A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

Syria crisis a Chess game. Putin sends warships


Posted: Sep 2, 2013

Putin sending warships to the Mediterranean. 

  http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/02/syria-russia-spy-ship-us-military

http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Amid-Syria-tensions-Russia-sends-more-warships-to-Mediterranean-324638

Putin says Obama Administration is like a Monkey with a hand grenade. 

http://godfatherpolitics.com/12310/like-monkey-hand-grenade-u-s-policy-mideast/

“He who talks a lot doesn’t act,” said Souad, a Damascus resident, mocking US President Barack Obama as a “coward” for delaying a decision to attack the Syrian regime.

“Obama is a coward. He didn’t strike because he knows that our President Bashar (al-Assad) is all-powerful,” said the employee of nationality electricity firm Ferdaws, in the northeast of the capital.

In the wealthy neighbourhood people went about their business without seeming too worried about the thuds from intermittent shelling of rebel positions outside the city centre.


Maariv quoted an unnamed diplomatic source in Jerusalem Sunday who bluntly called US President Barack Obama a "coward" for stepping back from an attack on Syria.


http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/09/01/syrians-mock-obama-the-coward/

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/171509#.UiSgsj_TcUM

UNITED STATES DEGADED MILITARY HAS NO MONEY LEFT TO STRIKE SYRIA.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/inhofe-US-obama-troops/2013/08/30/id/523224

“As a result of the President’s historic cuts to our defense budget, our military forces are at decreased readiness levels – so much so that General Dempsey said we are putting the military on a path where the ‘force is so degraded and so unready’ that it would be ‘immoral to use the force.’
“As a superpower we have a responsibility to follow through on our commitments and ensure the security of our allies and partners – as the President pointed out – but at the same time our President has decimated our military which is tasked to fulfill those responsibilities

http://newsok.com/article/3878231?prevArticle=1

With Barack Obama's Rose Garden statement on Saturday, the Israeli website Marriv is reporting that an unnamed diplomat official in Jerusalem bluntly called Barack Obama a "coward" for stepping back from an attack on Syria. Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/09/israeli-official-calls-barack-obama-coward/#ixzz2dkH9XmtW
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/09/israeli-official-calls-barack-obama-coward/#tLdrKy4vZoBXwwlT.99
With Barack Obama's Rose Garden statement on Saturday, the Israeli website Marriv is reporting that an unnamed diplomat official in Jerusalem bluntly called Barack Obama a "coward" for stepping back from an attack on Syria. Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/09/israeli-official-calls-barack-obama-coward/#ixzz2dkH9XmtW
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/09/israeli-official-calls-barack-obama-coward/#tLdrKy4vZoBXwwlT.99
With Barack Obama's Rose Garden statement on Saturday, the Israeli website Marriv is reporting that an unnamed diplomat official in Jerusalem bluntly called Barack Obama a "coward" for stepping back from an attack on Syria. Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/09/israeli-official-calls-barack-obama-coward/#ixzz2dkH9XmtW
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/09/israeli-official-calls-barack-obama-coward/#tLdrKy4vZoBXwwlT.99
With Barack Obama's Rose Garden statement on Saturday, the Israeli website Marriv is reporting that an unnamed diplomat official in Jerusalem bluntly called Barack Obama a "coward" for stepping back from an attack on Syria. Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/09/israeli-official-calls-barack-obama-coward/#ixzz2dkH9XmtW
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/09/israeli-official-calls-barack-obama-coward/#tLdrKy4vZoBXwwlT.99
;

Oh goodie, leaders of nations resort to - name-calling and taunting.

[ In Reply To ..]
I honestly don't know what the right thing to do is in this situation. I don't have all the information and I probably never will.

What I do know is that these taunts and name-callings from other countries are hardly important. They're meant to inflame and create more conflict. Our goal should always be to promote peace and civility in the world. If other leaders are taunting us for not taking immediate action, that says more about them than us. I prefer we take a more thoughtful approach.

I don't want the US to do anything hastily. I would not feel good about that.

These people can keep talking--it should not phase us.

Obama rhetoric of drawing the line caused himself - to be boxed in about Syria.

[ In Reply To ..]
http://www.vice.com/read/ride-lines-in-syria-obamas-trapped-by-his-own-rhetoric

But reality has trumped invention, and Obama is trapped by his own rhetoric. On at least five separate occasions, he has warned that if the autocratic Syrian government crossed a “red line” by going chemical against rebel forces, America would be compelled to act for moral reasons. Obama: “I have made clear that the use of chemical weapons is a game changer.” Obama: “As president of the United States, I don’t bluff.”

Nonsense. None of these words are reasons for - anything. Big, big geoeconopolitical

[ In Reply To ..]
factors are. Go read about those. It's guaranteed to make one less impressed with silly noise.

Well, I feel it's right for us to do something. - But not hastily, and not

[ In Reply To ..]
necessarily a military strike. Do we have other options? I'd prefer another option, such as humanitarian aid or--am I crazy? An arrest of Assad for war crimes.

I really am ignorant about the whole thing, I just would like to know what our other options are. I could care less about red lines drawn, blah blah blah. I care about what decisions we make, and that's it.
Basically with you. Obama's "red line" was a decision, - though, an attempt to deter gassing
[ In Reply To ..]
of its own people by the Syrian government.

There are a lot of little nations in that area, 5 of which share borders directly with Syria. Use of gas is a significant concern to all of them, particularly Turkey and Jordan, whose borders have already been violated by Syria's attacks on refugees, but Syria is too powerful for them to take on without the whole region dissolving into full-out war. Israel is one of them, of course.

I'm willing to trust Obama's decisions on this because he has a very well-earned reputation for reluctance to use military force and a desire to get our soldiers out of the Middle East as soon as possible. His drone strikes have diminished terrorist threats substantially, but he knew all along that those would also build fear and hate for us in those nations and that those need to be stopped as soon as he can also.

No warmonger here. If we strike Syria, it'll be because he feels we can't afford not to.

Bush's right wing neocons were eager to invade the Middle East, but they're not in the White House now and it's very different now.
Did you hear Charlie Rangel say we need to reinstate draft? - (msg)
[ In Reply To ..]
That oughta solve the problem, ya think? Maybe they can figure out how to stop WWIII that is coming.
He's been saying that since 9/11. Nothing new and - has nothing to do with
[ In Reply To ..]
Syria or wingers' WWIII fear mongering. He sees it as a "great equalizer" that will insure that privileged kids would have to serve alongside the poor ones. He wants conscription to be universal and to include women, so that future generations would all have a PERSONAL stake in waging war as parents and grandparents, sons and daughters, brothers and sisters, friend and neighbors. I'd be willing to bet even HE has lost count of how many times he has introduced such bills over the years. After all this time, it's nothing more than a symbolic gesture that he knows has no chance of passing, kinda like House pubs and their 40-something attempts to repeal Obamacare.

This reality check would tend to relegate your rhetorical question to the moot point pile.

US opponents: "I double-dog-dare ya." - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
This is exactly the kind of rhetoric that is designed to successfully provoke GOP hawks into action.

True, but we have no money. Our Military is - degraded because no money.

[ In Reply To ..]
The polls showed that most of the United States people didn't care about foreign policy. Obama and his administration basically suck when it comes to foreign policy and I will never forget the Benghazi attack. Don't forget, Anniversary of 9/11 is coming. I have NEVER in my life felt so ashamed and not proud and want my country back. I am shocked we have not had our own civil war.

I am shocked anyone would think of a civil war - here.

[ In Reply To ..]
I find the idea of a civil war here to be completely off-base and inappropriate. Look at what other countries are going through. We have it so much better. I'm grateful to live in the US, and I love my country, even the people who I don't agree with. I think anyone who believes we are on the brink of a civil war is way off-base.
It would be the people against the government. - Most Americans do not want strike.
[ In Reply To ..]
I do not know of any American from what I am reading or talking to who want to strike Syria. This is from the Liberal side.
DHS shrinking military and making domestic military - and it is unconstitutional.
[ In Reply To ..]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJiQkKoIeFw

When Obamacare is implemented, there will be forced home inspections.
there will be no forced home inspections - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/homeinspections.asp
Good job. Another fabricated alarmist urban myth - bites the dust. nm
[ In Reply To ..]
If only. :) Someone who believes this will believe - anything that pleases. Literally. nm
[ In Reply To ..]
x
You know one now. Liberal to the bone, strongly opposed to war - but
[ In Reply To ..]
even more opposed to the deaths, injuries, displacement, magnitude of suffering, human rights violations, war crimes and genocidal chemical weapons attacks at the hands of this monster.

I lived in Syria for 2 years during Hafez Assad's brutal reign of terror. I have family and friends there. I do not know if they are alive or dead, or if they have become refugees. The lovely mountain village where I stayed has been decimated and looks like a ghost town. The once peaceful residents there are now all armed to the teeth. Not surprisingly, like so many other regions, it has become an FSA rebel stronghold, which explains why periodically army tanks run through destroying the houses and crops. Electricity is frequently interrupted for hours or even days at a time. A generation of kids has lost its childhood. Only 3 schools remain open on days they have utility services. This has been going on for more than two years.

The chemical weapons attacks are THE last straw. Military intervention is long, long overdue. This is way beyond the political realm. For anyone with loved ones there, it boils down to the most basic moral concepts of right and wrong, and good versus evil.

So much to my dismay, I find myself being strongly supportive of John (The Hawk) McCain's position. I want to see more than just a punitive strike, though I'd settle for that if nothing else. I want to see the US go in there and TAKE ASSAD OUT, either with or without congressional approval or help from our allies.
.
This is the way it is when it's truly REAL to someone. - I hope your friends and family make it through, an
[ In Reply To ..]
that something we do does help them substantially.
Liberals are against war and aggression, not the government. - only extremists resort to
[ In Reply To ..]
threatening and fantasizing about a civil war of people v government.

Only a deluded TP mind would believe that liberals would ever join the the TP conservative cause of extremism/civil uprising against the government.

Is this what is circulating around the RW "Kooler"?
Liberals are not against war - They are voting for it
[ In Reply To ..]
Since you are not aware of that.
I was posting in response to "most Americans do not want strike." - as in nonelected officialsNM
[ In Reply To ..]
Maybe you didn't follow the thread, but I wasn't referring to members of Congress. I was responding to polls showing Americans are against the strike, and most of them on the "Liberal side."
How does that equate to a civil war? - nm
[ In Reply To ..]
.

our military is not degraded - thanks for your support

[ In Reply To ..]
How do you know Military is not degraded? - Not ready?
[ In Reply To ..]
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/inhofe-US-obama-troops/2013/08/30/id/523224
Am I the only one who feels our military - spending has been wreckless
[ In Reply To ..]
and bloated and desperately needed to be reigned in?

For example, ask produce brokers who their dream clients are--the military, because they pay twice as much for product as anyone else. There is no bargain shopping in the military. They pay sticker price, which is always jacked up because everyone knows the military will pay it.
Warships in the Mediterranean loaded for bear with missiles - poised for attack,
[ In Reply To ..]
ordered to move in closer by military commanders and currently in a holding pattern would indicate the military has been, is and will be ready for THIS strike if and when the order comes.
Ok. We strike. You think this will be all over? - Look out for WW3.
[ In Reply To ..]
Last night I listened to a bunch of University students who are getting bugout bags ready and deciding where would be a good place to go, like a cabin in case Russia and other countries have war against USA.

Is Russia ready to strike too?
I've posted this link before - and many on here said
[ In Reply To ..]
said it was RW conspiracy nonsense. Now it all seems to be coming to pass just like these guys said it would. BTW I am an O supporter and liberal, but it really makes me think.

http://stormcloudsgathering.com/the-road-to-world-war-3
Linked site reminds me of science fiction comics I read - in 3rd grade.
[ In Reply To ..]
In the words of Vladimir Putin, utter nonsense.
Remember when O was elected and we talked - about sheepel and FEMA camps.
[ In Reply To ..]
Here are some locations of FEMA camps near you.

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/find-the-fema-camp-nearest-you_062013

If this is what you believe, what are you doing sitting - around chatting about it? Shouldn't
[ In Reply To ..]
you be sneaking from bush to bush, making your way to some border?
I never knew about this post. This video shows - a marine talk about O the puppet.
[ In Reply To ..]
http://general.mtstars.com/359872.html

This is about the banks who are powerful. Sounds like mafia going on in our own government. I am not sure about 9/11 though in this video.
The guys with the freak-out bags - are beyond help.
[ In Reply To ..]

 


As for Russia's readiness to "strike" (I presume you mean the US), you be the judge.  As posted earlier, the US is #1 in global military power.  It's closest contender is Russia at #2.  If you go to this link, you can see a side-by-side comparison of just how close #2 is.  Needless to say, given the hard data, Putin would be a fool to try.  

The best the blustering Bolshevik can muster is a spy ship he's sending to "protect national interests" of Russia in the case of a US strike, since they have a permanent naval base in Tartous, Syria on the Mediterranean they have a right to secure.  Also, the ships the media are reporting today are being sent part of a long-planned rotation that are to relieve some old tugs they routinely keep stationed in the Mediterranean.  

 


As for Russia's readiness to "strike" (I presume you mean the US), you be the judge.  As posted earlier, the US is #1 in global military power.  It's closest contender is Russia at #2.  If you go to the link, you can see for yourself a side-by-side comparison of just how close #2 is.  Needless to say, given the hard data, Putin would be a fool to try.  


The best the blustering Bolshevik can muster is a spy ship he's sending to "protect national interests" of Russia in the case of a US strike, since they have a permanent naval base in Tartous, Syria on the Mediterranean they have a right to secure.  Also, the ships the media are reporting on today are being sent as part of a long-planned rotation to relieve some old tugs they routinely keep stationed in the Mediterranean.  


 


http://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-comparison-detail.asp?form=form&country1=United-States-of-America&country2=Russia&Submit=Compare+Countries

Umm, the US military power is #1 in the world. - That is indisputable fact. nm

[ In Reply To ..]

Degraded, the viewpoint you express has little - relation to reality. It is a direct

[ In Reply To ..]
result of the peculiar sources you go to for information. You say you're shocked we haven't dissolved into civil war. Most would find the very notion bizarre, and shocking that you think others would be willing join you in destroying what we have. Actually, most of us believe we still have much to be proud of and to preserve.

As for "YOUR country BACK"? Of all the nerve. Our nation is the same nation it always has been, and your share is the same as it always was, approximately 1/300,000,000th.

If you've just woken up (or not) to the fact that hundreds of millions of Democrats, moderates and minorities are also American citizens and that the wealthy conservatives you trusted have been cheating you into the poorhouse--oh, well.

The 12 years of public education we all get are supposed to be built on through the years by by our experiences and other means of continued learning. High school graduation is never meant to be the brief high point of a person's intellectual development.
Love this post. - nm
[ In Reply To ..]

What do you mean by "I want my country back"? - NM

[ In Reply To ..]
x

and you promote it - good job

[ In Reply To ..]

Sequester was GOPs baby. - Lest we forget. nm

[ In Reply To ..]

We do not have the funds. - Go more in debt?

[ In Reply To ..]
We are already in debt.

How can funds be unspent for preps that are - already in place? nm

[ In Reply To ..]
nm
The aftermath after strike. - Besides, most Americans
[ In Reply To ..]
Do not want the strike to take place. I live in one of the most heavily Democratic states and most polls at the news stations in my city DO NOT want a strike at all and if Obama goes through with it, they would have no respect for him. Polls on Facebook even state not only NO to a strike, but HELL NO to a strike and fear Obama is narcissistic that he would go through with the strike.
In matters of foreign policy, I always consult - Facebook first
[ In Reply To ..]
and rely on local polls for guidance second.

How many respondents could locate Syria on an unmarked map of the Middle East? Could they name Syria's president? It's capitol? Describe the immediate effects of sarin gas exposure on human beings? Count to 1,429? Know how many square feet it takes to lay 425 children's corpses out shoulder-to-shoulder on a wet dirty marble floor or how many miles 100,000 dead men, women and children would span when arranged head-to-toe-to-head-to-toe? Imagine what the exodus of 7 million refugees looks like? Name the top 20 different torture methods used by the Syrian army on detained protesters, POWs and defectors?
Over 65,000 just on 1 post, mostly stating they - are liberals and not wanting strike,
[ In Reply To ..]
And there are plenty of other posts from news media with Americans not wanting Obama to strike Syria, then yes I do believe United States could have a civil war, people against the government.
How does one get from liberals opposing war/violence to a civil uprising - against the gov?
[ In Reply To ..]
By definition, liberals are going to oppose war, striking other countries, any aggression, etc.

To find that a majority of liberals oppose Obama's proposition to strike Syria is not a reflection on disagreeing with Obama per se, but in opposition to the basic premise of war and aggression as a solution.

Liberals do understand the rationale behind aggression and punitive strikes, especially when innocent people are being targeted inhumanely, as in the case of Syria. But aggression as a solution is not a liberal principle.

They certainly will not to go the extreme of waging or supporting some kind of civil war against the government. That kind of supposition might come from a TP conservative mindset, and I doubt any liberal would appreciate a conservative projecting the ridiculous notion of civil war against the government as an option a liberal would consider.
you have to pass through the valley of darkness - nm
[ In Reply To ..]

No, hun. The sequester was Obama's idea. - nm

[ In Reply To ..]
Lest we forget.

Sequester was first introduced by Jack Kingston R-GA - in 2010,

[ In Reply To ..]

Hun.  Go here to read more.


http://www.politicususa.com/2013/02/27/republican-jack-kingston-introduced-sequestration-gop-reform-2010.html


or here:


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704700204575642702239206256.html


or here for the full 18-page text.  You'd probably enjoy this the most since it has so many pretty colored pie charts and flow charts:


http://ww1.politicususa.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/1kingston.pdf


Then there was John Boehner's 2011 sequester Power Point presentation found here:


http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2013/02/20/sequester_powerpoint_in_2011_john_boehner_was_touting_the_sequester.html


Paul Ryan''s been a member of the sequester fan club since 2004:


http://www.politicususa.com/2013/02/24/paul-ryan-fought-sequester-2004-bragged-2011-likey-anymore.html


You can run, but you can't hide.  


 

Sen. Johanns: Democrats Marching Toward - Second Sequester
[ In Reply To ..]
http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/johanns-democrats-second-sequester/2013/08/14/id/520375

In an op-ed piece for The Wall Street Journal, the Nebraska Republican wrote Tuesday that the "Democratic-controlled Senate Appropriations Committee is spending $91 billion above and beyond levels agreed to in the Budget Control Act of 2011."

"This irresponsible behavior," he added, "sends us careening toward a new round of sequester cuts and fails to fulfill our obligation to responsibly allocate taxpayer dollars, opting instead to keep spending beyond our means."

"The responsible way for Senate Democrats to avoid another sequester," he wrote, would be to "make the tough spending choices as each appropriations bill works through the committee.

"Instead, they have taken the easy way out and put us on a path toward another round of the very cuts the president spent much of this year railing against," he added.

If it happens, the Obama administration will surely complain again, Johanns continued. "And when they do, they'll know just who to blame. The Senate Democrats will own the next sequester."
OK. GOP owns 1st real sequester, dems MIGHT own the hypothetical one - Johanns is speculating about.
[ In Reply To ..]
Got it !

Why do you always call people "Hun"? It's insulting, condescending, and - inappropriate

[ In Reply To ..]
Lest we forget our manners and civility.

And you are incorrect to boot.

Now let's see here. Putin is clueless about - democratic process

[ In Reply To ..]
and therefore cannot grok the concept of seeking approval from elected representatives. Residents from the NE districts of Damascus where all the chemical weapons attacks happened (one of whom is obviously an ardent supporter of the Butcher) are understandably disappointed. Wealthy Syrians whose neighborhoods have been spared the wrath of Syria's military feel invincible. Senator Inhofe (conspicuously unnamed in the citation, but sourced in the link), the guy who demanded INCREASES in the DOD budget during sequestration which he voted against when he didn't get them, is weighing in before the debate has even begun. Another blaring omission in this selective presentation is Inhofe's closing conditional statement of support:

"I would consider strong decisive action but only if it supports a comprehensive strategy for Syria and the Middle East, if it is not open-ended, and if the President funds such a contingency operation after proper consultation with Congress. I look forward to the Syria debate before Congress, and I hope my colleagues will join me in holding our Commander-in-chief accountable to presenting America with long-term strategy."

Somehow these comments do not seem to merit the sea of red ink you've put on display here.

I say let Russia take the lead and strike first. - nm

[ In Reply To ..]
xx

? Russia is Syria's ally. They aren't going - to strike.

[ In Reply To ..]
The warship they sent is for gathering intelligence.

Similar Messages:


Obama Claims Putin War In Syria Is A Sign Of WeaknessOct 09, 2015
President tells CBS's Steve Kroft in interview previewed on-air Friday that Russian President Vladimir Putin's moves into Syria are out of weakness, not strength US has abandoned $500 million to train and arm rebels fighting to remove Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad from power 'He's moved troops into Syria, for one. He's got people on the ground,' Kroft said. 'Two, the Russians are conducting military operations in the Middle East for the first time s ...

Syria Reports Israel Attacks A Target In SyriaJan 30, 2013
Report: Israel attacks target in Syria January 30, 2013 JERUSALEM (JTA) -- Israel reportedly attacked a target inside Syria. The report of the attack on a site near the Syrian border with Lebanon came Wednesday afternoon, hours after reports came out of Lebanon that Israel had flown several sorties over its territory on Tuesday night and early Wednesday morning. Unnamed sources, including one identified as a Western diplomat, told Reuters that it was unknown what was hit inside Syria an ...

The US Is Deploying Warships To The Black Sea...smJan 20, 2014
to standby in case of the need for emergency evacuation of Americans during the games in Sochi.  Transport aircraft will be located in close proximity.  It is also all over the news that the "black widow" might aready have broken the security perimeter and the Russians are searching for her.  These are the same people that orchestrated the Boston bombing. ...

Pentagon Sends Troops To Jordan.Oct 10, 2012
nm ...

Trump Sends Private Jet To Help Sick Child.Aug 15, 2015
nm ...

Obama Sends Mexico $75 Million To Build WallSep 17, 2016
Turns out Barack Obama isn’t all that against building a border wall to keep out illegals after all. Thing is, he wants illegals to enter America, he’s just not okay with them entering Mexico. Looks like the U.S. is giving our neighbors to the south $75 million so they can build their own wall to protect themselves from Central American invaders. One of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s talking points in his campaign has that he wants to protect our borders. He wan ...

UN Sends A Strong Message To U.S. About The State Of Its Indigenous PeopleJan 22, 2010
UN sends a strong message to U.S. about the state of its indigenous peopleUnited Nations, United States, Violence Against Women | Posted by: Angela Chang, January 21, 2010 at 3:23 PMThe United Nation’s first report on The State of the World’s Indigenous Peoples, released on January 14, 2010, contains figures and an assessment that are both shocking and illuminating, even to those who are familiar with indigenous rights issues. The report evaluates the state of indigenous populations ...

Rhode Island Approves Gay Marriage Bill, Sends To HouseJan 22, 2013
With a unanimous vote, no less.   Thus far, 9 states have legalized gay marriage. ...

Obama Sends Special Forces Troops To Russian BorderJan 04, 2017
as NATO is poised to strike back against Putin's "aggression." It's a little late to put your big boy pants on, Obozo. ...

White House Sends Iran Deal Warning To Senate. SmMar 15, 2015
In an effort to reassert control over the domestic political debate surrounding sensitive negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program, the White House penned a letter Saturday night warning senators to hold back on legislation that would detract from the president’s ability to affect and approve a final agreement with Iran.   ...

Supreme Court Sends Redistricting Law Back To South Carolina. SmApr 20, 2015
A big victory for voting rights and against gerrymandering of voting districts! ...

Going To Intervene In Syria Next? The GovMar 25, 2011
oh what a tangled web we weave.... ...

So, Of Course, They Want To Attack SyriaNov 16, 2015
    All of the attackers have been identified as European Union nationals.  Egyptian passport belonged to victim.  Syrian passport---a plant? ...

Our Stupid Self-inflicted CrisisJul 25, 2011
New York (CNN) -- Let me get this straight. The people who have been preaching the most about the dangers of American decline are right now helping to hasten American decline. Because if America defaults on its debt, not only will we find ourselves in a far deeper fiscal hole, but the full faith and credit of the United States will be compromised. In our globalized era, that means America will be considered an unpredictable partner and a second-class power. Worst of all, this will be a s ...

A Flat Tire Is Not A CrisisApr 23, 2013
It's 100 bucks to get a tire put on.  This is not a crisis.  Although it feels like it, when you're dealing with someone who wants to repair a tire, well we'll use this old one, etc.  No, just let's get a frickin' new tire and be done with it. ...

President Speaking Now On SyriaAug 30, 2013
The unclassified report shows the chemical weapons were used by Assad. He has not made a final decision. He is not  considering any open-ended or military action that involves boots-on-the-ground but will be a limited, narrow act that would help make sure that Syria and others around the world know that using chemical weapons are not acceptable. You'll have to look up newspaper reports. I don't know if there's any as of yet.   ...

Up To Speed: Five Things You Need To Know On SyriaSep 04, 2013
For why gas is reason for a drawing a "red line," see #4. #3 explains Obama's grim, pragmatic long-term goal for a region way beyond our ability to actually control. (Note that this article, like all the others, does not explain what happened to change our very deliberative White House's announcement of a strike to an announcement of intention to seek Congressional approval. Something that, whatever else, made them decide to set the  strike date back.) Up to Speed: Five Things ...

Airstrikes In Syria Have Begun.Sep 22, 2014
NM ...

Russia Is Bombing SyriaSep 30, 2015
Hmmm. What was that meeting between Russia and Obama last week? I think Obama knew this was going to happen before the attacks today. Russia is up to no good and Obama fell for :Putin's crap once again....or doese this go back to that open mic event where Obama told the representative from Russia to tell Putin he would have more flexibility when he was re-elected? Really too much info from the link I'm going to provide, but this is NOT good. Kerry is speaking before the U.N. Security ...

Not All The People In Syria Are Being Bombed Out....Jan 05, 2016
of their homes.  Some are being imprisoned in their towns and starved to death.  Someone needs to do an air drop of food to these people! ...

Crisis Looming. Pay Attention, Obama !! YouJun 17, 2011
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110617/bs_nm/us_imf ...

Syria Moves Chemical WeaponsDec 03, 2012
Official: Syria moving chemical weapons components By PAULINE JELINEK and BRADLEY KLAPPER Associated Press Posted:   12/03/2012 06:16:25 AM PST Updated:   12/03/2012 11:59:02 AM PST   WASHINGTON—U.S. and allied intelligence have detected Syrian movement of chemical weapons components in recent days, a senior U.S. defense official said Monday, as the Obama administration strongly warned the Assad regime against using them. A senior defense official said intelligenc ...

Having A Midlife Crisis, Professionally And PersonallyFeb 12, 2013
Does anyone else feel this way? I feel like one thing fell apart, then another, then another, then another... Marriage is on the rocks, daughter and I having a ton of problems, work has dried up and changed dramatically, family illnesses, deaths, house repairs that have no money to get done, gained a ton of weight, dont feel like cooking or cleaning, everything has blown up!   I feel like buying a brand new camaro and taking off for a month by myself. I need a huge break from reality. ...

Hagel Says Syria Has Used Chemical WeaponsApr 25, 2013
Now what will Obama do? Syria crossed the line that Obama drew. President Obama has said the verified use of chemical weapons by the regime would be a "red line" and a "game-changer" for U.S. and international military intervention in the Syrian civil war. Syria has been stockpiling chemical weapons and reports indicate it has sarin, tabun,along with mustard gas and hydrogen cyanide. A 2011 CIA report said Syria was also developing the potent nerve agent VX, which could render a city uninha ...

John McCain Sneaks Into Syria. Why?May 27, 2013
nm ...

John McCain Wants To Arm Rebels In Syria,Jun 03, 2013
which includes members of al Qaeda. I really CAN'T STAND Rand Paul, but I have to give him credit, for the first time ever, on this: From:  http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2013/06/02/rand-paul-on-arming-syrian-rebels-well-be-allied-with-al-qaida-owns-mccain/ “I’m very worried about getting involved in a new war in Syria,” Paul said at the Reagan Library on Friday. “People say ‘Assad is such a bad guy.’ He is. But on the other side we have ...

Syria: Oil Prices Vs Wall StreetAug 29, 2013
That September drop you were expecting for gasoline prices? Don't hold your breath. Currently, gasoline averages $3.55 a gallon nationally, down from $3.63 a month ago. Most analysts had expected a drop to about $3.40 by early fall on seasonal demand slumping following the summer driving season. Not now. Some forecasters predict a short-term spike of up to 10 cents a gallon. Crude oil prices and gas futures are soaring on growing fears that if the U.S. military strikes at Syria for its h ...

Britain Votes NOT To Intervene In SyriaAug 29, 2013
They stated they didn't have enough evidence that it was Assad who did it, so they want to wait for the U.N. report.Obama seems to be pushing on, holding conference calls with "some" congressional members, but not all. Kerry and Hagel still seem to want intervention stating Assad is behind the whole thing. Syria and Iran has threatened to bomb Israel IF the U.S. intervenes. So....what's the answer? Yes or No and why?  British MPs have voted to reject possible military action aga ...

4-Day Plan To Solve The Border CrisisJul 26, 2014
But I can hear the libs whining already... ...

How The Democrats Created The Financial CrisisNov 09, 2014
I'm afraid that my answer to Kentuckian wouldn't be seen since I didn't realize that the posts were so far down on the page.  i think i posted the wrong link in that post, too, but it was also good info. :) How the Democrats Created the Financial Crisis: Kevin Hassett Commentary by Kevin Hassett - September 22, 2008 00:04 EDT Fannie and Freddie did this by becoming a key enabler of the mortgage crisis. They fueled Wall Street's efforts to securitize subprime loans by ...