A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
A Progressive Deficit Reduction Plan....sm
Posted: Nov 29, 2012
A Progressive Deficit Reduction Plan
- Repeal all of the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax breaks for the top two percent. Repealing the 2001 and 2003 tax breaks for the top two percent would reduce the deficit by about $1 trillion over the next decade. After President Clinton increased taxes on the top two percent, the economy added over 22 million jobs. After President Bush reduced taxes for the rich, the economy lost over 600,000 private sector jobs.
- Create an emergency deficit-reduction surtax on millionaires. Enacting a 5.4 percent surtax on adjusted gross income of more than $1 million would raise over $383 billion over 10 years, according to the Joint Tax Committee. According to a February 2011 NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, 81 percent of the American people support the creation of a millionaires surtax to reduce the deficit.
- End tax breaks and subsidies for big oil, gas and coal companies. If we ended tax breaks and subsidies for big oil, gas, and coal companies, we could reduce the deficit by more than $113 billion over the next ten years. The five largest oil companies in the United States have earned about $1 trillion in profits over the past decade.
- Establish a Wall Street speculation fee of 0.03 percent on the sale of credit default swaps, derivatives, stocks, options, and futures. Both the economic crisis and the deficit crisis are a direct result of the greed and recklessness on Wall Street. Establishing a speculation fee would reduce gambling on Wall Street, encourage the financial sector to invest in the productive economy, and reduce the deficit by $350 billion over 10 years without harming average Americans.
- Eliminate tax breaks for companies shipping American jobs overseas. Today, the U.S. government is actually rewarding companies that move U.S. manufacturing jobs overseas through loopholes in the tax code known as deferral and foreign source income. During the last decade, the U.S. lost about 30% of its manufacturing jobs and over 56,000 factories have been shut down. If we eliminated these tax loopholes, the Joint Tax Committee has estimated that we could raise more than $582 billion in revenue over the next ten years.
- Prohibit abusive and illegal offshore tax shelters. Each and every year, the United States loses an estimated $100 billion in tax revenues due to offshore tax abuses by the wealthy and large corporations. The situation has become so absurd that one five-story office building in the Cayman Islands is now the "home" to more than 18,000 corporations. The wealthy and large corporations should not be allowed to avoid paying taxes by setting up tax shelters in Panama, the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, the Bahamas or other tax haven countries. Cracking down on offshore tax shelters could reduce the deficit by as much as $1 trillion over the next decade.
- Establish a currency manipulation fee on China and other countries. As almost everyone knows, China is manipulating its currency, giving it an unfair trade advantage over the United States and destroying decent paying manufacturing jobs in the process. If we imposed a currency manipulation fee on China and other currency manipulators, the Economic Policy Institute has estimated that we could raise $500 billion over 10 years and create 1 million jobs in the process.
- Tax capital gains and dividends the same as work. Taxing capital gains and dividends the same way that we tax work would raise more than $730 billion over the next decade. Warren Buffet has often said that he pays a lower effective tax rate than his secretary. The reason for this is that the wealthy obtain most of their income from capital gains and dividends, which is taxed at a much lower rate than work. Right now, the top marginal income tax for working is 35%, but the tax rate on corporate dividends and capital gains is only 15%.
- Establish a Progressive Estate Tax. If we established a progressive estate tax on inherited wealth of more than $3.5 million, we could raise more than $300 billion over 10 years. Sen. Sanders introduced the Responsible Estate Tax Act that would reduce the deficit in a fair way while ensuring that 99.7 percent of Americans who lose a loved one would never see a dime of their loved one's estate paid in federal estate taxes.
- Reduce unnecessary and wasteful spending at the Pentagon, which now consumes over half of our discretionary budget. Much of the huge spending at the Pentagon is devoted to spending money on Cold War weapons programs to fight a Soviet Union that no longer exists. Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) and Lawrence Korb, an Assistant Secretary of Defense under Ronald Reagan, have estimated that we could achieve significant savings of around $100 billion a year at the Pentagon while still ensuring that the United States has the strongest and most powerful military in the world.
- Require Medicare to negotiate for lower prescription drug prices with the pharmaceutical industry. Requiring Medicare to negotiate drug prices, similarly to what the VA currently does, would save more than $157 billion over 10 years.
- Eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse within every federal government agency. Virtually everyone agrees that there is waste, fraud, and abuse in every agency of the federal government. Rooting out this waste, fraud, and abuse could save between $150 billion and $200 billion over the next 10 years.
;
Some of those should be done, regardless. - RC
[ In Reply To ..]
#s 4, 5, 6, 8, 11 and 12.
For sure. Taxing Warren Buffet's dividend checks lower than our paychecks? - Who thought that up?
[ In Reply To ..]
Not him, of course, and not us. The excuse was to encourage savings and investment, but if that were the case it would have been limited to the less affluent 80% of us or so. Wealthy people have so much left over after they buy everything they could possibly want that they have no choice but to invest it, unless they want to burn it or give it away.
I think there should be a sales tax on luxury imported goods. nm - oldtimer
[ In Reply To ..]
.
Some i agree with, some I don't - backwards typist
[ In Reply To ..]
7. Will NEVER pass. They've already tried this to do this. All it would do is make China more furious and up the U.S. import fees to their country.
8. I don't agree with the capital gains/dividends tax because everyone that has a 401K or IRA would have to pay this tax. It would be a double tax because you would be taxed on the gains or dividends yearly and when you took money out, you would be taxed again.
9. I don't agree with the estate tax. Why tax the family farmer who leaves his property to his family? Do you realize how much that would hurt? Heck, any family that owns property would be hurt by this tax.
They've also tried to end subsidies on big oil, gas, etc. Didn't pass.
Now I really have to go.
Read the one about estate tax again. only - over 3.5 million NM
[ In Reply To ..]
x
Check some taxes on a family farm with 150 acres - backwards typist
[ In Reply To ..]
Without taxing the house and other outbuildings, with the land worth $35K an acre, it already takes them over that $3.5 million.
Am I right, or am I wrong? What is the percentage of tax a farmer pays for their land? I know there is some type of deduction they can qualify for IF they never sell to a developer (at least in this state), but I don't know what that percentage is.
I'll try to get back to you on that for this state, but what would it be in other states as well?
If you have 150 acres at 35K per acre - You can afford taxes. nm
[ In Reply To ..]
Not if you're a farmer and living off what you produce - backwards typist
[ In Reply To ..]
I'm not talking about the large corporate farms. I'm talking about family farms-you know, mom, dad, the kids.
Farming and making a profit depends on the weather. Bad year = low to no income but you still have to pay the taxes on the land or lose it.
Farm Aid statistics show that 330 farmers leave their land every week. From the 1980s until 2 years ago, I gave money every year to Farm Aid to try to help the family farmers. They deserved the help.
If Obama's estate tax goes through, many more will lose. Good thing we have NAFTA so we can get our food from South America, Central America and Canada.
Family farmers are the ultimate welfare recipients, after - from Fanatics wealthy, of course. We
[ In Reply To ..]
pay them and pay them and pay them to help them stay in business. We're losing the battle to save much of our farmland, though, not because I voted for Obama but because of climate changes, disappearing water supplies, and other disasters that are turning what was once viable farmland into something that can't even be sold.
Much of the west right on through the what we call the heartland is heating up and drying up and burning up. When we start wishing we could afford to buy the kind of food we used to, we might also remember the moment we each individually admitted our own hand in creating this horrible catastrophe. Including destroying all those family farms.
You also have to blame the current government/court for what is - backwards typist
[ In Reply To ..]
happening out west with the water supply. Wasn't there a court case where farmers out there were being denied a decent supply of water because the big cities needed it - and didn't the farmers lose?
I just hope that case is remembered when we have to buy all our food from places that don't have as restrictive pesticide controls like the USA.
Again, look at how many toys from China they just confiscated at a port today because of lead paint. I know, not food, but an example of how our other countries don't follow our laws with regards to imports.
I have been a farmer, some of my family farms - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
Any farm worth 3.5 million can afford estate taxes. There is a reason it is worth 3.5 million.
Point by point - Voter
[ In Reply To ..]
The China currency deal - - wasn't that something that Romney was campaigning on? I am surprised that you think that WOULD NEVER pass if it was a Romney position.
Why would anyone having capital gains/dividends in a 401K or IRA have to pay tax? My earnings in my retirement accounts are not taxed until I withdraw, which I do not plan to do until I quit working and my income drops. I also have a non-IRA account and I believe I should be taxed on what I earn in that account.
If someone's estate is worth more than 3.5 million, they can afford to pay tax.
Just because big oil subsidies were not ended before, why not now? The voters have spoken, and the voters do not want this.
I heard someone say that Boehner should be the Speaker of the House, not the Speaker of the Republican Party. Very good point.
Dig a little deeper and do a little more thinking on capital gains/dividends - backwards typist
[ In Reply To ..]
I just have this feeling that we will be expected to report those items every year as it will be considered income whether you withdraw any of it or not. If that is the case, everyone loses. Both those items are on your Form 1040. It's just a matter of changing the amounts to report.
The voters wanted the subsidies, not only on big oil, to end before and spoke loudly on that, but Congress still voted against it. I won't hold my breath that it will happen now, either because
Congress works for themselves and not for us. It doesn't what party they belong to - re-election is always in the back of their mind, as are the big bucks they get from the businesses.
Have you ever added up your net worth? Most people think it just means their real estate, but it's more than that. Try it sometime. You might be surprised at how much you're really worth. It includes all property you own: vehicles, personal property including any collectibles, your pension/401K/IRA, cash, life insurance, etc. That's all considered in determining your net worth and it doesn't take long to add up.
Family farms need to be preserved. Do you really want to rely on Con-Agra and the like that ply our food with rBGH in cattle (used for milk production and growth), or the 3 genetically modified crops by Monsanto? I sure don't. I want my food to be safe, and that is usually guaranteed by the small family farms.
Simpson-Bowles - old and burned out
[ In Reply To ..]
I don't know if this is from Simpson-Bowles or not but it was a well-considered, bipartisan list of recommendations which, by the way, recommended resuming the pre-Bush area tax rates for the wealthy. It should be adopted.
Similar Messages:
"Romney's Tax Plan: Very Progressive, By 15th-century Standards."Oct 28, 2012From The Economist: "The Tax Policy Center has completed an analysis of the distributional effects of Mitt Romney's tax plan, and as might be expected it's quite good for you if you're raking in the big bucks, and not particularly helpful if you're not."
"So, again, while it's true that Mr Romney's tax plans represent a large net transfer from the poor to the rich if you start from the baseline of current tax law, they're actually pretty progressive if yo ...
Has Anyone Ever Undergone A Breast Reduction? (sm)Jun 30, 2010I have always, ALWAYS had large breasts. At the age of 12 my nickname was Dolly Parton (humiliating). I constantly battle with breast masses (all benign so far thankfully), back and neck pain. Recently I went to Belks and was fitted for a bra and even I was shocked at my "correct" bra size ..... 42 DDD!!!!!!! I have indentions in the top of my shoulders from where my bra has buried into my skin and I am SICK OF IT!!!
I am looking for anyone who has undergone breast ...
Popular Effective Weight Reduction ProgramJan 03, 2017ruined by acquisition by arrogant mogul. If there is any person who should NOT be trying to sell us a weight loss system, it is Orpha Mowfrey. She has failed, failed, failed, failed. I believe that is the # of highly publicized "successful" diets she has been on. A bit like the Most Interesting Man In the World buying an AA franchise. I do not purchase ANYTHING that has a celebrity brand - White haired lady racist's skillets and mixing bowls, blonde bimbo& ...
IRS Budget Cuts: 12,000 Staff Reduction + 83% Cut In Training Funds = Jan 14, 2015They will be able to answer about 4 out of every 10 phone calls until April 15. After that those who filed for extensions will not have access to phone assistance. Callers can anticipate at least a 30-minute hold. When you get someone on the line, don't expect them to know anything about anything beyond "basic" tax law, because that's the only kind of training the agency can afford to give them anymore. It will take months to receive written replies. On-s ...
Tax Plan Calculator-See How Each Candidate's Tax Plan Affects YouMar 28, 2016http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/3/25/11293258/tax-plan-calculator-2016 ...
Deficit QuestionDec 14, 2016can anyone explain why the deficit/debt got so much worse while obama was president? ...
Republicans Trying To Deepen DeficitJan 06, 2011Health-Law Repeal Would Deepen Deficit, CBO Estimates
January 06, 2011, 10:33 AM EST
By Anna Edney
Jan. 6 (Bloomberg) -- Repealing the health-care overhaul law would deepen federal budget deficit by $145 billion from 2012 to 2019, the Congressional Budget Office estimates.
Individual insurance premiums would be “somewhat lower” than under current law, while coverage obtained through large employers would be “slightly” higher under an overhaul repeal, the CBO, the ...
Bipartisan Deficit CommissionFeb 06, 2010Last month, a bipartisan commission went down in flames in the Senate after 7 republicans who sponsored the bill voted against it. Now, Obama is putting together a bipartisan commission and the republicans are still complaining it's not good enough.
Obama is telling them to come to the table and present their ideas. They are saying no. And then accusing him of not listening.
The problem seems to be that the republicans expect Obama to follow their platform (tax breaks for big busines ...
Taxing The Richest And The DeficitNov 12, 2010From Robert Reich-Christian Science Monitor
The economics are clear:
First, the top 1 percent spends a much smaller proportion of their income than everyone else, so there’s very little economic stimulus at these lofty heights.
On the other hand, giving the top 1 percent a two-year extension would cost the Treasury $130 billion over two years, thereby blowing a giant hole in efforts to get the deficit under control.
Alternatively, $130 billion would be enough to rehire every teach ...
U.S. Deficit Commission Recommends Changes To SSNov 10, 2010(The true suggestions will be coming out on Dec. 1.)
U.S. Deficit Commission Recommends Changes to Social Security
A draft proposal by the deficit commission suggests curbing Social Security benefits and raising the retirement ageto 68. It is currently 67 years for retirees to receive full benefits. The panel leaders also propose reducing the annual cost-of-living increases in Social Security.
The increase to age 68 would be implemented by 2050 and then would increase again to 69 by 2075.&n ...
Tackling The Deficit-Fix-It WeekJun 29, 2010The first of the series this week.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31510813/#37983994 ...
CBO Deficit Projections That Just May Suprise You.Jul 14, 2010Here is a graph depicting baseline deficit as affected by the economic downturn with comparisons made between the percentages of projected impacts (2009 to 2019) of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Bush tax cuts, Obama's recovery measures, TARP, Fannie and Freddie. Can you guess which one has the broadest and most far reaching damaging impact? Fascinating stuff.
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3036
...
11 Things The GOP Doesn't Want You To Know About The Deficit...smSep 08, 20121. The deficit has grown mostly because of the recession. (The deficit has ballooned not because of specific spending measures, but because of the recession. The deficit more than doubled between 2008 and 2009 as the economy was in free fall and laid-off workers paid less in taxes and needed more benefits. The deficit then shrank in 2010 and 2011.)
2. The stimulus cost much less than Bush's wars and tax cuts. (Republicans frequently have blamed the $787 billio ...
Candidates' Deficit Plans Don't Add UpOct 01, 2012As the government closes the books Sunday with a $1.1 trillion deficit for the year, which required borrowing 32 cents for every dollar it spent, budget analysts have little confidence in either presidential candidate's plan to address the accumulating debt, now at about $16 trillion.
The Republican nominee promises to balance the budget in eight years to 10 years, but he also offers a mix of budgetary contradictions: higher Pentagon spending, restoring cuts that Democrats made in Medicare ...
Anyone Have A Child Or Know About Attention DeficitOct 20, 2014Was just talking with my friend tonight. I have known as she has also for years that her 1st grader was not 100% "right," something was off with him. Tonight she tells me someone is finally maybe listening to her about him. He is in his own little world. I do not think autism because of the fact he will halfway interact "sometimes," does not reject a hug or kiss and maybe I am wrong but I thought autistic children were like that. I could be wrong. His teacher is every day trying to tell the moth ...
Deficit Commission Final VoteDec 03, 2010Guess it's back to the drawing board.
It's true that a commission that began with only limited authority failed in its most significant goal, which was to win at least 14 votes among the 18 members. Fourteen votes were needed to send the package to Congress as an official recommendation and force a vote on the proposals.
It's also true that prominent members of Congress on the committee took a walk on the commission report. That group included Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.), who will ...
Comission Gives More Details On Cutting The DeficitNov 11, 2010I have a feeling these suggestions won't go very far....especially the gas tax. If it isn't the people against some of the cuts, it will definitely be the federal employees against a wage freeze. I think the Congress will also be against their pet earmarks.
In my opinion, I think the federal employees could and should allow a wage freeze. The rest of America had to swallow it, why shouldn't they?
As for earmarks, I think only the frivolous ones, like the ones stu ...
More Good News! Jobs Up, Deficit Down!Oct 07, 2012The Congressional Budget Office has released its estimate for the fiscal year 2012, just ended on September 30 and the news is good. The federal deficit was just under $1.1 trillion, compared to just under $1.3 trillion at the end of fiscal year 2011, a reduction of $207 billion. As a percentage of the GDP, the 2012 deficit dropped to 7.0 per cent, down from 8.7 percent in 2011 and 9.0 percent in 2010. The actual deficit numbers will be released later this month by the Treasury DepartmentThe Sep ...
Budget Deficit Shrinks By $200 BillionOct 13, 2012
It starts with the figures released in 2009, when the deficit reached a record high of $1.4 trillion. Why is the column in red? Because, thanks to fiscal years, Obama inherited a deficit of nearly $1.3 trillion from Bush/Cheney the moment he took the oath of office.
This year, however, according to the official data published by the Treasury Department, the deficit is 1.089 trillion.
A big number, but going down--no thanks to those helpful Republicans in Congress. ...
Some Interesting Articles On Cutting The Budget DeficitNov 28, 2010All these articles are quite long but are worth reading every word. Remember, nothing is written in stone. All can be tweaked. I found some of the ideas very good, and some 'not so good.' All in all, it's good that there's plenty of input happening and hopefully, our government will READ (if that's possible) them and debate/compromise on them.
The first one is from the Brookings Institute which gives quite a few plans from various Senior Fellows:
http://www.brookings.e ...
Bernake Sounds Warning On Growing DeficitApr 14, 2010Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke warned Wednesday that Americans may have to accept higher taxes or changes in cherished entitlements such as Medicare and Social Security if the nation is to avoid staggering budget deficits that threaten to choke off economic growth.
"These choices are difficult, and it always seems easier to put them off -- until the day they cannot be put off anymore," Bernanke said in a speech. "But unless we as a nation demonstrate a strong commitment to fiscal re ...
Now, THAT Is A Progressive Liberal! Jul 06, 2010http://www.viruscomix.com/putthatinyourpipeandsmokeit.jpg ...
CBO Finds Dem Bill With Public Option Reduces Deficit Oct 21, 2009http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/10/21/health.care.cbo/index.html
...
Cool Debt Clock. Watch Our Deficit Rise.Mar 23, 2011On the left side is also more statistics on unemployment real and reported, births, etc. Near the bottom is corporate assets, small business assets, personal assets. There's also a lot more. Check it out. The moving numbers may get ya dizzy, though.
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ ...
Deficit Recution Commisions Seeks Increase In Its BudgetJun 08, 2010I find this hilarious (for want of a better word). It was a twitter that flashed by and I was curious so went to the site.
The whole article is in PDF here: http://taxprof.typepad.com/files/tax-notes-today_-2010-tnt-1...pdf
Deficit Reduction Commission Seeks Increase in its Budget
Eric Kroh, Fiscal Commission Bemoans Lack of Resources, 2010 TNT 106-2 (June 3, 2010):
Saddled with a tight deadline and great expectations, members of President Obama's deficit reducti ...
Budget Deficit/Econ Growth In Plain SpeakSep 28, 2012Sharp kid. See link. ...
Senator Lieberman Calls For Obama To Be More Involved In Deficit NegotiationsDec 03, 2012Sen. Lieberman calls for Obama to be more involved in deficit negotiations
By Alexander Bolton - 12/02/12 06:00 AM ET
Sen. Joe Lieberman (Conn.), the independent Democrat who has played roles in past Senate compromises, says President Obama needs to get more involved in the fiscal cliff talks.
Lieberman, who brought Republican senators on board with the 2009 economic stimulus package and a 2005 deal on judicial nominees, says it’s time for Obama to gather congressional leaders arou ...
Congressional Progressive Caucus And DSADec 09, 2010see link ...
The Progressive Jihad Against IsraelJun 15, 2010Shouldn't we be looking at the Progressives more closely?
http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/06/15/the-progressive-jihad-against-israel/ ...
An Unstoppable Progressive Future? Maybe NotSep 21, 2013
A new report tries to stifle Democrats' confidence that demographics guarantee the party's electoral success. But it's not totally persuasive.
[Maybe not, but I've known a lot of minority conservatives over the years who are not comfortable with the Democratic party, even if they're forced to vote Democratic to protect themselves now, and I expect them to force change at some point. The only thing certain about the future is that it will be different and it wi ...