A dem
A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
The economy is still recovering from the recession, and it's come a long way since 2008, when the housing market was dire and the stock market took a nosedive.
But new economic research indicates that the recovery hasn't benefited the average American family -- unless your family is part of the country's new elite. Only the top 1% saw average real income growth between 2009 to 2011, according to a Berkeley economist. (By the way, to break into to the top 1%, you'll need an annual income of at least $366,623,according to the World Top Incomes Database.)
For the rest of us in the 99% bracket, family incomes slipped by 0.4% from 2009 to 2011, according to Emmanuel Saez, the University of California, Berkeley, economist whose earlier research documented a three-decade run-up in income for America's top 1%.
The recovery is treating the top 1% much better, however. That group saw incomes gain 11.2% during the first two years of the recovery, according to Saez, who was named a MacArthur Fellow in 2010 for his research into income and tax policy.
But doesn't a rising tide lift all boats? Saez says it's not happening in this recovery. "In 2012, top 1% income will likely surge, due to booming stock prices, as well as re-timing of income to avoid the higher 2013 top tax rates," he wrote in the January report. "Bottom 99% will likely grow much more modestly than top 1% incomes from 2011 to 2012."
Astoundingly, Saez writes that his new research shows that the top 1% grabbed 121% of the income gains in the first two years of the recovery. How does that work? In essence, it means that the gains of the top 1% came at the expense of the remaining 99%.
The research may give a boost to President Obama's proposals outlined in his State of the Union speech on Tuesday. Taking a progressive stance, his address included ideas such as raising the minimum wage to $9 an hour.
That might not be enough to appease Saez, who last year told The New York Times he advocates much higher top marginal tax rates on the rich -- up to as much as 90%."
A dem