A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

Pennsylvania voter ID law struck down by judge as unconstitutional

Posted: Jan 17, 2014

;

Great. Now more illegals can vote for the - donkey party

[ In Reply To ..]
'cause they'll be promised the moon!

I wonder why no one came up with the idea of stricter voting regulations before - bofore 2008?nm

[ In Reply To ..]
x

Gee, I don't know - NK

[ In Reply To ..]
It's just a mystery.

Do a little checking - old and burned out

[ In Reply To ..]
Voter fraud is a very small fraction of 1%. Illegals don't vote because they don't want to be caught.

Oh, okay. Sure. - Whatever you say.

[ In Reply To ..]
But not true. Do some investigating.

If you want a more independent source - old and burned out

[ In Reply To ..]
I can't find one.

Even a little voter fraud is not acceptable. - Truthhurts

[ In Reply To ..]
Remember the saying "One vote can change the election" or something like that? It applies to voter fraud, too.

There was nothing wrong with the PA law. They had free services set up for those that needed help getting ID requirements, needing a way to and from the place to get the ID, etc.

http://www.dmv.state.pa.us/voter/voteridlaw.shtml

There was according to the judge, and therefore, there was a - problem.

[ In Reply To ..]
That's why we have judges. To decide right from wrong. We may disagree, but the judge has the last word. There was something wrong with the PA law.

Not all judges are correct - It just so happens

[ In Reply To ..]
You agree with him. If we have judges decide right from wrong, then judges would not come in and change the decision another judge makes.

So that there blows a hole in your theory.

It's not a theory. The judge is the law. Again as I stated - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Everyone has an opinion. The judge determines what is right and what is wrong in the eyes of the law. The law is what we follow. Therefore, the PA law was bad. The judge said so. The judge is law. It's not a theory. It's a fact. If another judge overrules it, then that is the law. That's the way it works. Opinions versus facts. Clear?

And again I state - Not all judges are right

[ In Reply To ..]
Otherwise you would not have judges overriding other judges decision.

In this case the judge is wrong.

My point is... we live under a system that says the judge makes the call and that call - is the law.

[ In Reply To ..]
You can say the judge is wrong, but the law says the judge makes the call. This is not a matter of opinion. Vote the guy out who appointed the judge. That's the system.

Or... are you saying that you don't respect our American system of justice unless it goes in your favor or it is aligned with your opinion?

Was going to answer until your last snotty paragraph - you get nothing! - nm

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

Was this judge being impartial or did he rule because of his party - Truthhurts

[ In Reply To ..]
The voter ID law has been changed to comply with the last time this came up in the courts.

How much more "liberal" (judge's words , not mine) does this law have to be changed? They were going to provide free transportation for voters to the photo ID centers to those citizens that had none. They were waiving fees for the ID cards for certain citizens (probably the elderly and poor). They loosened the requirements for proof of residency and I think they had something in place for proof of birth.

The judge is a Democrat...I don't care what anyone says, I believe he sided with his party. After all, these judges are elected to office. Was he up for re-election? I noted in an article that the judge stated that "the state failed to show any evidence of in-person voter fraud." Well, what about absentee ballots? There are plenty of other means to commit voter fraud. All you have to do is do a little research on line and you can see how others did it in other states. Photo ID could stop most of it.

I don't think this is done and over. The state attorney general thought the law was constitutional. I think with a little more tweaking, this law can pass.

I still can't figure out WHY people are so against this when they need ID for other legal matters.

People aren't against it, - democrats are

[ In Reply To ..]
because they like to stuff the ballot box with their person, as has been cited by many sources within this thread.

Please confirm we all accept twitter and FB as sources. Just say yes so I can use them - w/o challenge nm

[ In Reply To ..]
x

This is our system. Just because a citizen does not agree, does not make it so. - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Can I make an argument that a judge's ruling is wrong because it is not my personal opinion? No. It remains my opinion, but the law, our system, the American constitution, says it is law. I seriously don't understand why this is so hard to grasp.

I also believe this is not the end. Other states are facing the same challenge and it is my hope they will reach the same end. If they don't? Well, that's the law and I'll accept it as the law. It won't be my opinion, but is the law.

It's not the percentage that is important, its the fact that it happens - The Sarge - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
I'm not buying the 1% thingy, but even at that it doesn't matter what the percentage is. Voter fraud is wrong and illegal (hence the word "fraud"). And illegals do vote.

BTW, there are plenty of independent sites. The article you posted below is not the only "independent source". But even at that if a source is correct (i.e. if the information given can be verified to be correct), then it doesn't matter whether or not a conservative or liberal website posts the information. People do their research and the facts are facts. Just because something is posted on a conservative or liberal site does not change facts. There are plenty of conservative websites that post the truth. For anyone to dismiss facts just because they are posted on a conservative or liberal website shows people have a closed mind.

Here are a couple interesting websites. BTW - Illegals do vote.

http://www.newswithviews.com/JBWilliams/williams201.htm

http://brianmckinny.wordpress.com/2014/01/13/voter-fraud-what-voter-fraud/

What is so wrong with having to show ID? - I don't mind showing..

[ In Reply To ..]
...mine as long as the ID checker doesn't laugh. Seriously, though, is it a problem to have to show it?

I don't mind showing an ID either. - 1 person 1 vote

[ In Reply To ..]
It's the only way to be sure elections are fair.

The only people against this are people who want to cheat the system.

Were they fair before 2008? What was so drastic that all of the sudden it needs - to change? NM

[ In Reply To ..]
X

Maybe because of the people who voted for Obama 5 times - Check it out. It's true.

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

I'll post this for you too - old and burned out

[ In Reply To ..]
See link

No thanks - I'll stick with actual facts

[ In Reply To ..]
Straight from their own mouths:

"Yes, I voted twice," Richardson told WCPO-TV.

Authorities also are investigating if she voted in the names of four other people, too, for a total of six votes in the 2012 presidential election.

Four Dems admit to Voter Fraud, Voting for Obama more than once

Poll Worker Voted Six Times For Obama and She’s Proud of It…..

After publicly boasting that she voted twice for President Obama in November, a left-wing Ohio activist associated with a George Soros-funded group claims she did nothing wrong by double-voting.

“There’s absolutely no intent on my part to commit voter fraud,” said Melowese Richardson, a longtime Cincinnati poll worker and Democratic activist whose unlawfully cast ballot canceled out a lawful ballot and thereby deprived another citizen of his or her right to vote.

http://www.bing.com/search?q=people+vote+for+obama+more+than+once&qs=n&form=QBLH&pq=people+vote+for+obama+more+than+once&sc=0-22&sp=-1&sk=&ghc=1&cvid=4e1595a12dd0419aab29804e3efbf0a3

I wonder why - NK

[ In Reply To ..]
this article names only one person. You seem to imply that "people" voted 5 times. Do you have more information because, try as I might, I can't find them.

Sure, I'll be happy to help you - I'll stick with actual facts

[ In Reply To ..]
Okay, this first link shows tweets from actual people who went to vote to be told that they had already voted (when they hadn't).- That's okay though if they were going to vote republican their vote shouldn't count after all.

http://twitchy.com/2012/11/06/voter-fraud-people-go-to-vote-ballots-already-cast-in-their-names-others-vote-more-than-once/

Ohio Obama supporter voted 6 times - Her name is Melowese Richardson. I didn't "imply". Sorry if I misled you on that one, it's simply a "fact". Should have stated that, my mistake.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/19/ohio-poll-worker-obama-supporter-investigated-for-potentially-voting-six-times/

In regards to the above lady who illegally voted multiple times they are investigating 19 other people (I don't have their names, but I'm sure you could call the investigators back there to obtain their names. Since there is/was an investigation that means it's a true incident that happened).

3 registered democrats were arrested in NC for voting for Obama multiple times: Brandon McLean, Kierra Leache and Sheila Hodges.

Lela Murray also voted more than once

http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2011/08/four-dems-admit-to-voter-fraud-voting-for-obama-more-than-once/

Stephanie Caballero is the regional field director for Obama’s Organizing For America in Houston, Texas. Federal Election Commission documents show, according to Project Veritas, that Caballero is a “salaried employee of the DNC [Democratic National Committee].”

Caballero is caught on camera helping the young woman try to vote in Florida and Texas in the upcoming election.

She also states “it just really concerns me that if we don’t do everything we can we’re not going to win."

http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/10/new-okeefe-video-obama-campaign-staffer-caught-helping-activist-vote-twice/

This man (I can't find his name anywhere) but right from his own mouth (and on camera, so am not making this up) he talks about voting a couple times):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZwng4omanI

Jim Turner wrote on Facebook that he voted at least 4 times in 4 different districts and plans to vote a 5th time in his home precinct.

" What a great role model...his church, community and grandkids must be so proud!"

http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?219632-Idiot-brags-on-Facebook-about-voting-multiple-times-for-Obama

And the above are only the ones that make the headlines.

So, people are okay if people vote multiple times as long as it's for a democrat. What about voting for a republican 5, 6 or more times. Would that be acceptable too?

Then there is the whole issue of dead people voting. Oh that's a fun one to delve into...wink, wink.

Thank you for posting and bringing truth to the board. (sm) - msg

[ In Reply To ..]
These were highly publicized during the election but no one would have heard them on MSM. I don't know why people find it so hard to believe that someone who has a hard time distinguishing truth from fiction (El Presidente) wouldn't have a hand in this. Anything to be elected. Anything. (note to self - Kind of off topic but not really. Don't worry about the attack going on in Benghazi, you just get on to Vegas so you can win, win, win)

Yes, indeed. - Thank you! (sm)

[ In Reply To ..]
The bottom line is that it doesn't matter what color, what party, what persuasion. Voter fraud is illegal (as is illegal immigration).

Yes. "illegal" is the word that tipped me off. - :)) Why doesn't govt get it?

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

Thanks for the links - NK

[ In Reply To ..]
but I don't put too much stock in tweets and Facebook postings.

In regard to Hamilton County, Ohio, 80 people were investigated, and that number was reduced to 19. Of those, 3 were charged with voter fraud, and although of course it's not okay in any instance, only 1 of those 3 revealed who her vote was cast for.

If voter fraud were so rampant and the 2012 election was indeed fraudulent, I would imagine there would have been a lot of Republicans doing more than whining about it and that enough money could have been gathered by them to take it right to the Supreme Court.

The reason behind the tweets and FB is - Sheesh!

[ In Reply To ..]
you asked for names, I gave you names. This isn't some 911 event going on where you would look to tweets and FB to get an actual news story, but you asked for names and tweets and FB had the names. Just because it was posted on tweets and FB does not mean it didn't happen.

The issue is voter fraud, not what percentage not how many people. You can make up all the excuses as to why you think voter fraud is okay as long as your fave gets elected.

The issue at stake is voter fraud - period! Voter fraud is named voter fraud for a reason. Fraud means deceit, trickery, or breach of confidence perpetrated for profit or to gain some unfair or dishonest advantage. When its voter fraud that pertains to voting. Voter fraud is also illegal.

It doesn't matter whether or not voter fraud is committed by democrats, republicans or anyone. Fraud is fraud.

It's interesting - old and burned out

[ In Reply To ..]
how people only believe the things that support their own point of view. You don't believe posters on this board but you believe someone who says "Oh yeah, I voted six times." While any fraud is undesirable some occurs in every aspect of our daily lives. Voter fraud is not a major issue but voter suppression if this law passed would be. There are millions of voters who would have great difficulty obtaining a photo ID and this is clearly an effort to suppress the vote of the elderly, poor and minorities, all of whom tend to vote Democratic.

Why - I'll stick with actual facts

[ In Reply To ..]
When a lady states she voted multiple times, when a men states on camera in his own voice he voted multiple times. When an investigation is ongoing and it is found that someone votes multiple times. When someone on FB brags about how he voted multiple times, why would you not believe them. They just committed a crime and are pretty proud of it. Do you actually think they are lying about this? That would be a totally stupid thing to do on their part. That's like walking into a police station saying you murdered someone or committed a crime you didn't do. Nobody does that.

You keep stating over and over that voter fraud is not a major issue, but it is. You may not think so, but it is a very big issues that many Americans want resolved. All sides.

Everything is being done to ensure voters get to vote. I assure you there is nothing sinister going on, but you cannot sweep fraud under the carpet like it didn't happen or that's its not important.

If any politician gets elected by a fraudulant way that is a huge issue for most of us. If it was the other way around and all these people came out and said I voted 20 and 30 times for Romney and he ended up winning I know for a fact you would be upset about that and you'd be stating so. You can't just ignore it or pretend its not important because the person you support got elected.

That is just not right and that is not American and how our system is supposed to work.

ONE vote per person! ***PERIOD!!!***

Anecdotal evidence - old and burned out

[ In Reply To ..]
is just that and is not supported by further investigative attempts at proof. People lie about all sorts of things whether it makes sense or not. In the Bush v Gore election there was widespread evidence of election tampering, which is a different issue, much easier to accomplish and much more significant. Of course I don't want to see fraudulent elections regardless of who wins but neither do I want to see millions of poor, elderly, rural voters denied the right to vote because they cannot get an ID that satisfies Republican politicians.

OMG - why didn't you just say you are not interested - I'll stick with actual facts

[ In Reply To ..]
in facts and prefer to live in Candy Land.

I'm cutting off any further attempts at a conversation with you.

I presented facts. I gave you a video of a guy stating out of his own mouth he did that and and woman who stated she did that and you still seem to want to believe they are lying about it and everyone is lying just because it's not what you want to believe.

So here you go. I will have no further conversations with you.

This person is a baiter! - On every issue!!

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

That's why I'm not responding to any more of her posts - I'll stick with actual facts

[ In Reply To ..]
You just cannot discuss issues with them anymore. They bait you into a conversation then report you for giving your opinion.

I see I'm not the only one who feels this way.

I don't believe anything people post on FB. - Sorry. :/ nm

[ In Reply To ..]
/

Yes, I'm sure he posted because he wanted to be arrested for - something he didn't do

[ In Reply To ..]
Of course, it happens all the time. People just wander aimlessly walking around shouting out that they committed crimes they didn't because they secretly want to be arrested.

Jeepers creepers people. Do you even listen to yourselves? Wait, never mind.

I'm sure the FBI are going to be banging - on his door at any second.

[ In Reply To ..]
Have you seen some of the BS people post on Facebook and Twitter? Do you really believe it all? People brag about all sorts of things that never happened, and Facebook happens to be a perfect platform for it. If you want to beleive, believe it. I personally think Facebook is a perfect platform for pathological liars and showboats, and people who are just plain bored and looking for attention OR looking to rile people up and laugh about it later. There's no way to know if they're telling the truth, and I happen to be highly suspicious of "facts" posted on Facebook.

You've got to be kidding - rolling eyes

[ In Reply To ..]
Sheesh!

What about all the ones for Bush 10 times? You can check - it out tooNM

[ In Reply To ..]
x

One word: ACORN. - Truthhurts

[ In Reply To ..]
Read or watch some of the old articles on ACORN. That's what was so drastic

Elections need to be fair for EVERYONE - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
It doesn't matter what happened before 2008, 2004, 2000, or 1948 for that matter. The simple fact is elections need to be fair for everyone. The mentality that it's okay for democrats to commit voter fraud (just as long as their favorite sports team gets in there no matter what the cost, and only bring up voter fraud when republicans do it), needs to end.

As one statement below says it very well an "unlawfully cast ballot canceled out a lawful ballot and thereby deprived another citizen of his or her right to vote". You cannot just keep voting over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over for a person cheating the system at any cost just because you want your candidate to win.

1 person 1 vote.

I agree, or have a mail-in ballot... - NPC

[ In Reply To ..]
...so people won't laugh at the picture. :-) I heard OR has all mail-ins. Anyone know if that works well for them?

I'm in OR and it works great - Oregonian

[ In Reply To ..]
We get our ballots about a month or two before the elections. There are two envelopes. 1 with your confidential vote, the second is an envelope that you sign. They match the signature against your registration signature that's it. It is supposed to ensure that everyone gets to vote, they have enough time to vote, and 1 vote per person. Of course that's not to say that once it gets to the polls someone else has a ton of blank votes they can submit, but it's very convenient for all of us.

I am a conservative too, but I love our governor. One of the very few democrats who has tried to do things that help us.

Sounds wonderful - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
I had to go out of town unexpectedly and could not vote last election. With a system like this, this would not have been a problem. Sometimes the lines get very long and I feel bad for the people who have a hard time standing in line so long.

They've got secure boxes all over the city. - Oregonian

[ In Reply To ..]
Every where you go so that people can get to them easy. Don't feel safe driving in one area, no problem, a few streets away is another secure place to drop off the ballots.

My understanding is that everyone who registers to vote gets mailed a ballot. They are doing everything they can to get people registered to vote, but then only one ballot per person.

Republicans are doing everything they can to make it easy for people to get registered. Free to register, free transportation to the place to get registered. They want to ensure elections are fair. Democrats are the ones fighting against that. Like I say I am a conservative, but I really like my gov.

Have there been any problems with voter fraud? - How long has

[ In Reply To ..]
OR had this in place? It does sound ideal.

I wish I could answer that - Oregonian

[ In Reply To ..]
It's been in place ever since we moved here, bout 7 years ago. I can't answer on the voter fraud issue itself. While I have never heard of any problems if there is an election there is bound to be voter fraud. Personally I think it's a more secure system than the voting machines or voting via the internet.

Its too bad the Republicans would not allow - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
the automatic voter registration with driver's license bill. Sounds like they are trying to discourage voting to me, not encouraging it.

They give driving licenses to - ILLEGALS

[ In Reply To ..]
in some states!!! You sure you want an automatic voter registration with a driving license?

We are talking Oregon, follow post - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Just like vision test, it could be certified at the time of renewal. But hey, why not duplicate services and cost the government/taxpayers more money. We could always take the money from the aide to children and disabled.

They're discouraging illegal voting. - No fraud.

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

Mail-in/absentee. Be sure to update your signature. - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
More voter fraud is attempted through mailed ballots than in-person.

And ballot signatures are checked against what you have on file in your county supervisor of election/canvassing board (when you registered decades ago possibly). If it doesn't match, your ballot is not counted. Depending on the state/county, you will never even know it.

You can go to your respective supervisor of elections web site to see exactly the statistics regarding mail-in ballots that are not counted for whatever reason it may be (address verification via DMV not a match, voter not alive, bad postmark, signature not a good match--and we're not talking about experts here, so...). Most are required by law to post the statistics of rejected mail-in.

Mail-in, IMO, is a bad idea unless you have no choice.

I'm showing up in person. Even if my state for whatever reason chooses to cut early voting hours (they did in 2012--FL-backfire big time). Why they would do that is beyond me, unless they want to make it less convenient to vote (for both parties).

I used a mail-in in CA because I was married - in an election year

[ In Reply To ..]
and couldn't get my ID changed in time to go to the poll. I don't know how many other states have mail-ins, but I wouldn't have been able to vote without it.

The problem is - old and burned out

[ In Reply To ..]
that there are many, many poor people in rural areas who do not drive, have no way to get to a govt agency to get an ID and have been voting for years and years. To disenfranchise them now is simply an attempt to keep more poor people from voting. Voter fraud is not a major problem.

That's not disenfranchising - The Sarge - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
When people are offered free transportation to obtain a voter ID card, people are offered free transportation to get to the voting booths that is not disenfranchise. Everything is being done to get people to vote.

Disenfranchise is what the democrats do to the military by not counting their votes simply because they are more conservative. Don't you think they have the right to vote to?

Voter fraud is a very huge problems. Not only people voting multiple times, but you also have the voting machine fraud when the people selected Romney's name, Obama's kept coming up no matter how many times they pressed Romney's name.

I meant don't you think the military's vote should count too? - The Sarge -nm

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

Are you referring to that blog (fiction) about boxes of military - ballots

[ In Reply To ..]
that were throw away? It was posted here several months ago and was just a fiction piece written by someone with absolutely no truth and admitted to be same.

Please post a factual article about this.

No - .

[ In Reply To ..]
.

Then what? - nm

[ In Reply To ..]
x

And let's not forget - old and burned out

[ In Reply To ..]
hanging chads. Of course, I think all votes should count but also all people who want to vote should be able to do so without politicians throwing roadblocks in their way. And again, voter fraud is not a huge problem and I'd like to see one CREDIBLE source that says it is.

There is obviously no - getting through to you.

[ In Reply To ..]
How many examples of voter fraud do you need to hear about before YOU consider it a "huge" problem? The fact that it exists at all in this country is problem enough for me.

Furthermore, I agree 100% with the other poster regarding the military vote. These men and women are defending our freedom to vote. Their absentee ballots should be counted first before yours and mine!

I find it strange that with all the accusations and supposed..sm - VTMT

[ In Reply To ..]
proof of voter fraud, and after over a year of "investigation", no wrongdoing has been proven and no one has even been charged with a crime let alone convicted. I suppose that the next response will be it's a conspiracy and Obama destroyed all the evidence. This is another fool's errand .

This is another one who doesn't - get it.

[ In Reply To ..]
Even though the evidence is there. So sorry.

I guess you must have missed all the proof in post above. - Dead people voting is my fave. Thanks ACORN.

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

FB proof? Please don't dispute dem using CNN as source if FB is a reliable - Rep sourceNM

[ In Reply To ..]
x

Who says they are not? please source - thx nm

[ In Reply To ..]
x

Huh? - nm

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

No one said military ballots should not be counted. Nor is there prroof they - have not beenNM

[ In Reply To ..]
x

Um, yes there is - nm

[ In Reply To ..]
nm is deserved.

Where? Please link. thx - nm

[ In Reply To ..]
x

Please do your own research - The truth is out there

[ In Reply To ..]
I get it, I post a link and if you don't like the info you say its not credible.

Do your own research.

What I am asking is for a factual source. - thx

[ In Reply To ..]
I have researched it and there are no factual references to what you are incorrectly claiming.

If you have a factual source, I will be happy to take a look.

You have been given CREDIBLE sources in the past - and you refuse to believe it

[ In Reply To ..]
First, before anyone turns me in I'm not "going after" you. I'm giving you my opinion from what I have read here and what I have found when I researched this topic.

I've seen many posters give you credible sources on many topics, but when you don't like the information you try to discredit the source or the poster.

I've read some of your sources that you post and I don't find them to be independent or credible, but at least I have the decency to leave it at that. Everyone has the right to believe what they want, but nobody should be told their sources are not credible simply because a poster doesn't like the facts.

In fact, I thought the moderator was going to be getting rid of or editing posts that question sources. I was once told by a liberal poster that my post should be removed because I questioned the source it came from, now here we are being told by liberals that our sources are not credible (and in many posts).

You can pick and choose whatever you want to believe. That's your choice, but there are plenty of sources from both conservative and liberal sites that ARE credible.

The fact is voter fraud is a HUGE problem at every election. In fact 75% of Americans believe it is a huge problem. Maybe not today it isn't because we are not having an election today, but we are always concerned there will be voter fraud like with the last election and the ones before that. Yeah it IS a huge problem. Especially when you've got 2 candidates who are neck in neck in the polls and the number of votes. It simply is not right for one side (no matter what side) to be voting multiple times. That is just plain cheating. The only ones who are saying it isn't a problem is the liberals because their guy got in. If Romney had won you bet you'd be saying its a huge problem.

Let me repeat...voter fraud IS a problem and people go to jail for it. It is a huge problem.

How exactly does that work? Do all, let's say 20 or 30 people working - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
at the supervisor of elections or who ever is responsible for counting ballots... at one point do they all decide they are going to not count ballots. And how do they all get on the same page? Are they all democrats or republicans? Wouldn't there be at least one person who decided throwing away ballots wasn't the right thing to do?

From all of the above, it appears - we have options, but

[ In Reply To ..]
...to keep elections fair and square and if one has nothing to hide, what is wrong with showing ID? I'm all for that. Unfortunately, I'm not a judge.

Some posts have nothing to do with the PA law - Truthhurts

[ In Reply To ..]
Especially the post by NK, and the post by "Old and burned out" titled: "The problem is..."

Oregonian commented on the type of voting they have, but that's not REGISTERING to vote.

Can we please stick to the subject at hand which was PA voter ID law?

First of all, - NK

[ In Reply To ..]
my posts pertained to voter ID laws. How do you know I don't live in PA?

Similar Messages:

Aug 15, 2012
...

Oct 02, 2012
x ...

Jul 21, 2016
by the conservative fifth circuit Appeals Court. The Wisconsin law was struck down last week. ...

Oct 10, 2014
Score 2 for the home teams in Wisconsin and Texas. Thanks SCOTUS and Judge Ramos for your 150 page ruling ! http://www.cbsnews.com/news/voter-id-laws-in-texas-wisconsin-blocked-by-the-courts/ http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/10/us/politics/supreme-court-blocks-wisconsin-voter-id-law.html ...

Dec 12, 2016
Will they ever accept that the career criminal has lost big league? ...

Dec 14, 2010
xxx ...

Dec 16, 2014
These are two articles from the Washington Times. Links are there for both since I didn't post the whole article. BREAKING: Federal judge finds Obama amnesty is unconstitutional A federal judge has found parts of President Obama’s new deportation amnesty to be unconstitutional, issuing a scathing memo Tuesday accusing him of usurping Congress’s power to make laws, and dismantling most of the White House’s legal reasoning for circumventing Congress. Judge Arthur J. Schwa ...

Jan 21, 2013
just one of her jobs. She's an English professor at a community college (most of her students didn't know who she was for a long time), is involved in enough volunteer activities to overfill a totally empty schedule, is an ex- military wife and very concerned with their issues, writes books, and is a grandmother of five. And, she keeps her weight down--probably all that running around. I like her a lot, but just imagining her typical days wears me out, so I'm done. :) ...

Jan 17, 2015
Pennsylvania has agreed to pay $48.83 million to settle U.S. government claims it violated federal law by providing benefits to ineligible aliens under Medicaid and two other federal programs from 2004 to 2010. In a statement on Friday, the U.S. Department of Justice said the commonwealth provided improper benefits under Medicaid, the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly known as food stamps. The Justice Department said Pe ...

Jun 11, 2015
Fifty or so teachers and administrators with the Lebanon School District in Pennsylvania, including the superintendent, were just given a day of specialized training on Islam – at taxpayers’ expense – that wrapped with them hitting the floors of a local mosque, in the required shoeless fashion, and partaking of the faith’s call to prayer. Can you say what the –? Or better yet, how about imaging this “what if” scenario: Fifty or so teachers and administrators with one Pennsy ...

Mar 20, 2015
Having an extremely bad day and I really needed this laugh: The doc said the patient works at (name of restaurant) fast food.... VR put (instead of fast food) put "fresh glued". Thanks VR I needed that laugh. ...

Sep 29, 2014
"Doggone it! That explains why my Christmas cards keeps getting returned!" At least she knows when to admit a mistake, unlike some others, eh? ...

Oct 22, 2012
doesn't get this either. The guy must be as dumb as a bag of rocks. What part of more than half the votes cast will be by women is so hard to understand? Or that after after his "real rape" comments he's not in a position where displaying contempt for women will work for him? ...

Oct 18, 2012
Next it will go to the Supreme Court. ...

Oct 31, 2009
Read the over 1900-page HR Bill: The top 5 are in there: 1) Govt-funded abortion.2) Govt-run insurance.3) Higher taxes.4) Death panels will be back.5) $500 billion in Medicare cuts. That's socialism at the very least, and income redistribution. That is unconstitutional. Of course, they don't have the same health care that they're counting on subjecting on us. For all the "pro-choice" people, this doesn't sound like ...

May 31, 2012
. ...

Mar 16, 2013
Big, big decision. Note, this at the Federal District Court level. A dem. From NPR: A federal judge in California ruled today that the FBI cannot secretly demand data from banks and phone companies in national security cases. The judge said orders that keep those requests secret violate the First Amendment. NPR's Carrie Johnson filed this report for our Newscast unit: "The demands known as 'national security letters' became a quick and popular tool for the FBI to gather inf ...

Jan 20, 2015
Link: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/court-obamas-executive-action-immigration-unconstitutional ...

Sep 26, 2014
Sarah Palin just finished her speech to the Values Voter Summit, in which she told the far-right audience that they are “the most slandered group in America today.” After explaining that people who believe racism exists in America today are the real racists, Palin said that it is high time for someone to speak the truth in politics…and that someone is her. Palin lamented that “truth is an endangered species” at the famous address of “1400 Pennsylvania ...

Jul 08, 2017
As only a handful of constitutional conservatives, like Ted Cruz , Mike Lee , Rand Paul , argue for the full repeal of Obamacare, something that was promised by all Republicans for seven years, and as Democrats have no answers for disastrous Obamacare other than more government control — what destroyed the health insurance marketplace in America in the first place and caused prices and deductibles to unnecessarily skyrocket — we should be reminded that ALL involvement of the federal governme ...

Mar 24, 2014
I live in a rural state and I have always had to show my ID (even though those working at the polling place know me personally) to vote. Everyone that I know has some sort of ID, either a driver's license, a birth certificate, a social security card, etc. My state does not require a photo ID, although I am aware that some states do require that. I was surprised to find that some of the most populated states do not require any kind of personal identification to vote. ...

Jan 27, 2017
nm ...

Sep 12, 2016
I suppose there will still be the nonbelievers even after reading this, especially because it comes from Fox. Well, deal with it. It's the truth. ...

Aug 14, 2016
Myth of Voter Fraud It is important to protect the integrity of our elections. But we must be careful not to undermine free and fair access to the ballot in the name of preventing voter fraud. The Brennan Center’s ongoing examination of voter fraud claims reveal that voter fraud is very rare, voter impersonation is nearly non-existent, and much of the problems associated with alleged fraud in elections relates to unintentional mistakes by voters or election administra ...

May 12, 2013
The Republican Party of Florida’s top recipient of 2012 expenditures, a firm by the name of Strategic Allied Consulting, was just fired on Tuesday night, after more than 100 apparently fraudulent voter registration forms were discovered to have been turned in by the group to the Palm Beach County, FL Supervisor of Elections. The firm appears to be another shell company of Nathan Sproul, a longtime, notorious Republican operative, hired year after year by GOP Presidential campaigns, despit ...

Oct 23, 2014
Ineligible DACA beneficiaries discovered on North Carolina voting rolls, 10/22/2014: With the North Carolina U.S. Senate race in a dead heta, state election officials say they have discovered 145 names on the voting rolls who are ineligible to vote because they are illegal immigrants who have been granted President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals status. “We want to know how such a large number of non-U.S. citizens were ever registered to vote in the fir ...

Feb 03, 2016
I am a Republican but cannot believe that there are actually Democrats out there that believe in H. Clinton. Are we not tired of scandals, etc., with this lady. I urge voters in New Hampshire to truly think about who they are voting for. We all need to think about our kids future, jobs, college, etc. We cannot go on with the same status quo. Politics is a dirty business. Just my thoughts. ...

Jun 26, 2012
What a relief. He's erased any lingering doubts we might have had about that voter fraud charade. Spokesman Miskin didn't get the memo yet. http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/local/state/turzais-voter-id-remark-draws-criticism-641982/ ...

Sep 03, 2012
they are requiring photo ID to get into their convention. Some very good tweets in response to this at Twitchy. I loved the one pointing out the fact that the state IDs are free and that the people Dems argued would be shut out of voting still would need the very same public transportion or whatever to get the ID for the convention! Oh, and there will be a zone around the convention hall requiring those living within the zone to have a picture ID to get to their homes! Idiot hypocri ...

Sep 30, 2012
Florida officials are now confirming suspicious and possibly fraudulent voter registration forms in at least ten counties in the state. Then there is the video of the girl in Colorado who was registering republican voters and passing over the democrats. ...