A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
I have to say I do not like debates. It seems to me that the broad audience of the American public has developed this "blood lust" akin to a boxing or wresting match or some Superbowl event. How can someone say that this person won on style, and this one on memorization of facts and figures and then vote for them? How does that relate to them being president, or one heart beat away?
The only real message I can take away from these debates is how does my picture of this candidate jive with the person I am seeing on the screen's behavior?
The 2 presidential debates, I saw the polite Obama having to show his more forceful side. I know his policies and positions. I know he is thoughtful and doing his work behind the scenes. I can see the results.
I saw Romney being Romney, evasive on the tax plan, answering in a misleading way, changing his positions (and/or not stating his position masked behind some "personal story." Yes, the moderator interrupted him, why? Because he kept trying to control the debate. His contempt for the moderator and women in general (the binders) was pretty obvious to me. Instead of answering if he would support Lilly Ledbetter Act, he talked all around it but never said he would support it. The only time I feel I have ever heard Romney "not acting" was in his lengthy remarks about the "47%" to his rich fund marks.
What I really did not like to see was his visciousness when trying to say President Obama had not addressed Libya as an "act of terror." That part when he picked up his eyebrows and was going after the President looked almost bipolar. I recall Ann Romney stating something about being worried about Mitt's emotional state if elected. Does anyone really want this guy answering the 3:00 a.m. phone call?
;