A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

Republicans for Rape


Posted: Oct 21, 2009

This makes me ill. I know there will be responses on this thread from Republicans who are going to tell me they aren't for rape. Well, 30 of your Senators are! All men, oddly enough. So, what are you going to do about this one?

Click here for the video: http://www.themudflats.net/2009/10/2...cans-for-rape/

If you have not heard of the horrible story of Jamie Leigh Jones, a 19-year old woman working for KBR in Iraq, you won’t believe it. She was brutally raped by coworkers, evidence was destroyed by her employer, and she was locked in a shipping container to keep her from coming forward until a guard took pity and let her use a cell phone to call the embassy.

No rapes were ever heard of at KBR because they use mandatory arbitration for rapes and assault, which include a non-disclosure agreements. Rapists are never brought to justice at this federal contractor because the corporation actively covers up rape, “protects their employees and the work environment,” and makes evidence disappear to keep a good image.

Senator Al Franken (D) got an amendment to a defense bill passed that would keep the government from signing contracts with corporations that keep employees from taking rape and sexual assault cases to court. An employee who was raped at KBR could actually be sued for talking about it.
To compound the horrible crime, and the outrageous policies of this defense contractor (and others), this bill did NOT have unanimous support. It passed 68-30. 68 to THIRTY.

30 Republicans voted against an anti-rape amendment for federal military & civilian contractors. Any government contractor who uses mandatory arbitration for rape and sexual assaults will not receive any more federal funding. In other words, any contractor who covers up rape and sexual assault by using a behind-the-doors non-disclosure agreement with the victim will not receive any more of your tax dollars.

A satirical website called “Republicans for Rape” is encouraging people to call the thirty Republicans who voted against Franken’s amendment, and tell them what they think about that. There is also a petition you can sign to voice your agreement that the Republican Party is a “pro-rape organization.” The site is pretty hard-hitting and well done.
Who are the thirty Republicans who used their vote, representing their constituents to vote against Jamie Leigh Jones?
Lamar Alexander (R-TN)
John Barrasso (R-WY)
Kit Bond (R-MO)
Sam Brownback (R-KS)
Jim Bunning (R-KY)
Richard Burr (R-NC)
Saxby Chambliss (R-GA)
Tom Coburn (R-OK)
Thad Cochran (R-MS)
John Cornyn (R-TX)
Bob Corker (R-TN)
Mike Crapo (R-ID)
Jim DeMint (R-SC)
John Ensign (R-NV)
Mike Enzi (R-WY)
Lindsey Graham (R-SC)
Judd Gregg (R-NH)
Jim Inhofe (R-OK)
Johnny Isakson (R-GA)
Mike Johanns (R-NE)
Jon Kyl (R-AZ)
John McCain (R-AZ)
Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
James Risch (R-ID)
Pat Roberts (R-KS)
Jeff Sessions (R-AL)
Richard Shelby (R-AL)
John Thune (R-SD)
David Vitter (R-LA)
Roger Wicker (R-MS)
When you hover over the pictures on the website, their phone numbers will pop up. These men are not fit to hold office in the United States of America, and need to be told so.
My Democratic senator Mark Begich voted for the amendment. And I am very pleased to say that my Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski, in addition to all the women senators in that party voted for Franken’s amendment as well.

;

Un-freaking-believable! - Wow! NM

[ In Reply To ..]
..

Of course it's unbelievable.. dont have the whole story, as usual - more dishonest dems, no surprise.nm

[ In Reply To ..]
nm!

Why don't you tell us the whole story with supporting links that (sm) - Nikki

[ In Reply To ..]
show where the "dishonest dems" are?
Here is the record from the Senate website - Colleen
[ In Reply To ..]
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=1&vote=00308

As you will see, it has the entire thing mapped out from beginning to end, what everyone said, etc. Don't even to call this an unreliable website. All 30 votes-Republican. End of story.
Thx Colleen - NJ
[ In Reply To ..]
Facts? Facts? These people don't need no stinking facts! ;)

NJ
Yeah, I noticed. - Colleen
[ In Reply To ..]
Sad, huh?

Republicans for rape-Let's Get Real - MT

[ In Reply To ..]
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nathan-havey/republicans-for-rape-lets_b_328545.html

Democrats were for rape before they were against it.... - watcher

[ In Reply To ..]
that is the rest of the story. Franken's amendment is to a bill that was passed by Republicans and...gasp...Democrats. So I guess that means the Democrats were FOR rape before they were against it?? They CREATED the situation that caused this to happen (that this woman is having a hard time getting her day in court). BOTH parties. The Dems are not clean in this, but you would think they were, wouldn't you?

LOL...unfarking believable is right.

You are so far off base on that one...(sm) - Just the big bad

[ In Reply To ..]
it's absolutely hilarious! I'd call that a knee jerk reaction without any facts. They didn't have a vote in congress previously to allow misuse of binding arbitrations. These mandatory binding arbitrations are enacted by companies (frequently without the knowledge of the employee) and misused by them (the companies). What Franken is doing is trying to cut off govt funding to those companies who do use this tactic.

They were for it before they were against it? Please prove that.
Franken is a fraud trying to LOOK legitimate - and a liar..so not a good example.nm
[ In Reply To ..]
nm
Please provide examples and supporting links (sm) - Nikki
[ In Reply To ..]
of how he lied and how he's a fraud.
Here ya go sweetie..... these are a few..... - for starters
[ In Reply To ..]
http://www.frankenlies.com/lies/index.htm
Are we really supposed to take seriously a website call frankenlies.com? - Colleen
[ In Reply To ..]
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=1&vote=00308

The United States Senate website, about as reliable as you can get.
They have 'documented' every lie.... isn't that what - poster wanted?
[ In Reply To ..]
xx
WHAAATTT!!!! In other words, you are doing exactly what we - Colleen
[ In Reply To ..]
expect you to do! No matter what the source, even the United States Senate website, you do not want to believe it so you call fake. Un-freaking-believable! There is absolutely no talking to people like you. Thank you for proving what I always suspected though: That people like you are not interested in getting the truth, you are only interested in winning the argument and/or making the Dems look bad even if you are completely wrong and looking right at the truth.
Do your research before you jump....and pay attention. The Franken AMENDMENT... - watcher
[ In Reply To ..]
they are amending a previous law they already enacted which gave the companies the right to use mandatory binding arbitrations...because essentially someone signing one of those contracts is signing away their right to due process. Only Congress can do that...by law. Democrats and Republicans voted for it, and allowing that is what created the situation where this woman could not take her issue to court, because she signed an employment contract with the binding arbitration cause in it. What this amendment seeks to do, at least what Franken said and I am taking him at his word, is keep companies from being allowed to put that in contracts anymore.

I thought he knew what his own amendment was designed to do. Silly me I guess.

What the Republicans voted AGAINST was having the government further involving itself in private contracts, not voting FOR rape. If they are voting FOR rape now, then Democrats were voting FOR it on the original law.

The point being...the Republicans are for rape is a ridiculous statement. I was being ironic, and I see that was lost on you. NEITHER party is FOR rape.

Geez.
Show me the support.....they voted AGAINST it - just a different situation...the same thing
[ In Reply To ..]
While Senate Democrats overwhelmingly held together against the Senate GOP attempts to override six of Gov. Ed Rendell's line-item vetoes, one of their members rebelled and then scolded her leaders. The Senate GOP's multiple line-item veto attempts failed on identical 30-19 votes - three votes shy of the two-thirds majority needed to fund various social programs. Sen. Lisa Boscola, D-Northampton, was the only Democrat to vote with 29 Senate Republicans, saying she wanted to spare the pain of the budget impasse to college students and families relying on social services. After two such votes, Republicans sought to reverse a line-item-veto of funding for rape crisis centers and victims of domestic violence. Democrats responded by not casting Boscola's vote to override that veto. Sen. Jane Orie, R-Allegheny, insisted on a roll-call vote, saying she hoped some Democrats would vote to override these programs, since there was no partisan dispute over the funding levels for them. But she did so after Boscola had left the Capitol to drive home to the Lehigh Valley. Leaders in both parties had expected to just repeat the previous votes, but Orie's request meant that Boscola had to return, or Democratic leaders had to cast her vote against her caucus. Democratic leaders declined to do that. That forced Boscola to turn around and return to vote. Boscola blamed Democrats. An angry Boscola voted for the override, and later confronted House Appropriations Minority Chair Jay Costa, D-Allegheny, on the floor. She told Costa: "Don't you dare blame this on me!" After Costa said something inaudible to reporters in the back row of the chamber's Senate Press Gallery, Boscola yelled at him: "Don't embarrass myself? What you just did totally embarrassed all of us."

How many Democrats voted for it previously? - Nikki

[ In Reply To ..]
And please provide a supporting URL.
Watcher apparently can't defend her position. (nm) - Nikki
[ In Reply To ..]
/
I'm not Watcher but here's what always goes on.... - the dems kissing of backsides for MONEY...
[ In Reply To ..]
http://jeffmiller.tumblr.com/post/217131454/republicans-democrats-and-rape
I can defend the position..... even if I'm not - Watcher......
[ In Reply To ..]
xx
I don't live on this board like you apparently do....just saw this. - watcher
[ In Reply To ..]
I don't know "how many" Democrats voted for it. You can go to the congressional website where all votes on all bills are posted if it is important to you to know how many. Suffice it to say, some HAD to have otherwise it would not have passed...the Republicans did not have a large enough majority to do it alone, and you KNOW that.

Geez...you would think, the way you are coming after me, I spit in your post toasties or something.

Relax. Get a grip. Why do you give a rat's patootie what I say or what I think? You seem to have become all of a sudden obsessed.

Kinda strange, Nikki.
Since you think Dems are soooo concerned about rape - hmmmm
[ In Reply To ..]
This was some time back but the VOTES speak volumes.... ALL but ONE democrat voted NO.... hope you can comprehend

QUOTE..
"While Senate Democrats overwhelmingly held together against the Senate GOP attempts to override six of Gov. Ed Rendell's line-item vetoes, one of their members rebelled and then scolded her leaders. The Senate GOP's multiple line-item veto attempts failed on identical 30-19 votes - three votes shy of the two-thirds majority needed to fund various social programs. Sen. Lisa Boscola, D-Northampton, was the only Democrat to vote with 29 Senate Republicans, saying she wanted to spare the pain of the budget impasse to college students and families relying on social services. After two such votes, Republicans sought to reverse a line-item-veto of funding for rape crisis centers and victims of domestic violence. Democrats responded by not casting Boscola's vote to override that veto. Sen. Jane Orie, R-Allegheny, insisted on a roll-call vote, saying she hoped some Democrats would vote to override these programs, since there was no partisan dispute over the funding levels for them. But she did so after Boscola had left the Capitol to drive home to the Lehigh Valley. Leaders in both parties had expected to just repeat the previous votes, but Orie's request meant that Boscola had to return, or Democratic leaders had to cast her vote against her caucus. Democratic leaders declined to do that. That forced Boscola to turn around and return to vote. Boscola blamed Democrats. An angry Boscola voted for the override, and later confronted House Appropriations Minority Chair Jay Costa, D-Allegheny, on the floor. She told Costa: "Don't you dare blame this on me!" After Costa said something inaudible to reporters in the back row of the chamber's Senate Press Gallery, Boscola yelled at him: "Don't embarrass myself? What you just did totally embarrassed all of us."

Again, why? - NJ

[ In Reply To ..]
What justification could these guys possibly give for voting no on this? Free enterprise? Requiring employees NOT to report crimes to the proper authorities should be a crime if it's not already.

Why would anyone vote against this?

NJ

$$$$$$$$ - Just the big bad

[ In Reply To ..]
Kickbacks from Halliburton et al. Perhaps not all 30 that voted no are on the kickback list, but lets not forget we are dealing with the party of NO...

Oh, okay.. instead.. it's "yes we can" blow every taxpayer dollar - Thanks Obama... not.. I want ANOTHER party.nm

[ In Reply To ..]
nm
You are absolutely right!....(sm) - Just the big bad
[ In Reply To ..]
It's much more beneficial to "blow taxpayer dollars" on companies who condone rape. Geeesh!

Republicans Vote for Rape - See why - Backwards typist

[ In Reply To ..]

Mr. Sessions explanation (Emphasis place by me).


"with regard to this lawsuit, although it took some time, the Court, the Fifth Circuit,has ruled that this matter is not arbitrable, and this lady is entitled to a court trial because it goes outside normal employment matters.


The Department of Defense let me know to oppose this amendment. There are a number of reasons: because it goes far beyond the issue raised by my colleague from Minnesota. It eliminates arbitration for any claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, any claim resulting from negligent hiring, negligent supervision, or retention of an employee -- virtually any employment dispute that is now resolvable under arbitration, which the U.S. Supreme Court has said is good. Statistics show that employees get final judgment and actually win under arbitration than they do going to the expense of a Federal court trial.


I think we should listen to the Department of Defense and vote no on this amendment."


 


 

Exactly. But one has to actually be interested in the truth.... - watcher

[ In Reply To ..]
no matter which side it favors, for it to matter. No one is "for" rape. The whole thing is ridiculous and then they criticize Beck for telling the truth because it is not flattering to Mr. Obama or endangers the next big entitlement.

You would think they would have the decency to be ashamed of the flagrant hypocrisy but oh no....they wallow in it.

Boggles the mind.

Franken's Bill - diggle

[ In Reply To ..]
Thank you for posting this important story.

Satire or not - Rape is not what these Republicans are for - me

[ In Reply To ..]
They are not FOR rape per se, they are AGAINST eliminating their bankrollers from government contracts.

They (Republicans) have to dance with what brung 'em to the party - so they vote against this bill because it would force these corporations to have a shred of human decency.

Kudos to Senator Franken for walking the walk...

Anybody else note the STATES represented by these Republican Senators? Deep south, Wyoming, Idaho, etc. No surprise there.

Oh pleeeese..... what does deep south have to do with it? - what a crock

[ In Reply To ..]
xx

rape and money is so saaaaaad - chips

[ In Reply To ..]
more should be done then threaten not to sign contracts or whatever.

Similar Messages:


The Terms "legitimate Rape" Or "forcible Rape" Are Just...smAug 22, 2012
code words to narrow the definition of rape.  These people do not believe married women should have the right to accuse her husband of rape.  Women must just endure and cleave to her husband's desire for his "marital rights".  Rape is rape.  It needs no adverb to define it. ...

Ryan: Rape Is Just Another Aug 27, 2012
In an interview with Josh Smith, WJHL-TV out of Richmond, VA, when asked where he stands on the question of legal abortions for rape and incest victims, Paul Ryan replied: "I'm very proud of my pro-life record, and I've always adopted the idea that, the position that the method of conception does'nt change the definition of life."   Lah-dee-dah.  Rape is just another legitimate method of conception.  This should erase any doubts on where he stands, and demolish an ...

Video Regarding Rape And PregnancyNov 01, 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqeBHTxPkeA&feature=youtu.be ...

Franken's Anti-rape Amendment Becomes LawDec 22, 2009
By Stephen C. WebsterMonday, December 21st, 2009 -- 7:35 pm Over the unexplained objections of 30 Republican Senators, an anti-rape amendment authored by Senator Al Franken (D-MN) became law Monday with President Obama's signature on the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2010. The provision was sparked by the gang-rape of a 19-year-old Kellogg, Brown & Root employee by her coworkers in Iraq. After returning to the United States, Jamie Leigh Jones found she couldn't sue th ...

Bogus Trump Rape CaseNov 05, 2016
This is a sham lawsuit brought by someone who desires to impact the presidential election. ...

When Does Trump's Rape Trial Begin?Oct 17, 2016
It's not being covered in the media. ...

How Many Clintons Does It Take To Rape An Innocent Woman?Oct 08, 2016
Bill to rape them & Hillary to silence them! ...

CNN And MSNBC Mum On Rape Of 14-year-old GirlMar 23, 2017
I have one word for them. Despicable! It's no wonder the liberals...no, never mind... ...

Article On Media Matters Re: Obsession With RapeNov 20, 2009
There is an article on media matters listing many examples of the right wing commentators obsession with using the word rape to describe government policies. Warning - its rather lengthy reading!  Makes me think back to psychology classes . . . and what this says about such individuals.     ...

Obama 'Redefined Rape' In January 2012Aug 23, 2012
Ryan is being falsely accused of this, but any blame goes to Obama: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/07/us/politics/federal-crime-statistics-to-expand-rape-definition.html http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/08/23/Actually-It-Was-Obama-Who-Redefined-Rape ...

GOP US Senate Candidate Thinks Pregnancy From Rape Oct 23, 2012
it just so happens that a few hours before he revealed this in a state candidate debate forum, Mitt Romney voiced his support in a local ad release:  "There's so much at stake, I hope you'll join me in supporting Richard Mourdock for US Senate."  Until today, the race to replace Senator Lugar (who is not conservative enough to suit the Tea Party) was at a stalemate with Mourdock's democratic challenger, Joe Donnelly, having a hairline lead....despite obscene infusions of ...

No Exception: Banning Abortion For Rape The New RepublicanOct 27, 2012
No Exception Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock aren’t outliers. Banning abortion for rape victims is the new Republican mainstream. By William Saletan|Posted Thursday, Oct. 25, 2012, at 4:18 AM ET Mitt Romney with Richard Mourdock in August Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images. First it was Todd Akin. Then Steve King. Then Joe Walsh. Then Richard Mourdock. One after another, Republican congressional nominees opened their mouths, inserted their feet, and embarrassed ...

When Does Bill Clinton's Rape Trial Start?Oct 17, 2016
nm ...

US Soldiers Disciplined For Stopping Rape Of ChildrenSep 21, 2015
My father, who saw some pretty terrible sights during World War 2, used to frequently tell me that bad things happen in war, but I don’t think he ever ran into anything like this. A story breaking over the weekend reveals that our “Afghan allies” have been engaged in a sick practice referred to as “boy play” in the common parlance. This essentially translates into abducting, imprisoning and raping young boys, keeping them as sex slaves. As if that wasn’t shocking enough, it’s appar ...

Bill Maher Defended Statuatory Rape In 1998 OfFeb 23, 2017
having sex with a 12-year-old boy. ...

Afghan Immigrants To Sweden Stream 3-hour Rape Jan 26, 2017
Do what you need to do to keep animals like this out of our country, Mr. Trump. ...

Kathy Shelton Rape Case: Hillary Has No RemorseNov 03, 2016
Kathy Shelton tells her story about how she was raped when she was 12 years old. Hillary Clinton was the attorney for the child rapist. The rapist plea bargained and served less than a year. Hillary says that all survivors of sexual assault deserve to be listened to and believed. There are countless women who accuse her husband, Bill, of sexual assault, and Hillary is an enabler of Bill’s conduct. Hillary has learned to manipulate the law, learned how to use insider allies to help c ...

GOPers Want Franken To Defend Them In Opposing Anti-rape AmendmentDec 04, 2009
By Daniel TencerWednesday, December 2nd, 2009 -- 9:20 pmSome Republican senators are taking heat for voting against an amendment that would allow employees of military contractors to sue their employers if they are raped at work -- and they want the Democratic senator who wrote the amendment to help them fight off the bad publicity. In October, 30 Republicans voted against Sen. Al Franken's amendment to a defense appropriations bill that would de-fund contractors who prevent their ...

Classy Annie Coulter Tweets Rape And Abortion Jokes After Sep 06, 2012
"Bill Clinton just impregnated Sandra Fluke backstage." "They're spicing things up with a live abortion on stage." Any women who thinks this is funny stuff or sees it as an acceptable was to debate these issues, particularly alleged undecideds who assert the DNC is "using" women and making them feel less self-sufficient or "independent," kindly step the right side of the aisle, stay there, take yours just desserts and meet your new mentor, whose line you will be expected to toe...or else! ...

Hillary Clinton Is A Liar Claims Child Rape VictimOct 17, 2016
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sJvTPrT4fxs ...

GOP Nominee John Koster Explains "the Rape Thing" (AGAIN)Oct 31, 2012
that incest is "so rare" (as in hardly worth a mention):   "But the rape thing, you know, I know a woman who was raped and kept the child, gave it up for adoption and doesn't regret it.  In fact, she's a big pro-life proponent. On the rape thing, it's like, how does putting more violence onto a woman's body and taking the life of an innocent child that's the consequence of this crime, how does that make it better? You know what I mean?" the clueless one ponder ...

GOP Senate Candidate Todd Akin Thinks Victims Of "legitimate" RapeAug 19, 2012
....I suppose as opposed to women who are raped "illegitimately," whose bodies cannot prevent conception.  He explained his impressive knowledge of human reproduction by saying, “the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.”  Like his democratic challenger, incumbent Senator Claire McCaskill D-MO, I am truly stunned at this amazing turn of events.  This guy actually thinks we should pay him to legislate our laws.  It will be interesting to ...

GOP Candidate "rape Thing" John KosterNov 01, 2012
I know this was discussed below a little bit, but how does this clown possibly think incest is "so rare."  What alternate universe is this man living in?? ...

Bernie Sanders "rape Essay"Jun 16, 2015
This "longshot" gotten longer...what a freak.  He's right at home on the DemAlinksky Clown Car Campaign freak bus...BeepBeep.     Longshot presidential candidate Bernie Sanders may have just tripped over one of the third rails of politics — rape. A bizarre essay from 1972 in which Sanders described a woman having sex while she “fantasizes being raped by three men simultaneously” has surfaced. Published in an alternative newspaper called the Vermont ...

So The RepublicansAug 13, 2012
forfeit their Medicare & Social Security checks just to vote Obama out of office? HiLARious ...

Are There Any Other Republicans... Aug 24, 2012
who are troubled by the recent shift to the far right that the Republican party has taken? I strongly believe in fiscal responsibility, and the party used to represent this, but now it seems like it has been hijacked by extremists and that greed is the motivating force in the current Republican party, along with draconian far-right ideas that leave little room for those of us who are more moderate. I find it very troubling, and I'm considering switching my party affiliation to Independent. ...

What Republicans Need To KnowFeb 22, 2017
Exposed: The Democrats' Plan of Disruption and Intimidation Democrats are planning an all out effort of mayhem and disruption to undermine the results of the 2016 elections. They've put together a training handbook for protesters with detailed instructions to harass and intimidate. They are targeting Republican members of Congress for defeat in 2018. The UTGOP is shining a light on the Democrats' hypocrisy and we've posted their manual on our website. We want you to ...

Seriously, Republicans And DemocratsFeb 23, 2012
They pretend to take sides, all the while lining their pockets. Corporations run America. I'm sure they get a big jolly out of watching people become distracted and fighting over social issues. Just passing thru...and just my opinion. ...

A Guide For RepublicansMar 26, 2011
A Guide for Republicans ...

Another Warning To RepublicansMar 16, 2011
Dear GOP:  If you haven't realized it yet, the Tea Party is not just a game.  In a VERY liberal county, Miami-Dade in Florida, 88% of voters just FIRED (recalled) a tax-raising mayor who happened to be a Republican. He was raising taxes on declining property values while giving city workers raises. The hero in this story (other than the voters) is a guy named Norman Braman. He is the former owner of the Philadelphia Eagles. He put plenty of cash into this recall effort and helped ...