A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
U.S. employment increased more than expected last month as private companies hired workers at the fastest pace since April, offering more signs of an up-tick in a sluggish economy.
Employment in October was supported by the private service-providing employment, which jumped 154,000. Temporary help services, a harbinger of permanent hiring, increased 34,900 from 23,800 in September.
2010 has had more private job creation than during the entire 8 year tenure of George W. Bush.
The average work week increased to 34.3 hours from 34.2 hours in September.
Overall government employment dipped 8,000.
;"Health Care continued to add jobs in October".
Sure, but what where they? CNAs, LPNs, RNs, HIMs, medical assistants, research assistants, etc. Home care services are booming and hiring and those generally require CNAs or LPNs.
They aren't scrambling for MTs unless you want to work for a national.
Yesterday, I looked at aggregate job-creation numbers, comparing presidents Bush and Obama. Today, I am looking at the number of private jobs created during President Bush’s eight years and comparing that with President Obama’s record, in order to test the accuracy of Florida congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s claim that President Obama is on track to create more jobs in 2010 than President Bush did in his entire eight years of office.
The chart below shows the monthly changes in private-sector jobs between January 2001 and January 2009:
I think this chart is stunning in a number of ways. Interestingly, if we leave out January 2009 from the calculation, President Bush’s net private-sector job creation is positive: 133,000 jobs. Also, this chart shows that during the Bush years, the country went through two recessions — I never realized how bad the first recession was until I looked at the data. In the first year and a half, 3.4 million jobs were lost.
Overall, during Bush’s eight years in office, 7.6 million jobs were created. As I mentioned yesterday, the net number is negative, mainly because of the overwhelming number of job losses during his last month in office. So far, under President Obama’s tenure, some 938,000 jobs have been created — after losing 3.2 million private jobs. And it could get worse. According to the front page of the New York Times today:
More here:
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/249624/more-job-creation-veronique-de-rugy
Or how about this from the CBO itself if it will make you feel better:
The unemployment rate in October 2010 was 9.6 percent. In August, CBO projected a slow rebound in employment, with the rate falling to just below 9 percent by the end of 2011, and then declining more rapidly to near its long-run sustainable level of 5 percent by the end of 2014.
The articles state the employment growth during GW's term and when employment growth will take place during Obama's term. If you just want to skip over the info, then no wonder you believe everything you hear.
Sorry, not meant to be a snide remark or trying to start trouble, but I believe this is the second time you made a comment to a post that had info but wasn't read by you.