A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

The Reign of Right-Wing Primetime


Posted: Nov 12, 2010

(HOLLYWOOD REPORTER) — We'll name a hit TV show, and you guess if it's more popular among Republicans or Democrats.

 

First, "NCIS" — investigating military crimes on CBS. Safe bet conservatives love it, right?

 

How about ABC's "Desperate Housewives" — a racy soap, female audience? Little more tricky.

 

Now things get tough: CBS's geeky, atheist-friendly "The Big Bang Theory," Fox's megarated "American Idol," ABC's progressive Emmy winner "Modern Family."

 

Which of these shows is favored more by Republicans?

 

All of them.

 

According to months of data from leading media-research company Experian Simmons, viewers who vote Republican and identify themselves as conservative are more likely than Democrats to love the biggest hits on TV. Of the top 10 broadcast shows on TV in the spring, nine were ranked more favorably by viewers who identify themselves as Republican.

 

 

 

Liberals appreciate many of the same shows, mind you. But their devotion typically is not quite as strong as right-wingers, and Dems are more likely to prefer modestly rated titles.

 

Like "Mad Men."

 

The Emmy favorite has struggled to get a broad audience on AMC. It scores through the roof with Democrats (does anyone in Santa Monica or on Manhattan's Upper West Side not watch it?), but it has one of the weakest scores among Republicans. The same is true for FX's "Damages," Showtime's "Dexter," HBO's "Entourage" and AMC's "Breaking Bad."

 

And it’s not like Republicans have something against cable shows: The GOP has plenty of love for "White Collar," "Pawn Stars" and "American Chopper."

 

"The big shows with mass appeal tend to have above-average scores from Democrats and Republicans but with higher concentrations of Republicans," says John Fetto, senior marketing manager at Experian Simmons. "Looking at the Democrats' side, I don't mean to make light of it, but they seem to like shows about damaged people. Those are the kind of shows Republicans just stay away from."

 

That also goes for the soft-rated, critically beloved "30 Rock." Its score is highly polarized in favor of Democrats. The only show on NBC's Thursday night comedy block that Republicans rate highly (slightly better than Democrats, even) is "The Office" ... which happens to be the one bona fide hit in the bunch.

 

All this isn't to suggest Republicans are a perfect oracle of ratings success. Age certainly is a factor: Younger shows are more likely to be popular with Democrats, as is just about everything on The CW, as well as animated comedies like the Fox hit "Family Guy." Republicans vote strongly for reality-competition hits, but such popular youthful docusoaps as "Jersey Shore" and "Kourtney & Khloe Take Miami" are best appreciated by Dems. Likewise, left-wingers have a stronger affinity for certain veteran crime procedurals, including "The Closer" and "Law & Order," as well as anything that appeals strongly to women.

 

But if you look at the list of broadcast shows that are Republican favorites, it closely mirrors the Nielsen top 10 list, whereas Democrats tend to gravitate toward titles likely to have narrower audiences.

 

To Hollywood, the data suggest a potentially disquieting idea: The TV industry is populated by liberals, but big-league success may require pleasing conservatives.

 

[Photos: Find out what your favorite TV show says about you.]

 

Was TV always like this?

 

There certainly was a period during the mid- to late-1990s when the Clintons were in the White House and Nielsens were topped by NBC's young, progressive urbanites such as those on "Friends," "Mad About You," "Will & Grace" and "Seinfeld," along with liberal-skewing dramas like "The West Wing." But even back then during a progressive primetime heyday, there was plenty of Nielsen love for "Home Improvement," "Touched by an Angel" and "Everybody Loves Raymond."

 

"Historically, the shows that have done better are populist, mainstream and give us confidence in our public institutions," TV historian Tim Brooks says. "For a while in the 1960s and early 1970s, shows started representing social rebellion, but broadcast quickly reverted to 'Happy Days.'"

 

What has changed is the explosion on cable that has allowed networks to appeal to more specific viewpoints, from Comedy Central's "The Daily Show With Jon Stewart" to Fox News's "Glenn Beck." Moreover, if you're a liberal viewer in a major city (which typically correlates with higher education) and you have such titles as "Mad Men" and "Dexter" to watch each week, are you going to also be interested in seeing a paint-by-numbers crime procedural on broadcast or a laugh-track-boosted sitcom? On the scripted side, at least, the explosion of complex dramas on cable may have ceded some of the broadcast ground to what one might label Republican tastes.

 

Of course, a broadcaster can attempt to program a cable-style complex drama, but then you'll likely watch the show die faster than you can say "Lone Star" (or, for that matter, NBC's longtime struggling "Friday Night Lights," which skews Democrat in Experian data despite being about small-town football in Texas).

 

All of which brings us to …

 

Alaska.

 

"Sarah Palin's Alaska." TLC is set to make one of the biggest bets of the year by taking arguably the most polarizing figure in politics and giving her a reality show. The broadcast hits on Experian's index tend to have at least some bipartisan support, but the lower ratings bar set for cable shows mean they get away with appealing to only one side or the other.

 

"Look at what happened in the election: A lot of people will tune in for Sarah Palin," says Gary Carr, senior VP at media buyer TargetCast.

 

TLC president and GM Eileen O'Neill is likewise confident Palin will pay off.

 

"I'm really optimistic," she says. "I think it could be one of our strongest shows out there. There's a lot of buzz."

 

Get a sneak peek at "Sarah Palin's Alaska" right here:

;

Funny, and I am worried about my husband. - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
I didn't see "The Good Guys" on the list, which is now my favorite show. It is on Friday nights. It is incredibly cheesy and stars Bradley Whitford. It on Fox regular network. I am not sure where it fits as it is about a timewarped 70's kind of guy (Whiteford). It is so stupid, it is funny.

We watched Good Guys once - anon

[ In Reply To ..]
You are right...it was sooo stupid we couldn't stop laughing. Something about some guy being in a trunk and they were supposed to have some tracking system on the car, but the guy was watching porn on a laptop). We laughed til we cried. I only saw it once though cos I'm usually busy with other things. But it was good for a change of the usual programs.

I watch about equal amount of the shows in both the liberal and the conservative list, so don't know where that puts me.

Thank you--I was afraid I was the only one - who found that hilarious

[ In Reply To ..]

Is it just me or is it strange that #3 on the Dem side... - sam

[ In Reply To ..]
is a series about a serial killer? From Olbermann to Mad Men to a series about a Miami PD blood pattern stain analysts who moonlights as a serial killer. Yikes. lol.

They got the Palin-Dancing with the Stars - right. nm

[ In Reply To ..]

? Palin-Dancing with the stars? - sam

[ In Reply To ..]
not sure what you mean by that?
Are you really having trouble understanding the Palin reference? - Brenda
[ In Reply To ..]
How refreshing! lol.
I am really understanding the NEED for the Palin reference.... - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
I thought maybe there was some reason other than a drive-by Palin bash. Guess I was wrong. Gave poster too much credit.
You STILL don't get it. Was there a need for - the Democrat/Dexter analogy?
[ In Reply To ..]
You continually bash Pelosi and Frank, and who cares who else that has a D behind their name. You are probably the queen of giving yourself "high 5's", but accuse others of it.

I will repeat myself. You can't take what you dish.
I always post under the same moniker. Unlike you..you all...whatever. - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
I don't need to be high-fived. You..you all...apparently do.

I did not bash Frank...I told the TRUTH about Frank. There is a difference. Get on You Tube and watch the video. Of course, that would be indicate you are interested in the truth. It is just unfair to blame Bush (and he was by no means a favorite of mine) for something Frank and Dodd are responsible for. Have you completely lost your sense of fairness?

Yes, I said and I admit it, I found it odd that the #3 show among Democrats is about a serial killer. Sorry...but I did. Dexter is hardly Dancing with the Stars. However...the show was a #1 hit long before Bristol Palin was on it, so they do not owe their popularity to her. Still, following your logic...Republicans are drawn to Dancing with the Stars because Bristol is the daughter of a Republican? Does that mean Democrats are drawn to Dexter because they think he's a Democrat?

I guess your post proves one thing tho...the Palin comment WAS a bash. I was not taking up for Bristol...I was just trying to understand why the Democrats on this board take every opportunity they can to rag on a woman who is not even in office anymore and her DAUGHTER for pete's sake. But if that makes you proud, go for it.

Barney Franks and Chris Dodd are STILL in the House and Senate. They are STILL part of the decision-making process, and we are reaping right now what they sowed, made worse multiple times over by the current President.

Those are the facts. You just refuse to see them.
I remember a very nasty person on this board - once who always (sm)
[ In Reply To ..]
spelled Barney FRANK's name the way you just did, and she also sighed a lot.

Can't remember her moniker, but it wasn't Sam. Most of us thought she was a paid Freeper.

Can't help but notice the similarities.
It - was
[ In Reply To ..]
"watcher" and yes there are distinct similarities.
Bingo! - nm
[ In Reply To ..]
:)
She sure is missed - Heavy Sigh
[ In Reply To ..]
Watcher was her name. She had the prog/libs going all the time. As far as her posts, she was not nasty at all. You couldn't debate her so you would attack her personally just as you are doing to Sam.

If you can't stand the heat, go back to the Mean Girl Forums where you belong.
lol. Your perceptions sure are different! - That
[ In Reply To ..]
isn't the way it was at all.
I don't suppose it matters that is the first post about Barney Frank... - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
where I have added the "s".

By the way, who is "most of us?"

If she sighed a lot...I can certainly see why. There is a lot to sigh about.

Sigh.

I do believe the show is called Dancing with the Stars - Not Palin Dancing with the Stars (nm)

[ In Reply To ..]
nm
No, I think it is Bristol Palin - DWTS - nm
[ In Reply To ..]
meooowwwww. - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
sounding a little jealous there.
Ummm. . . You read a lot into things - Kinda paranoid?
[ In Reply To ..]
Something must have prompted the post.... - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
paranoid has nothing to do with it...kind of a stretch, don't you think? Obviously like of Bristol Palin did not cause the post...so jealousy...hatred...pick one. The thread was not about Bristol Palin, it was about TV shows.

If anyone is paranoid, methinks that would be you. lol.
Just a gentle research reminder . . . - try Google
[ In Reply To ..]
Bristol Palin and Dancing With the Stars.
Gentle question - what was the reason for mentioning Palin at all? - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
The show on the list was Dancing with the Stars. No need to mention Palin that I can see other than another snide drive-by. I wanted to see if the poster had a reason other than a snide drive-by. Guess I gave the poster and all the pile-ons too much credit. Sorry for giving benefit of the doubt.
Another gentle question - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
Are you getting paid for this nonsense? Perhaps one of those shady organizations like "Freedom Works" or whatver, is paying you per post?
First..no. Not getting paid for posting. I could ask you... - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
the same question, and on the face of it you are more likely the one being paid as I seem to be your "target" and you seem to have this morbid need to respond to any post I make.

"Shady organization" like Freedom Works...now that sounds like it came straight from a DNC email.

Don't know much about them. Please, do tell, why do you consider them "shady?"
You make an incorrect assumption - I have avoided you until now
[ In Reply To ..]
but I can only take so much . . .

RE: Freedom Works. FreedomWorks is chaired by former U.S. House Majority Leader, Republican Dick Armey and does "astroturfing" of the so-call grassroot organization of the tea party.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Freedom_Works
Thanks! Had not heard much about FreedomWorks... - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
I went to your link and read what was there, then did some research on SourceWatch and decided I needed another view. Talk about shady. Looks like a wiki page and does not give very much information at all about who started it, the purpose, and funny, I could not see where they were looking at anything on the left side of the political spectrum, just the right side. So, I went to the horse's mouth, the Freedom Works site. I liked the "lower taxes, less government, more freedom" line I saw. Also, your reference to astroturfing..."fake grassroots" is what I read about that.

Well, I am thinking you and sourcewatch need to abandon that astroturfing thing because this past election blows the "fake" right out of the water.

Thanks for clueing me in on that so I could do the research. Not done with FreedomWorks yet but on first blush they don't look bad to me. Jury still out on that one.
The beauty of it is that you can cross reference - the references
[ In Reply To ..]
And you will find corroborating evidence. Try it.
I assure you that I am. On both sides. - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
Thanks!
Here are some other reference sites for you - Good for you
[ In Reply To ..]
http://sunlightfoundation.com/
http://www.commoncause.org/

I hope that you make an effort to not to listen to the echo chambers.

It's just you. - nm - son of sam

[ In Reply To ..]
x

What a great contribution to a thread. And by the way... - sam

[ In Reply To ..]
Am I to assume your moniker fits? Big fan of Dexter are ya?

What do you get out of these drive-by slams? Make your day? Is that really all it takes?

Sigh.
lol, doesn't take much to get a rise out of you. - son of sam
[ In Reply To ..]
You never fail to disappoint. :P
Glad I could make your day yet again. This need... - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
you have for drive-by jabs...let over from your junior high days?

You, also, never fail to disappoint. And disappointing it is to see the continuous drive-by jabs and nothing of substance. Really...nothing better to do with your day?? LOL.
sniff sniff - mommy :( - son of sam
[ In Reply To ..]
you hurt my wittle feewings. :(
Do you actually care about anything going on in... - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
any topic to discuss? Any at all? Even a wittle one?
Sure. - son of sam
[ In Reply To ..]
mommy. :)
Is this some kind of MTStars stalking. There was - once a thread about bullying
[ In Reply To ..]
I think you might qualify. Really, silly and rediculous. The mods really need to do something about you.
I enjoy reading Son of Sam's posts. - Samonella
[ In Reply To ..]
I think you are the one who is being ridiculous with your silly accusations of stalking and bullying.
I understand you like reading son of sam's posts... - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
You are reading your own work.
Mommy! Please post data to back up your claim. - son of sam
[ In Reply To ..]
Not surprising you would stoop to that....again. You're the queen!
Only the moderators know for sure.... - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
and you, of course.

Let's put it this way...I strongly SUSPECT you are posting under several monikers. You appeared at the same time...LOL. Kinda speaks to the suspicion. Also in support of the suspicion...I chided the stalkers for posting anonymously. And then you you and samonella just appeared high-fiving each other? Coincidence? I suspect
NOT. Come ON. Really??? lol.
Love your delusional conspiracy theory! - Samonella
[ In Reply To ..]
It just goes to show how easily you jump to wrong conclusions, and it speaks volumes about your lack of credibility. I have never met Son of Sam and would never call you mommy, as it would be an insult to mothers everywhere. May you and your delusions live happily ever after. I am done responding to your posts.
You know what they say..."the smeller's the feller." - son of sam
[ In Reply To ..]
Shame on you Mommy.
As always, you are wrong. - Samonella
[ In Reply To ..]
I am not Son of Sam, but I do enjoy reading her responses to your drivel.
Kind of like that movie - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
"Dumb and Dumber." You and Son of Sam deserve each other.

In case you haven't noticed, this is a political forum.
So why post your favorite movie on a political - forum
[ In Reply To ..]
hmmm?
Sorry, never saw that movie. - Samonella
[ In Reply To ..]
I prefer documentaries, news, and nonfiction. By the way, what exactly did your post have to do with politics?
Rigghhhhttttt. nm - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
nm
Looks to me like Sam was trying to draw - some sort of strange analogy
[ In Reply To ..]
about Democrats and a TV show. When someone countered by pointing out a tidbit about a Republican-favored show, Sam got her nose out of joint because she didn't get it. Now, he/she is crying "foul" in a typical bully-like manner. Sam dishes it, but can't take it.
Thank you for trying to explain what I was trying to do.... - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
Let me clear it up for you. No one was crying foul. I asked a simple question, thinking maybe for once someone brought up Palin again, for absolutely no good reason other than a drive-by Palin bash. I thought maybe, just MAYBE, there was another reason for doing that. Dancing with the Stars has had a #1 rating for several seasons...long before Bristol Palin was on it. All I was asking is why bring up Palin. I guess you guys just understood it for what it was...a Palin bash. I gave the benefit of the doubt that maybe there was some reason for doing so.

And YES, I found it odd that the third most popular show among Democrats was about a serial killer. However, with the serial posting going on here, it becomes more clear.

I do not understand the big thrill of drive-by insults and piling on that seems to get your motors running. Although I tend to think it is just one of you posting under different monikers high-fiving yourself in an attempt to feel relevant. Lord knows there is nothing positive happening in Dem politics to talk about now.

lol.
You can't understand that the string started - with
[ In Reply To ..]
shows liked by pubs vs. shows liked by dems; Dancing with the Stars is on the pub list, and that Bristol Palin (who is on the show) is the daughter of a famous (or infamous take your pick) tea partier? You honestly cannot make that connection?
I will try one more time...WHY make the connection?? - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
First, Dancing with the Stars has been a #1 show long before Palin ever got on it. I watched it before her and will watch it after her. I happen to like th show (though I am not a pub). So I don't see assuming that Dancing with the Stars is on the list because Palin is on it.

And as to Sarah Palin being a tea partier...she was around and famous (or infamous, take your pick) long before there was a tea party. She just threw backing behind it because likes what they stand for. Her right as an American citizen last time I looked.

Now can we stop beating this dancing with the stars palin dead horse? lol.
Why get your hackles up every time Palin is - mentioned
[ In Reply To ..]
? People are going to mention her as long as she keeps herself in the spotlight, and her family too. Nothing you can do about it, whether you consider it bashing or not. Why don't you just stop policing Palin posts?
Sorry, trying to understand the mindset... - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
Sarah Palin is not in office anywhere. She can endorse candidates, as every American can if they wish to. Why you want to involve her daughter, who is not now nor was she ever in politics, is beyond me. Even President Obama said kids should not be fair game, you hang on his every OTHER word, why do you ignore that one? I have seen the meanest, most hateful and slanderous things said about a teenage girl on this board that all who said them should be VERY ashamed...yet they pile on. Why on earth do you think it is okay to slander the girl for whatever ills you think her mother does? Does that not seem at least harsh to you and why would you waste time doing it? What, please tell me what, do you get out of it?

You really think it is your right as an American to attack another American not in public office because she "keeps herself in the spotlight?" TLC approached her about the show, she did not hunt them down. Yes, she wrote a book. Obama has written a few too, I believe.

The fact that you think that she said ok to a show, that Bristol said ok to dancing with the stars, gives you the "right" to attack them....seriously...do you not find that the least bit concerning?

Perhaps you are just trying to deflect attention off the President and the Democrats in congress. Not a really decent way to do it, but go ahead...have at it.

Sigh.
Why do you care? You get upset every time she is mentioned...just trying to understand the mindset - It appears you
[ In Reply To ..]
think that if Palin is mentioned, it is in order to avoid talking about other things? That's really reaching.

If you don't want to talk about Palin, then stop.
That certainly is over the edge--who attacked - Bristol, or her mother? nm
[ In Reply To ..]
It seems you have forgotten why they were asked... - and
[ In Reply To ..]
she hasn't stopped.
You are the epitome of the pot calling the kettle black! - Samonella
[ In Reply To ..]
To quote you: "However, with the serial posting going on here, it becomes more clear."

You have posted over 30 times on this forum in the last few days and over 125 times in the last 12 days. The only serial posting going on here is being done by you!
Umm....it's epitome. And only a serial stalker would know.... - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
know how many times I had posted in how many days.

You are one scary dude, son of sam/samonella/whoever.

LOL.
Not only them, their mothers know too. - son of sam
[ In Reply To ..]
by the way....you are wrong. I am posting under only one name. Not that it matters, especially since it makes you feel better to think otherwise. Only the best to you Mommy. :)
Riggghhhhttttt. - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
Now what say we stop beating this dead horse?
You can stop any time... Mommy. :) - son of sam
[ In Reply To ..]
You be in charge. You're the mommy. :)
Per the moderator... - Samonella
[ In Reply To ..]
"Absolutely no grammar, spelling, punctuation police! Do not correct posters on spelling, grammar usage, punctuation, etc. The ONLY exception is for items specifically asked about on the Word Help board."
Oops. Sorry. I DO hope that you made this same comment... - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
to the other posts I have seen doing the same thing...conscientious rule-follower that you are.

Thanks for the info tho...no more spelling corrections. :-)
The best part was that she was correcting a word that - was already correct! LOL (nm)
[ In Reply To ..]
nm
Ummm...what is funnier is you are wrong. - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
Epitome is spelled with an "e" not a "y." Look it up if you can stop patting yourself on the back long enough.

Old proverb...look up before you pile on. :-)
The poster typed "epitome." You "corrected" her by saying - it's "epitome." Please
[ In Reply To ..]
show me where there was a "y" in her spelling of it. Instead, her spelling was identical to yours.

Here's a new proverb: Look down before you pile on.

Like I said, SHOW ME THE Y in her post.
Hmmm...no response. Interesting. - nm
[ In Reply To ..]
nm
Hmmm...here is your reponse. Open one of your posts. See the Options button. - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
Anyone can edit their own post at any time. She edited the post to say epitome after she was corrected. Not rocket science. Of course, if you are her, you know what you did. lol.
Get a clue! Click on options in your message and you can edit it...LOL - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
It was epitomy until she edited it. Sheesh. Try researching a little before you pile on.
Yes, it's epitome. That's exactly what the poster wrote. - Umm, what exactly are you (sm)
[ In Reply To ..]
trying to correct, watcher?
No, that is exactly what the poster EDITED after correction. - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
You can edit your post after it is posted. The options button. Come ON.
Don't know about that, but it is certainly stalking when... - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
they can tell me how many times I have posted in the last how many days. That personifies stalking. Same mindset that makes people continue to go after Sarah Palin and keep her in the news. It is the political way...unfortunately, both sides do it, however, the left has it down to an art. If you can't answer what is posted, then make pointless attacks to divert attention...i.e...."I'm not going to tell you what I will do when I'm elected, all I am going to tell you is how baddddd my opponent is."

Here's another one for them....SIGH.
Not stalking at all...just providing facts. - Samonella
[ In Reply To ..]
You made a comment regarding serial posting, and I was just providing facts to prove who exactly is doing the serial posting on this forum. It is not rocket science, your posts are plastered all over the board.
Rigghtttttt. Got it. lol. nm - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
nm

LOL! Hilarious! She didn't get it though. - brb

[ In Reply To ..]
Or, chose to pretend like she didn't. We can only hope.
Do you have a political opinion on anything? Or do you just get your buzz... - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
by piling on with the drive-bys? Guess this post answers that question. It is just to taxing to bring up a subject for debate? Easier to just jump on the bash boat? Guess it must be. Didn't you get over this in junior high?

(this is assuming of course that you are actually not high fiving your own post of course) lol
Some people feel that people who think they know it all - are just tiresome. nm
[ In Reply To ..]
nm
And people who post just to bash--equally as tiresome. Try to mix in a little... - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
political discussion.

Is your self-confidence so low that you cannot post what you believe and defend it? Or respond to someone with reasons you don't agree and your own take on things, and have a discussion?

If you think I act like I know it all, then tell me where I'm wrong and let's talk about it. That is what political discussions SHOULD be about. Of course, open mind is required for that. And, a willingness to be open to the truth when it is staring you in the face.

But I guess that would be too "tiresome."
It's interesting that you assumed I was referring - to YOU. sm
[ In Reply To ..]
Certainly your name wasn't mentioned by me.
Well, since you posted in response to my post... - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
I believe it is fair to assume were referring to me. LOL. Doesn't matter....I think we said "you" "no You" and taken up enough board space, don't you? Hands across the aisle and all that?

Ah, but he only kills other killers... - ...

[ In Reply To ..]
Wonder why the pubs don't go for that? Saves a lot of money.

Similar Messages:


Right Wing Against Right-WingersNov 04, 2010
The Alaska Senate race has devolved into a fight between two Republicans!  A two-party system.   I can't wait to see all those solutions the new House is going to propose! ...

Left WingMay 15, 2011
What does left wing mean? ...

The Right Wing On This BoardJan 19, 2017
does not seem to have noticed that the Republican budget resolution adds almost 10 trillion dollars to the national debt.  And that is taking into consideration the 14% tax cut for the superrich, increasing the military and assuming the economy grows the way Trump preaches it will although the majority of economists say it is highly unlikely. ...

Right-wing PunditsJan 17, 2015
What's really bad is when one of them (Rand Paul, I think but I could be wrong) calls social security a "hand-out." Say what? We've been paying into that! Or how about Paul Ryan, who thinks that all the unemployed do all day long is "lie in hammocks" instead of getting a job? Enough said.... ...

HS Wary About Reporting Right-wing Apr 20, 2010
Is Homeland Security Wary About Reporting on Right-Wing Extremists? Despite a recent upsurge in threats and violence by far-right groups and loners, the Homeland Security Department appears gun-shy about reporting or monitoring the trend too closely. Domestic security and counterterrorism officials say that even though, in light of recent events, a controversial report issued a year ago by Homeland Security about a "resurgence" in far-right radicalization and recruitment appears well i ...

The Back Bench: Right-Wing GOPers You Don't Know...But ShouldApr 21, 2010
TPMDC Jillian Rayfield | April 21, 2010, 8:49AM Birthers, militias, Tea Partiers -- it's hard to keep track of all the fringe groups that have popped up across the nation. But what to do when the extreme ideas of some of these groups bleed into the politics of public officeholders? We've rounded up some of the right-wing House GOP members who may not have the national presence (or charisma) of a Michele Bachmann or a Steve King, but who certainly share their penchant for appealing t ...

8 Right Wing Obama Myths DebunkedFeb 03, 2013
Right wingers would like to make us believe that Obama is Un-American, Anti-Christian and worse.  Those of us who know the facts, understand otherwise. Below, we have exposed 8 right-wing myths attacking Obama for what they are – complete falsehoods. These have all been fact-checked by Robert P. Watson, Ph.D., Lynn University. SOURCE Myth 1: The Obamas demanded and spent more money than any first family to move into the White House.Fact: The Obamas paid for the renovations of the pr ...

Message To The Wrong Wingers, Aka The Right WingFeb 13, 2013
Wait... Go grab a bottle of water to sip half way through reading this because apparently you guys get thirsty an awful lot! ...

Right Wing Pundits Are Damaging AmericaJan 17, 2015
There's no question that the people like the right wing pundits -- left wing too, to a degree, but they are dwarfed by the right wing -- have done a lot of damage to this country in my opinion, I don't consider that journalism, I consider that to be advocacy." Jones added of O'Reilly, Limbaugh, and Fox's Sean Hannity, "I don't think that they don't believe what they say, I just wish that they looked at the world in a different way, something more constructive." He ...

Threat From Right-wing Extremists Greater ThanFeb 20, 2015
Some federal and local law enforcement groups view the domestic terror threat from sovereign citizen groups as equal to -- and in some cases greater than -- the threat from foreign Islamic terror groups, such as ISIS, that garner more public attention.   http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/19/politics/terror-threat-homeland-security/index.html Lest we think this is a new subject it was in a DHS report in 2009: http://www.dhs.gov/news/2009/04/15/secretary-napolitanos-statement-right-wing-extremis ...

Right-wing Movement Growing To Kill Perhaps Most ImportantAug 19, 2013
War on the Core By BILL KELLER Published: August 18, 2013 9 Comments FACEBOOK TWITTER GOOGLE+ SAVE E-MAIL SHARE PRINT SINGLE PAGE REPRINTS I respect, really I do, the efforts by political scientists and pundits to make sense of the current Republican Party. There is intellectual virtue in the search for historical antecedents and philosophical underpinnings. Enlarge This Image Tony Cenicola/The New York Times Bill Keller Go to Colum ...

Left Wing Extremists Get Loonier By The Minute.Mar 27, 2015
will be responsible for women becoming prostitutes...you cannot make up the stuff that comes of these left wing nuts. Google is your friend. ...

Former Right-wing Leader Warns Of Religious Right Violence: Anyone Can Be KilledOct 15, 2009
This is some scary stuff. http://rawstory.com/2009/10/former-right-wing-leader-warns-of-religious-right-violence-anyone-can-be-killed/   ...

Right-Wing Media Sleuths Try To Create The New Richard JewellApr 17, 2013
Right-Wing Media Sleuths Try To Create The New Richard Jewell Blog ››› April 16, 2013 4:28 PM EDT ››› MATT GERTZ 260 Days after the 1996 Olympic Park bombing, media and federal investigators focused on their top suspect: Richard Jewell, the security guard who had first discovered the bomb which killed one and injured 111. It took more than a year for Jewell to clear his name; he would successfully sue several ou ...

Left-wing Activists Posting Ted Cruz's Home Oct 18, 2013
address and family info online and encouraging harassment. ...

Right-Wing Group Claims God Is Punishing America By Lowering SAT ScoresAug 01, 2013
This is NOT from The Onion- these people are serious. WTF???There’s good news where the Lord is concerned and bad news these days. According to the American Family Foundation of Kentucky, a right-wing Christian group, the United States has been going to hell since prayer was removed from the schools. Now, as part of a petition drive to put religious observation back in the classrooms where they believe it belongs, the Foundation has warned:“Prayer was in our schools for over 200 year ...

Left-Wing Bigotry And Hatred On Full Display After Trump Win Nov 11, 2016
There's nothing like an election to bring out violent hatemongers, the narrow-minded bigots and the just plain intolerant extremists. And no, we are not talking about Trump supporters here, but the legions of left-wingers who are showing off their true colors. According to the current vote tally, Donald Trump secured 60 million votes. Exit polls show that 42% of women cast ballots for the Republican. Nearly half (49%) of independent voters backed Trump. So did 14% of LGBT voters. Trump d ...

Left-wing Law Professor Jonathan Turley Baffled His MSNBC CohortsJun 26, 2014
Left-wing law professor Jonathan Turley baffled his MSNBC cohorts... Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/06/25/liberal-law-professor-jonathan-turley-thinks-congress-could-win-their-new-lawsuit-against-obama/#ixzz35nlu9t2G ...

How Long Before The Right-wing Machine Blames Obama & Media For Malaysian Plane Shot DownJul 17, 2014
I bet it won't be long. ...

DOJ Collecting Your "ring Wing" Social Media Posts Jun 02, 2015
yesterday evening, of Establishment Republicans and Democrats in defense of the NSA's massive data collection program, was that the program was not only free from abuse (something we know is not true), but that it's ultimately useful in targeting real threats to the American people; maybe not yesterday, maybe not today, but perhaps some day in the future it will ensnare an entire sleeper sell of Jihadists mid-phone call to Iran, giving an unsecured credit card number to their yellowcak ...

Right Wing Slams White House For Meeting With Atheist ‘hate Groups’Feb 27, 2010
By Daniel TencerFriday, February 26th, 2010 -- 5:56 pm Some conservative commentators are accusing the Obama administration of inviting "hate groups" into the White House by holding a meeting with a coalition of secularist and atheist groups. Officials from the Justice and Health and Human Services departments met Friday with representatives of the Secular Coalition for America, an umbrella group that includes American Atheists and the Council for Secular Humanism. The coalition called it "the ...

Gingrich: Tea Party Will Become ‘militant Wing’ Of GOPApr 23, 2010
Former President Bill Clinton got into trouble with conservatives after he compared today's political climate with the climate preceding the Oklahoma City bombing. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich seems to be having a moment of his own: in a little-noticed appearance Wednesday, he suggested that the Tea Party will become the "militant wing of the Republican Party." But this time, conservatives aren't up in arms. While speaking at an event in York County, Pennsylvania Wednesday, Gin ...