A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
From the L.A. Times: "...Congressman Broun’s remarks have raised eyebrows among liberals and scientists — congressional tracking service Govtrack.us rates him as one of the most conservative members of the GOPcaucus — some of Broun’s strict creationist views aren’t that far out of the mainstream of American public opinion.
Nor are Broun’s views radically out of whack with other Republicans on the House Science, Space and Technology Committee. Another member is Missouri Rep. Todd Akin, still dodging flak for saying victims of "legitimate rape" were unlikely to become pregnant because “the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.” Akin is running for the Senate.
Over at Wired Magazine, Brandon Keim has run down the list of other views held by House science committee members:
1. The committee’s chair, Ralph Hall (R-Texas), lumps 'global freezing' together with global warming, which he doesn’t believe humans can significantly impact because 'I don't think we can control what God controls.
2. Dana Rohrbacher (R-Huntington Beach) thinks cutting down trees reduces levels of greenhouse gases they absorb.
3. Mo Brooks (R-Alabama) still trots out the debunked notion that a scientific consensus existed in the 1970s on 'global cooling,' which he portrays as a scare concocted by scientists 'in order to generate funds for their pet projects.'"
For the rest of the article:
(From Wikipedia: The Committee on Science, Space and Technology is a committee of the United States House of Representatives. It has jurisdiction over non-defense federal scientific research and development. Specifically, the committee has partial or complete jurisdiction over the following federal agencies: NASA, theDepartment of Energy, EPA, ATSDR, NSF, FAA, NOAA, National Institute of Standards and Technology, FEMA, the U.S. Fire Administration, and United States Geological Survey.)
;