YouTube isn't a goverment entity. - sm

So many people misunderstand what free speech/The First Amendment really mean.

"This is very important: freedom of speech, along with the other freedoms in the first amendment, are designed to protect the liberties of the populace against an oppressive government that would seek to squash those rights in its own self-interest.

Private entities and private spaces, however, are largely not required to protect your speech, and the first amendment does not protect what you say—only your right to speak.

....Most spaces on the internet are privately owned, and have no obligation to allow you to speak freely in their space. Whether it's Facebook removing content that violates its own terms of service, a blog owner deleting a comment they find offensive, or a big company deleting user posts from its Facebook page, your speech may be censored, but you have no first amendment right to free speech in those places. This includes our discussions on Lifehacker—we've always held our community up to high standards, and if you start a discussion we find isn't up to those standards, we reserve our right to dismiss it."

http://lifehacker.com/5953755/what-exactly-is-freedom-of-speech-and-how-does-it-apply-to-the-internet

For what it's worth, according to the article linked in OP, WND has been restored on YouTube now.

Just like that bakery in Indiana, it's privately owned. It's only censorship when - the govt does it, well it used to

I'm not a Republican, but... - wheres_my_job

If it were the "truth" it would set free--the - "paranoia" not so free

To compare coming out as transgender - and using public toilets

What he said sounds about right to me. He objected to local - ordinances that would