A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

Ted Turner urges global one-child policy

Posted: Dec 9, 2010

Ted Turner founder of Commie News Network (CNN) and TBS at Cancun global summit wants one-child policy instituted. What a moron, but he is a progressive/lib after all.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/ted-turner-urges-global-one-child-policy-to-save-planet/article1825977/

;

I thought progressives were Marxists in the - closet.

[ In Reply To ..]
looks like Ted came out in Cancun.

Ted Turner is absolutely right. - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
The world is dangerously overpopulated, and something must be done to correct the problem. In my opinion, having more than 2 children is selfish and irresponsible. Whatever happened to zero population growth?

Well maybe you could put in a word to the - muslim population

[ In Reply To ..]
I am sure they would love to hear what you would have to say.

Actually, maybe we should start with the Duggars. - nm

[ In Reply To ..]
:p

Don't forget the Gosslin's. - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
No need to be racist and single out Muslims. We have plenty of Americans who are having way too many children. Maybe we should clean our own house first.

Here is an eye opener - sm

[ In Reply To ..]

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article1683635.ece

It is a British tabloid...not a valid news source. - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
However, it is a great tool to fuel racism, if that is what you are interested in doing.

Maybe you should read up - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
on Muslims. Muslims are not defined as a race, but of a religion. So your knee-jerk response to the post is typical of a pseudointellect. Throw out the race card, when you have nothing else.

How is it selfish and irresponsible if you - have more than 2 children

[ In Reply To ..]
if you are taking care of you own kids? Why would that be anyone's business? This is coming from a mother of 3 who works at home, taking her children to school everyday, picking them up from school so they don't have to go to daycare or ride a bus. They are involved in about anything they want to be involved in. They have excellent grades. How is this selfish and irresponsible of me? Please remember this is a forum of medical transcriptionists, many of whom have lots of children, hince their reason for choosing an at-home profession.

It is called overpopulation. - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Overpopulation is a condition where an organism's numbers exceed the carrying capacity of its habitat. The term often refers to the relationship between the human population and its environment, the Earth. Steve Jones, head of the biology department at University College London, has said, "Humans are 10,000 times more common than we should be, according to the rules of the animal kingdom, and we have agriculture to thank for that. Without farming, the world population would probably have reached half a million by now." The world's population has significantly increased in the last 50 years, mainly due to medical advancements and substantial increases in agricultural productivity.

The recent rapid increase in human population over the past two centuries has raised concerns that humans are beginning to overpopulate the Earth, and that the planet may not be able to sustain present or larger numbers of inhabitants. The population has been growing continuously since the end of the Black Death, around the year 1400; at the beginning of the 19th century, it had reached roughly 1,000,000,000 (1 billion). Increases in life expectancy and resource availability during the industrial and green revolutions led to rapid population growth on a worldwide level. By 1960, the world population had reached 3 billion; it doubled to 6 billion over the next four decades. As of 2009, the estimated annual growth rate was 1.10%, down from a peak of 2.2% in 1963, and the world population stood at roughly 6.7 billion. Current projections show a steady decline in the population growth rate, with the population expected to reach between 8 and 10.5 billion between the year 2040 and 2050.

The scientific consensus is that the current population expansion and accompanying increase in usage of resources is linked to threats to the ecosystem. The InterAcademy Panel Statement on Population Growth, which was ratified by 58 member national academies in 1994, called the growth in human numbers "unprecedented", and stated that many environmental problems, such as rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, global warming, and pollution, were aggravated by the population expansion. At the time, the world population stood at 5.5 billion, and optimistic scenarios predicted a peak of 7.8 billion by 2050, a number that current estimates show will be reached around 2030.

The word abstinence comes to mind....is that too... - obvious? If population control...

[ In Reply To ..]
you would preach abstinence. There are certain portions of the "humans" you seek to "modify."

Much like that German fella who sought racial purification? He took the quick method, however. Just round them all up and kill them, don't bother to go through the steps of population control. They can't procreate if they are dead.

Sigh.

It's not just whether or not you can financially afford children - anon

[ In Reply To ..]
It is can the earth survive more people. I'm certainly not questioning whether you can afford your children or if you love them. You sound like a wonderful mother and even though I don't know you, I know you love your children.

I think overall Ted Turner is right. The earth can only sustain so much. The poster above me said it better than I could. There are a lot of factors that come into play. I think if people limited their families to one or two children that should be enough. There is no reason for people to be having tons of kids. I'm not talking about you, I'm thinking of people like Octomom and a lot of families that have a brood.

The planet needs a rest from the infestation of people. If we could cut down on the population then the planet could have a chance to heal.

Here's hoping folks like you don't take the express lane... - like Hitler did.

[ In Reply To ..]
I doubt rank and file Germans thought it would happen either.

That is just plain crazy! - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Your ridiculous leap from controlling overpopulation to Hitler's genocide is not worthy of discussion. A perfect example of regressive fear mongering.

As opposed to PROGRESSIVE I am sure... - "fear mongering" does not

[ In Reply To ..]
get it anymore. People are tired of you telling them what they are. You take the typical Dem tac...don't explain anything, just point the finger at the other guy.

When you open the door, give away more personal freedom and put that kind of power in any government you expose yourself to whatever the people in government power want to do, however they want to get rid of certain elements, control population, etc. Remember the movie where the way do jour to control population was killing everyone on their 30th birthday? Do you think the average German yelling sieg heil ever thought in their wildest imagination their leaders would commit genocide for ANY reason?

The point here is not to give that kind of power to a government, even though you not so skillfully tried to deviate attention from it.

Too much TV - ....

[ In Reply To ..]

Sincerely,

Jack Boots

Problem is, many dont. ...had a lady come into the - doctor's office I work for today..

[ In Reply To ..]
FIVE kids... she basically cannot afford to pay for even one of them... all on Medicaid. I know this lady... never married.. FOUR different fathers for the kids. Basically, she acts like a kid herself, totally irresponsible. The taxpayers pretty much support her and her family. Its ridiculous and not all that uncommon. I think you should have as many kids as you want as long as you take care of them.. the more, the merrier, but if you cannot, at least use birth control after the first one!

And what do you suggest? Mandatory tube tying... - after 2?

[ In Reply To ..]
forced abortions? The fertility police?Big fan of Chairman Mao are you? Obviously Ted is.

The birth control of your choice. - nm

[ In Reply To ..]
:p

And what happens when birth control fails - and you already have 2 kids?

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

What do you think should happen - see message

[ In Reply To ..]
That people should carry on and have broods of kids and not give a crap if the planet can sustain them. Sometimes people have to sacrifice for the good of others. So you think its okay for people to have as many children as they want and show they have no regard for the planet?

What do you think happens when resources run out? This planet can only survive with so many people on it. It is irresponsible for people to have more kids than is necessary. People should control themselves. And before you flame me about my beliefs, I am a conservative/independent. But at least I have enough sense to think about the planet and not my selfish wants.

Okay, flame away.

You didn't answer the question - No I don't think we should continue overpopulating

[ In Reply To ..]

but what's the alternative? It's not something a government can control outside of forcing women to have abortions or outright killing newborns if the parents already have 2 kids. That's not the kind of world I want to live in, do you?

There are other alternatives - see message

[ In Reply To ..]
I thought I answered the question, but I guess I didn't.

I thought everyone knew what was obvious. If someone wanted to be responsible then there are procedures after your 1st or 2nd child to have your tubes tied or the father a vasectomy. There is no need for barbaric abortions or killing newborns. People need to learn to be responsible. Limiting the brood is the responsible thing to do.

To go back to my original question, - what about when those measures fail?

[ In Reply To ..]

Tubals and vasectomies have been known to fail or spontaneously grow back, so what happens in that case?

Nothing. - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Please stop trying to imply that there is something evil about the concept of zero population growth. You can educate yourself on this subject by clicking on the link provided.

http://www.populationconnection.org/site/PageServer

Thank you, - see message

[ In Reply To ..]
I was going to reply and glad I saw your message first.

My feeling is people need to be responsible. Having a brood in my opinion is not responsible. The earth cannot survive.

I had not seen that link before. Thanks for posting it.

And you are right. There is nothing evil about the concept of zero population growth.

But there might be something certainly evil... - about the means used...

[ In Reply To ..]
by a government if given the power.

There might be a boogey man under your house, too! - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
You can come up with anything if you let your imagination run wild. It means absolutely nothing!

Do you think the German people ever thought... - their government would

[ In Reply To ..]
choose government sponsored genocide? Who would EVER imagine a government would do that?

Imagination indeed. Thank goodness there are more cautious people than sure government do whatever you want to because you would never hurt us people.

Do not disagree with responsibility.... - aspect...

[ In Reply To ..]
just with giving the control of it to the government.

So then what happens if you leave it to the - the irresponsible people

[ In Reply To ..]
who are determined to have a ton of kids that the earth cannot sustain because of their selfish wants. I am a conservative but this is one time where I feel it is the responsibility of the government to put into law a 1 or 2 child minimum. Anything after that should be illegal. If people are so selfish that they only care about their immediate wants and not what is right for the planet then they should face the consequences.

So what are you going to do then? Jail pregnant women ... - and kill the baby?

[ In Reply To ..]
Good grief. To even think of such a thing is nuts...whether you be conservative or liberal.

Taxes - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Take away tax exemptions for more than 2 children and add additional taxes for more than 2 children. Hitting people in their wallets seems to get their attention very quickly.

Unconstitutional. Don't think a law trying to... - limit size of family...

[ In Reply To ..]
would ever pass the constitution test if states are challenging making health insurance mandatory as unconstitutional.

It sure doesn't pass the smell test. My opinion of course.

What is your solution? - What

[ In Reply To ..]
do you believe would take care of the situation of people having child after child after child on welfare?

People do not want to pay for these children, cannot keep people from having them, yet do not believe there should be any penalty or deterrent of any sort.

What do you believe the solution might be?

I remember a few years ago one of the pundits - on Fox was sm

[ In Reply To ..]
talking to someone who was encouraging the white race to procreate more rapidly because of the fear of Hispanics becoming the dominant race in the United States.

Progressives have tried to use "birth control" - as a means of "purifying"

[ In Reply To ..]
their idea of what the "race" should be in this country...check out these quotes from Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood:

"The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."
Margaret Sanger (editor). The Woman Rebel, Volume I, Number 1. Reprinted in Woman and the New Race. New York: Brentanos Publishers, 1922.

"Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race."
Margaret Sanger. Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12.

"We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don't want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."
Margaret Sanger's December 19, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, 255 Adams Street, Milton, Massachusetts. Original source: Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College, North Hampton, Massachusetts. Also described in Linda Gordon's Woman's Body, Woman's Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America. New York: Grossman Publishers, 1976.

"Eugenic sterilization is an urgent need ... We must prevent multiplication of this bad stock."
Margaret Sanger, April 1933 Birth Control Review.

"Eugenics is â�¦ the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems.
Margaret Sanger. "The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda." Birth Control Review, October 1921, page 5.

"Birth control itself, often denounced as a violation of natural law, is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defectives."
[no source available at this time...]

As an advocate of birth control I wish ... to point out that the unbalance between the birth rate of the 'unfit' and the 'fit,' admittedly the greatest present menace to civilization, can never be rectified by the inauguration of a cradle competition between these two classes. In this matter, the example of the inferior classes, the fertility of the feeble-minded, the mentally defective, the poverty-stricken classes, should not be held up for emulation....
On the contrary, the most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective.

"The third group [of society] are those irresponsible and reckless ones having little regard for the consequences of their acts, or whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers. Many of this group are diseased, feeble-minded, and are of the pauper element dependent upon the normal and fit members of society for their support. There is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped."
Margaret Sanger. Speech quoted in Birth Control: What It Is, How It Works, What It Will Do. The Proceedings of the First American Birth Control Conference. Held at the Hotel Plaza, New York City, November 11-12, 1921. Published by the Birth Control Review, Gothic Press, pages 172 and 174.

Please note the phrase "in the minds of all thinking people" and think about how often we have seen a similar phrase used on this board.

THINK about it.

Some ugly words, but did you ever think - about

[ In Reply To ..]
what things might be like without Planned Parenthood?

Ah...so the ends justify the means.... - in other words?

[ In Reply To ..]
What it has done is make promiscuity A-OK, and why we now use abortion as a means of birth control. And if you look at the stats, Margaret got what she wanted. Look up the stats on abortion divided by race and income level.

Might have been better if the doors had not been thrown wide open on promiscuity...? Better on SO many levels...young girls' self esteem being one of the first casualties. I think that's very, very sad.

Tom DeLay's reasoning - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
"Speaking in Arlington, Va., at the recent national convention of College Republicans â�� a 250,000-member organization that promotes GOP policies and candidates â�� the Texas Republican said: "I contend [abortion] affects you in immigration. If we had those 40 million children that were killed over the last 30 years, we wouldnâ��t need the illegal immigrants to fill the jobs that they are doing today. Think about it.â��

Oh lol. So he is suggesting that those - children

[ In Reply To ..]
would be any more able to work for less than minimum wage than the millions of people already here who need jobs? Illegal immigrants are here because it's cheap labor escaping the laws of the United States. Having extra Americans who have no effect on that issue.

How ridiculous to suggest it.

Tom DeLay--GOP House Majority leader - Pretty powerful Republican

[ In Reply To ..]
From my understanding of the context (I recall the video, but I can't find the link), it was that more abortions are in low income, relatively uneducated, working class families, thus ensuring a cheap labor supply. He was speaking to a very "yuppie" group of young Republicans.

That's not unlike Margaret Sanger's - argument

[ In Reply To ..]
x

That is nothing like Margaret Sanger's argument... - however, a dumb statement

[ In Reply To ..]
on DeLay's part, and even though I think it is goofy rationalization it his his right to say it.

He is no longer house majority leader, and as to being a powerful Republican...what little power he still has does not go past the Texas border, and I doubt he has much there. He is not a national player any longer. For some reason Republicans tend to freeze out their criminals and the Democrats want to censure them and let them keep their office. Not sure why that is. Illegal is illegal...right?

He is making a "class" argument. Maybe you - don't consider

[ In Reply To ..]
that on the same level as a race/class argument, but I do.

It is most definitely not unlike Margaret Sanger's argument.

Sanger was trying to purify the race.... - DeLay said nothing about that.

[ In Reply To ..]
and there is a grain of truth in what he said...illegal immigrants will take any job for any pay. Americans by and large won't. If there were no jobs for illegals it would not pay them to come here. They are not getting the "good" jobs. They are getting the ones Americans don't want to do, for whatever reason.

What DeLay is suffering from is the delusion that those millions who have died through abortion would have taken those low-paying jobs. History shows they would not have. Which still does not diminish the horror that we as a country exterminate millions of babies every year.

You read it one way, I read it another.

That's not correct. They are taking jobs for pay below - minimum wage

[ In Reply To ..]
A reputable employer who follows US hiring laws and minimum wage laws does not hire illegals. Extra Americans would not be able to fulfill this... ahem, "demographic." It's illegal.

He is making a class argument. In essence saying the babies of low income people would be able to fill jobs that illegal immigrants do? How ridiculous.....among other adjectives.

I do not read what he said the way you do..... - and Margaret Sanger's..

[ In Reply To ..]
goal was to prevent that "lower class" FROMN EVER BEING BORN. DeLay's premise was that if we had not aborted those folks, perhaps they would have taken the lower wage jobs that the immigrants are now filling (chicken plants, seasonal farm work, etc.) that American workers don't want to do, thus no job market for illegals. Again...his problem was that he thinks Americans actually want to fill those jobs. They don't. That's a fact. That is where his argument fails. Probably what would happen is we would now have millions more unemployed and the illegals would still be doing the jobs they are currently doing (all how many thousands of them)?

Apparently we have a lot of "nonreputable" employers who are giving jobs to those thousands of illegals because they are here working and more coming over every day. Probably a lot of THEM on unemployment.

The fact remains, as I said, both are making class - arguments

[ In Reply To ..]
And, if those employers offered at least minimum wage, you bet there would be Americans doing the work.

It's a silly old argument that Americans would rather not work than work at a minimum wage job....any minimum wage job. Of course, there are bad apples in every barrell, but the main reason illegals are working here is because below-board people hire them.

Here is the link to the video - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
It is at about 3:45 in the playback.

Delay same position of power that Boehner is now - Republican-elected philosophy-nm

[ In Reply To ..]

Charlie Rangel still in the House....Dem elected - and protect philosophy. nm

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

Ethics violation, not legal violation - DeLay was prosecuted under law

[ In Reply To ..]

Ducking taxes is illegal. When caught... - he paid up.

[ In Reply To ..]
and all he got was censure. Not even booted out of the House, much less prosecuted. Same with Bill Clinton. Committed a felony on national television and got a pass. He is still real big in the Dem political scene because, as I said, Dems tend to circle the wagons on their own felons and take potshots at the other side. Tom DeLay is no longer a player in national pub politics and he should NOT be. Rangel should have been kicked out of Congress and Clinton should have been prosecuted like you or I would be if we lied under oath.

And then there was that guy with all the money in his freezer. The Dems circled the wagons on him for months.

Nixon, when caught, resigned.

As I said...there are crooks on both sides, but the Republicans are better about cleaning their own house. Dems...not so much. It's a fact. And apparently that is all righty then with you. :)

I don't know....I just find it funny that Nixon's offense is being compared - to Clinton's.

[ In Reply To ..]
And the fact that so many straws are being grasped to try and prove Pubs are somehow better than Democrats.

If anyone wants to claim Republicans clean house better, there had better be a lot more facts and statistics than this post shows.

I sure can't find any to support it. I can; however, find information to show there are about 30% more Republicans than Democrats who committed crimes while in office.

Nixon COVERED UP a felony (break-in)....Clinton - personally COMMITTED...

[ In Reply To ..]
a felony. So, in this case, Clinton WAS worse. Nixon resigned. Clinton did not, so in that case, a Republican did the right thing and a Democrat did not. Rangel should have resigned. He did not.

I would be interested in the percentage of Republicans who committed crimes and stayed in office rather than resign and the number of Democrats who stayed in office rather than resign.

Bottom line, there are crooks on both sides, not saying Republicans are less likely to be crooks than democrats. But it is pretty evident that Republicans when caught resign more often than Democrats and Democrats tend to protect the wrongdoers even after it becomes public...Republicans not so much.

LOL! The nature of the two crimes is not - comparable

[ In Reply To ..]
and Nixon knew he'd better get outta there before he said "I am notta crook" under oath. lol

Saying the pubs "clean house better" is just plain silly.

Give some statistics showing how many pubs committed crimes while in office, how many of those who committed crimes in office left or were removed due to those crimes. Same for democrats.

Republicans clean house better....LOL! Well, they sure have more to clean.

What means are you referring - to?

[ In Reply To ..]
??

I don't get it. - no1joe

[ In Reply To ..]
Really... I don't get the point of your post. Are you trying to suggest that there's a racist hidden agenda behind the pro-choice, liberal, (maybe even Ted Turner's) point of view by citing quotes (perhaps even misquotes) from as early as the 1920s when the social climate was VERY different?

As for Ted, another "brilliant" solution to a problem without thinking of the changes/policies that would need to be implemented (not to mention hypocritical coming from a father of 5).

one child policy - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Wow, some of the posts on here are way out. I think Ted Turner is correct in the fact that if we keep going, we are going to outpopulate the planet and its resources. It is kind of funny, we think it is okay to control the population of animals, but not humans. Nobody is suggesting we slaughter humans or anything like that. I think we just need to control population through birth control. I don't think it has anything to do with race, religion, social status or anything like that, just common sense. Too many people don't give a crap about our planet and, sorry, but when it is used up, we will all cease to exist. Many people think the planet is just here for whatever we want to do with it. It is the source of our existence and when it is all used up, we are gone no matter what race, religion or social status we are.

Everybody is so concerned about the deficit we are leaving our children and our grandchildren, how about leaving the earth in good condition for them!

Look back in history at what opening a door has caused.... - and the "unitended" consequences.

[ In Reply To ..]
the point is, you do not want to relinquish that control to the government. How many more rights are people willing to give away? Seriously? Now you want to give the government control over your womb?

Already the statement "we control the population of animals but not humans" speaks volumes. Ok, perhaps we just start a neuter and spay campaign for humans? Every year all the OBs can get together and do half price. Or maybe if we ever get to the government run option neuter and spay are free and you get a check from Ted for volume.

Opening doors....sometimes once opened they can't be closed, but you really, really wish they could.

consequences - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
I guess I need to rephrase my comment. I do believe we need to control our population. I do believe we just need to do it as individuals. We humans need to control our population.

Sorry to indicate that I meant we should have government control over that. I do see how you took it that way.

I just mean we all need to take care of our planet and part of that is not having so many children. Back in the old days, when we worked farms and so forth, we had many children mainly because of lack of birth control and the need for many people to work the farms. This is not the case now and though we love our children, we just need to have less of them in order to sustain a population that our planet can withstand.

Sorry for the misunderstanding.

Ok. Then I believe we agree that if ... - people do believe we need to...

[ In Reply To ..]
control population, it needs to be done through education, and not through any government intervention. Meaning, in the final analysis, the choice to have more than 2 children rests with the individual and not the government.

Oversimplification as explanation. - MHO

[ In Reply To ..]

As stated previously, the earth has a finite amount of resources and habitable space. For the purposes of illustration, boil this down to its simplest form. If a person were allotted 2 square feet of earth for themselves and all of their offspring, how long would it take before they overran their allotted space? How long would it be before members of that family had to stand on top of each other because there was no longer enough room for all their feet to touch ground. Carry that out a little bit further by including the effects of overcrowding observed in testing on animals . At what point does reproduction begin to have a significant detrimental effect the family unit as a whole?

While I am not advocating abortion, genocide, racial purification, or government population control, I do believe that the effects of the overpopulation of our planet can already be seen, not just in the dwindling natural resources, but also in the increase in violence in our cities, the increased incidence of mothers and fathers killing their children, the increase of general crimes committed against and/or by children, and even in the decrease of personal interaction between people (the latter being partially attributable to the inability to get personal space making interaction a chore rather than a choice).

As with any right, the right to bear children comes with its own responsibilities. In my humble opinion, it is the abdication of personal responsibility that opens the window for government to step in and attempt control of personal freedoms.

You could always move to China. They control - their population

[ In Reply To ..]
and are full of personal freedom.

If the republicans had their way, we would - relinquish our wombs NM

[ In Reply To ..]
x

LOL! Yes, that is exactly their intent. I have - not seen many that

[ In Reply To ..]
really cares how many children you have as long as you support them.

Well, maybe just be more studious guardians of them. - LOL.

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

With Obamacare....I'm sure the population - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
will start to go down a tad especially considering that they will deny certain life saving treatments to older people. Plus with the funding of abortions through taxpayer money going to planned parenthood....we will kill innocent babies too.

What next? You wanna determine who can reproduce by their financial standings or their IQs?

You've been watching Glen Beck. Show me - where in the bill s/m

[ In Reply To ..]
these 2 things exist.

From a genius with 3 ex-wives and 4 kids...he's a buffoon! - nm

[ In Reply To ..]
!!

John Holdren and Ecoscience - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
These are excerpts from a book written way back. I believe Obama's science advisor was onto something.

http://www.infowars.com/obama-science-advisor-called-for-planetary-regime-to-enforce-totalitarian-population-control-measures/

Similar Messages:

Mar 12, 2011
It doesn't matter to me how or why, but weather where I live has been dramatically different. We've never had ice storms this vicious. We've had snow and ice and cold, but not like this. I believe things are changing. I am not political or religious about it. I don't care why or how, but it has changed. ...

Jan 26, 2013
Does the below paragraph mean that any "former" American who becomes a citizen of another country will STILL have to pay taxes to the U.S. government? How does that work????? Are they saying this to scare her or is the government now going to start taxing every former American who renounced their citizenship? BTW, in reading another article on the same subject, the top tax rate in Switzerland is 22.4%. "But if the 73-year-old singer is making the move to cut her tax bills, she ...

Sep 13, 2011
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44501985/ns/politics/#.TnAqp-xhiSo This seat had been held by Democrats since 1923. ...

Feb 10, 2010
Former Va. governor urges DNC chairman's firing By BOB LEWIS (AP) – 8 hours ago RICHMOND, Va. — Democratic former Virginia Gov. L. Douglas Wilder is urging President Barack Obama to fire Democratic National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine, another former Virginia governor. Wilder wrote of Kaine, in a column for the Politico news Web site, that "the chairmanship of the Democratic National Committee is the wrong job for him." In an interview with The Associated Press, Wilder cite ...

Aug 03, 2016
Speaking in an interview in the wake of a fortnight of terror attacks in Europe, the president of the Czech Republic has said the only solution to terrorism is removing the cause — deporting failed migrants — and has said in the meanwhile citizens need to be armed and ready to defend themselves and others.... ...

Jun 18, 2016
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN FOR EVERYONE ...

Apr 11, 2010
11 April 2010, KABUL — Afghan President Hamid Karzai urged Taliban insurgents on Sunday to lay down their arms and air their grievances while visiting a violent northern province, adding that foreign forces would not leave the country as long as fighting continued. In the country’s south, meanwhile, a bus carrying Afghans working for a U.S.-supported demining group was struck by a roadside bomb in Kandahar province Sunday, killing five workers and wounding 13 others. &n ...

Dec 16, 2014
The Obama administration is urging dismissal of a lawsuit that would dismantle the president's immigration program, an initiative designed to spare nearly 5 million people in the U.S. illegally from deportation. The case was brought by an Arizona sheriff, Joe Arpaio, who contends that President Barack Obama's program serves as a magnet for more illegal entries into the U.S. Arpaio says the new arrivals will commit crimes and thus burden his law enforcement resources. In a court fil ...

Dec 29, 2014
White voters are abandoning the Democratic Party because they feel left out, so the GOP should react by wooing Latino voters, President Barack Obama said in an interview with National Public Radio. “There’s a burden on Democrats to need to make very clear to a broad swath of [white] working-class and middle-class voters that we are, in fact, fighting for them. And there’s also an obligation on the part of the Republican Party to make sure that they are broadening their coaliti ...

Mar 09, 2010
Beck is going to end up hanging himself.On his daily radio and television shows last week, Fox News personality Glenn Beck set out to convince his audience that "social justice," the term many Christian churches use to describe their efforts to address poverty and human rights, is a "code word" for communism and Nazism. Beck urged Christians to discuss the term with their priests and to leave their churches if leaders would not reconsider their emphasis on social justice."I'm begging you, y ...

May 10, 2011
I don't know about the rest of you, but the weather we have been having in our state is unusual. It has been for several years, huge ice storms and blizzards when we never had a blizzard before as far as I know, and ice storms were rare. Now we have middle-of-the-summer temperatures, and absolutely no rain. I've never thought about 'Global Warming' as defined politically, but I definitely, without a doubt, believe in 'Global Weather Changes' no matter what the caus ...

Feb 05, 2011
http://www.globalwarminghysteria.com/ten-myths-of-global-warming/ ...

Jun 25, 2011
To make it easier for the drive-by, just chose one of the letters below: 1. Conspiracy theory. 2. Lost in translation. 3. Islamophobia. 4. Making a big whoop out of nothing. 5. Fear mongering. 6. Yawn. 7. Other. June 24, 2011 Special Dispatch No. 3944 Muslim Brotherhood Figure and Former Spokesman in the West: Establish a Global ...

Aug 17, 2017
NOAA... http://www.noaa.gov/news/globe-had-2nd-warmest-july-and-year-to-date-on-record ...

Sep 15, 2011
From the climate reality project. Really informative. http://vimeo.com/29107248 ...

Jan 31, 2013
Ha! Ha! Ha! Now I have heard it all!!! :-) ...

Feb 09, 2014
Oh, really? ...

Sep 20, 2014
They total maybe 15 minutes. They are on Jon Stewart, but he doesn't say much, interesting perspective on a couple of things--how technology has changed our responses, and such. http://www.politicususa.com/2014/09/19/explainer-in-chief-bill-clinton-daily-show-absolutely-kills.html http://thedailyshow.cc.com/videos/cobpcv/bill-clinton-pt--2 ...

Nov 25, 2009
Seems like this is a topic that interests everyone. Please read this! For more info just google the word Climategate - there's tons of articles out there. Funny, when you search CNN's website there is no mention of it. Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of 'Anthropogenic Global Warming'? By James Delingpole Politics Last updated: November 20th, 2009If you own any shares in alternative energy companies I should start dumping them NOW. The conspiracy behind the Anthropo ...

Aug 19, 2016
A physicist who foresees a 30-year period of global cooling says other climatologists have tried to “silence” her latest research on solar cycles. Valentina Zharkova, a professor at Northumbria University at Newcastle in the United Kingdom, said the Royal Astronomical Society received requests to withdraw a press release on her team’s latest research pointing to a significant drop in solar activity by mid-century. She presented her results July 9 at the National Astronomy Meeting in ...

Oct 22, 2016
...but they laugh at people who are skeptical about the crappy so-called "climate science." Sun activity the lowest since the last mini-ice age. Very interesting article. Link below. ...

Sep 29, 2016
Despite the massive amount of negative press at home and abroad Donald Trump leads Hillary 77% to 23% in a global poll of 98,914 voters. Trump leads with 87% of the vote coming from the United States. Trump leads with 72% of the vote coming from Great Britain. Truly Trump is the not just the best hope to save America from the globalists but the best hope for the world. Hillary Clinton leads in only a few countries including Saudi Arabia, Iran and Pakistan. Saudi Arabia is one of ...

May 24, 2016
funny!! https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/05/24/donald-trump-calls-global-warming-a-hoax-until-it-threatens-his-golf-course/ ...

Nov 27, 2014
Just what we need, thugs who need more excuses to tear apart this country on an even bigger level. ...

Jun 29, 2017
with extensive operations in the Philadelphia area, said this morning its computer networks had been the target of a massive hack.... A massive ransomware attack Tuesday took down computers across the globe, including the systems of the pharmaceutical firm Merck & Co., which has extensive operations in the Philadelphia area.... Also hit was the Heritage Valley Health System, a two-hospital chain in Western Pennsylvania, which made “operational adjustments to ensure safe patient care cont ...

Mar 03, 2013
OP-ED COLUMNIST The Scary Hidden Stressor By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN Published: March 2, 2013 52 Comments FACEBOOK TWITTER GOOGLE+ SAVE E-MAIL SHARE PRINT REPRINTS IN her introduction to a compelling new study, “The Arab Spring and Climate Change,” released Thursday, the Princeton scholar Anne-Marie Slaughter notes that crime shows often rely on the concept of a “stressor.” A stressor, she explains, is a “sudden change in cir ...

Nov 05, 2016
Executive Order that the WH hopes nobody is paying attention to. Like pardoning hundreds of criminals. How much sovereignty do we still have? ...

Nov 02, 2016
"Before the Flood" beaten out by clowns and children's shows. The reviewer tells you exactly why (namely, the cast consisting of DiCaprio, Obama, Bill Clinton, John Kerry, the Pope, Elon Musk and Ban Ki-Moon): ---------- "I mean, who wouldn’t want to tune in and have a jet-setting actor-millionaire, a government handout beneficiary, a Pope, the globe-trotting Secretary of State, the lame-duck president, the ‘Horndog-in-Chief” and the leader of the U.N. come on for 96 minutes ...

Aug 25, 2015
The Heartland Institute published a very revealing article about Leftist shock jock Naomi Klein who just published a new anti-capitalst screed entitled This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. Essentially, Ms. Klein admits that the issue of climate change (formerly known as global warming) is not about science but really about overthrowing capitalism. “Our economic model is at war with the Earth,” writes Klein. “We cannot change the laws of nature. But we can change our eco ...

Aug 16, 2016
A leaked memo from left-wing financier George Soros’s Open Society Foundations argues that Europe’s refugee crisis should be accepted as a “new normal,” and that the refugee crisis means “new opportunities” for Soros’ organization to influence immigration policies on a global scale. OSF program officer Anna Crowley and program specialist Katin Rosin co-authored the May 12 memo, titled “Migration Governance and Enforcement Portfolio Review.” The nine-page review makes th ...