A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

Obama to Propose Wage Freeze for Federal Employees


Posted: Nov 29, 2010

Let's watch and see how this goes over. Already Steny Hoyer and the National Federation of Federal Employees are against this proposal.

My thoughts on this (regarding the union), why should the American people that aren't covered by unions have to make all the sacrifices? Why should unionized employees get all the 'breaks' no matter what issue comes up?

 

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Obama on Monday called for a two-year freeze in the wages of federal employees.

The freeze, which would need congressional approval and save $60 billion over 10 years, would make a small dent in the nation's debt problem. The accumulated deficits are currently forecast to exceed $9 trillion over the next decade.

Still, it's an important step to help generate taxpayer support at a time when policymakers will need to make numerous difficult decisions about curbing the debt, one fiscal expert said.

"It's a real money issue and a psychological first step," said Maya MacGuineas, fiscal policy director at the New America Foundation. (Obama's debt panel nears final report)

Debt in focus: Obama's proposal comes at the start of a critical week on the debt issue. The president will meet Tuesday with congressional leaders of both parties and a bipartisan deficit commission he set up earlier this year is set to make final recommendations on Wednesday.

"The hard truth is that getting this deficit under control is going to require some broad sacrifice," Obama said. "And that sacrifice must be shared by the employees of the federal government."

According to the administration, the two-year pay freeze would save $2 billion for the remainder of fiscal year 2011 and $28 billion over the next five years.

The freeze would not apply to military personnel, but would apply to all civilian federal employees, including those working at the Department of Defense. Approximately 2 million federal workers will be affected, according to the Office of Management and Budget.

Federal workers shouldn't feel singled out: The White House says more tough choices are on the way.

"This freeze is not to punish federal workers or to disrespect the work that they do," the White House said in a statement. "It is the first of many actions we will take in the upcoming budget to put our nation on sound fiscal footing -- which will ask for some sacrifice from us all."

According to a recent CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll, 68% of Americans say reducing the deficit is more important than avoiding cuts in salary and benefits for federal workers.

In the same poll, Americans said that avoiding significant spending cuts to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, college loans, aid to farmers and unemployed workers is more important than reducing the deficit.

Next steps: On Capitol Hill, Obama's proposal is likely to pick up support on the other side of the aisle.

Republicans have argued in favor of a freeze in recent weeks, and the co-chairmen of Obama's bipartisan deficit commission made a similar recommendation earlier this month.

"It's a great start. I'll applaud when he [Obama] does the right thing, and he did in this case," said Rep. Jason Chaffetz, a Utah Republican and the presumptive chairman of the House subcommittee on federal workers. "I'd like to see things go further. Personally, I would like to see the overall payroll cut by 10%."

At the same time, the proposal was criticized by a key lawmaker of Obama's own party. Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland said the president's freeze should be extended to more military personnel although not those actively serving in combat.

The National Federation of Federal Employees, which represents 110,000 workers, immediately came out against the proposal.

"We understand that sacrifices will have to be made in order to reduce our nation's growing budget deficit, but we believe doing so at the expense of dedicated civil service employees is a misguided approach," President William Dougan said in a statement.

 

;

The simple answer is that unions are are big financial... - sam

[ In Reply To ..]
backers of the Democratic party. They don't want to bite the hand that feeds them. Remember the SEIU during the elections. Unions love the Democrats..it is a love FEST.

But if you look at abstractly...what union ever created a job except for union higher-ups? It is those corporations that the Democrats want to tax to death that provide the jobs for the workers who pay the union dues. Then the unions come against the corporations for higher salaries and more benefits. Then comes...offshoring.

Sigh. It is bad when countries cannot afford to do profitable business on their own shores. I read an article that describes it...multinational corporations invest their income in countries with the lowest income tax rates. That is not the US. We are second only to Japan in corporate taxes.

Yet the skillful manipulators that the Democrats have become, even though what they have done has caused the whole mess, force corporations offshore through taxation and unionization and then turn around and blame the corporation for not wanting to go bankrupt.

I take a line from the poster above...you don't know whether to laugh or cry.

The unions hold all workers up from the trenches - Keeping sweatshops at bay.

[ In Reply To ..]
Child labor, safety, overtime pay, 40-hour work week, family leave, vacation, sick leave. The unions protect employees from abuse and discrimination by bosses. By unionizing, at least a minimum standard is set that employers have to match in order to get the best employees.

As far as salary freezes. Sometimes that needs to be done and unions have gone along and COMPROMISED (unlike Republican so-called "bipartisanship"). If I recall from your previous posts you are one of the first to call "government" incompetent. The Federal employees are some of the best workers as they have a very large applicant pool. Many people want a federal job unless they can earn more through the private sector--sometimes a wash. Many of the federal offices are understaffed, such as the import inspections and transportation inspections, and no doubt other offices as well.

Do you really like sweatshops?

My aunt belonged to a union and it didn't do anything for her - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Except send her threatening letters after she was laid off to keep paying the dues and not quit the union. She'd get a letter each week threatening lawsuits, etc. They didn't help her keep her job or anything.

I also used to belong to a union and they never did anything for the people at my company (we were all union), but they did get their dues.

Each situation is different.
Union helped me through a comparable worth procedure - I got a $6/hour raise
[ In Reply To ..]
The next year I got another $3/hour. They also helped me out when the boss tried to retaliate.
Same thing happened with my husband's company - when the union was voted out
[ In Reply To ..]
They has just moved from being paid per job to hourly when people were trying to get a union going. As soon as it was voted out, they got raises. They didn't do it before as they needed playing room just in case the union were voted in. So, then they all benefited. It has only been a few years ago, and he now makes about 12 an hour more than he did right when they went to hourly.

The large company near where I live that was union was a joke. They stayed on strike more than they worked and finally have just shut down. They paid well, but when actively working, the employees had to save a lot as they knew they would be on strike soon.

Unions had their place years ago, but not today - Backwards Typist

[ In Reply To ..]
Child labor, afety, overtime pay, 40-hour work week, etc., but today federal law covers most of the good unions did way back when. Greed and corruption have turned unions into a legal mafia-type organization.

Unions stick it to their workers more than corporations do lately. My one son was forced to join the union to get the job and was also forced to take and pay for health care to the tune of $1300 a month even though he is covered by his wife at her job for $200 a month. He couldn't refuse it or he wouldn't have his job. He also must pay union dues which are also high.

Unions are the reason a lot of companies close up shop. They make ridiculous demands on the company, especially wage hikes and health care, even if the company can't afford it. They make the workers go on strike even if the employees don't want to do it, to show their strength. It's more like blackmail today.

I'm talking from experience here, too. I worked for a good company but because the union demands were not met, we were forced to strike, giving the employer no choice but to close up shop and move out of state. The company told the union they couldn't afford their demands, but the union wouldn't listen, wouldn't COMPROMISE, so they company left.

Don't forget the auto workers and their high wages that almost helped put GM and Chrysler under water. Good example there.

Unions are more of a detriment than a help in this day and age.

Very few workers would have the resources - to take on a corporation
[ In Reply To ..]
Things would go backwards pretty quick. The federal govenment will not have the resources to take on all the abuses and discrimination cases the unions deal with. I do agree that there are some odd union structures in some areas with some strange rules. However, even in the unions you elect your stewards and officers--the members have a responsibility to keep it honest.
In some companies, rhe stewards and officers - Backwards Typist
[ In Reply To ..]
are elected because of their years with the company and usually turn out to be for the company, not the union. This happened to my one son at a company. The officers and stewards had 25-30 years at the company. They were too worried about their jobs to fight for the workers. His friend, through a huge struggle, became a steward and did fight for the guys, but he was outnumbered by the others. After the contract was passed by the workers, his friend was fired but I can't remember why. All I remember is it was a flimsy excuse (about 10 years ago). Did the union fight for him? Nope. He wound up going to an attorney to fight the company and won.

So, another reason why unions aren't all they're cracked up to be.

Unions are another great idea that has become corrupt.... - sam

[ In Reply To ..]
by greed and power.

You did not address to core issues...overtaxation of corporations and unions piling on asking for more wages and benefits, knowing that the product that the company produces will not sell for enough to keep it in business. So what happens? The unions keep collecting the dues until the business closes or offshores, either way the union members are screwed and lose their jobs, and the union just skips off merrily to unionize another place.

It happens often in this country. If the union's goal was to really keep their members working, do you think they would be acting in this way?

My answer is no. What is your explanation for that? Look how much the price of a car has escalated. What percentage of that do you think is due to inflated union demands?

Sweatshops. Really. There are laws in place to stop that, yes, largely due to activity of unions initially, which was noble and admirable. Is the SEIU noble and admirable? Dont' believe so.

Sweatshops. Pulleezze. There are laws against that now. Don't need unions. There are child labor laws now. Don't need unions for that anymore. They served a purpose, they got the legislation. Now all they are doing is getting rich on the backs of their members.

Where do you think all those dues go? How many pension funds have been raided by union bosses? The teamsters higher-ups were all buddy-buddy with organized crime for a time. I think the days of noble unions has long since passed.

As evidenced by your posts, all workers rights - are on the chopping block - nm
[ In Reply To ..]
We need unions to fight further erosion of wages, benefits, and working conditions because the individual is not strong enough to fight the corporations and the US Chamber of Commerce.
Oh please. I have heard it all from unions trying to... - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
unionize hospital. I got the same spiel from the professional organizers. I didn't buy it from them, I don't buy it from you. Unions come in, that raises the cost of health care when they walk in the door.

Tell me...if the product or service the company/business/corporation cannot be sold for enough to cover those wages and benefits you want, what then? Like in one of the other posts, forced to close and go somewhere else or go bankrupt.

Unions and Democrats of the same mindset- my way or the highway. The thing is, the union walks off having lost nothing, gained your dues while they had them, and will be unionizing another business before you get your first unemployment check.

Yeah, they are all about the worker.

Sorry, not buying the brochure. Been there, experienced that, no thank you.
Each experience is different, you can't speak for - all
[ In Reply To ..]
Just remember that.
You are correct....I am not the only one here who posted... - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
unfortunate experiences with unions. I see nothing to suggest that much remains of the noble entity they used to be. I see them as part of the problem, not the solution. Doesn't it seem odd to you that they would demonize the very entities (businesses, corporations) that they would die without? No businesses/corporations, no employees, no unions. Because it is an effective manipulation tool and I have to say...they are masters of the craft. The hard left socialists have trained them well.

Yes, each experience is somewhat different, but there is a consistent thread unions. That being said...I do believe that when they started, unions WERE noble and needed and they were in it for the worker. Somewhere along the way, when the big money and power started coming in, they lost their way and their focus turned away from the worker and onto the power and money.

Let's just agree to disagree. I do not speak for all; nor can you. We will both remember that...?

Thanks for the debate!

You are correct. No one can speak for all. - My
[ In Reply To ..]
experience with the steel worker's union has been one of saving my husband's job from a new boss whose main focus has been trying to cut older workers. I will not go into it further since it seems the positive posts about unions are invisible to you.

Not saying there isn't corruption, or that improvements cannot be made. Just that folks who make blanket assumptions based on what they've heard are a big part of the problem here in the US.
I did not make an assumption on what I heard... - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
I made a decision based on my experience with professional union organizers, what I have read and what I have been told by union members.

I did say that I thought unions had a noble beginning. But when they use their big money to influence elections (sorry, YOUR big money as you or your husband pay the dues) to influence elections...the way the SEIU behaved during the Presidential elections, the way the nurses union in California behaved during the governor's race...is why I say many unions have lost their way and become not workers' rights organizations but political organizations, and yes, it does shed a bad light on unions as a whole...but it is up to unions to clean their own house, and those who do not partake in those kinds of activities should condemn those who do.

Sadly, I would not hold my breath to see that happening.

However...I was heartened a bit by seeing some union members interviewed on TV saying they did not like the fact that the union had used their dues to support candidates in the union's name when those individuals were not their personal choices. I agree with them. I think that's wrong.

In closing, I am glad the union did right by your husband. It is always to hear a good story among the bad.

Have a good one!
Didn't realize you were actually in a union and your - assumptions were
[ In Reply To ..]
not based on heresay.

I guess the unions are like insurance companies eh? :P
Yep...another noble thing gone bad. And the answer there is good old American competition (insuranc - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
Don't know why we can't at least try that first. lol.
I can certainly see - why
[ In Reply To ..]
"you" don't. :P
Excellent post - nm
[ In Reply To ..]
They would be IF the workers would all stick together. - Backwards Typist
[ In Reply To ..]
An individual, as noted in my above post, cannot do it alone. In fact, if all workers would stick together, there would be no need for unions at all.

But, there's always those that would rather put up with injustices at a company than to band together and fight for better wages, conditions, etc. Those workers would still vote no in a union setting.

offshoring - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Offshoring is a tough subject. We are losing jobs all the time overseas. I believe what needs to happen, since we cannot stop offshoring, is to make it so that if we are sending jobs to other countries, the other countries need to bring jobs here too. Don't bite my head off. I do not like the idea of our jobs going overseas either. The thing is, however, if the rest of the world is doing it, we will be left behind. What needs to happen is that when we are sending jobs to other countries, we need to make sure that they are sending jobs to us too. In my state, China just bought a huge automotive supply plant when nobody in America wanted it and it is keeping thousands of jobs in the state. Nissan is also building a big plant in our state which will provide jobs here. Yes, the profits are going back to these other countries, but we are doing the same with GM and Ford overseas. It is okay to offshore if all the jobs are not going and none coming. I am sure you will disagree and I have thought long and hard on this issue and the fact is we cannot stop this global economy but we need to make sure we are included in it. Just some of my thoughts. Welcome to disagree and say why without personally attacking!

That is the kind of post this board needs - An opinion without belittling others

[ In Reply To ..]
Thank you. And I do agree with you. I believe we need to have a workforce that is educated for the kinds of jobs we need here.

Agree, although along with it I do wish we would... - sam

[ In Reply To ..]
try to make it more attractive for American businesses to operate in their own country more again. We have the ability to do that, we just need politicians to put the country ahead of personal power grabbing.

I agree that offshoring will not stop totally, but I do believe if given the chance and a level playing field a lot of American companies would choose to remain in America.

I made a post not too long ago about the flip side of the coin which you bring up...how many employers we have here who are foreign owned and employ American workers. Medquist is now owned by a foreign country.

I just don't think American companies should be demonized because they want to stay afloat. Not all small, medium, large businesses and corporations are an Enron or Lehman Brothers or any of the big companies who were criticized for the big bonuses. They are not all bad. There are a thousand good ones for every 10 bad ones. The good ones should not be punished for the few bad ones. Find the corruption where it exists and punish those individuals, but not an arbitrary group who make over $250,000 a year. That just does not seem right to me.

Thanks for your post!
agree - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
I do not mean to criticize all businesses. I was impressed by the fact that when Bill Ford was the CEO, he took a salary of $1 a year until the company stabilized. Yes, he is still a very rich man, but I was impressed by his act. He did make a sacrafice also. Ford Motor Company did not take money from the government and is doing much better now.

There are many companies, no not all, that do all that they can to earn corporate bonuses at the expense of their workers and those are the ones I do not like. There have been many companies that have gotten government money and still took high bonuses. I have no respect for those companies. In tough times, we all must make sacrafices.
yes, but the problem is, the raising taxes hits all of them... - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
not just the bad ones, and that hurts the economy. Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. When we find the bad ones we tahe what action we can. I wish we had been able to let Lehman Brothers fail. It would have served them right. I am not sure the economy would be in any worse shape if we had not bailed them out and just let them fail.

However, the past is the past. I just do not believe in punishing everybody who makes over $250,000 a year in order to punish those few who need punishing.

That is all I am saying.

Good talking with you!
yes - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
I am not trying to be a smart a##, but we also cannot punish all the unemployed because of the ones who are lazy and just not looking for jobs. What do you propose we do for them, since you don't believe another extension is warranted. Again, just asking your opinion.

I also work and pay taxes and am grateful for my job, but I know that a lot of people lost their jobs and cannot find jobs. I know there are jobs out there, but not as many as there are unemployed people looking for them.

Perhaps they could reach a happy medium and raise the limit to a higher level where the tax cuts expire to not include the $250,000 level that you keep pointing out (not being sarcastic, just stating a fact). Sorry, but when I hear oil companies making billions in profits each year, I do not feel sorry for them with regards to raising their taxes. They are not creating more jobs and are reaping the rewards. If you have not noticed, gas prices are going up more and more and they are still making record profits. Where is the sacrafice on their end?
I don't think another extension is warranted...I mean isn't this the third one? - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
it has got to stop sometime, otherwise they might as well get on the welfare rolls. We can't sustain paying both indefinitely. The deficit is dangerously high as it is.

I said in an earlier post, okay, if absolutely no job of any kind at all is available, then keep those people on benefits, but make them go look for jobs every day, and if there are infrastructure jobs that can be done in their town or county but have not been done because the town or county can't afford it, let the federal government pay those benefits in the form of wages, tax them appropriately, and those people can contribute to the tax base. Why not think about trying to save some money instead of keep using the same band-aid that eventually has to stop? That is all I am saying. Then maybe it might cost 3 billion instead of 6 billion to extend them and the country gets something back out of it. That is all I am saying. Why does it have to be all or nothing?

I understand what you are saying about oil company profits. But look at the big picture. Oil companies employ thousands of people, and the supporting businesses of oil exploration employ thousands more. Oil companies are not laying off. Of those thousands of people who are employed by oil companies and the companies who support them, rich executives are a minute portion. The guys who work on the rigs make good money. If they keep all those thousands of people employed and they are so necessary to the well being of the country (we have to have oil), frankly, i do not begrudge them their profits and I don't think they owe me a thing because they operated in a way to pay their people and not lay off.

Guess that is just the way I feel about it. I guess I don't see the need FOR them to have to sacrifice. I don't know why we can't try to cut costs and stop spending FIRST before just saying tax ANYbody? Why not just TRY it? Unless the goal is to punish them for making big profits. If you do that, then where is the incentive to start a business and make it grow, if that is what is in your future?

And I know you are not trying to be a smart-a$$.

It is good to discuss things... :)
extension - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
I agree with making people work for their money, as with unemployment or welfare. I disagree with you on a lot of things but have always said people should work for welfare. I also believe the illegal aliens need to be removed from this country. Perhaps along with infrastructure, many could be rounding up aliens and guarding the borders so no more can get in. We could create a wall across Mexico! That way, we working people would not have to support the illegal aliens. There are many men and women who are quite capable of that type of work. There are a lot of things they could be doing in this country. The problem is, this was talked about in the past and the AFLCIO or NAACP or somebody said that these people must be paid the standard wage for doing that type of work. I guess if you look at it that way, by removing the people like the illegal aliens, who are sucking our country dry, they would be saving enough money in give-aways to them that it might be worth it to pay the welfare people decent wages.

You do always bring up the fact that people want handouts, but I never hear you mention the problem with the illegal aliens. To me, that is a major problem. They come here, get freebies and I have to dial 1 to speak to someone in English. Not right!

We can also remove the cushy benefits for the government officials. We could afford to have a low-cost healthcare plan for people who need it or want it without forcing them to, including the welfare workers, who should pay a premium for their insurance since we all have to. We could penalize the rich businessmen who reap in all the profits and bonuses if they do not create jobs in this country, like they claim they are. Wow, problems solved. The country runs great.

I'm sure this plan needs some revision and compromise, but sounds fair to me.
I agree with you completely on illegal aliens... - sam
[ In Reply To ..]
I think they should be sent home and get in line behind the immigrants doing it the right way. Personally I think we should bill Mexico for all the benies they have stolen while here illegaly...though I doubt that is trackable.

I think anyone, I mean ANYONE, who works should pay taxes. That is why I favor a flat rate across the board, no loopholes, deductions, period. Then everybody pays a straight percentage of their income, period. Can't have a tax code more simple than that. Don't need near the IRS beauracy we have now. Every other part of the working base has had layoffs, about time the feds had to go through one too.

I agree with cutting back on congress benies. And it should stop when they leave office, other than a 401K or whatever any of the rest of us have. This old stay on the ticket for life is ridiculous. And that includes Presidents. They should not get a huge pension for life, nor security after they leave office unless they pay for it themselves.

As to the rich CEO's...punish them individually, and don't give a corporation a bad name just because it had a bad man running it. Corporations employ thousands of people, the CEO is just one of hundreds in a corporation. And corporations should step up, condemn and not encourage that kind of thing. And if that guy messes with the other employees' pensions, etc....he should go to JAIL, just like the Enron guy did. But no need in overtaxing all the thousands of corporations who run efficiently and fairly.

So, it appears that while we may disagree on a lot of things, we agree on a lot of things as well!

Good - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
It's about time. Everybody else is making sacrafices, why not the government. Somehow they all think they are special and should not have to make any sacrafices. They also need to get rid of the cushy benefit packages that our representatives get. Give them 401K plans like the rest of us and no life-long benefits for a few years of service.

Agreed. Those life-long benefits cost a fortune. - sam

[ In Reply To ..]
of course, the federal employees union is already fighting the freeze. Go figure.

Similar Messages:


The President Will Propose Discretionary Three-Year FreezeJan 26, 2010
What does this mean for health care reform? Bye bye? If we cut out two wars, we wouldn't need a freeze.WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Barack Obama will ask Congress to freeze spending for some domestic programs for three years beginning in 2011.The proposal comes as Obama and the Democratic-controlled Congress face public anger over growing deficits.Administration officials told The Associated Press on Monday that the freeze would apply to a relatively small portion of the budget. It would af ...

We The People Ask The Federal Government To Propose A NewFeb 03, 2017
Issue an International Arrest Warrant for George Soros! Sign This Petition: Needs 99,355 signatures by February 20, 2017 to get a response from the White House. George Soros is a menace to the free world and stands in the way of making America great again. He is guilty of the following crimes: 1)Financially supports open sedition in major American cities resulting in millions of dollars of property damage as well as loss of life. 2) Attempts to manipulate democratic elections by ...

Applebee’s CEO Threatens To Fire Employees And Freeze Hiring Because Of ObamacareNov 11, 2012
Just in case the food alone wasn't good enough reason to not eat there...Applebee’s CEO Threatens To Fire Employees And Freeze Hiring Because Of ObamacareBy Annie-Rose Strasser on Nov 9, 2012 at 3:00 pmZane Tankel, the CEO of Applebee’s New York Franchise, Apple-Metro, is so dedicated to not spending money on his employees that he’s refusing to hire anyone new. Why? Because he might have to provide them health care. Under the Affordable Care Act, a business ...

Obama Commutes Sentences For 214 Federal Prisoners, Aug 03, 2016
sentences. he White House says it's the largest batch of commutations on a single day in more than a century. Almost all the prisoners were serving time for nonviolent drug offenses. The commutations bring to 562 the total number of sentences Obama has shortened. The White House says that's more than the past nine presidents combined. Almost 200 of those who have benefited were serving life sentences. White House counsel Neil Eggleston says Obama will continue granting clemenc ...

Border Patrol Could Not Enforce Federal Law Under Obama.Jan 25, 2017
On our way to making America great again! ...

Federal Judge Find Amnesty Unconstitutional & Obama Tells CourtsDec 16, 2014
These are two articles from the Washington Times. Links are there for both since I didn't post the whole article. BREAKING: Federal judge finds Obama amnesty is unconstitutional A federal judge has found parts of President Obama’s new deportation amnesty to be unconstitutional, issuing a scathing memo Tuesday accusing him of usurping Congress’s power to make laws, and dismantling most of the White House’s legal reasoning for circumventing Congress. Judge Arthur J. Schwa ...

I Propose A Tax Deduction For Every Eligible CitizenNov 14, 2015
The ONLY answer to terrorists living and hiding among us is the UNCERTAINTY AND FEAR that an armed citizenry would obviously pose to them as opposed to other countries, where they know perfectly well that they can conduct operations with little fear of opposition so long as they hit targets where there is no significant police or security presence. There should be NOWHERE in this nation that a terrorist would not know that he runs a serious risk of meeting armed opposition from ordinary citizen ...

Georgia Democrats To Propose Limitations On Vasectomies For MenFeb 22, 2012
I left out a few paragraphs in the middle, but the link is at the bottom.As members of Georgia’s House of Representatives debate whether to prohibit abortions for women more than 20 weeks pregnant, House Democrats planned to introduce their own reproductive rights plan: No more vasectomies that leave "thousands of children ... deprived of birth."Rep. Yasmin Neal, a Democrat from the Atlanta suburb of Jonesboro, planned to introduce a bill Wednesday that would prevent men from vas ...

Will The Tax Freeze Create Jobs? Article From Dec 07, 2010
The Wealth Report Robert Frank looks at the lives and culture of the wealthy. December 7, 2010 One of the core arguments for extending the Bush tax cuts for the rich was that the wealthy create jobs. Extending their low rates, conservatives argued, would encourage them to hire. Associated Press President Barack Obama makes statement after meeting with Democratic congressional leaders on a year-end bipartisan agreement to extend expiring tax cuts. “I think that extending a ...

Crockpot Recipes, Freeze-ahead Meals, Etc.Jul 28, 2012
Does anyone have any suggestions or good recipes for meals that can be made ahead of time or crockpot meals.  I'm not new to working from home with my 3 kids, but I am starting a new job where I won't have flex shift.  School is starting back all at the same time, so I want to make a smooth transition.  I will have a "practice" week their first week of school before I start, but  then after that, I'm hoping to be able to get some meal ideas.  ...

Effort To Freeze Credit Card Rates Dies In SenateNov 19, 2009
(The Republicans killed it.) http://www.coloradoan.com/article/20091118/UPDATES01/91118020/Effort+to+freeze+credit+card+rates+dies+in+Senate Another link:  "GOP senators block effort to freeze credit card interest rates" http://rawstory.com/2009/11/gop-senators-blocking-effort-freeze-credit-card-interest-rates/   ...

Etiology Of Cain's Brain Freeze And Flatulent Foreign Policy IsNov 15, 2011
which he perceives as "all this stuff  twirling around in my brain."  Symptomatic tardive dyskinesia in the form of facial twitching, rolling his eyes at the ceiling, squirming around in his seat, grasping at straws, ummm, I mean his water bottle, adjusting his coat, and yanking at his tie, were observed when questioned about his stance on Libya.  Plan:  Consider possible adjustment in medication dosage and observe for reduction in involuntary movements.   &nbs ...

Now He Wants Government Employees To Spy On EachJul 10, 2013
See what you've done? ...

IRS Overpaid More Than 600 Employees Approximately May 11, 2017
The Internal Revenue Service, which is responsible for collecting federal taxes and enforcing federal tax law, was unable to accurately deal with its own complex rules governing the payment of its own employees and ended up overpaying more than 600 IRS workers about $4,200,000, according to an audit report by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration. The IRS also underpaid more than 900 employees about $2,700,000, according to TIGTA’s estimate. The inspector general found th ...

Big Jump Seen In Health Costs For Employees Oct 14, 2009
As companies begin unveiling their workplace benefits for next year, many employees are learning they will have to dig even deeper into their pockets for health coverage. Such price increases have become a fact of life during open-enrollment season, when workers sign up for their health plans. But the jump is expected to be steeper in 2010 than this year, as employers struggle with the impact of the recession and continually rising insurance costs. Employees will pay $4,023 on average in premiu ...

Sad News For My County-another 130 Employees Laid OffNov 06, 2012
The last garment factory that survived for 112 years is now gone. They just couldn't hang on any longer. They did last 4 years longer than the 90 year old company, but imports killed all of those factories. It was nothing to have 3-4 garment factories in each town. Some of the workers were employed there for 40 years and that's all they knew. The only opportunities they have now is Wal-Mart or picking orders in big box warehouse jobs 20 miles away or whatever is left in the closest ci ...

Employer Pushes Employees Over The LineJan 22, 2013
http://news.yahoo.com/chinese-workers-revolt-over-2-minute-toilet-breaks-081615186--finance.html ...

Why Illinois Is In Trouble, 63,000 Public Employees WithJul 26, 2017
Illinois is broke and continues to flirt with junk bond status. But the state’s financial woes aren’t stopping 63,000 government employees from bringing home six-figure salaries and higher. Whenever we open the books, Illinois is consistently one of the worst offenders. Recently, we found auto pound supervisors in Chicago making $144,453; nurses at state corrections earning up to $254,781; junior college presidents making $465,420; university doctors earning $1.6 million; and 84 small-to ...

Ever Wondered: America's World Rank In # Of EmployeesOct 21, 2012
Turns out we're only 50th in erection length, which I guess could be explained as a nation of immigrants. Uraguay is first...; a surprise to me, but of course not to them. Netherlands is the only European nation to make the top 10, another surprise--tidy little Holland? :) We are #1 in gross domestic product, economically speaking. Ranking America, a Site for Information About America" http://rankingamerica.wordpress.com/ Oh, BTW, infant survival? #47.  Six deaths per thousand live ...

Feds Probing VA Employees As Theft Of OpioidsFeb 22, 2017
Congress and governors have clamored for action in the face of a rising tide of opioid addition and deaths, but part of the trouble might come from inside the government itself. The Associated Press reported yesterday that the federal government has launched investigations into the Veterans Administration for widespread theft of opioids. They suspect that doctors, nurses, and other employees have “siphoned off” opioids and helped to fuel the black market: Federal authorities are steppin ...

Comcast Employees Get Time Off To Protest Trump'sFeb 02, 2017
TRENTON -- President Donald Trump's executive order temporarily restricting travel from seven majority-Muslim countries prompted Comcast to give its employees paid time off to protest. Trump's order sparked protests around the country and elicited rebukes from a handful of CEOs of companies that employ tens of thousands of U.S. workers, including Bill Ford, CEO of Ford Motor Company, who took to the airwaves to say the ban "goes against our values as a company." Comcast, one of t ...

SCOTUS Justices And Court Employees Are ExemptJun 25, 2015
But maybe not for long.  On what grounds would Obama dare to veto a bill that eliminates the exemption? ...

16,000 Bank Of America Employees Lose Their Jobs...where Is The Outrage?Sep 20, 2012
Why isn't the media telling this little story?  Probably because it will reveal just how bad this economy is and the Bamster will look bad.  ...

EEOC Tells Employers To Investigate Employees Who Wear Aug 05, 2016
You know that government can’t restrict your speech. Officially. But they can in all kinds of practical ways, just as they can do lots of other things to you without ever really taking an official action against you. Take the famous “Don’t Tread On Me” cap. Congress will never pass a law that says you can’t wear that cap, just because politicians may not like what the cap stands for. Constitutionally, Congress cannot do so. But if you think that means the government can’t come do ...

Employees Face Higher Deductables And Out Of Pocket CostsJan 05, 2014
This is an MNSBC video so therefore should be approved by posters here to be able to post here. We tried to tell them, but noooooo, don't want to hear it.  shhhhhhh it's the truth, just don't say anything.   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45o-s1Oh3zs#t=144     ...

IRS Employees Sent Sensitive Taxpayer Info To Their Personal EmailNov 19, 2016
IRS employees sent emails with sensitive taxpayer information to their own personal email accounts, according to an audit from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration. Additionally, from May to June 2015, 49 percent of IRS employees in the small business and self-employed division sent 326 unencrypted emails containing 8,031 different taxpayers’ personally identifiable information to other IRS employees and other non-IRS email accounts. Karen Schiller, commissioner at the s ...

Chik-Fil-A Owner Pays Employees During A 5-month ShutdownAug 16, 2015
in Austin, Texas shocked his 50 employees by paying their full salaries during a five-month period when the business shut down. Jeff Glover, who has operated the Chick-fil-A for 15 years, wanted to remodel the building to accommodate more customers, but didn’t want to hurt his workers. So he continued paying them for the full five months. The restaurant, which reopened this week at West Braker Lane and U.S. 183, is now the largest Chick-fil-A in Austin–and surely the chicken retailer ...

Minimum WageAug 20, 2013
If the minimum wage goes up to 15 dollars like we want I bet all our work goes to india.  I am first in line filling out an app at Micky D's.     http://finance.yahoo.com/news/heres-us-minimum-wage-stacks-174426659.html ...

Minimum WageOct 23, 2014
I heard a fellow on TV the other night say (quote?) a conversation at the dinner table the night before with dad telling his children "my dream for you is to some day have a minimum wage job."  The conversation was about minimum wage jobs not being the goal, but rather the stepping stone to a better job with better pay - people should strive to get out of the minimum wage jobs - not want them to be the best that they can do - with minimum wage, the employer can have more positions to offer ...

Minimum WageJan 23, 2015
I want to ask what would happen if the minimum wage changed to higher than it is. Would all these companies have to pay minimum wage? I know that when I asked about this from the head of the local (can't remember the title of the organization right now) that she said that they had to pay minimum wage. I have heard someone say that if they increased it to $16 an hour that people would be able to live on that. Can't remember who but he was a business expert, etc. Even if they don ...