A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

In response to Nikki


Posted: Apr 10, 2010

Some of our posts were deleted and I just wanted to answer one specific question you asked me before you had to leave.  You asked me if I would be angry and/or upset if, God forbid, President Obama was assassinated.

I will never condone, encourage, or rejoice in the assassination of our president.  To wish death upon our president is extremist behavior and I do not condone those who called for Bush's death nor do I condone those who call for Obama's death. 

I know I own a hand gun and a rifle or 2 as well as other "weapons" but I am not a violent person.  I'm a very passionate and opionated person but I would never threaten and/or hurt anyone to try and get my point across and that is where the loons on both sides take matters WAY too far. 

I see no reason why people can't own guns.  It is my personal opinion that if you take guns away from the law-abiding citizens, the criminals and crooks will still get them.  I don't believe it is overly smart to have rallies and encourage everyone to carry a gun because they can because the chances are...there could possibly be a moron or two in the group who could do some serious damage, but people carrying guns in general does not bother me as long as they have a permit, have taken safety lessons, etc.  Just my 2 cents on the whole weapon thing. 

The bottom line is, violence is on both sides and I don't condone it from either extreme...whether it be right or left.  I just wish that the REAL reason for the tea party could be looked at instead of the crazies who have obviously taken things too far.  That is all I'm saying.

;

I really wish people would not ask us - anon

[ In Reply To ..]
if we'd be upset (or happy) if the President of our country was assassinated. NOBODY wants that to happen. Because there are people who disagree with the policies of this administration does not mean anyone wants that to happen. Maybe there are some kooks in this country, but they are no better than the one who wanted President Bush assassinated.

I do not remember seeing the post you are referring to, but I just had to say that I find that question very offensive and disturbing and I hope I don't ever see it here on this board. It's very disrespectful to ask/accuse someone of that just because they disagree with policies.

I'm glad I didn't see that post and I hope never to see that question here.

I don't think there's anything wrong with asking (sm) - Nikki

[ In Reply To ..]

a person who chooses "Trigger Happy" as a moniker if he/she owns any weapons, and the answer turned out to be affirmative, which, indeed is her right to own firearms.  Nobody is arguing against that.


As far as my other question, she answered it, and that gave me some renewed hope that not all Tea Partiers wish death to our president.


With all the media attention given to the armed Tea Partiers who wish death to the president, I think my questions were fair, and the answers were affirmative -- not your answers, but the answers of "Trigger Happy."

This is very disturbing - anon

[ In Reply To ..]
Trigger Happy is a hidden camera comedy television from the UK. You can watch episodes on YouTube. It's quite funny and similar to Just for Laughs. Whether Trigger Happy's moniker is taken from the show, or for issues dealing with weapons I have no idea, but have always thought of the comedy show when I see it.

As for the weapon issue, for someone who is responsible and of sound mind, has training, etc having weapons is not an issue. Maybe you should ask that question of the criminals and gang members in the country. I think owning a weapon is a very personal choice they make and is nobody's business but their own. Besides, they have gone through a background check, so there should be no issues there.

No, of course not all Tea Partiers wish death to a president. The thought that they do is just ludicrous. Nobody at a Tea Party event has ever expressed those wishes. If they had they would have been escorted away by members. Maybe there are a few loony toons people who have, but they have not shown up at tea parties I have watched stating that, and the ones who do state that do not represent the tea party, and as I said they are no better than the people who wished death upon the previous president and upon all presidents before that.

"The media attention given to the armed Tea Partiers who wish death to the president"??? Oh my goodness...did you read that on daily kos or spouted by MSNBC or some lefty site. I have watched all the tea parties across the country. They are peaceful people who attend rallies and hold up signs and discuss issues. They are tired of the direction the country is heading in. I'm sorry, regardless of what you have read in the tabloids, there are no "armed tea partiers wishing death, blah, blah, blah".

I think asking anyone if they wish death upon this president (or any previous president) shows a very disturbing and offensive line of behavior, and shows how obsessive people are. Those are the ones who are disturbed and people should be very concerned about them. Not someone attending a tea party holding a sign saying "no more taxes or We the people or Cut taxes, not deals or Don't tread on me or I am an American and I vote" People are unhappy with the policies. Luckily most of the tea party attendees know that President Obama is not responsible for everything going on in DC. He follows the orders he is given and the decisions are made and voted on by congress. The president is just the messenger that has to tell the public how they are going to be screwed by government.

I don't remember the original post or what exactly it was that you asked. All I commented on was that it is very offensive and disturbing that people would resort to that type of question (assassination) when all we are doing is voicing our disatisfaction. It also shows disrespect toward people who have a difference of opinion. If I said to my mom because she disagrees with the policies "oh you just want him assassinated", well then I'd probably be writing this from the loony bin.

I could name about 100 things wrong with asking people that question.

Again, I will say, I did not see and hope to never see that offensive and disturbing question on this board.
I just wanted to watch my back, that's all. (sm) - Nikki
[ In Reply To ..]

Methinks she doeth protest too much.

No need to watch your back. - Trigger Happy
[ In Reply To ..]
Just FYI...I used the name "Trigger Happy" because it is, like you have proven with your comments, what liberals assume conservatives who own guns are. LOL. I was just making fun of a stereotype that is for the most part untrue. I can count on 1 hand how many times I've actually fired a gun.
Please see my post above about Oklahoma and Tea Partiers (sm) - Nikki
[ In Reply To ..]

Every normal, anti-violence American has every reason to watch their backs.


Militias are being more and more associated with the Tea Party.


What's astonishing to me is that the anniversary of McVeigh's Oklahoma City bombing is coming up, a true homegrown terrorist, and this is the action Oklahoma is considering.  Yet another state I cross off my list of places I'd like to visit someday.  Ironically, ALL of them are in the South.


In fact, Rachel Maddow is having a special coming up of the McVeigh tapes on Monday, April 19, on MSNBC, in HIS very own words, not hers.  That should be enough to make anyone fearful for their well being.

First of all.... - Trigger Happy
[ In Reply To ..]
each state has a right to stand up to big govt. This administration has spent money like crazy and now they have crammed this healthcare down our throats. States cannot afford to pay for this. So instead we are just supposed to stand back and not stand up for ourselves and allow the government to stick it to us. I think the term "militia" is wrong in this instance. I don't see these as conservative people willing to shoot anyone who disagree with them. I see a group of people who are tired of being screwed by our government. Our founding fathers understood that...I don't see why people today just don't get it.

Totally agree anon - see message

[ In Reply To ..]
I found an interesting article from 2009 regarding the leftists' obsession with violence.

I totally agree with you that to pose a question about our president such as the poster did was very disturbing and quite offensive.

I do not agree with his policies or the way he is running the country, but he is our president for now. May he go back to Chicago when his term is up in 2012.

I too hope this never comes up again, and if it does, we should ignore it completely or report it.

See link

http://www.oilforimmigration.org/facts/?p=3444

Excellent article - thank you for posting - anon - see message

[ In Reply To ..]
I had not seen it before. It really shows how disturbed and obsessed the leftists really are. This is why people of the country are very upset. The lefties want to have free reign, act like children, and not be questioned about anything. Did you read the article above about Obama going off the deep end? They think that they can do anything they want and nobody is supposed to question them or bring issues up, and they are using the left nut-wing media to vilify anyone who speaks up. It is quite disturbing indeed and they need to be in a padded cell if they think they can get away with it. They need to be held responsible for their actions (i.e. fired in November). Unfortunately in the meantime they are accumulating wealth, so being unemployed for them will not even affect them. Their savings, retirements, health care, etc is set for life and they will never have to worry about how they are going to pay for their next meal, etc. They are so disconnected from reality. I say November can't come soon enough.

Thanks for posting the link. It was an excellent article.

Are you freaking kidding me! You are saying that there is now a ...sm - oldtimer

[ In Reply To ..]
radical movement on to make people believe that people on the left, namely democrats?, want to assasinate the president? Why did you even post that evil link? Democrats are far from obsessed with violence, more accurately, we are obsessed wth peace and prosperity through kindness and understanding.
Could have fooled me. Read the posts up and down - the forum
[ In Reply To ..]
nm
Yes, bashing of liberals all over the board. (nm) - Nikki
[ In Reply To ..]
NM
It's on BOTH sides Nikki - nm
[ In Reply To ..]
nm
I agree it's on both sides now. It seems liberals (sm) - Nikki
[ In Reply To ..]
are starting to get fed up with all the bashing that comes their way.

And there are one or two posters on this board who will ALWAYS respond with a negative Obama driveby, regardless of the topic of the thread. I could write that it's raining today, and that person would say it's Obama's fault because he lied or it's his fault because he's ruining the country, etc.
Moderator, please do not bother banning me - as I am only going to use
[ In Reply To ..]
the word board from here on in. I appreciate it.
I didn't know we could pick and choose which board - an observation
[ In Reply To ..]
to be banned from. I didn't find anything wrong with your comment that you think you would have been banned, but I thought if you were banned you were banned from all boards.
Yeah! What happened to "bleeding heart liberals" - and hippies, etc.
[ In Reply To ..]
I guess those only apply when they support the pubs statements.

Yeah, I have about given up on this bunch. We have people here, some of whom are teabaggers, who are ignoring blatant and numerous attacks on dems with some arrests, but it our imagination, could not possibly be by republicans or crazy conservatives (who else would it be??). We have people here accusing Obama of being extreme radical left when they are in fact SOOO far right that to try and make a judgement like that is preposterous and in truth, he is a moderate, too moderate for some. We have people here who accuse the president of attempting a government takeover when all he did was get 32 million people health insurance coverage-how dare he!!! Socialism! Communism! Marxist!! Nope, no paranoia there. No leaning on the panic button at all! We have people here who justify taking guns to rallies to "protect themselves" and because they want to "do it while they still can." First of all, who exactly are you protecting yourselves from? Other teabaggers? From each other is more likely when the rhetoric gets out of hand but then again, that is another area of denial-will NEVER happen, right? Secondly, President has NEVER, EVER said that he had any intention of taking away anyones guns, and yet we still hear that lie. And now this garbage?? Good lord!! Generally, dems are more the peace-niks, they are the people generally who are concerned with all Americans being helped, and not just other dems btw. They are the people who want to see all Americans living better, and in a safer situation, not support only the very rich and who cares about anyone else.

I am going somewhere else. There is no reason here anymore. I have never seen the level of denial that I see here, the BS that I see here and refusal to see truths, even when in a video right in front of your eyes! It is only attack and deny anything the libs say, attack and deny but never, EVER consider that we may actually have a point, and that Obama might actually be trying to do better for the people, is not arrogant, trying for a government takeover, trying to make us a socialist nation, or any of the other ridiculous accusations made here. He is an intelligent man who was left with one h**l of a mess and now is trying to dig us out of it in spite of a bunch of bozos whose only interest is to make sure that he makes no headway, no matter who it hurts, in order to further the republican agenda.

Talk to you later Nikki, oldtimer, NJ, the other libs and the few reasonable independents and republicans like BT we have on this board who can actually at times have a reasonable conversation.

I know how you feel. It is sad that the war going on in our own country is...sm - VTMT
[ In Reply To ..]
as important to our national well being than either the war in Iraq or Afghanistan, and this hateful war is being waged for the self-interest of those who would benefit from unrest.
Like i said before, the media is mostly to blame - Backwards Typist
[ In Reply To ..]
I watched a bunch of videos today (some older ones) and one really disturbed me. It was MSNBC about the guy at a rally where the president was going to speak carrying a gun on his shoulder and a pistol on his hip (which should have NEVER been allowed because of the prez being there).

They never showed the person above the shoulder and said he was a racist and threatening with those guns. Then, another video from a different media showed the whole body of the man and guess what....he was black! So, how could he have been racist?

I was furious! I can't remember the woman's name who made those remarks, but I think she is an instigator. I wonder how many people saw her segment and went ballistic over it. Probably quite a few and that's why the division between people is the way it is today.
You nailed it! Your first paragraph (sm) - Nikki
[ In Reply To ..]

explains perfectly just WHY I asked the questions I asked and got blasted for it.  You are much more eloquent than I, but I refer any reader who wants to know WHY I would ask such questions to read your first paragraph.


The rest of your post was dead on, as well!


Thank you. Smile

Sorry, but Obama is a radical. All you have to do - is look at his policies, his agenda.
[ In Reply To ..]
I am a democrat, but I do not see Obama as helping, just hurting. In the long-term, our economy will hurt MORE, and so will our people. The HCR bill is a disaster. It will raise rates, and we will end up with fewer doctors, yet more need and long lines. Obama was never qualified to be president. He has never even run a business, has done nothing so far to improve things, but people should not call him on the carpet? Bull. We have EVERY RIGHT to. You want to leave? leave. No one asked you to. You should know that people will disagree with you on this board. Its politics!
You are soooooooo right! (sm) - Nikki
[ In Reply To ..]

I'm not obsessed with violence, and to suggest that a liberal wants to kill President Obama is beyond ridiculous.  It seems they take their own party's actions and then flip them around to make it about Democrats.  I especially like (NOT!) the repeated mantra, "Obama lies" that litters this board and the other drive-bys that they post, as well.


I asked my questions regarding guns and reactions to something bad happening to Obama simply because I'm trying to figure out which category these teabaggers fit into, how far this violence and obvious hatred will go and whether I should take this group seriously regarding violence.  If they admit to being a Teapartier, then I'm curious as to how many weapons they own and how they would feel if something bad happened to President Obama and whether I should fear for my life and the lives of others.  Only they know if they gave honest answers, but some of the indignant offense that has been taken does make me wonder.

Really? (sm) - Nikki

[ In Reply To ..]

You wrote:  "I do not agree with his policies or the way he is running the country, but he is our president for now."


This is the first time I've ever seen a conservative concede that "he is our president for now."  Looking up and down this board, all I see is Obama bashing.

Please see message. (sm) - Nikki

[ In Reply To ..]

I'm trying to look at the real Tea Party. That's why I posed the questions I did.


Thank you for responding. Smile

And there was NOTHING offensive in your - request, Nikki

[ In Reply To ..]
To say it was given the types of questions and responses seen on this forum by everyone-again,everyone-is being disingenuous, at the very least.

Similar Messages:


Nikki Haley, Shootings And Confederate FlagJun 19, 2015
This morning, Haley appeared on CBS Morning News and was asked if it is finally time for the state to stop adorning government buildings with the Confederate Flag. Haley dodged the question, refusing to give her personal opinion, and seemed to imply that a debate over the flag would be too traumatizing for her state: HOST: There are also calls today that you have to take the Confederate flag down from the state capitol. How do you address those calls? HALEY: I think that...at a time ...

This Is In Response ToJul 19, 2017
http://general.mtstars.com/472526.html One of the points brought up in this post was that with national healthcare, innovation would come to a halt. This is an older article but it is showing quite the opposite.  I just thought it was worth posting. ...

Right's Response To SummitFeb 26, 2010
The talking point distributed on Fox was that the summit was "boring."  It is a major flaw, I guess, of this presidency that Obama does not make his meetings on crucial legislation interesting enough to entertain the opposition. Awwww.  In other words - look away - the right came off badly and Obama's directness, honesty and tendency to point out political posturing triumphed again.   ...

For Anyone Who Is Interested-email Response From Jan 11, 2010
did this so I am just sharing for anyone interested. Dear Friend, As the first year of the Obama Administration concludes with the State of the Union, the White House is inviting Americans across the country to connect directly with some of the President’s senior advisors.  Through WhiteHouse.gov, these leaders will report to you on their work and answer your questions on where we’ve been, where we are, and where we’re heading. Every morning this week at WhiteHo ...

Response To Obama's DeclarationFeb 14, 2013
Obama: "We're not the kind of country that gets rid of illegal immigrant children who are here through no fault of their own." Response: "We are the kind of country that aborts children who are here through no fault of their own." ...

In Response To Below Re: Why Are You Voting For TrumpJul 24, 2016
It is painfully obvious that President Obama used the tools he had available in order to do something. Unfortunately, the only thing republicans (the ones in control of congress) know is dictatorship - they know nothing about real life and how one has to compromise. I do it all day, every day in my life or I would not have a job let alone a husband or relationships. When you lose at a game or an election, you then have to play fair. They have acted like spoiled little losers and it makes me asha ...

Love Chelsea's ResponseJul 10, 2017
I heard Ivanka sat in Trump's seat at the G2 and personally don't think she had any business being there.  This whole Trump "Royal family" disgusts me.  Of course a Trump supporter would find nothing wrong with the fact that she had no business even being there but she didn't.  Call it petty if you want but this family just thinks they can do whatever they want and what is more disgusting is that they are getting away with it.  When are the pubs in congress goi ...

Republican Talking Point ResponseMay 10, 2012
heard this last night on Mathews, this morning on Joe and now from Hasselbach on the View - (read with whining tone).  "Why-y-y-y didnt Dick Cheney get credit for saying he was for gay marriage?"   I imagine decent, thinking republicans are getting absolutely sick of the moaning and crying and belittling EVERY TIME the president says or does something.  Live YOUR life, not someone elses.   ...

O's Hashtag Response To Kidnapped Girls.May 11, 2014
I wish he would just slither back wherever he came from and let us have a real president again.  Sigh.... ...

St. Johns Wort...anyone Have A Positive Response...Dec 19, 2014
With this herb for depression, anxiety, etc? I've read a lot of good things about it and thinking of trying it rather than the Effexor that my doctor wants me to try for these problems. I'm very premenopausal and stressed. ...

Obama's Alleged Slow Response To Oil Spill -May 02, 2010
Obama not slow in his response to oil spill ...

Response To SM/Anon Post At Bottom Of PageNov 26, 2012
My thoughts exactly. Absolutely impossible to post anything on this board that might in the least be able to be twisted into a negative against Pres Obama. I taught my sons and now my grandchildren first and foremost to be honest to establish a character that others can trust and respect, to be compassionate, to be open-minded but to be true and not swayed from their established values. I think almost any open-minded individual reading this board would agree there is very much a bullying nature ...

The Tolerance Thread/response/re Byrd/one PersonMar 19, 2013
It seems to have disappeared.  I'm not going to inquire about why it's gone, but I did want to repost my reply regarding associating modern-day Democrats with Byrd and the fact that there was only one person caught making a statement on tape.  --Byrd  was over 40 years ago. Surely we can't use Robert Byrd and other racist Southern Democrats circa pre-1960s as examples of who modern day Democrats identify with, no more than we could use Lincoln as a modern day R ...

Republicans Mull Response To Obama On ImmigrationNov 15, 2014
WASHINGTON (AP) — House Republicans debated Friday how to respond to President Barack Obama's expected executive action on immigration, with GOP leaders anxious to craft a solution that satisfies the demands of their most conservative members without courting a government shutdown. Another option would be to pass a temporary spending bill into next year when the GOP will control the Senate, to try to see if Republicans can use their grip on the purse strings to gain leverage over the ...

Bill O'Reilly's Response To Mother JonesFeb 20, 2015
http://nation.foxnews.com/2015/02/20/bill-oreillys-talking-points-memo-22015-airing-tonight-8pm-et ...

King David's Response To The UN Anti-Israel Resolution.Dec 28, 2016
response to the Security Council's recent resolution regarding Judea and Samaria." So said Rabbi Zalman Melamed on Monday, speaking before hundreds of students and guests at a Hanukkah candle-lighting in the presence of Israel's President Reuven Rubi Rivlin. With a hint of a smile betraying his delight at the eternal inter-generational connections, Rabbi Melamed said: "King David spoke, in his prophetic spirit, about future events. He wrote about Israel sitting by the rivers of B ...

Funny, The Difference Between Charleston's Response To The Church IncidentJun 23, 2015
Wonderful how the community came together - people of alll races, political persuasions, etc.  After Ferguson, etc., it was the most amazing display I think I've seen of this type in a pretty long lifetime. Here, the incident has been used as an opportunity for hateful political posturing.  And, incidentally, let's be real honest.  Anyone can call themselves a conservative, a liberal, or a liverwurst sandwich, but that doesn't make it so.  Roof wasn't a ...

Media Turn On Obama For Low-key Response To Paris MassacreNov 16, 2015
Someone needs to reign in this buffoon before he makes more of a laughingstock out of America. Is there a sock big enough? ...

“Screamer” Tries To Ruin Trump Rally; Best Crowd ResponseMar 10, 2017
This insane screamer is going viral – and you can see, er- hear why. During a “March 4 Trump” rally in Lake Oswego, Oregon, a woman (we think she’s a woman) showed up to try and interfere with the several hundred people gathered at the pro-President Trump event. going viral. There were several counter-protesters. One person who attended the event told the Independent Journal Review that there were close to 1000 anti-trump protesters, most of them from Portland. But it was one ...

Response From Senator Regarding Affordable Care Act. Bunch Of Crap As Usual. Apr 03, 2015
Aren't the insurance companies still in control, with what they will approve and what they won't approve? Senator Debbie Stabenow Mar 30 at 4:33 PM To me Dear ***, Thank you for contacting me about the Affordable Care Act and its ongoing implementation. Millions of Americans, including several hundred thousand people in Michigan, have been able to buy high-quality private health insurance plans through the Affordable Care Act. The law also holds insura ...

Kalid Sheik Mohammad: Bush's Shock And Awe Response To 9/11 PreventedDec 02, 2016
Far from trying to draw us in, KSM said that al-Qaeda expected the United States to respond to 9/11 as we had the 1983 bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut — when, KSM told Mitchell, the United States ‘turned tail and ran.’ ‘Then he looked at me and said, ‘How was I supposed to know that cowboy George Bush would announce he wanted us ‘dead or alive’ and then invade Afghanistan to hunt us down?’’ Mitchell writes. ‘KSM explained that if the United States had treated 9/1 ...

Response To Suggestion To Watch "The Talk"Feb 08, 2011
There was a discussion last month about "The VIew" and how revolting it has gotten. Someone on here suggested watching "The Talk", which I have recorded and have watched 6 or so shows, rarely the whole show.  I can't say I'm crazy about it.  Seems like they are all too much alike and not spontaneous.   I guess my favorite would be the one that sits by the host, the one married to the football player.  As much as I liked Leah Remini on King of Queens, I find her over ...

My First Response Was "Oooh, Ouch."Jan 19, 2011
Dictated:  Last bowel movement was on 01/17/2011.  ASR:  Last bowel movement was in 01/1979.  ...