A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
Sounds like the GOP is preparing to ratchet up the next phase of their jobless benefits strategy. Guess we do not have to offset the cost of posting armed guards at the unemployment offices by spending cuts...just divert federal funds to the states already allocated for unemployment benefits administration toward so-called security and away from UI benefits recipients to keep them from storming the palace like they did in Greece. Isnt that just nifty?
For the more than 2 million jobless slated to lose benefits Nov 27, looks like Spam will be gracing their Thanksgiving table this year and many families could be homeless by Christmas. This makes perfect sense to those among us who would like to bring new meaning to the War on Poverty. Batten down the hatches. We are in for a rocky ride, just in time for the lame duck session.
;You must skip over the speeches where he spews hate against the pubs. I have never seen or heard another president do this. It started from day 1 and is so bad now, I change the channel when he has a press conference or the stations show his rah-rah hate speeches on the campaign trail.
For all the promises he made about working together with the pubs, his direction was just the opposite. I think he has 'D' and 'R' mixed up on the car he keeps talking about.
He gave an interview last month with Univision he stated:
“If Latinos sit out the election instead of saying, ‘We’re gonna punish our enemies and we’re gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us,’ if they don’t see that kind of upsurge in voting in this election, then I think it’s gonna be harder and that’s why I think it’s so important that people focus on voting on November 2.” (This was mentioned on Chris Matthews today.)
This interview alone shows that he considers everyone that does not vote dem or is not a dem, an enemy. Real smart. So, all you 'enemies', get out there and vote! Then vote again in 2012. Hopefully, there will be a good candidate.
Or how about the 2001 radio interview that just surfaced:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck
He is starting to really scare me with his retoric.
Budgets do not come from the White House. They come from Congress, and the party that controlled Congress since January 2007 is the Democrat Party. They controlled the budget process for FY 2008 and FY 2009, as well as FY 2010 and FY 2011. In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush somewhat belatedly got tough on spending increases.
For FY 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Barack Obama could take office. At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to complete the FY 2009 budgets.
And where was Barack Obama during this time? He was a member of that very Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete FY 2009. Let's remember what the deficits looked like during that period: (below)
If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the FY 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets. That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending. After that, Democrats in Congress took control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for the budgets. If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself.
In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is I inherited a deficit that I voted for and then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th.