If you feel like reading, great. If not, fine. This was written by Matt Lewis.
"The Tea Party movement I know looks nothing like the one portrayed on MSNBC," says Armey in an e-mail to me. "The movement is made up of good, hardworking, honest, smart people that love their country. . . . Chris Matthews and MSNBC have an axe to grind, but it will only backfire. I wouldn't be surprised if the Tea Party movement responds forcefully against these outrageous charges."
(Based on the way Matthews covers conservatives, I expect him to interpret Armey's notion that Tea Partiers may "respond forcefully" as a personal threat. In fact, as is the case with most civil American political rhetoric, Armey intends for Tea Partiers to seek revenge at the ballot box.)
The documentary features selective editing of heated political rhetoric that both parties regularly use. For example, while promoting the documentary on a recent episode of "Hardball," Matthews said the Tea Party movement is engaged in a debate over "whether the federal government deserves toppling." As evidence, the documentary features a video of Rand Paul saying, "We've come to take our government back."
Matthews feigns that this is dangerous talk, but the "take our country back" slogan has been around forever -- and employed by both parties. As Matthews' own documentary shows, MSNBC's Pat Buchanan used the line back in 1992. But Matthews fails to note that
Howard Dean even wrote a book titled "You Have the Power: How to Take Back Our Country and Restore Democracy in America."
(Did Howard Dean think that Bush overthrew democracy? Did Dean want to topple our government and "restore democracy"? Of course not!)
This program comes on the heels of Rachel Maddow's
April documentary on Timothy McVeigh on the anniversary of the Oklahoma City bombing (at the time, liberal pundits like Maddow and
even Bill Clinton were attempting to tie the current anti-government political sentiment with the Oklahoma City bombing). Of course, that comparison was both insulting and disturbing.
Ultimately, the Matthews' documentary failed to engage the central question repeatedly raised by the activists interviewed: Is the government too big, doing too many things, spending too much money? It is a discussion the left does not want to have.