A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

Well, well. The Boston brothers did NOT have a license

Posted: Apr 22, 2013

to own guns. This kinda blows the argument that stricter gun control will curb murder and mayhem. The younger one wasn't old enough to own or buy a gun. The older brother never applied. He probably wouldn't have been able to lawfully own a gun anyway because of his previous charge in 2009.

They didn't have assault weapons, either, so that blows another argument. Get mad all you gun control posters want, but facts are facts and it's something I've been trying to get you all to think about since Newtown.

WASHINGTON -- The Boston bombing suspects engaged in a deadly firefight with police last week, possessing six bombs, handguns, a rifle and more than 250 rounds of ammunition. But the Tsarnaev brothers did not have proper licenses to possess the firearms, according to the Cambridge Police Department -- a revelation that comes just days after the Senate voted against strengthening and expanding background checks for gun sales.

Cambridge Police Department spokesman Dan Riviello told The Huffington Post that neither Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 19, nor Tamerlan Tsarnaev, 26, appeared to have a license to own a handgun.

"The younger brother could not have applied as he is not 21 years of age and the older brother did not have a license to carry and we have no record of him ever applying," Riviello said.

Under state law, residents under 21 can obtain a firearms ID card that allows them to own shotguns or rifles that hold 10 rounds or less.

Reuters reported that the police in Dartmouth, Mass., where the younger brother was a student, also had no record of gun licenses or ID cards for either brother.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/22/boston-bombing-gun_n_3131363.html

;

guns? - effie

[ In Reply To ..]
guns? They exploded guns in Boston??

Seems to me the concern should be whether they had chef liscence to justify owning two pressure cookers...

And lets not forget over 20 babies who DID die from being shot.. its not a joke and its not a political statement.. babies dying is okay with the gun lobby... thats a fact.

But it's hard to debate a crystal ball - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
I'm not sure how people who are against common sense gun laws know that they won't prevent future gun violence.

That argument, in my opinion, is tragic because the only way they will be proved wrong is when the next sensational massacre occurs, not to mention countless murders, suicides, accidents every day that aren't so sensational that may have not happened if we had common sense gun laws.

And of course, if we as citizens ever get lucky enough to be allowed our constitutional right to the pursuit of happiness it will never be documented how many lives were saved as a result of common sense gun laws that 90% of the people want.

You don't have to look far to find evidence - Truthhurts

[ In Reply To ..]
You said: "I'm not sure how people who are against common sense gun laws know that they won't prevent future gun violence."

The gun laws they are trying to pass are not common sense. It ties the hands of the law-abiding citizen and, again, it will not stop criminals or mentally ill. They will always find a way to get guns...especially since Fast and Furious let all those guns walk.

Mentally ill people are NOT stupid as some people seem to think. In fact, they're smarter than the average person. If you know anyone who is mentally ill, you should know that they are pretty darn good at getting around situations. Just look at what's been going on. Aurora, Newtown, Boston, etc. Those guys were mentally ill but it didn't stop them from getting guns, now did it?

You may find it funny by stating about "debating a crystal ball" but I don't find it funny at all. Look at the former gun ban. Did it do anything to curb gun violence? Nope. Why do you think Congress didn't renew that law? Because it didn't stop the criminals.

They need to ENFORCE the laws on the books now. There are plenty of laws that could curb gun violence but aren't enforced. Wake up.

I am so sick of you telling people to wake up. - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
all a law-abiding citizen is to murder to not be a law-abiding citizen.

I didn't say ANYTHING about anything being funny. The right wingers are the ones throwing around the LOLs and happy faces.

If anyone is a responsible gun owner, they should have absolutely no problem with common sense (and endorsed by 90% of the people) gun laws.

I agree with you but you're arguing with brick walls here, many here think - mentally ill should be defenseless just because of

[ In Reply To ..]
Most mentally ill are not violent and more likely to be victims then the general population, however many lack critical thinking skills and would rather take the easy way out and stereotype them all as dangerous psychos.

Many here apparently think that just because someone's been "branded for life" and diagnosed with something, regardless of the fact they've been stable for years, or gotten counseling for something or taken meds, that they're less than human and so worthless that they shouldn't be able to defend themselves against rapists, robbers, murderers, burglars and other assorted criminals. As I said, it's easy to do Biden and Obama's "repeat after me" than to actually RESEARCH things.

There are multiple other ways to protect oneself - without the use of firearms.

[ In Reply To ..]
Pepper spray, stun guns, tasers, etc. All without the risk of a loved one/child accidentally killing themselves with the chosen method of defense and available to all, regardless of mental health history.

I've heard home alarm systems are also handy devices. - AND

[ In Reply To ..]
you can also protect your property if not home!!

Of course if you are home, an alarm system could scare away the criminal and take away the self-satisfaction of killing someone.

I had one that went off all the time - when my dog pawed at the door,

[ In Reply To ..]
lightning struck, thunder, etc. Only an absolute idiot would think self-satisfaction comes with killing in self-defense.

You don't think George Zimmerman was consumed with - self-satisfaction?

[ In Reply To ..]
Before he was arrested, that is.

And regarding the alarm, my experience is that unless I leave something open none of my animals have tripped the alarm. And it wasn't that expensive either.

They're not one size fits all - You weren't there

[ In Reply To ..]
Pretty pathetic to wave the Zimmerman case in my face when I point out my right to defend myself in my own home. Alarm systems are not foolproof.

Sounds like the "buddy system and ballpoint pens" mentality. LOL

Zimmerman's community was his "home." And he - claimed self-defense

[ In Reply To ..]
He was a community watch dangerous gun-toting defender of his "home." And he killed an innocent young man in his warped misguided sense of "self-defense."

I don't know what buddy system and ballpoint pens mentality LOL is, but the humor (your LOL) escapes me unless loss of life (is that what LOL means?) is something you find humorous.

Loss of innocence to a rapist, burglar, etc. - is what 2nd amendment foes

[ In Reply To ..]
LOL at.

Buddy system remark http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/341113/another-colorado-democrat-women-can-use-buddy-system-judo-prevent-rape-andrew-johnson

Ballpoint pens remark
http://revealingpolitics.com/blog/video/hes-got-a-gun-get-your-ballpoint-pens/

Trayvon Martin jumped George Zimmerman. Zimmerman should've stayed in his car, yes, BUT you honestly think Zimmerman shot him for fun? Or is it just about a race thing for you?

I agree - no foe

[ In Reply To ..]
I have no problem with individuals owning guns. I also have no problem with guns and ammunition being strictly regulated and meticulously enforced.

You should try to ease yourself into embracing the reality that people in favor of gun control are not foes of the 2nd amendment.

How long do you think it would have taken for - Martin to be arrested

[ In Reply To ..]
if he was the one with the gun, defending himself against some guy twice his size chasing him down the street?

Not only should Zimmerman have stayed in his car, he was not supposed to be carrying a weapon, and he was instructed by dispatcher not to give chase,but he did anyhow, because he was a "big man" with a gun. He'll pay and I can't wait.

Think about it - did you realize that in many states - Tazers are banned to civilians

[ In Reply To ..]
and even pepper spray and stun guns are regulated? It's only a matter of time before someone acts a fool with one and just happens to be taking medicine for something and voila! Taser/pepper spray/stun gun/sword/knife control legislation will be the up for a vote in the senate. Look at what's up in Britain

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/british-doctors-call-for-ban-on-long-kitchen-knives-to-end-stabbings/

The non-dangerous mentally ill have just as much a right to defend themselves. They are NO LESS of a person than you or I.

Go ahead and thumbs-down a fact. - Can't handle it, not my problem

[ In Reply To ..]
x

please explain how it would tie the hands of law-abiding citizens - thanks

[ In Reply To ..]
I have heard this argument, but I don't understand how any of the proposed regulations tie the hands of law-abiding citizens.

Perhaps you should ask this rape victim - Who your fellow liberal

[ In Reply To ..]
Evie Hudak berated:

http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_22721762/colorado-senators-comments-rape-victim-drawing-criticism

There are other links

she's not my fellow liberal - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
I would be happier if you didn't make it personal. I read the article. I would not qualify the senator's remarks as berating, but that's my opinion.

You article referred to college campuses - an environment apart from the general population. I still am trying to understand how law-abiding citizens' hands will be tied by proposed gun legislation.

How do you think they had the fire fights with the police? - Truthhurts

[ In Reply To ..]
How do you think they shot and killed the policeman in his patrol car?

How do you think the younger one shot back at police?

Read news articles, for pete's sake and stop living in the dark.

How did they get 250 rounds of ammunition? - it's legal

[ In Reply To ..]
but it shouldn't be. Stop insulting people.

It's legal and should be - for a non-criminal to buy lots of ammo

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

but he was a non-criminal until he did the bombing. - that's the point. nm

[ In Reply To ..]
x

Most non-criminals aren't under surveillance - Ask law enforcement

[ In Reply To ..]
By that logic you can deny everyone their rights because they're "future criminals." Not how the constitution works.

Ask law enforcement. One of these guys was already under surveillance. YET they still had a gun.

No, the older brother wasn't under surveillance. - Truthhurts

[ In Reply To ..]
Russia asked to do a clean sweep on him but the FBI/CIA/whoever didn't follow through because they found nothing in the skim sweep.

Didn't insult anyone. - Truthhurts

[ In Reply To ..]
you have a problem. Told the poster to wake up and stop being in the dark. If that's insulting someone, then you have a problem.

BTW, when people insult me ("crystal ball"), making remarks about pressure cookers when the kids used guns, they're going to get it right back from me. I'm tired of following rules for this board when others don't.

Have a nice day.

What you said is condescending and insulting. What is so insulting - about a crystal ball?

[ In Reply To ..]
It's a metaphor for knowing something before it happens. It was not an insult. And that is exactly what you are doing if you say stricter gun laws won't prevent future violence.

So was what I said. Just a metaphor.... - Truthhurts

[ In Reply To ..]
...and stricter gun laws won't prevent future violence. I proved my point with my post on the former gun laws and I stand by it. It didn't and a new, even stricter law, won't do any better.

Read the old law.

I guess the future will tell. And you'll be the first - to report it

[ In Reply To ..]
With "sincere" sadness and prayers for the families left behind.

Stop insulting me! - Truthhurts

[ In Reply To ..]
You think just because I don't believe the gun laws they're trying to pass won't work, you give yourself a pass to insult ME by putting the word "sincere" in quotes as if I don't care about the murders.

I just wish for once you would rather debate or discuss than to insult. Have a nice day.

I shall have a nice day. Thank you for your sincere - wishes (nm)

[ In Reply To ..]
x

Notice all the dislikes? She comes with a posse. - me

[ In Reply To ..]
Never posts without them.

No you didn't, you just have an opinion they're trying to silence - Shall not be infringed

[ In Reply To ..]
x

Who's trying to "silence" anybody? - what?

[ In Reply To ..]
Since when is having a difference of opinion the same as trying to silence someone?

BTW, they just didn't think about setting off bombs - Truthhurts

[ In Reply To ..]
in a day. They decided to do this over months or even a year. Who knows? They certainly didn't go to a gun shop and buy the ammo in one day.So they had plenty of time to stock up on ammo to use that day.

millions being killed by abortion is ok with liberals - Preemie mom

[ In Reply To ..]
x

Thing is, pro-choice still want regulation and boundaries. - Pro-gun will not compromise at all.

[ In Reply To ..]
.

Not on things they approve of - Preemie Mom

[ In Reply To ..]
It's a tad ironic that Planned Parenthood basically refused to condemn murdering late-term babies that survived abortion. Babies farther along than mine when she was BORN.

Boundaries my foot. Liberals want to regulate EVERY part of our lives, yet see no problem with drug use and infanticide. Trash.

This is about Boston and gun control, you are - thread hijacking to rant about abortion.

[ In Reply To ..]
and liberals you think are "trash."

There's a "post new message" button at the top if you want to have that dialogue.

I'm putting it in perspective, you're talking about 20 babies dying here - PM

[ In Reply To ..]
way more die from abortion, something you libs condone. Throw invectives all you want but that's still a fact

That was not me that talked about babies dying. - We aren't all the same person here.

[ In Reply To ..]
I'm trying to have a decent conversation about gun control, not put up with side rants by people about Planned Parenthood.

For the record, Planned Parent provides birth control to 3 million women a year, doing a lot more to prevent abortion than hot-aired windbags who like to complain about the organization.

That WAS me who posted that reply, just abbreviating my nickname, geez - PM

[ In Reply To ..]
I put it in perspective when someone was going on and on about those 20 kids in Newtown. To me it's a tragedy when ANY child dies

Also a tad ironic - NK

[ In Reply To ..]
that someone of such moral superiority has no compunction about calling liberals trash and suggesting that we have no problem with drug use and infanticide. I suppose by the same token I could suggest that all conservatives hold Scott Roeder up as a hero and applaud the murders of abortion providers and violence against clinics.

LOL, most want legalization of pot - LOL pathetic reply

[ In Reply To ..]
Only trash has no problem with murder of millions of unborn children, yet uses the murder of 20 as an excuse to strip constitutional rights of citizens. I'm not ok with ANY violence.

My point, liberals are hypocrites who are ok with abortion yet still ok with taking away 2nd amendment rights with those who are not deemed mentally "perfect."

LOL LOL - commie trash NK

[ In Reply To ..]
You seem to have a good (albeit strange) sense of humor.

right? What is it with the right's LOL fixation? Nothing funny about - this conversation NM

[ In Reply To ..]
x

not a clue - NK

[ In Reply To ..]
One poster seems to add an LOL to most of her posts. Perhaps it salves her conscience for all the name-calling.

We get it. Aborting a fetus is legal. Tit for tat. So murder should - be legal too. NM

[ In Reply To ..]
x

babies - Effie

[ In Reply To ..]
The problem with bringing abortion into the debate is to make clear the fact that conservatives care about babies until they are born.... liberals care about people after they are born??

Abortions will be unnecessary once the world is perfect.

People will steal guns and buy them illegally. - No reason not to have laws.

[ In Reply To ..]
I don't get why a minority of people are bothered by things like background checks and licensing. The only guess I can make is that they have something that would pop up and disqualify them from owning a gun.

The argument that the government is going to storm people's homes and take ALL! THEIR! GUNS! doesn't cut it for me. We licence all kinds of things in this country, yet we all drive, fish, hunt, etc. People still drive illegally, but you don't hear anyone saying "don't bother with DUI laws, people will drive anyway."

Actually, I think some people just have some kind of cowboy complex.

Hitler's sheep thought the same thing once - "just trying to keep us safe!"

[ In Reply To ..]
right?

That is so asinine. - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
No, not right. Comparing something 90% of us believe is fair to Nazi Germany and genocide is wrong, on all sorts of levels.

It's a point I'm making - Throughout history, - nm

[ In Reply To ..]
rights being restricted and eventually being done away with starts out with "We're just trying to keep you safe." Not just Germany.

Then why not say that about every law and - call it a day?

[ In Reply To ..]
/

Not every law infringes on constitutional rights - nm

[ In Reply To ..]
x

Hitler and Nazis had nothing to do with keeping - people safe. NM

[ In Reply To ..]
x

We know that now, however he preached quite differently - back then

[ In Reply To ..]
to his people

hitler did not preach - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
he fomented, he agitated, he maligned, he propagandized. And it certainly wasn't about safety.

Just like Beck, Limbaugh, O'Really and - the rest of the

[ In Reply To ..]
subspecies. Guess they style themselves after Hitler.

Thing is it didn't start out as - genocide..

[ In Reply To ..]
It started out exactly like this - "just want to keep you safe." Make this illegal, then make that illegal, and pretty soon, the government has all the weapons and the people have none, which means they have no way to fight back.

No one's saying this is going to happen in the next 3 years or even the next 20. All it takes is the wrong person in charge and a few executive orders, "It's for the kids," "It's to keep you safe," and we'll either have a police state or a revolution. Our rights have been infringed on and our freedoms are disappearing little by little for decades now, so much so that we hardly even notice anymore. It's only going to stop when the people stand up and let the government know we've had enough. This is enough.

The background checks and licensing means the - Truthhurts

[ In Reply To ..]
government will control the database. That's a no-no.

If the gun control laws would have passed as they are, the police in Boston would have been stripped of the weapons they used last week. There were no stipulations in the bills that exempted law enforcement from using AK-15s like they did.

It's not a no-no to most of us. - So, are you saying

[ In Reply To ..]
If the law had been better written, you would have been open to a compromise?

The government controls the database on us when we get a license to drive a car, go fishing or hunting, even add an extra bathroom to our home.

I'm sorry, but I see no rationale in fighting this and I'm not going to change my mind, so I guess I'm going to go lie in the sun and drink my iced tea now.

The difference is no one in the - government

[ In Reply To ..]
might someday come after your car, your fishing pole, or your toilet. They may, however, come for the guns and since they know from the database exactly how many you have, they'll search your house until they get them all. This may not happen tomorrow or even 10 years from now, but all it takes is the wrong person in charge saying the right things for people to just accept this is the right thing to do - I mean, if no one needs an AK47 to defend themselves, why should they have the one they bought before the gun control law passed, right?

or maybe they could use the data base as - evidence

[ In Reply To ..]
or as a source to track down someone who commits a crime.

Or knowing a gun is registered, the owner of said gun might be deterred from committing a crime or selling/giving a gun to someone illegally knowing the gun will be traced back to them if a crime is committed with the gun.

And the AK47 was illegal until the law was allowed to expire.

Isn't that what congress is for? Checks and - balances? Seems

[ In Reply To ..]
to me that congress is doing a very good job keeping THIS administration from getting anything done; might that not be the case with future administrations as well? Also, since our democracy no longer seems to be representative of its constituents but more representative of industry and corporate lobbyists, I can't see any industry or corporation pushing for the confiscation of all guns/weapons. OTOH,I do see where a lot of legislation could be seen as a trek on a slippery slope.

"A background check could have caused problems..." - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Maybe you missed this part, or didn't read the whole thing as you demand everyone else to do:

From the article you posted:
"A background check could have caused problems for Tamerlan. Department of Homeland Security officials decided not to grant him citizenship after what The New York Times called a "routine background check" revealed that FBI officials had interviewed him in 2011, at the request of the Russian government, which was concerned that he had ties to Chechen terrorists. He was also reportedly involved in an episode of domestic violence in 2009 against his girlfriend."

Congrats to the NRA for being powerful enough - to drown out 90% of Americans.

[ In Reply To ..]
Never mind that elected officials are there to represent the public. They instead chose to represent the NRA, who uses their members' (i.e. pawns) bank accounts to fund their lobbying against the very bills the majority of their members support.

Talk about a broken system. I wish we could just do a majority vote in this country and do away with putting our trust in sleezy politicians and super-PACs and lobbyists.

Our elected officials have not been there to represent us in years. - Truthhurts

[ In Reply To ..]
They represent themselves and only themselves. They wouldn't get re-elected if they represented the people because their coffers wouldn't have enough money to campaign.

Wow now it's 90%. Just the other day somewhere I read 75%, then 80% now 90% - Jeepers people make up your minds.

[ In Reply To ..]
I don't think the NRA had anything to do with it.

But the other poster is right. Our politicians have not represented us, well, since I don't know when.

neither did Aurora shooter... - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Licenses are not required in Colorado. All of his guns were obtained legally. I think it's facile to argue that gun laws aren't useful every time someone commits a violent crime.

Holmes' shrink tried to warn authorities - nm

[ In Reply To ..]
x

Similar Messages:

Dec 06, 2012
goes to.... These cute little old ladies. Well done, Washington! ...

Mar 02, 2017
because a thief switched the plate of stolen vehicle with our license plate. Police stopped us with guns drawn and we were handcuffed before it was all sorted out. You can get anti-theft screws for your plate at an auto parts store or Amazon. ...

Feb 08, 2012
...

Mar 05, 2013
The word “FREEDOM” is among the list of banned vanity license plate slogans for Washington D.C., according to a government file obtained by a Freedom of Information Request filed by the transparency website GovernmentAttic.org. Other banned phrases include anti-tax messages such as "TAXKLLR" and "TAXRUS4" as well as any reference to the President of the United States such as “OBAMA,” “BARACK,” and “OBAMA44.″ “RONPAUL” is also banned. http://washingtonexaminer.com/f ...

Apr 15, 2013
I am sitting her just shaking and sick to my stomach. My sister was no where near the site but her husband is in the area. He is okay. Hopefully, no more bombs will go off. ...

Apr 18, 2013
Obamarama made of himself? He acted like he was at a pep rally. He is sickening. ...

Feb 12, 2015
I would like to put in a request for a nice 5 inch snowstorm for the Midwest, if that is possible? ...

May 04, 2015
And this time it was witnessed firsthand by a Fox News reporter who was there, so conservatives won't be able to say it was "made up by the liberals." ...

Nov 17, 2014
SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — A Utah woman says she encountered only brief resistance when she recently had her driver's license photo taken while wearing a colander on her head as a religious statement. Asia Lemmon, whose legal name appears on her driver's license as Jessica Steinhauser, said the pasta strainer represents her beliefs in the satirical Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. The Flying Spaghetti Monster movement, also known as "Pastafarianism," started in 2005 as a pr ...

Jul 03, 2015
HELENA, Mont. – A Montana man said Wednesday that he was inspired by last week's U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage to apply for a marriage license so that he can legally wed his second wife. More at link... ...

Apr 15, 2013
A pair of explosions rocked the finish line at the Boston Marathon, injuring at least a half-dozen people ...

Oct 16, 2009
http://rawstory.com/2009/10/louisiana-denies-marriage-license-interracial/ ...

Jan 14, 2010
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2010/01/06/some_saw_coakley_as_lax_on_05_rape_case/ ...

Apr 18, 2013
They can't punish one of their own. ...

Apr 24, 2013
Figures...birds of a feather. ...

May 01, 2013
BOSTON (AP) — Three more suspects have been taken into custody in the marathon bombings, city police said Wednesday. The police department made the announcement in a tweet Wednesday morning, saying more details would follow. Police spokeswoman Cheryl Fiandaca confirmed the tweet but referred all other questions to the FBI. Three people were killed and more than 260 injured on April 15 when two bombs exploded near the finish line. Suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev died after a gunfight ...

Aug 06, 2017
Four Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles employees and two others were arrested for allegedly creating false identification cards for illegal aliens; some of the false ids were used to register the illegals to vote in Boston. Mass Live reports: Four state Registry of Motor Vehicle clerks along with two other people were arrested Wednesday after authorities say they were making false identifications through the registry and selling them to people living in the country illegally, some of ...

Nov 01, 2014
This is an issue that affects EVERYONE!!! We should all be outraged and hold accountable those at fault. ...

Dec 17, 2016
It doesn’t matter how many articles of clothing Phelan Moonsong puts on before walking out the door each day: If he’s not wearing his favorite pair of goat horns, the Pagan priest might as well be naked. Unless the 56-year-old Millinocket, Maine, man is sleeping or bathing, his beloved horns are rarely far from his scalp. It’s been that way since he first laid eyes on the horns at a Pagan men’s group gathering in 2009. A friend whose goat had recently died offered the horns to gr ...

Apr 08, 2015
as he should be. He should get the death penalty. Actually, he should be blown to bits with one of his own bombs. ...

Aug 10, 2015
Unless some of us are secretly part of the 1% and just gluttons for punishment by working in this field, this is not in our best interest. http://www.politicususa.com/2015/08/08/charles-koch-admits-power-control-government.html they want total control of the government to dismantle it. It is a sad commentary, but instead of paying heed to what the Kochs are accomplishing in every state in America to prepare for their eventual takeover, Americans are mesmerized by a ridiculously long Re ...

Jan 09, 2013
tenfold over last year. Nationally, hospital beds in some areas filling up. Methinks it's time to stop procrastinating and go get that shot. If I still can. This was on the evening news. I'm hoping the illness that hit most people at our Thanksgiving dinner was this flu. It was certainly an enthusiastic spreader, but the seminal sympton was an unusual weakness that everyone commented on; fever yes and going to the lungs, but no one had significant tummy problems. Oh, well. Sounds lik ...

Jun 15, 2013
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=f_YLXFZJ3kc#! ...

Jul 22, 2013
http://www.wmur.com/news/national/woman-arrested-in-boston-victims-fund-scam/-/9857926/21079648/-/52lfbqz/-/index.html ...

Jul 17, 2013
The measures they were funneling money to didn't even pass. ...

Aug 19, 2017
$10 an hour for 3 hours of protesting, how much will Soros have to pay? (Hint: Conservatives ask your kids). I suppose he will report all this on individual W9 forms. ...

Oct 07, 2012
From an article in the New Yorker: "Their combined fortune of thirty-five billion dollars is exceeded only by those of Bill Gates and Warren Buffett." "The Kochs are longtime libertarians who believe in * drastically lower personal and corporate taxes, * minimal social services for the needy, and * much less oversight of industry—especially environmental regulation. These views dovetail with the brothers’ corporate interests. In a study released this spring, the University ...

May 13, 2013
xx ...

Jun 24, 2017
See article ...

Apr 20, 2013
OP/ED | 4/19/2013 @ 10:58PM |31,194 views Senator Lindsey Graham Says Suspend the Constitution For Boston Marathon Suspect And Designate Him An Enemy Combatant (Photo copyed from Wikipedia). (Photo credit: Wikipedia) Why is it that those who spend an inordinate amount of time professing their dedication and fealty to the United States Constitution seem to always be among the first to toss our founding document out the window the moment it becom ...