 1 a.m. to prove the point. “I hope we have a vote on this today,” said Reid to reporters. “If not, we’re going to go through all this procedural process. They cannot stop us from having a vote o ...

Not Romney But OBAMA Proposes Cuts To FEMA!!Oct 30, 2012
See pages 94-96 of Obama's sequestration budget plan.  Yes, Romney believes that FEMA has been over-funded for the results that we've actually gotten from the agency (which are perfectly miserable) - but the difference is, Romney plans to redistribute the money to the states and it isn't therefore a cut to emergency funding.  Under Obama's plan, the money would be used to fund OBAMACARE. Got knowledge?     ...

The Republican War On Math: Tax Cuts And Austerity" Nov 18, 2012
On election night, Republican strategist and Fox News contributor Karl Rove was unwilling to believe that President Obama had won Ohio, arguing with anchor Megyn Kelly that Ohio was too close to call. Eventually, Kelly asked Rove if his calculations were "just math you do as a Republican to make yourself feel better or is this real?" This televised moment on Election Day was one small victory for statistics. Another was thatFiveThirtyEight blogger Nate Silver accurately pred ...

Regarding Medicare Cuts In January - Our Local Paper (sm)Jun 23, 2013
said the cuts to physicians will be 40% by 2016.  Not 2014.  So all the young "folks" can have baby after baby every year by different baby daddies and get the wanna be future hooligans on Medicaid.  This really stinks. ...

Sen. Paul Uses 3rd Grade Math To Explain How Tax CutsJun 24, 2017
On Friday’s Morning Joe, MSNBC panelist Donny Deutsch pushed the typical liberal “tax cuts for the rich” narrative as he slammed the Republican health care reform bill: "The other side of the aisle will call this as a redistribution of wealth. Obviously, parties are given to hyperbole, but the reality according to the Center [for] Tax Policy is that 90 percent of the benefits in this plan go to families making $700,000 a year or more, the one percent. That is a fiscal reality." He demanded ...

Ron Paul Calls Out Obama On Cuts To Veterans' Benefits. SmSep 20, 2011
Totally disgusting they want to cut benefits from those who pay the ultimate price.  The government needs to honor its contract with the troops.       http://www.marketwatch.com/story/ron-paul-issues-open-letter-to-president-obama-concerning-cuts-to-veterans-benefits-2011-09-20 ...

Cuts For Health Care And Veterans But Tax Breaks For NASCAR???Mar 02, 2011
Rep. Betty McCollum is out to get rid of the Pentagon's sponsorships for NASCAR teams says she won't back away from her efforts and, despite GOP resistance, will broaden her fight to repeal tax breaks for track owners, too. In an interview, McCollum said it doesn't make sense to keep the benefits for NASCAR teams and track owners when other cuts are being made to community health care, programs for homeless veterans and Head Start. "I started to look at what is in this large def ...

Benefits For Unemployed Better Econ Stimulus Than Tax Cuts For RichNov 29, 2010
See link ...

Paul Ryan Talking About 2012 Budget CutsApr 03, 2011
Just FYI: I know some of you don't like Fox News, but try to tune in at 2 p.m. today for Chris Wallace (Fox News Sunday).  Paul Ryan is on and he gives very detailed information about budget cuts for 2012.  This budget will be released Tuesday, so this is kind of a sneak peak for anyone that's interested. ...