A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

This article says

Posted: Feb 4, 2017

I have felt this way about Trump even before he became president. This is what many of us fear. Many can disagree with the source but it is basing it on facts.

;

I disagree with fear mongering - especially from CNN.

[ In Reply To ..]
It's apparent where the left's talking points come from.

What a joke. No one takes CNN seriously anymore.

I wasn't - fear mongering

[ In Reply To ..]
This is a real concern for many of our citizens and it was not meant to be "a joke." I didn't need CNN or anybody to tell me what I was seeing in Trump. This article just happened to be one that I related to very well.

What would you say? - Just wondering

[ In Reply To ..]
There were many times when Obama spoke out about judicial decisions that he didn't agree with. What would you say to the people who had real concerns back then?

The article included - comparing what

[ In Reply To ..]
Obama said to what Trump said. Obama pointed out that he disagreed with decisions but didn't call them "so-called judges" and things like that and that is what Trump is doing. These are two different things. He is putting doubt in our government agencies. There is a difference between disagreement and insinuating that they are "so-called" judges.

I agree 100% with this article...SM - Old Anon

[ In Reply To ..]
What's that saying? Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Not an exact quote, but there is an absolute parallel to how Trump is leading to some devastating consequences in history caused by his style of leadership.

What absolute parallels are you referring to? - Just wondering - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
I'm not seeing much difference between Trump and Obama in this regard.

For example, do you remember that time when Obama used the State of the Union Address to criticize the Supreme Court about their Citizen's United decision? Then do you remember when Obama ordered the IRS to make life miserable for conservative groups because he was worried how the Citizen's United decision would affect his reelection chances?

Are those the "devastating consequences in history" you're talking about?

I remember the right claiming Obama ordered - the IRS

[ In Reply To ..]
to make life miserable for conservative groups but have never seen proof that he did. Could you provide this proof?

Here you go. - Proof.

[ In Reply To ..]
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/irs-admits-targeting-conservatives-for-tax-scrutiny-in-2012-election/2013/05/10/3b6a0ada-b987-11e2-92f3-f291801936b8_story.html?utm_term=.9d7db1fea3b8

This article says - the IRS admits

[ In Reply To ..]
to it. I'm not seeing where it says "Obama ordered" them to do it, as your post stated. There is a difference. In some of the articles I have found, the IRS has done this several times in our history. I don't think that is right but again, I do not see where Obama ordered them to do this.

Then here is this one - Here you go

[ In Reply To ..]
http://www.inquisitr.com/683532/barack-obama-tied-to-irs-scandal-by-weekly-irs-commissioner-visits-claims-critics/

Obama is linked not only at his direction but also because it is under his watch. They don't go out and do things unless specifically ordered to.

There are many other articles.

Again, this and the - articles in the other

[ In Reply To ..]
post do not say Obama ordered the IRS to do that. In the one you posted, it says Obama critics are claiming he did but no where does it say he did. I'm still researching this subject but from what I'm finding is Lerner was the one behind it.

The evidence is there. Looks like you are baiting - Not going there anymore.

[ In Reply To ..]
There are websites and proof, but whatever we post you will say is not credible.

Typical bait. Not going there anymore.

BO was involved in many scandals - SM

[ In Reply To ..]
during his time in the White House, some we know about, others that are yet to be uncovered. He was not only the worst president ever, but also the most destructive. Thank you, God, for giving us the chance to make America great again!

I remember it very well - Different poster

[ In Reply To ..]
Here are just a few articles:

Obama tied to IRS scandal by weekly visits:

http://www.inquisitr.com/683532/barack-obama-tied-to-irs-scandal-by-weekly-irs-commissioner-visits-claims-critics/

http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2013/06/confirmed-irs-scandal-tied-directly-to.html

Everything you need to know about the IRS scandal in one FAQ - Last Friday, the IRS admitted that it targeted nonprofit political advocacy groups with the terms "tea party" or "patriot" in their names.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/05/14/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-irs-scandal-in-one-faq/?utm_term=.812d0387f536

IRS Caught Using Donor Lists to Target Conservatives for Audits:
(Some of the targets):
- Groups that criticized Obama administration
- Hundreds of conservative groups were targeted
- A Hollywood conservative group was targeted and harassed
- Conservative activists and businesses
- IRS continued to target groups even after the scandal was exposed
- And… 100% of the 501(c)(4) Groups Audited by IRS Were Conservative
Constitutional groups

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/07/more-lies-irs-caught-using-donor-lists-to-target-conservatives-for-audits/

Federal Judge says IRS is still targeting tea party

http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/05/federal-judge-says-irs-still-targeting-tea-party-with-classic-catch-22/

IRS Scandal: 8 Key Figures Caught Up in Tea Party Tax Targeting Controversy - The longer the IRS scandal stays around, the worse it gets. Conservative and, particularly, Tea Party organizations were targeted by the IRS leading up to the 2012 campaign, creating a controversy that surrounds President Barack Obama.

http://www.newsmax.com/FastFeatures/barack-obama-scandal-irs-key/2014/12/26/id/613692/

Pages and pages of other articles, but that's it for now.

No, I'm talking about history in...SM - Old Anon

[ In Reply To ..]
broader terms, say the last 100 years or so, not something that happened within the last 8 years, specifically world history. You could do a search about leaders of the world during the past 100 years to find out what mistakes were made and unfortunately do get repeated. We humans are sure slow to learn from our mistakes sometimes as history will bear out.

Weighing in on this - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
There is so much to write about, will try and keep it in order.

This may be what many of you fear, but there are more that do not fear this. There are more of us who think it is about time.

President Trump is by far not a perfect man, but he is perfect for the job he had to undertake. The country could not have suffered through another devastating democrat presidency. More people in the country voted for President Trump, therefore I am confident that there is finally hope for the country. Some people (like the ones we see on the TV they call snowflakes and the anarchist and satanic people committing crimes, burning down and destroying property, etc) think that only what they want matters. They don't take into the fact that more people didn't want what they want. They are the ones who told us, you didn't like that Obama won, well you can vote him out in 4 years. Now that the shoe is on the other foot, they conveniently forget this. It's that "only what I want matters". Maybe if they stopped thinking about only what they want and started thinking more about what is best for the country and world and learn to live with their neighbors and learn how to give a little instead of only taking then the country would heal. We had to do it when Obama won. People (and I see some in Hollywood are already starting to come to their senses), but people need to stop listening to the fear mongering, brain washing leftist media. These are the same people who lied to us for the past 24+ years. Now they are finally getting back some of their own medicine. I have never put trust in CNN, since they became the Clinton News Network. They have lied and became untrustworthy as a news station and no longer is a news station. And this article proves that too.

I had to laugh at the dramatic headline "most bone-chilling tweet". LOL...Seriously? You have a judge committing treason and they (CNN) are upset that someone is pointing it out. Telling the truth...gee what a concept Clinton News Network. Maybe if you tried it for a change you wouldn't be where you are now (with very little viewers and nobody trusting you). Most bone-chilling....puuulllease. LOL Yeah, anyone who violates the law IS a "so called Judge". Judges are supposed to uphold the law, not commit treason.

So...the sky is not going to fall under President Trump. Life is going to be better than what we have had to suffer under. God sent him for a reason and I trust in His decision.

This article had many - facts

[ In Reply To ..]
that support what it is saying.

First off, more people did not want Trump. He won the electoral college.

Secondly, I was not brainwashed by media. I'm not listening to their "fear mongering." I listened to Trump and that was and is fearful enough.

The judge did not commit treason, he upheld the law and it is still being upheld.

You are right in that the sky is not falling but we might not be able to see the sky when Trump gets through lifting all the regulations that have helped clean up our air, water and food.

God did not send Trump, the electoral college did and unfortunately we have to all suffer for it.

Another fear mongering post. The article did not have facts - except the Judge is committing treason

[ In Reply To ..]
It is Clinton News Network. I don't need to say anymore.

The Judge certainly is not upholding the law. He is committing treason. He is not a real judge when they decide to ignore the laws and create their own.

The electoral college is put in place for a reason. It is so that the smaller states have an equal say. The electorates who do the voting, vote by the will of the people who voted in their districts. Since they voted for President Trump that means the people of their area voted for President Trump. They also found evidence of voter fraud with the Clintonistas. She did not get as many votes as she claimed. And they are finding more and more evidence that more people voted for President Trump, so yes, President Trump won more votes. Both popular and electoral.

Yes, God did send President Trump. God's will be done. Thank you God! The country finally has a chance to get out from under the evil regime that just left. The country (and world) is already benefiting from His decision.

The judge actually - did uphold the law

[ In Reply To ..]
and so did another judge who so far has found no evidence through Trump's appeal to change the verdict of the first judge.

I know the reasons the electoral college was put in place. I also know Trump won the electoral college. I also know Clinton won the popular vote.

The only evidence I have seen on Trump's accusations regarding voter fraud were Trump's claims. He said he based in on the Pew study. He misinterpreted the Pew study. The Pew study did inform us that our registration system does need an overhauling since there are dead people and people who are registered in two states to vote, but never said these dead people actually voted or that the people registered in two states voted.

Similar Messages:

Dec 21, 2009
January 18, 2006 DEMOCRATS PLEDGE TO PROVIDE HONEST LEADERSHIP, OPEN GOVERNMENT "Washington, D.C. – Democrats from across the country today unveiled their Honest Leadership and Open Government Act. In the Great Hall of the Library of Congress, Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, were joined by Senator Barack Obama and Congresswoman Louise Slaughter and their Senate and House colleagues to shine a spotlight on the Republican "pay for play" ...

Jan 27, 2010
Here is an article from the Rolling Stones magazine. Pretty interesting. http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/31234647/obamas_big_sellout ...

Apr 11, 2010
An article that some of us already knew, but nonetheless, is an interesting observation. There were a lot of different websites with this article, this is just one of them. http://www.chronwatch-america.com/articles/6670/1/Obama-Off-the-Deep-End/Page1.html ...

Jul 25, 2010
Link attached. ...

Dec 18, 2012
worth the read, and factual. ...

Feb 27, 2017
interesting points. The article is about the ban. It seems to me that the president should continue, as both Bush and Obama did, on putting new and adventagious things in the vetting process. We can always improve on things but an all-out ban to me is not adventagious. The video in this touches on a few other points. Perhaps listen with an open mind and maybe you will see how this "fine tuned" machine is running. ...

Jan 02, 2017
Could be true. ...

Nov 03, 2009
Very good article. Not so good for us, but the article is well written and interesting. Pretty insightful. Written by a naval aviator, Commander http://www.mesacounty.com/A%20Warning%20to%20Americans.pdf ...

Sep 16, 2011
hid her pregnancy and gave birth to twin boys in her parent's house and smothered them so her parents wouldn't hear them cry. She hid the babies' bodies in the laundry basket where her dad later found them. So...just curious if this is acceptable to some of you who declare women have a choice. Perhaps it would have been better had she went to a doctor and had the doctor deliver them breech and suck their brains out and crush their skull before he delivered their ...

Nov 11, 2009
Kiss your freedoms goodbye. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2009/11/06/judge-andrew-napolitano-health-care-freedom-congress/ ...

Nov 13, 2009
Good article Quote: "The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." —Margaret Thatcher http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204251404574342170072865070.html ...

Nov 13, 2009
No matter how much you hate him this is a good article. Cut him down all you want but it won't change the truth. Here's a quote from the article: Mr. Bush said that "the role of government is not to create wealth, but to create the conditions that allow entrepreneurs and innovators to thrive." I wish it was someone else who has said this because a lot of people sole purpose is hating and cutting him down, which diminishes from the importance of the article. http://www ...

Nov 22, 2009
If you don't like Huffington post I found this on other non-liberal sites. The article is the same words no matter which site you choose, so I'll just post the Huffington Post one. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dave-lindorff/obama-must-dump-the-bums_b_364293.html ...

Nov 23, 2009
Written by someone who doesn't think too highly of Palin. He gets a couple digs in, but nothing I wouldn't expect, but overall it's a good article and pretty fair. http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/11/not-that-it-matters-politically-because-shes-a-republican-idiot-and-hes-a-democrat-geniusbut-sarah-palins-poll-numbers-are-c.html ...

Nov 29, 2009
http://www.rense.com/general88/dss.htm ...

Nov 29, 2009
http://crabbycon.wordpress.com/2009/09/18/king-obama-to-head-the-un-security-council-scraps-the-missile-shield/ ...

Nov 30, 2009
Found this to be an interesting article I wanted to share. http://www.richardccook.com/2009/11/23/economic-crisis-what-must-be-done/ ...

Jan 18, 2010
An article by John Whitehead. Speak Truth To Power. Just thought it was interesting and wanted to pass it on. http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/commentary.asp?record_id=630 ...

Dec 10, 2010
A Bloomberg National Poll shows most Americans say they are worse off now than 2 years ago when PO took office. Full article below. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-09/most-americans-say-they-re-worse-off-under-obama-poll-shows.html ...

Dec 09, 2010
Gee, sounds like the dems are trying to be pubs in this article. Wish everyone would make up their mind. More than 50 House Democrats oppose tax-cut proposal By Vicki Needham - 12/09/10 11:02 AM ET More than 50 House Democrats announced their opposition Thursday to the bipartisan tax-cut proposal brokered by the White House and Republicans. Led by Rep. Peter Welch (D-Vt.), 54 Democrats signed on to a letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) calling the plan "fiscally irrespo ...

Dec 06, 2010
I thought this was interesting. Not a bashing post, just interesting read. ...

Feb 09, 2010
From American Thinker by Geoffrey Hunt Barack Obama is on track to have the most spectacularly failedpresidency since Woodrow Wilson. In the modern era, we’ve seen severalfailed presidencies–led by Jimmy Carter and LBJ. Failed presidents have onestrong common trait– they are repudiated, in the vernacular, spat out. Ofcourse, LBJ wisely took the exit ramp early, avoiding a shove into oncomingtraffic by his own party. Richard Nixon indeed resigned in disgrace, ...

Nov 20, 2010
This is interesting. It's an article by David Horowitz called "The Democrat party will disappear from the political scene". Well written and has some really good insight. The link has the first part of the story and at the bottom of the article is a link to the full story. Horowitz is founder and president of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, founder of Students for Academic Freedom, and co-author of “The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, an ...

Mar 20, 2010
Thought this was interesting and wanted to pass on. http://washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/19/impeach-the-president/ ...

Mar 23, 2010
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201003/why-liberals-are-more-intelligent-conservatives ...

Mar 24, 2010
Link Below. ...

Mar 25, 2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/24/business/24leonhardt.html?th&emc=th ...

Mar 25, 2010
http://nyunews.com/opinion/2010/03/23/24stark/ ...

May 24, 2011
Not really surprising how much of it goes to Muslim or Arab countries, but what the money is actually used for was an eye opener for me. Most Arab countries are oil rich....so my question is, why can't they take care of their own military and police forces and let us put some of those billions against reducing the deficit? Or...why not use that money to fund some of the programs people seem to think they can't live without within THIS country instead of ADDING to the deficit? ...

Apr 01, 2010
Pa. couple fight to not have to use township water - The Associated Press HOLLIDAYSBURG, Pa. — An elderly central Pennsylvania couple is fighting a court order forcing them to use township-supplied water because they say the chlorine in it makes the woman sick. Donald and Janet Burket were forced by a Blair County judge to tap into Greenfield Township's water system in 2008 to comply with a local ordinance. That ruling was upheld by a state appeals court. The Burkets complied ...