A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
My Sunday paper had a piece from the AP on the stolen emails that brought about Climategate. It seems there is nothing in them to refute the scientific evidence that climate change is real. The brouhaha was caused by lifting bits and pieces out of context. Quelle surprise, non?
The stereotypical scientist is a nerd without great social skills. The emails do support that, to a degree. But they do not support fraud.
My feeling is that the scientists are aware of and afraid of the lack of critical thinking skills by the public in large. So, while debating climate change and all the possible explanations and theories, they did not wish their debate to be public since that same public might seize on the side presented by any devil's advocates. It's not the right thing to do, but in this age of dumbed-down media and Big Business Brainwashing, it's an understandable mistake.
NJ
;