A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
If there is an attorney client privilege can a defense attorney throw something out like Jose Baez did regarding sexual abuse and drowning death without sufficient proof to back it up and claim attorney client privilege as to the source? HLN showed clips of Baez making statements that he thought Caylee was in New York or the Carolinas prior to her body being found. HLN also showed clips of Baez saying Casey was not present when Caylee died. HLN showed clips of Baez making many contradictory statements to his surpriise opening statements in court that Casey was present at the drowning death.
I wonder if Baez can get away with this from an ethics point of view. It seems to me if he knew his client's daughter's death was accidental he would have had to present this to the prosecution and try to work out a deal based on this accident rather than let her sit in jail for 3 years.
The question raised by HLN Vinnie Politan is what did Baez know and when did he know it. Will anyone be looking into this?
Wasn't Jose Baez threatened with sanctions and being held in comtempt by Judge Perry for breaking rules. Hopefully the Florida Bar will look into his tactics if Judge Perry follows through.
;the Defense needs to alter the defense. I keep in mind who the client is, someone who lies with the greatness of ease, and all her fables suit her advantage. Based on the runaround she gave LE, maybe J. Baez stepped on a merry-go-round, too. Past behavior is a good indicator of future behavior. The assumption is that defense attorneys operate ethically, with integrity. Attorney/client privilege inhibits monitoring of this standard. In opening statement, a defense attorney can make whatever declarative statement he wants; however, if evidence is not presented during evidence phase, he's disallowed from making that statement during closing argument, like the sexual molestation allegation against George. Jose Baez' obligation to Casey was to "zealously defend" her, which sounds open to interpretation, like "beyond a reasonable doubt."