Comission Gives More Details on Cutting the Deficit
Posted: Nov 11, 2010
I have a feeling these suggestions won't go very far....especially the gas tax. If it isn't the people against some of the cuts, it will definitely be the federal employees against a wage freeze. I think the Congress will also be against their pet earmarks.
In my opinion, I think the federal employees could and should allow a wage freeze. The rest of America had to swallow it, why shouldn't they?
As for earmarks, I think only the frivolous ones, like the ones stuffed into the healthcare reform and stimulus projects should be stopped, but those dealing with our firemen, policemen, etc. should stay. Volunteer firefighters have a hard time raising money for equipment now and with the economy the way it is, it's even worse. Their donations are way down, yet the equipment necessary for saving lives is necessary to save lives.
As for the tax code changes, I'm all for that. Simplify the rules. Make it equal for all, not just for a few. See part of the article below and use the link to read the whole article:
The plan by Chairman Erskine Bowles and former Sen. Alan Simpson, the co-chairman, doesn’t look as if it can win the support from 14 commission members that is needed to force a debate in Congress.
The two were among the first to acknowledge their plan’s unpopularity — and to suggest it would be a nonstarter in Congress.
“We’ll both be in a witness protection program when this is all over, so look us up,” Simpson told reporters. Bowles said: “We’re not asking anybody to vote for this plan. This is a starting point.”
Their document says in a statement of principles: “America cannot be great if we go broke.”
Other proposals by Bowles and Simpson include:
•Increasing the gas tax by 15 cents a gallon to fund transportation programs.
•A three-year freeze in the pay of most federal employees and a 10 percent cut in the federal work force.
•Eliminating all congressional pet projects, known as earmarks.
Bowles and Simpson also are proposing a fundamental rewrite of the tax code, though they didn’t offer a specific plan.
But the goal is to lower overall tax rates, simplify the code and broaden the taxpayer base. One option proposed is to completely eliminate so-called tax expenditures — including popular deductions like the mortgage interest tax break and a deduction taken by companies that provide health insurance to their employees.
They didn’t specifically call for doing away with these popular tax breaks, instead listing that among a series of possible options.
While it may not survive, the Bowles-Simpson proposal illustrates the painful choices involved in tackling a deficit that presently requires the government to borrow 37 cents out of every dollar it spends.
Read more:
http://www.kansascity.com/2010/11/10/2418850/deficit-fighting-panels-leaders.html#ixzz14zFRrJid ;