A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
WASHINGTON, April 14, 2010
Arizona Senator Says U.S. Has Been Backing Away from Iran Conflict; Warns Tehran Will Get Nukes without Bolder Action
(CBS/ AP) Senator John McCain said the United States has been backing away from a brewing fight with Iran, while that country moves ever closer to having nuclear weapons.
McCain opened a Senate hearing Wednesday by saying that Iran will get the bomb unless the United States acts more boldly.
Speaking figuratively, the Arizona Republican says the U.S. keeps pointing a loaded gun at Iran but failing to "pull the trigger."
Military and intelligence officials testifying before Congress said Iran's accelerated nuclear program could produce one weapon in roughly a year, if the country decided to go that route.
But Gen. James Cartwright predicts it would still take longer than that to make the bomb usable.
Cartwright said that, historically, it takes a country three to five years to make such a leap. Cartwright is the second highest-ranking U.S. military officer.
The timeline he cited Wednesday could be shortened if Iran pursued ways to deliver a weapon at the same time as it worked to build a bomb.
The U.S. government has prepared a new, classified, assessment of Iranian nuclear ability and intent but has not released it yet.
The State Department's No. 3 official said the United States is working as fast as it can to win new international sanctions on Iran.
William Burns predicted that a resolution will emerge from the United Nations Security Council within weeks. And Burns called the case for new penalties urgent, saying he expects China will agree to some form of sanctions.
The U.S. appeared to have gained support from China, a traditional stumbling block on the United Nations Security Council regarding Iran, during a U.S.-hosted summit on nuclear proliferation this week.
Iran has denied it is seeking a nuclear weapon and maintains its ambitions are strictly energy-related. Tehran has also scoffed at U.S. threats to increase pressure. As the Obama administration welcomed nations to the nuclear summit Monday, Iran was busy celebrating "National Nuclear Day," reported CBS News correspondent Elizabeth Palmer from Tehran.
Despite the rhetoric brushing aside the prospect of sanctions, the head of the country's nuclear program, Ali Akbar Salehi, made a candid admission in a rare interview with CBS News.
"Of course sanctions will affect us," said Salehi, who earned his Ph.D. at MIT in Boston."But it only will delay our projects. It will not stop our projects."
"They will hurt," he added. "Then we will have to come up with our own manufacturing systems."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/04/14/politics/main6395289.shtml
(Isn't this the dope who said (during the Presidential election before Bush started the bailout program and when McCain rushed back to Washington in the middle of the campaign to "solve the problem"), "The fundamentals of the economy are strong"? How many people on this forum would prefer attacking Iran to receiving healthcare, and would you complain about the cost of yet another war? I personally think it's time for McCain to retire.)
;Iran?
Or is this just the generic flaming of Obama (who has nothing to do with this post about McCAIN!!!!)?
You'd rather spend money on another war than on healthcare for Americans?
get frustrated sometimes, it's because of people who prefer war over HRC. My biggest fear was that Bush was going to start a third war (with Iran) before he left office.
Yeah. How terrible does a person have to be to try for world peace? We should be swaggering our false bravado more in the world's eyes because not enough people hate us. Shame on you, President Obama.
Yeah. I think I get it now, too.