A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

Top 10 Reasons to Dislike Mitt Romney

Posted: Sep 22, 2012

Top Ten Reasons To Dislike Mitt Romney:

1. Drop-dead, collar-ad handsome with gracious, statesmanlike aura. Looks like every central casting’s #1 choice for Commander-in-Chief.

2. Been married to ONE woman his entire life, and has been faithful to her, including through her bouts with breast cancer and MS.

3. No scandals or skeletons in his closet. (How boring is that?)

4. Can’t speak in a fake, southern, “black preacher voice” when necessary.

5. Highly intelligent. Graduated cum laude from both Harvard Law School and Harvard Business School…and by the way, his academic records are NOT sealed.

6. Doesn’t smoke or drink alcohol, and has never done drugs, not even in the counter-culture age when he went to college. Too square for today’s America?

7. Represents an America of “yesterday”, where people believed in God, went to Church, didn’t screw around, worked hard, and became a SUCCESS!

8. Has a family of five great sons….and none of them have police records or are in drug rehab. But of course, they were raised by a stay-at-home mom, and that “choice” deserves America’s scorn.

9. Oh yes…..he’s a MORMON. We need to be very afraid of that very strange religion that teaches its members to be clean-living, patriotic, fiscally conservative, charitable, self-reliant, and honest.

10. And one more point…..pundits say because of his wealth, he can’t relate to ordinary Americans. I guess that’s because he made that money HIMSELF…..as opposed to marrying it or inheriting it from Dad. Apparently, he didn’t understand that actually working at a job and earning your own money made you unrelatable to Americans. My goodness, it’s a strange world, isn’t it?

http://freethoughtblogs.com/ashleymiller/2012/09/12/i-get-e-mail-mitt-romney-is-super-likable/

;

He is a national treasure, no? - pffft

[ In Reply To ..]
We are lucky to inhabit the same planet as this walking blessing.

Yes he is and we are - Better than David Letterman

[ In Reply To ..]
Better than the other.

Actually Mormonism IS freaking weird. - I just saw a You Tube video ...

[ In Reply To ..]
... about Mormonism and the religion is hilariously strange. You should do a search for it and educate yourself on the origins and beliefs.

And Mitt's five sons are kind of creepy. Sasha and Malia are cute and sweet.

And how do you know Mitt's academic records aren't sealed? I've never seen them. Oh, and where are the last 12 YEARS of Mitt's tax returns? Obama released 12 years. But then he had nothing to hide, did he?

Don't need to educate myself on it - used to belong to the church - Careful your hate and bigotry are showing

[ In Reply To ..]
I could find lots of you tubes to show how strange the Muslim faith, catholic, judaism or any religion is.

It would be wise for you to follow Obama's own words and leave your nasty hateful remarks about politicians kids to yourself. Romney's boys are handsome and Obama's girls are cute. Creepy is your attitude.

No, his records are not sealed and no you do not need to see them, but if you wanted to (which you obviously don't) you can find out for yourself.

And you guys need a new line with this faux tax form thingy. Here's a hint MITT HAS SHOWN THE PROPER YEARS TAX FORMS THAT ARE REQUIRED. GET-A-GRIP!!!

You need to educate yourself on manners.

Mormonism is okay for those who need a ruled-in - little world. Rates of depression Sm

[ In Reply To ..]
and other emotional problems are reportedly fairly high among Mormon women especially, but by a long shot not all of them have their husbands effectively chosen for them, etc., etc. Like any other church, it works for those for whom it works.

The problem is, if you're not the right-shaped peg for that hole, to leave the church is usually to lose all your family, all your friends, become an outcast to the only society you've ever known, and condemn yourself to a lower level of heaven, away from all you've know. So most don't.

Pssst - in case you didn't know this - Careful

[ In Reply To ..]
Here since you didn't know this I'll outline it for you.

1. Americans are not going to have to change their religion.

2. Emotional problems run high in all religious groups and in people that don't associated with religious groups.

3. You are not going to have your husband picked out for you.

4. You will be able to attend or leave any church you please. You will be no losing your family or friends if Romney becomes president.

5. All religions are okay for those who need a ruled in little world.

6. You will not be baptized unless you want to be. My sister who does mormon baptism said they do not baptize everyone.

Besides...I would rather be baptized after I'm dead and gone and onto my next life than to be forced to wear a burka, cover up every inch of my body or face being beaten and raped. Be forced to pray 5 times a day and not question them or get your head chopped off. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out which is the better of the two.

But, no, after Romney is elected I will still have the freedom to go to a methodist, catholic, hindu, wiccan, lutheran, jewish, mormon, or muslim church, synogague, mosque or whatever service I want or none if I don't want.

You people really need to lay off the fear mongering and hate. It will make you older before your time.

Live and love life. Peace to all and have a great weekend.

How refreshing! A post that makes sense. - I applaud you.

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

Everyone definitely needs to - vf

[ In Reply To ..]
stop buying into all the fear mongering and hate, and that includes believing that silly fiasco being passed off as a documentary about America in 2016 under Obama. Obama and Romney want the same thing for this country; they just have different ideas on how to get there. Romney wants to do it the same way the republicans have done it for years even though Republican ideas of tax breaks and deregulation have failed time and again and even had disastrous results during the last Republican (Bush/Cheney) administration. Obama wants to do things the way the Democrats have always done them because that way has been successful time and again… especially during the last Democratic (Clinton) administration.

Mormonism - also a little creeped out

[ In Reply To ..]
Actually his great-grandfather moved to Mexico to avoid the US anti-polygamy laws. Nothing strange about this apple-pie American guy.

He, meaning Romney, -

[ In Reply To ..]
Romeny himself didn't move to Mexico to avoid anti-polygamy laws. The mainstream Mormom church, of which he is a member, no longer practices polygamy. Also, Obama's grandfather or great (one of the two if not both) practiced polygamy in Kenya. His father had married his mother while having a wife in Kenya. I don't hold that against Obama. You shouldn't hold what other Mormons and relatives of Romney's do against Romney. Vote for the man who can fix our financial problems - Romney.

I found this article that sheds some light on....sm - VTMT

[ In Reply To ..]
the very early days of the Mormon church and Joseph Smith. It is titled "Why William and Jane Law left the LDS Church in 1844."

Do mormons..while they're being so....sm - JTBB

[ In Reply To ..]
"charitable and honest" ignore the lower 47% of the population cuz they're moochers? Do they just give to those who just make 1 mil a year as opposed to those who make 13 mil (those poor souls)?

BTW, representing "yesterday" in a society that is constantly changing and evolving really does us no good. People in this country (as opposed to say those in Afgan) like progress. Its called moving FORWARD.

Google Mormon savings rates--they're among the lowest. - Cannot afford to save after tithing, SM

[ In Reply To ..]
and they do sign up for assistance programs. This is most true for a lot young families these hard days, and of course their share of the poor.

I got the impression, from.... - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
....some source (which I honestly don't remember where right now), that a lot of the Romneys' donations to the Mormon Church go toward the immense expense of maintaining their facilities, internal programs for their members, and mission trips aimed at bringing in new members as opposed to the lesser amounts that go to actually helping the poor and needy without concern for conversion, the way Mother Teresa did.

Now, I'm just saying this was the impression I got....I haven't researched the actual numbers of where the donations go.

Estimates are that the Mormon church donates approximately - 2% of its income to charitable causes. nm

[ In Reply To ..]
.

Ouch; if true, that's.... - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
....awfully embarrassing!! I would be hesitant to call that very charitable, for a "church." :-(

LOL....sm - JTBB

[ In Reply To ..]
maybe they should keep their money instead of giving it to the church and then they wouldn't need assistance and be such "moochers."

Of course, tithings for them is an obligation. "He who is tithed shall not be burned at Christ's' 2nd coming." They are the only religion I can think of where you actually have to pay to be considered a good member.

Beg to differ. All churches that I know want you to tithe 10% - backwards typist

[ In Reply To ..]
of your income if you're a member. If you don't, you're kicked out. Happened to me when I was in my 20s and I'm not a Mormon.

I'm gonna call BS on that one. Prove it. - JTBB

[ In Reply To ..]
x

I think the Catholics wrote it into the - Bible to make sure

[ In Reply To ..]
everyone paid to get into heaven, but am not sure which part. I think now it is just recommended by a lot of churches, especially if you use some of the programs they offer, that you pay that much, but Mormons enforce it more and may kick you out if you don't pay up. After all, the Crystal Cathedral, Mormon Tabernacle and Vatican City didn't pay for themselves!

Methodists and Catholics do. It's in the Bible. - Aunt Sue (sm)

[ In Reply To ..]
Call it whatever you damn well please.

How the heck can I prove to YOU that I was kicked out of a church????? - backwards typist

[ In Reply To ..]
for not tithing my 10%? That's the most ridiculous thing you've ever posted. I don't keep records from the '70s or '80s. Do you?

LOL....you misunderstood...sm - JTBB

[ In Reply To ..]
you said "all churches I know want you to tithe 10%" or presumably get kicked out? That leads me to believe you think (at least) a lot of churches do kick folks out for tithing issues. That's where I'm looking for proof. I'm sure you can look online and find individuals who have run across this, but I find it hard to believe this would be wide spread thing.

Okay. i apologize. It's been a rough 24 hours-2 hours sleep. - backwards typist

[ In Reply To ..]
Better pack it in for today. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

LOL....you misunderstood...sm - JTBB - Misunderstanding is all yours

[ In Reply To ..]
.

Wow! May I ask what denomination it was? (sm) - Texan

[ In Reply To ..]
I was a member of a Methodist church and I never tithed and was never thrown out. I have never heard of such a thing - I'm not saying I don't believe it, I'm just saying I never heard it. That's terrible.

It does sound kind of harsh... - I think most churches

[ In Reply To ..]
figure if they pass the collection plate, sooner or later everyone will be shamed into paying something, even if it is just a couple of bucks.

Didn't have to attend church. They send tithing envelopes - backwards typist

[ In Reply To ..]
to member's homes.You were expected to put money in the envelope and return it every week.

Things may have changed. I don't know. After all, that was 40-some years ago.

It was an Evangelical, then Reformed, later United Church of Christ.. - backwards typist

[ In Reply To ..]
Don't know what it's called now. It was a very prestigious church in my town. I haven't been in a church since except for son's marriage and grandkids baptisms although at times, I miss the friendship a church can provide.

I have never heard of it either, baptized as - episcopalian and have SM

[ In Reply To ..]
gone to other denominations during the years. Never tithed, never kicked out.

Discussion of handling change competently and bravely - needs its own thread, JTBB. ? NM

[ In Reply To ..]
x

Here, I'll try and simple-ize it for you - Better than David Letterman

[ In Reply To ..]
1. No, they do not ignore the lower 47%. Mormons are charitable and honest. When my mom passed away she did not belong to any religion. I was living across the country. My sisters church did everything for us. They took care of us and helped us without anyone asking for their help. So the answer is they help "everyone".

BTW, the section you purposely distored I will go over for you:

"7. Represents an America of “yesterday”, where people believed in God, went to Church, didn’t screw around, worked hard, and became a SUCCESS!"

When my MIL talks about growing up, she talks about the "America of yesterday" where people believed in God, went to Church, didn't screw around, worked hard, and became a successful. She grew up in the 50s and she said it was a great time to grow up. Clean, where kids still had an innocense to them. Representing an "America of yesterday" does not mean moving backward. It means bringing back the goodness in America Even my MIL who is a die hard progressive, if you don't support Obama your a racist women always says she wishes it was the 50s again when life was good and clean. It doesn't mean moving backwards, it means moving forward but in a positive direction bringing back the goodness that we had of yesteryear. But then again, you already knew that.

Wanna try again?

I'm off for the weekend. Have a good one.

I like all the good things about.... - Cassie

[ In Reply To ..]
..."yesteryear," but when we wax poetic about those good old days, I think a lot of us forget that in those picture-perfect 1950s, while the "picture" may have been perfect, this was an era where women didn't have much choice besides staying with an abusive or alcoholic husband because she had never worked outside the home and had 5 or 6 kids to raise, victims of child molestation were often not believed (IF they had the courage to even tell someone, that is), and priests were considered God's representative here on earth (who could do absolutely no wrong, and we all know where that kind of thinking could lead). Yes, there were some beautiful, simpler things about the 1950s; but let's not forget that a lot of the children who were born and raised in those picture-perfect families ended up being the generation that got into lots of irresponsible sexual activity and drug abuse. It seems like they must've been escaping from SOMETHING.....just not their Father Knows Best societies, eh?

I'm a believer that every time and era has been filled with good and bad, and it's too easy to look back and remember only the good. Some day, we'll probably look back at THESE days and reminisce about the best of times. Heck, if we didn't live in THESE times, I wouldn't be able to Skype and visit with my grandson who lives 12 hours away. :-)

And we have a winner - you too have missed the point - go figure

[ In Reply To ..]
The article was not talking about alcoholic husbands, child molestations, drug abuse etc. Each time a liberal tries to argue and twist what was written into something its not, it never looks good for the libs.

Wherever you got not being able to Skype??? The article never said anything of that sort.

But then again you know that too.

C'mon libs, at least try and act like you know what you're talking about.

Hmmmm; not sure, but maybe... - Cassie

[ In Reply To ..]
....you missed the point, too(?). I wasn't addressing any "article" in my post....at least not that I know of or intended to (LOL). I'm not even sure which article you're talking about, but, no matter--I was only trying to say that when we think those good old days of yesteryear (the 1950s, etc.) were perfect, they may not have always been so perfect as our memories recall.

My reference to Skyping was just to say that these "imperfect" times of ours have brought about their own good things. My mom almost NEVER got to see her grandchildren who lived across the country from her. I wasn't referencing any article, at all.

Sorry, I may not understand just what you're taking me to task about; but I actually DO know what I'm talking about as far as remembering what things were like in the 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s.....well, you get the idea. :-)

That's what I'm talkin about...sm - JTBB

[ In Reply To ..]
Dinner on the table by 5 pm or else, back ally abortions, disowned if you did the "right thing" and kept the kid, kids getting spanked with wooden planks at school, half wages for those husbandless harlots who did work, go to church or be a society outcast....yep..those were the days. A regular Leave It to Beaver utopia :D

It may seem like the "good ol days" but in - reality it was anything SM

[ In Reply To ..]
but for women and minorities. It was a white man's world and we just got to live in it. A lot of bad things went on behind closed doors and now those things are out in the open. As ugly as it is, it was same then, just hidden. IMO

Gosh, this list almost.... - Cassie

[ In Reply To ..]
....makes him sound TOO perfect, to be honest with you!! It's a prejudice, I admit, but I have a healthy distrust of people who are toooooo perfect.

As for #4, "Can’t speak in a fake, southern, “black preacher voice” when necessary," -- maybe not, but he sure TRIED to fit in with his "Who, who, who....who let the dogs out?" riff, when he was trying to pal around with a bunch of African American kids that time. And he also tried to show that he was "just one of them" when he was sitting down with a group of out-of-work folks and spouted that "I'm unemployed, too." Heh, heh, heh....real funny, Mitt!!

My point is that, in case you haven't noticed, it's a POLITICIAN thing to try to "connect" with your audience. The difference I see is that Obama actually can do it--Mitt seems to be buffoonish when he tries to do it.

Mormons ARE encouraged to consider themselves - superior to others, too perfect or not. :) NM

[ In Reply To ..]
x

It is something that more people don't like him - and he will most likely lose.

[ In Reply To ..]
He probably should have stuck to his guns as a more moderate pub than veering so hard to the right. Now he just seems like a scary flip-flopper who will basically say and do anything he thinks will get him elected.

I agree with you, but.... - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
....in the current Republican climate with the frenzy of tea-partiers, he likely would not have even BECOME the nominee if he HAD stuck to his guns as the more moderate Republican he used to be. I agree with a talking head I heard earlier today, saying that if Romney loses, there will likely be a sort of "civil war" in their party between the far right and the moderates between Nov. 6th and the next election cycle.

With regard to #4, it's not really fair to (sm) - Texan

[ In Reply To ..]
diss Romney just because he can't speak Choom. Obama can talk down to people at will, can even speak different dialects. Sometimes I think he's not sure who he is, he gets so caught up in the lies. The only thing he can't do is talk UP to people. He's as high as he can get on that pedestal now. If he went any higher, he would be wearing a halo.

What America of yesterday? Which yesterday? - Fanatical Hypocrite

[ In Reply To ..]
The revolution where we were fighting and dying in the streets? The time after that where we made it illegal to speak ill of the government through the Alien and Sedition Acts. The War of 1812 when we decided to annex Canada for wood and they burned our capital? The intervening years of slavery? The Civil War where American killed American in the bloodiest war of our history and eventually assassinated the man responsible for ending it? The Trail of Tears? The Wild West? World War I? Prohibition? The Depression? World War II? Korea? Segregation? Vietnam? The Nixon administration? The red scare, Cuban Missile Crisis and Cold War with a Russia that never really existed outside our own nightmares (while they fought their own Cold War with an America that didn't exist either)? The era of widespread southern violence against de-segregation? The Carter financial crash and Iranian hostage situation? Reagan's administration that oversaw the beginnings of Wall Street's rise to power and the fundamental destruction of our nation's financial safeguards because of Washingtonian corruption and widespread lobbying? The Clinton administration which saw us at war with Serbia for no apparent reason, bombing an aspirin factory because we thought it was something else and the further decay of our laws? I'm assuming people remember the last 12 years.

I love America, but America has never been perfect - the human condition, perhaps? Everyone keeps talking about the days where we were all paragons of morality and hard work. Those days never existed. I thought that way about the 1990's. Do you know why? I was a kid. I was care free. The whole world was at peace and I knew I was safe and loved. People I've talked to who are older than me tell me they didn't remember the 90's as being such a paradise, now forever adrift in a past only me and my generation remember (at least the other privileged middle class suburbanites of my generation).

Conservatives look back on the 1950's and the baby boomers as the real America. We just beat the Nazis and everything was perfect. Being predominantly white helps maintain that viewpoint. Meanwhile, liberals look ahead to a future where all the world's problems have been solved by hugs.

So, what was the perfect time in America? Was it a decade or a year or a month or a day? For some brief moment in time was everyone who worked hard and treated their fellow man with respect universally rewarded for their behavior? Or like me was your paradise an illusion because you were still too small, too ignorant and too sheltered to see the truth. It disrespects all the previous generations to gloss over the hardships they endured and disrespects all the future generations to forget the sins of our past.

Similar Messages:

Sep 22, 2012
....takes the advice of a failed VP candidate (and I would submit that her ticket failed because she was on it), I would have even less respect for his judgment!! ...

Sep 08, 2012
and his offshore accounts. Too bad the democrats didn't mention Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, Valerie Jarrett and Princess Pelosi when they were talking about that evil sort of behavior. I guess it is okay for them to have offshore accounts but let's tar and feather Mitt Romney. ...

Sep 17, 2012
Think about this when you hear in the news today about Gov. Romney attacking Obama about China. There's a word for what Romney's doing: It's called "projecting". God bless. ...

Nov 13, 2015
GOP chatter this morning is that they are very nervous about their chances in the general, especially if either Trump or Carson is the nominee, and draft Mitt might be the answer. ...

Jan 24, 2014
http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/17/22343692-mitt-gets-real-documentary-shows-another-side-of-romney?lite Too bad Mitt did show who he really was, although he did during the first debate. Mitt was awesome and made Obama look like a fool. ...

Mar 26, 2015
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHCFqjxpuPY ...

Aug 28, 2012
Note that within the list are clickable links for further documentation. ...

Sep 22, 2012
Sounds to me like the audience likes his plans. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipnUoe47u64&feature=player_detailpage ...

Oct 08, 2012
His positions cannot be made more clear? ...

Jan 19, 2013
So many of you argued that Romney had no foreign policy experience or even knew anything about the rest of the world but he was right again! So, when do you think Obama will send troops into Africa? Wanna bet it will be soon? Because if he doesn't help France more than what he's doing now, you can bet your bottom dollar that another ally will bite the dust. Note the date on the below article: Mali Responds To Mitt Romney by Matt Taylor October 31st, 2012&nbs ...

Jul 03, 2014
While Obama beat Romney by 4 percentage points, voters say a do-over in the 2012 election wouldn't be a bad thing. "Would Mitt (Romney) have been a better fit? More voters in hindsight say yes," Malloy said. Overall, 45 percent of voters say America would be better off if the White House went to the Republicans in 2012, compared to 38 percent who said we'd be worse off. And because it's World UFO Day, a 2012 survey indicated 65 percent of Americans think Barack Obama would be b ...

Sep 21, 2012
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/21/david-twede-mitt-romney_n_1903226.html So much for the mormon church staying out of politics. ...

Oct 18, 2012
In spite of Governor Romney's mistake in thinking automatic weapons are illegal in the U.S., I was more interested in a more rambling answer about single mothers. I surmise that his completely unstated mental link seemed to be single mothers = poverty = violence. There is one, of course. For POOR single mothers. At least for those of the subgroup of the subgroup of that subgroup who aren't surrounded with good supportive families but are rather living all alone in poverty and are livin ...

Mar 18, 2014
This is what happens when you elect an inexperienced idealogue, a community organizer, to lead the country. Hope this is a lesson to people, though it's too late for the near future. Hopefully all this can be repaired, but it won't be done overnight. Link ...

Jun 11, 2016
"Donald Trump has shown an extraordinary ability to understand how our economy works,” Romney said, citing Trump’s record as a job creator. And, he concluded, “it means a great deal to me to have the endorsement of Mr. Trump." Romney's father pulled a similar weird stunt on Barry Goldwater. Maybe the insanity is inherited. ...

Sep 21, 2012
Makeup when you spoke to the Latinos on Univision the other day. What's next, the NAACP in blackface? ...

Apr 22, 2012
Last night I dreamt that Mitt (Mr. Etch-a-Sketch) was trying to "make time" with me. I got so po'd that I smacked him with my fist. He thought I would be flattered by the attention he was paying me so I would vote for him. (No, he does not relate well to middle-class women, obviously, not in real life or in dreams). I sure I hope I make it to 2013! The last election cycle I had a recurring dream that Sarah Palin and I were driving around. She was driving ...

Sep 18, 2012
Those of us with intelligence know that you were speaking about not getting votes from the freeloaders. We know exactly what you meant, and every word was true. If you start apologizing, you remind me of the Apologizer-in-Chief who is an embarrassment. You said what you meant, don't apologize for it. ...

Sep 27, 2012
http://youtu.be/b0K1U0FcDPs ...

Oct 30, 2012
Over the last two years, Congressional Republicans have forced a 43 percent reduction in the primary FEMA grants that pay for disaster preparedness. Representatives Paul Ryan, Eric Cantor and other House Republicans have repeatedly tried to refuse FEMA’s budget requests when disasters are more expensive than predicted, or have demanded that other valuable programs be cut to pay for them. The Ryan budget, which Mr. Romney praised as “an excellent piece of work,” would result in severe cutba ...

May 21, 2015
xx ...

Jul 27, 2012
to the Cayman Islands! ...

Aug 16, 2012
He’d have us believe that underneath his cool, calm, and collected manner, President Obama is a bitter, divisive, hateful man, bursting at the seams with anger, a desperate attack dog, full of animosity, and willing to say anything to get elected….the underlying tone being he is not at all what he appears to be. Meanwhile, the President was stumping in Iowa, complimenting (not criticizing) the locals on the joys of their fairgrounds junk food fare, joking around with his wife ...

Sep 03, 2012
...

Nov 06, 2012
Who's it gonna be? ...

Dec 10, 2016
many of you voted for Trump is because you said he wouldn't owe any favors to anyone. Well folks, six of his new appointees contributed 12 million dollars to his campaign. So much for his self-funding. If Jack the Ripper were alive and had been able to contribute a million he probably would have appointed him to head Health and Human Services. ...

Apr 15, 2012
Naturally, this breaks down along the lines of socioeconomic class, i.e. wealthy moms vs welfare moms. Here we have a CSPAN video from January 2012 where Romney is touting what sounds like his plan for privatizing unemployment. This is a scheme where folks would contribute money while they are working to an "unemployment account," thus eliminating the current requirement for employers to do so and transferring that MANDATE onto workers, in addition to tax and SS payche ...

Oct 16, 2012
K-O for the president. ...

Oct 27, 2012
Mitt told a crowd in Ohio that Jeep is going to close down its US plants and move them to China. The benovalent Romney said after he is elected he will do everything in his power to keep those jobs here (unlike Sensata which he has refused to help). Even after he was told his statement was false, Romney repeated it in another city. The thing is, Jeep has no intentions to close American production. The company put out this response to Romney shortly after news ...

Oct 27, 2010
The verdict is out on flu shots. Many medical experts now agree it is more important to protect yourself and your family from the flu vaccine than the flu itself. Let’s take a look at the reasons behind this verdict: 1.) There is a total lack of real evidence that young children even benefit from flu shots. A systematic review of 51 studies involving 260,000 children age 6 to 23 months found no evidence that the flu vaccine is any more effective than a placebo. Also the shots are on ...