A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

Jon Stewart nails it yet again!

Posted: Jul 25, 2010

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-june-29-2010/blame

;

Its only funny if you are on his political side. I am - an independent and, frankly, bored to death

[ In Reply To ..]
with his one-dimensional comedy. Nothing is his own. Its simply making fun of others. snoooooozze. If you watch him doing the same thing over and over and over, you will realize he has duped you into thinking he is a comedian. He just plays clips, makes fun, makes faces. whooopie.

Its called satire, a widely recognized style of comedy - You forgot to mention

[ In Reply To ..]
that he writes his own material and/or collaborates with a writing staff to produce the show's content. That would make it original. He has a impressive broad-based knowledge of politics and the media and a very unique style of delivery.

One dimensional? Hardly. His focus is on politics, political figures, current events, media, media personalities and organizations, not to mention the fact that he often makes fun of his own show and BOTH political parties. For example, he does a hysterical impression of Keith Olbermann. He does monologues and plays the straight man in dialogues, especially the recurring segments. His interviews are conducted with political figures, reporters and correspondents, musicians, actors, celebrities and authors. He does not just play clips, but interacts with them, interprets, edits and examines multiple perspectives simultaneously.

His show is so well received, it has produced 2 spin-offs (Colbert Report and America (The Book). It has won 13 Emmys and 2 peabody Awards. Since he started hosting the show, he has doubled the viewership from 1 million to 2 million. Certainly seems to have duped just a great big bunch of people, huh?

PS: Yep, he sure did nail that blame thingy.

Dress it all up, but he has gotten boring over time.nm - Fargo

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

There is a remedy for that. - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Switch the channel.

Yep, did that, thanks - Looking for someone with originality.nm

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

I watched it - just what exactly is it that - he "nailed yet again"

[ In Reply To ..]
I like Jon Stewart. He makes me laugh, but don't know what exactly it is that you think he "nailed".

If you just wanted to provide the political board with a comedy sketch, because we could all use a little comedy, thanks. I enjoyed it and it made me smile. Just don't know what your purpose was to post this.

Republican hypocrisy. (sm) - Nikki

[ In Reply To ..]
I'm amazed you couldn't see that. Maybe you should watch it again.

Yes, Nikki. We know. In YOUR eyes, pubs could - never be anything else. nm

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

If you have an actual point to offer, I'd be glad to read it. (nm) - Nikki

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

Honey, if the shoe fits.... - wear it.

[ In Reply To ..]
Nikki is not alone, not by a long shot.

Thats right! The post and Nikki are right on - as usual.

[ In Reply To ..]
You just don't like it.

no, what they ARE would be PREDICTABLE.nm - ZZzzzzzz

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

Okay. Have it your way. - PREDICTABLY correct.

[ In Reply To ..]
Zzzzzz yourself.

Wrong, just opiniated and close-minded, but thats typical.nm - Dallas

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

ROFL! You're so cute. (((HUGS))) - Nikki

[ In Reply To ..]
:-)

No, it is downright hysterical! - Not to mention childish

[ In Reply To ..]
and silly. Nikki is probably the least closed-minded person on this board.

What in th world are you talking about? - Do you even now yourself?

[ In Reply To ..]
The thread is about repug hypocrisy on the subject of blame. Stop sputtering and get with the program.

Okey dokey. I am very happy for you both.nm - Tx

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

You don't even know the COLOR of my eyes, let alone (sm) - Nikki

[ In Reply To ..]
what's IN them.

I'm amazed that's what you got from that - see message

[ In Reply To ..]
Okay, I watched the video again (I am the person you replied to). I have always liked Jon Stewart. I think he's a funny comedian. Sometimes funny, sometimes not, but that's like every comedian...they have their ups and downs.

Anyway..the first thing that struck me odd was when he said "I am the most trusted journalist". I'm thinking really??? He actually thinks he's a journalist? Maybe someone needs to tell him...your a comedian. You give your opinions about things and make them funny for people to laugh. That's a far stretch from being a journalist. I don't see him out in the field interviewing world leaders, soldiers in the field or covering all news stories like the job of a journalist. He's a comedian. So I thought okay, NBD. If he wants to think of himself as a journalist we'll just let him think that.

Then I went to Axelrod and what he said. Now....if you are talking about hypocrisy that is where it was. Just like this current admin to not take responsibility for things that are their fault but blame it all on the past president. Sorry...just don't buy it. Just doesn't fly.

So, then I went to the Fox clip he played. What the lady said (don't know her name, but she said what Axelrod is saying is "It's Bush's fault". Then commented that is weak and so unserious of Axelrod". Well I do have to agree with her. They are not taking blame for things that are their fault. They DO have the "It's Bush's fault" line down. They might as well just come out and say to us "For the remainder of our term if anything ever happens it will be Bush's fault. It could be a volcano over in Peru...that will be Bush's fault. So sick of the blame game and when people try and point out the facts they are labeled with "hypocrisy". But I did think it was funny when Stewart was saying "okay, first....you watch our show". That was funny. But then he got into screaming something bout writing books and making faces and Jesebel and Jack Parr, and well that just wasn't funny anymore and certainly didn't refer to any hypocrisy.

Then there were the clips of the people who even spoke that its always blame it on Bush, which is true. But maybe you thought it was funny cos you liked that a comedian said that Bush ran the country into the ground. If you want to start getting into who ran what into the ground we need to go back to Clinton (remember NAFTA for starters). Then he sat looking around with a blank look on his face. I got to the part where he talked about the part of Bush played by Josh Brolin, so maybe that is where he is confused. Someone should tell him....that was a movie, written by who....Oliver Stone...a known liberal. So maybe poor Johnny is confused between a part in a movie and Bush. I think there is much more to the Gulf mess. I don't think nobody knows the full extent of it, but maybe we should be looking for who is at fault and just not automatically blaming Bush for every thing that has, is, and will go wrong.

If there is any hypocrisy, it lies with the democrats at not placing blame where blame is due. There is a lot wrong this administration has done about this whole mess. The blame needs to go on them for not dealing with this in the manner they should have. For playing golf and going on vacations and date nights while the largest natural disaster in history has happened. Acting like he doesn't care because he has his little minions that will go out and try to blame Bush for this and free themselves from guilt.

Hypocrisy is what this whole film clip is about, but it's called liberal hypocrisy

Oliver Stone didn't have anything to do with this, (sm) - Nikki

[ In Reply To ..]
That was in reference to Kevin Bacon and a 6 degrees of separation game. Nothing to do with Oliver Stone. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Degrees_of_Kevin_Bacon

Republicans are slamming Democrats for blaming Bush for the current day problems.

This showed that the REPUBLICANS blamed Clinton for everything when Bush was in office.

The part about Stewart being a "journalist" was obviously part of the humor, tongue in cheek. Why would you think this comedian was serious in regard to that remark?

Yes, I saw hypocrisy. Again, you might want to actually watch the entire tape and take it for what it is, instead of talking about Oliver Stone, etc.

Reply - see message

[ In Reply To ..]
Oliver Stone made the movie "GW". The story about Bush played by Josh Brolin. Stewart DID reference this movie in his comedy sketch. Stewart needs to separate a liberal portrayal Bush and real life. It's only a movie.

Of course republicans are slamming Bush. Every day I see it in the news and read on this board. I heard people blaming Bush for the earthquake that hit Haiti, Katrina, etc, etc, etc. Every single thing that has happened bad, whether it be natural disaster or manmade disaster the first thing that pops out of liberals mouths was "It's Bush's fault". That's what that lady was referencing and she was spot on.

Republicans blamed Clinton for things that were his fault. Name one thing that republicans blamed Clinton for that wasn't his fault. The difference is the republicans also accepted responsibility for things that were their own fault. Something the democrats NEVER do.

This is why I am not and never will be a democrat. I say if you don't respond to the gulf disaster, but instead wish to play golf, go on vacations, parties and "date night" without showing any concern for a natural disaster happening then you need to take the blame for that. Not make up every excuse as to why you are not responding to something this serious. If you are running the country into the ground, passing bills the country has clearly said "NO" to, creating jobs only in government, continuing on a war you said you were going to stop, printing money like you have your own money tree, continuing to send jobs overseas (continuation of NAFTA, from who....Bill Clinton who started it), etc, etc, etc. If you don't show any concern in what is happening to the country but would rather go play and vacation and go on dates then yes, you better dang well take credit for it. At least the Bush administration took blame of things that were their fault and put blame where it was due when things were Clinton's fault. But at least Bush sure as hell didn't go on a "date night" or a vacation when national emergencies happened.

I don't need to watch this tape for a 3rd time. Twice is enough. Maybe you should watch it again. I'd say with an open mind but I know that won't happen.

You must be one of those who - believes that if you

[ In Reply To ..]
repeat something enough times it will somehow make it more believable. I would be curious to see if you can reply to the "I agree with" post directly below this one without repeating yourself a third time around. Doubtful. Very doubtful.

Gee, thanks? - see message

[ In Reply To ..]
Since Oliver Stones name came up in the JS video that is what I was referring to. (just thought you'd like to know since your post obviously shows you don't know this.

But alas...nothing of value to add to the original conversation? Go figure.

You must be one of those who believes if a liberal says something its got to be true. Here's a helpful hint you might want to know (we had to keep reminding my 94-year-old grandmother of this) - just because it's in written in the National Enquirer does not mean it's true. Hence, don't believe everything you hear whether it comes from a democrat or republicans mouth. Research it for yourself.

But if all you wanted to do was a drive-by insult you did accomplish that so more power to ya.

What part of Oliver Stone is not the issue - are you not getting?

[ In Reply To ..]
and that repeating it over and over is not going to change the subject at hand, which is GOP style hypocrisy and their incessant blame games. Neither are personal insults. It is fairly apparent by now that you have nothing to say on that, so no need to waste your time with another Oliver Stone curtain call.

you are not even making sense now - see message

[ In Reply To ..]
I responded appropriately. You somehow seem to think I keep repeating something over and over. That doesn't even make any sense. Read the "context" of the messages again. The post/statements were about the movie called GW (won't mention his name since you don't like that).

If you want to talk about hypocrisy look no further than the liberals for that.

Listening to the liberals in the media is like the definition of Insanity - repeating the same thing over and over and expecting different results. They can keep saying that "hypocrisy" word over and over.

If you are saying there are hypocrits in the republican party...you bet there are. But guess what? There are also hipocrits in the democrat party. Both sides have them.

That's why it's great to be an independent. I can see fault in both parties.

The posts regressed to be about Oliver Stone, but (sm) - Nikki

[ In Reply To ..]
the original post was about Jon Stewart's revelation that the Republicans are upset because their party is being blamed for all the things they did, yet they're guilty of doing the same thing with Bill Clinton.

It's called hypocrisy, and W's movie or Oliver Stone had nothing whatsoever to do with it. The reference to Kevin Bacon (which somehow got twisted to Oliver Stone) is a GAME called the "6 degrees of Kevin Bacon."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Degrees_of_Kevin_Bacon

Okay - thank you for a respectful post - see message

[ In Reply To ..]
First, I watched the JS Stewart video. I know they were claiming republican hypocrisy. Unfortunately, what that tells me is that they (liberal media) thinks that because Bush blamed Clinton for things they think were not his fault, that it's okay to blame Bush for things that are not his fault. I'm sorry but I don't think that's right. What's that saying - two wrongs don't make a right.

I never saw the movie 6 degrees of Keven Bacon so I rightfully did not have any reason to comment about what was said. They were ridiculing some guy for what he said and it made absolute no sense to me, but then they brought up Oliver Stones movie and he had that sickening smug look on his face, but whatever joke he was trying to make was just not funny.

Why I commended about the movie W is because watching JS they made it sound like that was a true story. Personally I don't think Bush is a very nice person in real life (out of politics), but people need to separate reality from Hollywood. Whether or not its a conservative or liberal if you are talking about the other party they will demonize them to the end. Oliver Stone is no different.

As for hypocrisy...it's on both sides.

I agree there is hypocrisy on both sides. (sm) - Nikki

[ In Reply To ..]
Other than that, I think maybe we can agree to disagree. You have your opinions, and I respect that. I also have mine, and hopefully you respect that, as well. We all have opinions, even if we disagree, and we're all entitled to them, and they shouldn't be disrespected with one-line negative drive-bys or other malicious content, IMHO.

As far as writing a "respectful post," I tend to give what I get. And what I get are plenty of untrue characterizations of myself and downright personal insults from people who have never even met me, yet believe they know me. These are the people who ruin it for everyone else.

I'd like to see more respectful posts on this board. Then a really good, productive dialogue can take place. I doubt that will happen, though. I hope I'm surprised someday.

I hope you have a great day. :-)

I do respect your opinions - see message

[ In Reply To ..]
My mom taught me a long time ago you can disagree with someone, but you always should respect them especially if you want the same in return. Everyone here is a human being with feelings. We are all basically working for the same thing. A roof over our heads, food, clothes and education for our children and decent health care. Nobody is different in that respect. It's all just political viewpoints that differ.

In fact we don't always agree, but I will still read your posts because I want to know if there is something that maybe I am looking at the wrong way. A good example is the Arizona law. I don't fully understand it, but after listening to a lot of people talk about it my feelings may have changed a bit. It helps to understand issues and what is all involved. That's what I try to get from here, and you are always good at explaining why you feel a certain way.

There are a couple posters who really do research and bring good conversations to the board. Backwards Typist is another good poster who brings facts and links to back up what she says. A couple others too but I can't think of their handles at this moment.

I think we all can take what we dish out, but the attacks on posters are so unnecessary. I have seen insulting posts directed towards you (remember reading someone about your eyes or the color of your eyes or something like that), but I didn't read the posts because it was just insulting.

What I don't really like and what really gets my goat are the posters who come on board and generalize a whole group of people and just write absolute hate toward the group. Some examples are the ones who just come on and write one liners that GOPs are hypocrits and GOPs are pathetic. Now that really gets to me because they act as though the democrat party is free from blame for everything they are doing. They act as though the politicians in the democrat party care about the people of the country when the truth is with everything they are doing that is the farthest from the truth. There are hypocrits on both sides and there are pathetic politicians on both sides. Nobody has ever said Bush was free of blame for a lot of things that happened in their administration, but the democrats are acting as though the Obama admin are free from blame for things that are his fault. And I'm just not the kind of person who believes its okay to blame Bush for things that aren't his fault because Bush blamed Clinton for things that were not his fault. I also find it amazing that people will talk about how stupid Bush was, yet on the other hand they will talk about all these master minded plans he did (like the war). My understanding is that Bush did not start a war, and no president has authority to just start a war. My understanding (and I may have to research this further) is that congress or the house or senate are the ones who authorize whether a country goes to war or not. Anyway...not saying he is free from blame for a lot of things, but this group that is in power now needs to take responsibility for things that are their fault. Okay, didn't mean to get side tracked...I was just saying that I'm sick of all the bickering and childish name calling and demonizing of anyone here who is not a democrat. I'd like to just see articles and opinions of articles and different topics discussed instead of trying to weed through all the insults to find anything decent.

I agree with - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Nikki, that the journalist remark was tongue in cheek, as can be gleaned by the delivery of the line and expression in his face. The Daily Show presents itself as a "fake news" program. However, the 200 US and Canadian journalists and columnists from the Television Critics Association who nominated Jon Stewart for their Outstanding Achievement in News & Information award in 2003, 2004 (the year he won) and 2005 do not seem to agree with that.

Here's what I don't buy and REALLY doesn't fly. Instead of taking the Fox Hail Mary play on Axelrod's MMS comment and running with it (completely dodging the issue and trying to claim day is night and night is day), consider the reality of the situation. You are obviously unfamiliar with the history of mismanagement of the MMS and the direct part both W and Cheney played in enabling the culture of corruption to thrive at the behest of the O&G industry cronies through bait and switch/smoke and mirrors policy development that was bold enough to directly circumvent Congress (now there's a surprise). You probably have heard about the mishandling of billions and billions and billions in royalties, the crystal meth, sex parties and connections to prostitutes W and Dickey-Boy overlooked for years, reported in 2008. In case you missed that too, I have posted one of the reports and a couple of links to articles for your entertainment and convenience. There is also a link to the IMMEDIATE actions taken to mitigate the situation once the Obama administration was sworn in.

In light of this evidence (and believe me, I can supply truckloads of it), I would correct that one statement of yours to read, "they are not taking responsibility for the corruption that was fostered, nurtured and overlooked by the previous administration." The Fox report, of course, is a blatant example of the hypocrisy Stewart was discussing. Otherwise, there would be no reason to include a pak of lies in that blame segment. The rest of your blather on that subject will be left to stand as, well, the blather that it is. I will try to help you out on that part that flew right past you which you claim had nothing to do with blame. Actually, Stewart's entire statement was rhetorical and was expressing the fact that there are SO MANY examples of pub hypocrisy, there is not enough time in the day nor airspace to cover it all, since they had other irons in the fire. Personally, I thought it was really cute.

You seem to be unaware that your next entire paragraph about skipping over the pristine W reign to blame Clinton is a perfect example of the blind spot pubs have regarding their own behavior when assigning all the blame in the world for every problem imaginable to their opposition party, and the HYPOCRISY of the accusations the pubs are making now about recent Bush bashing. After all, since the moment Obama took office, bashing is the only thing they every do. This is in the true spirit of do as I say and not as I do, which would indicate that the confusions is yours, not Stewart's.

The rest of your incessant O bash reads like an instant replay of Fox reporters foaming at the mouth about Obama taking a short summer vacation with his kids before they go back to school (how dare he), a 2-hour golf game and a standing weekly dinner date he keeps with his wife, which you somehow equate to his being a careless slacker (go figure). A 2-hour break and spending time with his family on a regular basis is nothing to feel guilty about and certainly requires no explanation or defense by more rational folks who allow our President to be the normal human being that he is.

Investigative Report of MMS Oil Marketing Group - Lakewood
http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/investigative/documents/mmsoil-081908.pdf
Report Says Oil Agency Ran Amok: Interior Dept. Inquiry Finds Sex, Corruption
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/10/AR2008091001829.html
Sex, Drug Use and Graft Cited in Interior Department
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/11/washington/11royalty.html?_r=1
Summary of Ethics Investigation and Obama Administration Clean-Up Measures
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/28/AR2010052804599.html?hpid=topnews

This was very funny. Thanks for posting it! (nm) - Nikki

[ In Reply To ..]
:-)

Seems like the same thing he always does to me.nm - Dallas

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

It is. That is what makes the blame skit so funny. - Never fails to lift my spirits. There is

[ In Reply To ..]
nothing like a good belly laugh to brighten one's day and help keep perspective on things. Try it sometime. It could do you a world of good.

Yeah, I do that when laughing at pathetic Obama - (to keep from crying at his poor leadership).nm

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

You know what I think - Catddoa

[ In Reply To ..]
is REALLY pathetic? That would be those people who feel pathologically compelled to bash Obama in senseless one-liners no matter what the subject at hand is, just because they are so void substance they couldn't come up with something of value to add if their lives depended on it.

His stimulus plan was even MORE PATHETIC. - as well as OBAMACARE!!

[ In Reply To ..]
Still, its a free country so far even with Obama, so I can speak freely. You can do nothing about it. :-) I know its hard to handle the truth right now.

What makes you think - Catddoa

[ In Reply To ..]
I am trying to do anything about your senseless drivel other than express my own opinion about it? I have no trouble with handling the truth. Next time I enounter some, I would be most happy to show you how it's done, but first you will need to know how to recognize it.

Oh, how funny you are.. You are so in denial, but - it might hit ya in November. :-)

[ In Reply To ..]
Have a lovely few months.

ROTFLMAO! Loved your response, Catddoa! - Thanks!

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

Great point. I couldn't agree more. (sm) - Nikki

[ In Reply To ..]
These one-liners are nothing but personal insults. It's too bad these people don't wish to engage in an actual discussion. Sticks and stones, sticks and stones.

If you notice, all I did was to thank the poster for posting the link. I was being polite to the OP, and that was challenged.

OMG, you're right. - and

[ In Reply To ..]
the other poster was extolling the virtues of a good belly laugh. Guess NM gets off on being hateful more than laughter. Poor thing.

Speaking of hateful, there is no one more hateful - than those on the left, so true.nm

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

A quick scan of this board would "refudiate" that notion. (nm) - Nikki

[ In Reply To ..]
:-)

Yeah, once again, in YOUR opinion... whoopie.nm - TX

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

I have my opinion, and you have yours. (sm) - Nikki

[ In Reply To ..]
I believe that's how this board is supposed to work, no?

Oh, okay, Nikki, but when you do it its fine? Talk - about hypocrisy... open the eyes.nm

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

Please copy and paste a post of mine as an example. (sm) - Nikki

[ In Reply To ..]
If I've been hypocritical, then I will apologize. I've admitted it on this board before when I've been wrong, and I'm not afraid to admit it again.

Otherwise, yours is nothing but another drive-by, meaningless insult.

Again, I'd LOVE to discuss issues, but some people only need to read my name and slam me. I have to wonder if they've even read my post. That's not even close to having a discussion.

Still waiting for some examples. :-) - Nikki

[ In Reply To ..]
:-)

Yeah. I would like to see that myself. - Postcards from the Show Me state.

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

I would, too. Still waiting. (nm) - Nikki

[ In Reply To ..]
:-)

Tick Tock. (nm) - Nikki

[ In Reply To ..]
:-)

Morning Nikki. You will be waiting forever with - this group. I think the

[ In Reply To ..]
Regressives here are getting worse, more defensive and nasty reactions right out of the gate~if their responses were any more of a "knee-jerk" variety, none of them will have any teeth left!

And I thought it was very funny and thanked the poster for posting it. - Nikki

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

Similar Messages:

May 02, 2012
His routine on the republicans complaining about Obama politicizing bin Laden's death. I think he is very effective in cutting through the garbage. I nominate him as press secretary for the Hilliary/Rachel ticket. No more "messaging" just tell it . . . . ...

Jun 16, 2010
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-june-15-2010/respect-my-authoritah ...

Mar 02, 2014
Hi everyone- I'm going on a trip and am wanting to get a gel pedicure for the trip. A regular pedicure wears off too quickly when you wear socks and shoes, and I'll be doing a lot of socks and shoes wearing because we'll be hiking. Is it as complicated getting the polish removed as they say? What else can you tell me? ...

Nov 05, 2010
Link below. ...

Jun 22, 2010
I have fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome and just turned 40. I have been told that the hair/nail problem may also be somewhat related to an autoimmune condition, but the doctors really don't know for sure:( Any ideas? ...

Oct 08, 2013
It's always good to laugh! ...

May 06, 2015
I used to get my nails done professionally. Absolutely loved them, but gave them up years ago because of cost. My nails are awful and trying to shape and paint them myslef looks bad. Does anyone use press on nails that you can buy in walmart or target. If so do you like them. Used them over 20 years ago and they just fell off easy, wondered if they improved since then. Just curious if anyopne has experience/knowledge of these. ...

Sep 06, 2012
You really can't argue with that. You know it's the truth. ...

Jul 08, 2013
I'm just curious. Wouldn't it be pretty much common sense, to want to avoid as much exposure as possible to chemicals and possible harmful things if you were pregnant, especially in the early first 3 months? ...

May 06, 2015
What has Hillary accomplished, indeed. Link ...

May 14, 2013
You will all think I am crazy, but am having a difference of opinion with a good friend and would like to know what others say. Do you think Rod Stewart is handsome? I do. He (along with the Beatles and the Stones) was one of my faves back in the day. The other day I said that I thought Rod Stewart was handsome. My friend nearly choked on her coffee and said, "HANDSOME? You're crazy." What do you think? How would you classify Rod Stewart ...

Feb 24, 2010
.. ...

Mar 18, 2010
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-march-17-2010/in-dodd-we-trust ...

Mar 25, 2010
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-march-22-2010/on-topic--scandal-list---tea-bagging ...

Mar 30, 2010
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-march-29-2010/health-care-slime-machine ...

Apr 07, 2010
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-april-5-2010/inethical-basterds ...

Jun 04, 2010
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-june-1-2010/cenac---the-spilling-fields---oil-leak-containment-ideas ...

Dec 11, 2014
Here is a link to his thoughts on torture report and John McCain. ...

Aug 20, 2011
Jon Stewart telling it like it is as usual. I do not agree with Jon on everything, but he calls out both sides and has principles. It is appalling that the only truth we get is from a comedian. My favorite liberal. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EY5Ofcxjs0 ...

Mar 10, 2010
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-march-3-2010/anchor-management ...

Apr 01, 2010
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-march-31-2010/fear-of-a-black-c-spanet ...

Apr 09, 2010
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-april-7-2010/pope-opera ...

Apr 30, 2010
irritating, and can NOT answer a straight question to save his life. He is perfect example of what many of us on the left see on a daily basis-sticking to an idea like velcro in spite of the proof to the contrary. Just keep on regurgitating the same garbage and hear nothing else-hands over the ears, eyes closed, saying nah,nah,nah,nah, nah....... http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-april-28-2010/exclusive---ken-blackwell-extended-interview-pt--3 ...

May 11, 2010
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-may-10-2010/a-nightmare-on-wall-street ...

Aug 01, 2010
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-july-29-2010/leader-s-digest ...

Jun 05, 2010
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-june-3-2010/glenn-beck-airs-israeli-raid-footage ...

Jun 14, 2011
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_thecutline/20110614/ts_yblog_thecutline/jon-stewart-defends-sarah-palin-rips-media-for-wasting-our-time-with-defcon-1-coverage-of-her-emails No smoking gun... its all ridiculous... get over her, people ! ...

Apr 28, 2013
Warning: This video contains vast amounts of funnies and is probably offensive to Fox fans. PS--Is Ann Coulter for real? Go to prison for wearing a hijab? ...

May 14, 2014
I can't believe Rush can't find anything better to complain about than an awareness campaign regarding over 200 kidnapped girls. It was a South African activist who started this campaign (although the misinformed are claiming Michelle Obama started it) and these days, Twitter campaigns have played a leading role in spreading information in a world where people seem to have technology-induced ADD. Not to mention the fact that the President caught flack for sending assistance to Nigeria ...

Sep 12, 2014
This is pretty funny, and sad. ...