A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
This site is the preview version of Obama Achievements Center. It’s a work in progress. Far too much time has been spent putting the spotlight on complaints while significant achievements are either ignored, not reported, or minimized. (from "about site")
While you certainly probably will not agree with each and every one, this is especially for those of you who say there "aren't any accomplishments".
;Transparency doesn't just mean visitor's records. That only shows who was at the White House. In fact, I wonder why it took so long to release those records, after he became president; especially since today is ELECTION day. Does he think people are going to take the time to read them before voting? Does he think it's going to change the vote?
and there is a lawsuit/injunction pending against the stem cell research.
\"It\'s the worst outcome we could imagine,\" says George Daley, a stem-cell researcher at the Children\'s Hospital Boston in Massachusetts. \"It\'s going to be enormously disruptive to anyone holding NIH money [to conduct work on human ESCs], which has been a big deal since the Obama policy.\"
According to figures posted on the NIH website, the agency granted a total of US$143 million in funding for human embryonic stem-cell research in 2009, with funding estimates for 2010 and 2011 being $137 million and $126 million, respectively.
Under the previous administration of George W. Bush, scientists could not use federal funds for research on human embryonic stem-cell lines derived after 9 August 2001. In March 2009, US President Barack Obama overturned those restrictions by executive order, mandating the NIH to develop a policy for the ethical approval of newly derived lines.
CONTENTION AND APPEAL
The lawsuit against the HHS and NIH contends that the new policy violates the Dickey-Wicker Amendment, a law that prohibits the destruction of human embryos. The suit was dismissed last October because the original plaintiffs — listed in court documents as two Christian organizations, six individuals, and \"embryos\" — were deemed to have no legal standing in the case, that is, they had no tangible interest in its outcome.
However, the two scientists on the plaintiff list — James Sherley, a researcher in adult stem cells at the Boston Biomedical Research Institute, and Theresa Deisher, research and development director of the firm AVM Biotechnology in Seattle, Washington — appealed, and in June the case was granted standing on the grounds that human embryonic stem-cell research increases funding competition for scientists working on adult stem cells.
Read More:
http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100824/full/news.2010.428.html