A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

newt's outrage over question

Posted: Jan 21, 2012

Crowd cheering at his outrage of wasting debate minutes? Hello . . . Newt was at the forefront of the 2-year waste of time spent hounding Clinton with impeachment all the while boofing dear Caligula in his wife's marital bed. Newt was principle behind shutting the whole govt down in a fit of pique. Wake up people. It is simply not worth taking the whole country down because you fear the intelligence of democrats. Don't be afraid. . . we don't want to harm you, we want to help you.

;

Debate cheers/lack of civility of the modern times - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Some of the more memorable moments from the debates have included:

Audience cheering Rick Perry's death penalty record.

Audience cheering for Ron Paul's "let them die."

Audience cheering on Newt's position on child labor.

Does anyone see a pattern here besides me? This is the scariest bunch of people I have ever seen to have so much power in the US. I sincerely hope that the Republican regressive ticket is voted out the next election.

Debate cheers - Sounds like the DEMS and OWS

[ In Reply To ..]
x

Wow, twist much? What a convoluted bunch of - junk.... same a lies. nm

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

I agree - when I read it the first thing I though of is - "Lets do the twist" by Chubby Checker.

[ In Reply To ..]
The people in the audience were right to applaud. What the CNN guy did was wrong. You don't start a presidential political debate with some tabloid headline. Newt calmly explained so.

The crats are so hell-bent on trying to make anyone republican look bad, that when an actual intelligent response is given they can't handle it.

Lack of civility falls in their hands.

Let's do the twist - Hit the nail on the hed

[ In Reply To ..]
Boy did you get it right. Look at ANY speech, debate, interview by a lib with libs in audience. Without fail, any and all with a conservative POV are treated like garbage. Look at the crap (literally) spread by OWS and they are held up as socieies best, yet anything by the Tea Party, they immediately resort to sexual slurs on this board. Shows you crats lack of grace, tolerance, decorum and common sense. Used to vote Dems on issue, but no more. Completely sick and tired of their lack of civility. They lost a voter.

I'm so sick of the blatant obvious hypocrisy. - Chubby Checker - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
I'm am sick and tired of it. You are right, conservatives are treated like garbage - to include here too. The hateful nasty name calling has gone way past civil. They are downright nasty little imps. Reminds me of the saying - why do you look at the splinter in your brother's eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye. They'll never admit that a democrat has done anything wrong and they'll never admit that they themselves are wrong.

But the messages go beyond hate. I don't even know what the next level would be called, but the nastiness displayed here, well I surely would not want to turn my back on them. Some of them sound like they are ready to just kill anyone who is a republican. The apparent readiness to commit violence is quite obvious.

So they don't like when people applaud a republican candidate for standing up for what is right. They consider applauding as "lack of civility". But yet they wouldn't say that about their side when they stand and clap at responses from democrats.

I'm tired of the garbage they spew. They claim tea partiers are violent, but when asked to cite one incidence of violence they cannot. In other words they are liars and they'll never admit that OWS or whatever they are called commit any violence. No, they say they are just standing up for what is right. But the tea partiers who all they do is go and sit and listen to people speak, well...won't go any further with that. Think you get the picture. What it boils down to is they don't like anyone questioning anything democrat politicians do. Everyone is supposed to stand back silent. When politicians make decisions that affect the people who elected them in a bad way, nobody is supposed to say anything. When the democrat politicians do not do the jobs we elected them to do we are supposed to be silent, but if its a republican they don't like they'll do a recall on them. They showed what sore losers they were after the last election when all the democrats were voted out of office for what they did and now they are like a bunch of spoiled children and aren't getting their way and they are throwing a tantrum.

You got it exactly right when you said it shows their lack of grace, tolerance, decorum, and common sense. They just don't know how to be civil towards other people who don't agree with them. When someone below called republicans "blood thirsty throngs" is about as bad as I've heard. Talk about such hate. That's the person I'd never turn my back on. I would hope that people could talk in a civil manner and discuss issues, but I guess that's too hard for them. They really should read how the civil wars was started because they are going to repeat history if they don't cool it with their hate and intolerance.

Good post.

yikes - nastylittleimp

[ In Reply To ..]
unhinged much? The repubs are the ones who bomb clinics and murder doctors. T. mcVey was no dem. Occupiers do not wear their holsters to rallies. I could never understand that conservatives on one hand claim they are the vast majority and dems are a small fringe group. Then the cons turn around and claim to be victims. Vast majorities are not mistreated by tiny minorities! No logic. If you do not wish to be called blood thirsty, don't give a standing ovation when capital punishment is mentioned. Dont cheer when a pol suggests a person in a coma without insurance should just be left on the cart in the hallway until he decays. In either words, reap what you sow. Finally, enuf of the they ... they ... they ... You obviously are aware of the plank in the eye ditty, use it?

Yikes back at ya - Oh you do not even want to go there - Get a grip! - What if - SM

[ In Reply To ..]
1. Republicans DO NOT bomb clinics and murder doctors - GET A GRIP!!! There are nut cases all over the country that affiliate with every political party. Do you really want to go down the line of every murderer, rapist, arsonist, thief, etc and what their political beliefs are - no, I don't think so. Let me repeat one more time, you might want to read it slowly so you will understand. Republicans...do...not...bomb...clinics...and...murder...doctors. Got that?

2. Wearing holsters to rallies: Please, tell me you have a little more sense than that. People who own guns and carry concealed weapons do not do it for the intention of going to commit a crime. If more people were trained properly and carried guns there would be less crime. If someone at Virginia tech had a concealed weapon or Colorado Columbine had one and was there more kids lives would have been saved. Do you even understand the concept of why people own guns and carry concealed weapons? It certainly is not to go shoot up everything in sight. It is for protection and to protect others. I for one would be grateful to any concealed carrying gun owner if I got caught in the middle of a crime and they were there to help me and others that might get caught in the middle.

3. Conservatives never claim to be victims. We do, however, know when we are constantly being dumped on and for no good reason. Lieberals, however, have mastered the game of victimization.

4. Imaginary cheers and standing ovations for tragedies? Oh please...another one of those "get a grip" moments.

5. As for the last sentence. You do not know what it means, so let me explain. "Why do you look at the splinter in your brother's eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye". It means pretty much what it says. Hypocrites will always point out the fault of others, never admitting the faults of their own. Look at your own before you point out the others.

Nasty little imps is a perfect description. Nasty, hateful, spiteful, liars, intolerant of anyone who has a different opinion than them, fear mongerers. In other words...nasty little imps. Sorry if you don't like the truth but that's it plain and simple. If you don't like the truth then learn to be tolerant of others opinions, don't call them blood thirsty when you have no cause to, and listen with an open mind. Listen to an idea before deciding you disagree just because they have the "R" after their name, and stop calling posters names.

So you don't like lieberals being called nasty little imps but you are perfectly happy to call republicans blood thirsty throngs and, oh yes, they should be "safely contained". Now that's what I call Hypocrisy with a capital H, among other things.

kurt replie - mj

[ In Reply To ..]
Forgive me for not plowing thru this latest screed. I did read the first sentence of each paragraph though.

Simply put: If all occupiers are rapists and pass gas (a major topic of interest apparently for conservatives), then all conservatives hang out in trees with rifles around family planning centers.

ta da.

huh? Are you the one who also wrote the kurt reply above - because this one doesn't make sense either

[ In Reply To ..]
Some coherent words would be good so that we could all understand.

helping - bho

[ In Reply To ..]
I think the poster is calling all republician conservatives farting tree hanging assassins.

Yikes - You are WAY OFF

[ In Reply To ..]
Occupiers have stabbed and raped throughout their little demonstrations; I guess they were having their guns cleaned. Do you need the stats on the rapes, robberies, ARRESTS, murders, destruction of propery, indecent exposure, sex in public, defacation in public all by OWS? Didn't think so. As for the "holster" you claim was spotted at a Tea Party rally. Had you bothered to watch something besides a lib leaning station, you would have found out that that "holster" photographed and shown worldwide actually belonged to a law enforcement official in plain cloths, but CNN, HSNC, MSNBC refused to show that portion. They cut off everything but the holster to try to bolster their liberal bent. You reap what you sow with intolerance, hate speech and complete disregard for anyone not marching to the party line. Oh by the way, what about the lib pilot that flew his single engine direclty into a building to protest the fact that Obama was not liberal enough? Notice that's never mentioned. What about the shoot up at Fort Hood..another liberal gloss over because they don't discuss terrorists. What about the guy that shot Giffords (liberal leanings with research on liberal websites, and yes he was also certifiable)...as soon as libs found out he was not a conservative, dropped that story pretty quickly.

nastylittleimp - crack a history book

[ In Reply To ..]
x

Chubby Checker - Conservative

[ In Reply To ..]
Stopped posting on this board for the very reasons you mentioned. Very difficult to understand such consuming hatred by so many. When you post sites or facts, you're attacked personally. I've been called many names simply for pointing out another side. A few other things very conveniently overlooked.
1. When Clintons left the White House, they pried all the "Ws" off of all keyboards, destroyed office property, glued drawers shut, resulting in thousands of dollars worth of cost to all of us to repair what they did. Libs never mentioned how "unfair" or childish that was.
2. When Clintons left, they were forced to return hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of furniture, drapery, paintings, etc., that was to remain in the White House (not Clintons personal belongings). Libs never said a word.
3. When Bush came in office, libs constantly carried on about his IQ because he did not rely on a teleprompter, and tried mightily to tout Obama as the smartest president in history. Obama's IQ is lower than Bush's (Obama's IQ is also lower than mine, as well). Yet, when a poster below stated that Obama said he was going to visit "57 states", they went off on that poster mercilessly. If push comes to shove, I bet the poster doing the insulting cannot tell you what Obama's IQ is (not what was fabricated by the elite media, but the actual IQ; I know what it is, look it up yourself if interested). Then, there's Biden; total fool.
4. Libs scream from the rooftops for Romney to publish income tax records (Romney broke no tax laws), but gave Kerry a complete pass on his ILLEGAL activities regarding his yacht for God sake. On top of that, Obama still has never released college transcripts or his so-called thesis subject; if there is no problem, why not put it out there for all to see? You hide nothing, if you have nothing to hide.
5. Valerie Jarrett, listed as SENIOR WHITE HOUSE adviser, went to Atlanta, Georgia on 01/15/2012, at Ebenezer Baptist Church, and delivered a sermon from the pulpit about Obama and his magnificence and how evil the Repubs were. Immediately, thereafter a voter registration was conducted AT CHURCH. Whatever happened to separation of church and state?? Hypocritical libs never made a peep.
6. The best of all: There was a study done in 2011, whereby a gentleman was trying to prove the hypocrisy of liberals. He took a list of Obama's so-called achievements listed by the liberal media and embraced by libs. He changed out Obama's name and placed Bush in the text. When presented to the libs, they screamed everything from worst president, who elected this idiot, to treason and impeachment. When it was revealed that the libs elected this "idiot" and these were actually Obama's "achievements" and had nothing to do with Bush, they turned on the gentleman doing the study. Would be comical if it were not so sad. No, I am not going to publish the site or the study. If someone is so inclined to learn the truth, they will look it up themselves.

Most libs wouldn't know truth if it bit them in the behind, and have no desire to seek it. They just want complete, total control. They have no desire to hear out anyone. Biggest hypocrisy of all is, if they so beleive in Obama and his social programs, why have their incomes not been turned over to the goverment, why have their homes not been opened up to the homeless, why have their pantries not been opened to the hungry...all in their banner of "social justice". Yet if the 1% (paying 37% of ALL federal taxes) does not pay what they deem a "fair share" they crap on police cars, take over whole sections of town, rape, murder, do drugs, rob, destroy personal property all in the name of OWS.

Good to see you back Conservative - Chubby Checker/what if

[ In Reply To ..]
I was going to stay away for the same reasons you mentioned, but guess its the Irish in me. My mom always taught me to stand up for myself and fight for what's right and if anyone gives you a bunch of "hooey" (can't say the other word) give it right back.

Everything you wrote sums it up. By reading all the posts on the board the LIEberals don't care about the truth. They'd rather live in some fantasy land that Clinton was the best thing since sliced bread. They will never admit to any wrong doing. Same with the current one. It's very frustrating trying to have any sort of intelligent conversation with people of that mindset. They just don't care about the truth. They don't realize that there are other independent news sources and that not everyone who isn't a LIEberal doesn't watch Fox. Then when they can't argue with facts they'll throw out the Fox thing as though its an insult.

The poster who called republicans "blood thirsty throngs" and that they should be "safety contained" did it about for me. They have no proof. They are just nasty spiteful creatures hence the term nasty little imps. And if they don't want to be called that then they should not call republicans all the nasty names they do.

No, I do not like all republicans, but at least I don't hate all democrats. I actually thought a Ron Paul/Dennis Kucinich ticket would be interesting. But Ron Paul is so far down. There is something about Kucinich I just like. I don't agree with all of his ideas but I think he is a man true to his word and he has spoken on a lot of issues I agree with.

This board is getting really nasty lately. They can dish it out but they sure don't take it well.

Don't stop posting. I love your posts and insight. For me, when I recognize a moniker replying to my messages, if they've caused trouble with nasty name calling I just don't read it. I expect the undue attacks on anyone republican will be happening more and more because of the election coming up. Their purpose is to defect the real issues of the trouble this country is in because of the democrats. Hey lets talk about how Newt farted in public one time in hopes that they just might forget the hole this economy is in.

Anyway...keep posting. All you said about Clinton and that regime is true and well documented.

Thanks for your post - I am what if, just felt like posting Chubby Checker cos all they do is twist.

Newt masters dog whistle - tapping the anger

[ In Reply To ..]
He seems to have found the trick of tapping into the anger and creating the devisiveness that the regressives are so quick to embrace. Child labor, taking away the jobs of janitors, name calling, attacking the media, food stamps. What won't he stoop to. Where will the regressives draw the line?

Newt's outrage - SM

[ In Reply To ..]
Only fear of Dems intelligence is the lack thereof. Dems definition - DNA makes it impossible to glean truth from any situation. Clinton was and is a PIG. Guess it is okay to boff and get "other services" from Monica while your wife and daughter are in the white house, and lie to all Americans regarding same. Send you wife out on a "sympathy tour" for you (Hillary), knowing she is lying to CYA. Ask what the definition of "is" is, yet be a Rhodes scholar, dodge the draft, yet discredit those that served to give you the freedom to insult them. Real class act. Clinton did not balance budget alone, was done with Newt. Newt did not close govt - that was done by Clinton (dems could not "compromise" - their favorite word). Raise taxes to highest level in history and then make them retroactive so Dems could spend more. Leave a recession for incoming pres, but lie, lie, lie about the surplus. Have yet to see a Dem on here with any grasp of history. Very, very selective memories; another Dem definition. Keep your head in the sand...leaves yours Azz exposed, bigger target than the head.

i find the constant - grating

[ In Reply To ..]
obsessive changing the topic back to what dems did years ago frightening. The repetitive tit for tat. Almost like a mentally ill, stalker thinking pattern. Creeps me out. We cannot change the past. We can only safeguard our future by keeping blood thirsty throngs of republicans safely contained.
If that is not an incentive to stay informed and vote, I dont know what is.

Yet, if you reminded them about Bush tanking the economy - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
They would cry foul and do the poor me it's all the media's fault talking point countdown.

Obama TANKED the economy.... stalled the recovery - His policies are as bad as Carter.nm

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

Rewriting history - old and burned out

[ In Reply To ..]
The economy tanked before Obama ever took office. You cannot expect what was so many years in the making to turn around in 3 years.

Rewriting history- Everything Obama touches - Obama makes worse

[ In Reply To ..]
No rewrite of history here. Obama needs to buy a clue AND STOP SPENDING OUR MONEY WHILE HE DOES IT. Arrogant and elite are his only 2 qualities.

Obama tanked - In more ways than one

[ In Reply To ..]
Nice to see someone can actually read something besides Dems fairy tales and talking points. Obama = Bans drilling, allows foreign overshore drilling in Gulf and off Florida coast, double gas prices since he took over, kills Keystone pipeline to give to China, food stamps, inflation, increased bank fees due to Dodd/Frank (both D), more shipment of jobs overseas (can you say GE for one and paying ZERO taxes), high nemployment, lower wages, higher cost of living, out of control spending (increased by 33% by him alone). But hey, he and Michelle and a few selet dozen of family/friend travel on our time and dime to the tune of 10+ millions in 3 years, outlandish White House parties, constant fundraising/no governing (thank God for no governing, not Obama's strong suit). That's just scratching the surface. Obama demands from others what he refuse to give...but if you are part of the elite sociliast group, guess you don't need to. None of these things ever mentioned by the Dems blinded to his ability to sing. Since Obama is Dems idea of a fairy tale, can only imagine Dems horror story; an orange juice can would be better at president than Obama.

Grating - anything to keep the Dems out worth it

[ In Reply To ..]
Sick of self-righteous Dems that continually want to pick and choose what portion of their history to repeat here. Then, waste no time in listing every single criticism of anything not Democrat. Pretty typical, hypocritical Dem maneuver. Dems should be buried in 2012 election to save us all from Obama nonending debt, the food-stamp pres he is!!

but the dems who post - SM

[ In Reply To ..]
are posting happy thoughts and things to celebrate. Then the curmudgeons have to intrude to repeat their ancient grievances and cast aspersions. It is like they cant stand anybody who is not as miserable as they are. Never adding any ideas or insights, just purging.

Dems who post constant criticisms of others- - Perfect example of schizophrenia

[ In Reply To ..]
X

humor - SM

[ In Reply To ..]
I couldnt understand why this post make me laugh hysterically until i realized that it reminded of the knock-knock joke about interrupting cow. The post is just about as nonsensical. Thanks for the laugh on this cold, cold day!

Nonsensical to Dems only - All others will grasp it

[ In Reply To ..]
x

MOO! - laughing

[ In Reply To ..]
responding at your level of conversation.

Moo - Responding to level of conversation - Get a ladder - Dems will need it

[ In Reply To ..]
x

I find your message very disturbing - what if - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Do you find it frightening when the constant Bush bashing goes on. No, you do not. Bush bashing is the favorite past time of the dems and you never get sick of that. The posts below is not Tit for tat? It's a conversation regarding issues and past presidents. When talking about a certain issues Bush or Clinton's name is bound to come up. I read below posts praising Clinton as though he was a god and everything was great about him and the whole country prospered because of him. Which is not true. Many American suffered under his presidency. Middle income now low income, people losing their jobs because he shipped them overseas, families losing their homes. Taxes skyrocketed for many middle income families to double of what they were when republicans were in. Savings wiped out. Children now thinking it's okay to lie because the president does. Below the democrat worshipers even mentioned that phony surplus lie. The Lieberals will not get a grip on reality and understand the truth (i.e. facts put out by a government website even). They want to live in some fantasy that he was the savior and nobody is ever supposed to say anything bad about him or bring up facts about him or any other democrat for that matter. That is not what tit for tat means. If people can't handle a conversation with wrong doings of past democrat presidents and the current one's names being brought up then they have some serious growing up to do, as we are always listening to the wrong doings of Bush.

No, we cannot change the past. Doesn't stop the Lieberals from bashing past republican presidents. Even a leading psychiatrist came out and said Liberalism is a mental illness, and this shows he is right. The mentally ill and delusional is in your own party.

We cannot change the past, but we MUST learn from it. This includes past president (IN EVERY PARTY) and other leaders like Hitler, Stalin, etc. The only way to "safeguard our future" is by researching and learning everything we can about people we elect and make the best informed decision we can with the knowledge at hand. Listen to their ideas, research their voting records (not what they promise you to get elected). Despite whether or not you want to believe this some republicans have had some great ideas and so have some democrats, but you will never learn anything if you don't listen with an open mind and instead taking what democrats say as gospel and not questioning anything. You act as though all democrats are angels and every republican is a demon with horns. Your attitude is exactly what's wrong with this country and why we have the problems we do now. The country is not filled with just democrats sweetie. Its filled with democrats, republicans, independents, green party, communist party, no party, etc, etc, etc. What part of that don't you understand? Did you even take history in school and learn how our political system runs or just sleep through the whole course? "We can only safeguard our future by keeping "blood thirsty throngs of republican safety contained"????? ARE YOU (bleep)'n KIDDING ME. Talk about so obviously mis-informed and uneducated.

People with this mindset (or lack thereof) is what is wrong with the country, and what is truly frightening is they get to vote.

People with your viewpoints is EXACTLY why people need to say informed and learn about the politicians. Keep an open mind and vote for who is best, even if he/she is not in the party they affiliate with. People need to vote for the person who is best qualified. Not spew ignorant hateful words calling people in the opposing party "blood thirsty throngs". Especially when nobody in that party has done anything to have such ignorant hate directed at them. This is the worse kind of propaganda I have seen in a long time. Shame, shame, shame on you.

If you don't like that there are other parties other then the democrat party you should move to a country where you don't have a choice. Cuba would be a good choice (they are actually pretty close with the democrats). Try living in one of those countries where the people don't get a say in politics. And since you believe only democrats should ever be a politician and president, lets turn that on the other foot. Lets get a republican in there and then have him declare martial law and decide he's going to be in there forever and YOU don't get a say or get to vote or anything. No, wouldn't like that much would ya. So why do you believe your party should be the only ones.

You know, sure there are messages on this board I don't agree with. Most of the time I just pass them by seeing people blow off steam and some make me smile, but I respect their opinions whether or not I agree or disagree with them. This message does not deserve any respect. It's insulting and not "cute".

So the hate for any republican is clear. Yeah, we get it. I don't like all democrats, but I would never ever in my life ever come out and say that democrats need to be "safely contained". It's one thing to think it, to come out and actually say it is another.

When you admit there are good and bad in all parties then people can have a discussion. Until then attitudes like your is what will bring the country to a civil war. Maybe you might want to try listening to something other than Matthews, Olberman and Shultz. CNN is at least half way decent. Then there are many independents website. Please for your own safety and sanity stay away from the above mentioned hate and fear mongerers.

That's all - just truly disgusted at what you wrote. Everyone here is a human being. We may not all agree on the same thing, but a little civility on your part would have been the decent "human" thing to do.

End of the condensed version. Go ahead and flame away, it's expected with people of this mentality.

parenthetical - Sm

[ In Reply To ..]
do you ever wonder why children and grandchildren roll their eyes and walk away frequently.

What if - Conservative

[ In Reply To ..]
Glad to see your post. There are a few on here really sick of the constant insults by a handful that think they have the inside track on politics. If truth be told, which they never want to hear, their arguments are that alone...arguing and no facts. Since they cannot support their position with facts, they insult, name call, condescend, write novels that they believe reveal their intellect (not). See all the time on the lib lover's networks. Too bad they do not have a board for those that do not want to discuss, but only want to fight and insult. I guess then, they would preaching to the choir.

grating - Pretty pompous

[ In Reply To ..]
Wonder how those writing such hateful, despicable things would like to have their name inserted where they call out Repubs and anyone else not agreeing with them. Following their own advice would be in order.

So you really like Newt, huh? - me

[ In Reply To ..]
Well, I guess you must, although you just talked about Clinton in this post.

Which one of Newt's policies do you think will turn the economy around? What makes you excited about Gingrich?

Liking Newt - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Good place to start would be with the plans for unemployment and having people educated while on enpmployment (length of unemployment now equal to time it takes to get an associate degree). Once better educated and employed, reduction in ALL government services reduces (instead of massively expanded under Obama - Look at Obama's own stats published last week). Respect for American and its' exceptionalism (Obama bows to foreigners and kisses their rings - see Obama's own pics). Balanced budget which Newt did WITH Clinton (Obama has not submitted ANY budget for 3 years and refuses to do so). Smaller Government and more control over your own livies (Newt); absolute control by Gvernment in all aspects of your life (Obama). That's just a few differences.

Similar Messages:

Jun 11, 2011
I come here hoping to get a few laughs over the reptile man's bad luck and zip, zilch, nada. Y'all are slipping! ...

Jan 22, 2012
Going off about Saul Alinski, community organizing thugs not voters, blah blah. I would welcome his candidacy because all that gibberish was judged by Americans last time and deemed rubbish. Mittens released tax returns. I dont expect much scandal, he seems to be upstanding in regards to the law, just personally carrion seeking. I think Newt is doing all this (with the aid of the Las Vegas guy with $5 billion) just so he can ride on that dang presidental airplane in the seat of ...

Feb 10, 2010
Take note of Newt's big blunder about the nationality of Richard Reid (shoe bomber) . . . http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/10/newt-gingrich-richard-reid-american-citizen_n_456259.html ...

May 27, 2011
No wonder the Republicans are "sensitive." ...

Oct 21, 2009
I agree with you that the outrage seems to be missing in some of these stories. I believe this and others are completely outrageous http://rawstory.com/2009/10/sc-gop-chair-leaders-resign-pennypinching-jew-comments/ ...

Sep 06, 2011
Where is the outrage, or do most feel this is okay to promote this violence. If you don't like any of them, fine, we get it. I'm not wild about any of them myself. Don't watch and didn't vote for them, but where do we draw the line. I'm sure if the names were reverse with Obama, Biden and Chris Matthews all he!! would break lose and republicans would be accused of inciting violence. So where is it here? I'll be interested to read ...

Feb 17, 2017
from the right now that Trump is costing the taxpayers millions by jetting off to Florida every weekend? There were all kinds of complaints about Obama taking vacations. ...

Jun 05, 2014
Prior to Inauguration Day 2009, the Bush administration released 532 Gitmo detainees. One was implicated in the Benghazi attack. Where's the GOP outrage? ...

Dec 03, 2014
Where is Mr. Begic's protests? Where are Jackson and Sharpton at? Where is the media? Why is there no public outcry for his murder? He was murdered by 5 TEENAGERS with hammers. Why were those teenagers carrying hammers? Were they rebuilding Ferguson? There is not one word on this board about this tragedy. Why not? Why are we not outraged? It was a human life beaten out of existence by 5 thugs. I just pray I don't see the ...

Dec 03, 2014
Eric Garner in New York. Barkley says it is not a homicide, they were a little aggressive. Watching the video, Garner says several times, "I can't breathe." They didn't let up. Involuntary manslaughter. People need to be held responsible for killing people. Policy of choke hold is outlawed there--question seems to be whether it was a choke hold or a take-down procedure. I don't feel the end result of the incident was racist, but the beginn ...

Jun 09, 2017
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/london-attack-trump-sadiq-khan-tweet-gun-crime-us-a7776696.html?cmpid=facebook-post ...

Jan 20, 2012
Newt deeply outraged at audacity of questioning his personal life. Too bad he does not exhibit such sensitivity towards the feelings of others. ...

Aug 24, 2013
I think the Travan Martin case was tragic. It evoked enormous response, even from the POTUS, but where the heck is the outrage regarding the 88-year-old WW II white veteran who was pulled from his car and beaten to death by two 16-year-old black kids? Just where is it? This man fought and was injured in Iwo Jima for God's sake, gave years for his Country, and we hear nothing? That is sick. I'd just like to see some reaction from somebody. ...

Aug 24, 2013
Truer words were never spoken. http://www.ijreview.com/2013/08/74804-matt-walsh-random-and-bored-are-just-new-code-words-for-black-on-white-hate-crimes/ ...

Mar 25, 2017
When Obama was still in office there were constant complaints on this board about how much was spent on his vacations. Now that Donald Trump and family are costing this country much more money than the Obamas did, you are all silent. ...

May 16, 2011
Newt Gingrich and "the food stamp president" He didn't call Obama a "strapping young buck," but his slur is coded racism (and not very Catholic) just the same By Joan Walsh AP Newt Gingrich doubled down on his clever new slur against President Obama as "the food stamp president." He tried the line in a Friday speech to the Georgia Republican convention, and he used it again on "Meet the Press Sunday." It's a short hop from Gingrich's slur to Ronald Reagan's attac ...

Jul 30, 2012
Let’s give credit where credit is due. Mr Nowhere was finally able to pull off his chance to capitalize on his Olympics connection when he commemorated the Israeli athletes killed in Munich 40 years ago. The only problem is that shining moment took place on Israeli soil, instead of the long anticipated realtime spotlight he sought to bask in during his stop-over in London. The press-impoverished Tisha B’Av fundraising break-fast (LOL) was scheduled f ...

Sep 18, 2014
party or color? http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/flashback-george-w-bush-visits-mosque-condemn-islamophobia-wake-911-attacks ...

Mar 19, 2017
about his numerous trips to his Florida mansion to play golf. Every trip costs the country 3 million dollars and he has already spent more in 2 months than Obama spent in a year yet there were numerous complaints about Obama wasting taxpayer money. Also proposing tax cuts for billionaires and cutting funds for Medicaid. I see a lot of posts on this board about being Christian. Do these policies fit in with Christian principles? ...

Apr 10, 2012
Feeling a bit nostalgic for the good ol' days of the Clown Car Show. ...

Jul 12, 2017
ACTUAL collusion with a foreign government. This proves that this is just all political. The NYT never cared about Hillary's REAL collusion or Bill's either for that matter. Just curious....with Veselnitskaya in the US for all this time...who fronts her bills? She has to be living in fairly comfortable surroundings and likely eating up $10,000 a month minimum. And who came to the NY Times with this pitch for the story about Jr? I’ve yet to have clearly explained how they stumbl ...

Sep 20, 2012
Why isn't the media telling this little story? Probably because it will reveal just how bad this economy is and the Bamster will look bad. ...

Nov 21, 2016
Isn't it just astounding what gets their undies in a bundle? ...

May 12, 2011
What are your thoughts on Michelle inviting Common to the White House? I don't know the guy and know nothing about rappers, but from what I'm hearing, this is causing a big stink. I can't figure out why she would invite such a controversial person. Even though it's 2011, we're still litigating whether rap music in and of itself is a societal corrosive or an artistic expression that channels raw experience and expurgates emotions in the form of a catharsis. It& ...

Oct 27, 2012
On feminism and unattractive women: "Feminism is about victimization. Don’t forget Undeniable Truth of Life Number 24. Feminism was established to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream."- The Rush Limbaugh Show June 9, 2011 fromMediaMatters.org On college education being "feminized":"Colleges have been chickified. Men aren't showing up in as many numbers as they used to...This is what we have done to boys and men. The fe ...

Nov 15, 2014
As usual, superb show!! Replay at 9 p.m. Pacific time. ...

May 05, 2011
The facts of Pat Tillman's death were manipulated and Jessica Lynch was molded into a hero by the Dubya's message massagers. Now many question every bit of information coming from government. The damage done by dimbulb Dubya just keeps on reverberating. ...

Dec 03, 2011
I am making a blueberry pie to take to my stepfather tomorrow, and I thought it would like nice to use a cookie cutter in the shape of a bell and apply that piece of crust to the top of the pie. If I use a little bit of water to attach it, will it bake to the top crust securely? A lot of you sound like you are pretty handy in the kitchen! The lemon sponge pie I made for Thanksgiving was wonderful. Thanks to the person who suggested the allrecipes.com webs ...

Feb 10, 2010
I'm always facinated at some people who think all social problems and situations are so black and white.Abortion is here to stay, whether it's legal or not, just like it's always been an option when a woman finds herself facing the impossible situation of an unwanted pregnancy. Wishing it wasn't an option has never worked.However, when a discussion comes up about abortion, we women are strictly divided. Black and White in our opinions.This is a complicated issue. It doesn ...

Aug 05, 2011
Don't know if you remember my last posts awhile back about a stray cat we started feeding and took care, gave her shelter for the winter and she had kittens. We've taken the kittens in and adore them all. Now...here she is 3 or 4 months later, every once in awhile I'll get a glimpse of her nursing them. Vet told us milk has to be dried up before they can fix her. However, she is a stray and she has been going out walking around the neighborhood like she has ...