A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
I just can't believe, with all the problems in this country, that the Dept. of Agriculture is wasting money and time on Hemmingway's babies. They have it better than most of the people in this country. What kind of ding dongs reside in D.C.?
Excerpt of article here and link to the whole article at the bottom.
The museum’s nine-year bid to keep the cats beyond the reach of the Department of Agriculture ended in failure this month. The United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ruled that the agency has the power to regulate the cats under the Animal Welfare Act, which applies to zoo and traveling circus animals, because the museum uses them in advertisements, sells cat-related merchandise online and makes them available to paying tourists.
In other words, the cats are a living, breathing exhibit and require a federal license.
“The most ludicrous part of the whole thing is that if we were really dealing with the health and welfare of the cats, this would have never been an issue,” said Michael A. Marowski, the great-nephew of the woman who bought the Hemingway house in 1961, the year Hemingway died, and opened it as a museum in 1964.
“These cats are so well taken care of,” he said, “but because there is a book, and this book tells us that exhibited animals need to be kept this way, we have been put through this.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/23/us/cats-at-hemingway-museum-draw-a-legal-battle.html?_r=0
;
There has never been a problem after all these years. Hemminway's place is not a zoo and they don't exhibit animals. Those animals have lived there forever. I still find it ridiculous. There are so many other important and vital investigations they should be doing, but no...they have to harrass the museum.
Just in case you missed reading this part (and after only 1 person complained in 2003):
"The agency concluded that the museum needed to follow federal regulations on exhibiting animals. But the museum argued that the cats are born and bred at the house, that they seldom wander beyond the grounds and that it is Mr. Hemingway’s legacy — not the cats — that serve as the main attraction.
But the agency disagreed. It sent in an animal behavioral specialist to index the cats and analyze the situation. Undercover agents were then sent in 2005 and 2006 to observe the cats and surreptitiously photograph their movements. One photo shows a gray cat sitting on the pavement. It carries the caption: “Picture of six-toed cat taken in restaurant/bar at end of Whalton Lane and Duval. May or may not be a Hemingway Home and Museum cat.”
“It’s silliness; it just got insane,” Ms. Higgins said. “This is what your tax dollars are paying for. The agents are coming down here on vacation, going to bars and taking pictures of cats.”
At one point, the agency recommended a night watchman for the cats. It later threatened to confiscate them. A federal judge in the case even led an impromptu field trip to the museum; federal marshals cleared a path of tourists for the suit-wearing contingent. The legal back-and-forth filled six boxes.