A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

Supreme Court Refuses To Hear Obama Birth Certificate Challenge


Posted: Jun 11, 2012

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court has refused to hear an appeal challenging President Barack Obama's U.S. citizenship and his eligibility to serve as commander in chief.

Without comment, the high court on Monday refused to hear an appeal from Alan Keyes, Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the challengers did not have legal standing to file the lawsuit.

The U.S. Constitution says only "a natural born citizen" may serve as president. The challengers allege that Obama, whose father was Kenyan, was born in that African country, rather than in Hawaii. They claim his Hawaii birth certificate is a forgery. Hawaii officials have repeatedly verified Obama's citizenship.

Keyes and Drake ran against Obama on the American Independent Party ticket and Robinson serves as the party's chairman.

;

SCOUS - goldie

[ In Reply To ..]
I think the problem is that the US Constitution never defines a "natural born citizen," and that leaves the door open to question. It's bound to come up again, whether it's Obama or another candidate. Don't you just love it when the SCOUS says "no" and doesn't have to say why? Was the appeal specifically about Obama's eligibility or did it also have a more general tone to it? If was just about Obama, then I can certainly understand the refusal. Does anyone have any good links to reference?

Because they would look as ridiculous as Trump if they commented - A dignified response

[ In Reply To ..]
Talk about frivolous nonsense to even bring something like this to the court. Shows some real fear on the Republican Conservatives part that they do not think they can win without court action or cheating.

If they do not have "legal standing", who does? - They always say that -cop out. nm

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

I think it's a sad day when an important issue like this is - not even heard

[ In Reply To ..]
My deep down feeling is they were simply told don't go there or else. It is truly a sad day when an important issue is not looked at. Maybe they've been told don't take it on as Romney will be the next president and if it comes out he wasn't born here then there'll be too many problems for them to fix. Who knows. But they could be holding his Kenyan BC in their hands and they still won't hear it. It does make you wonder the implications of all that has been done if there really is a Kenyon one. So I can understand why they won't even hear it.

As for the comment about Trump. Well we all know who he supports and who put him up to do what he did. No, of course he would not take it any further.

The conservative leaning SCOTUS has decided that this is a - frivolous law suit. Stop with the insanity. nm

[ In Reply To ..]
.

You have no right to tell me what I can and cannot write - not even heard

[ In Reply To ..]
Are you the Moderator?

So I will repeat. It is a sad day when an important issue like this is not even heard. I'm sure they were told not to discuss and don't even bring it up. That is the only reason for their decision.

However, you see, that is the nice thing about freedom and this board.

I CAN WRITE WHATEVER I WANT TO!!!

If you don't like what I write, as the moderator has said many times, just skip by the posts.
It is a sad day when this issue has gone through.. - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
all the courts in the land an some people will just not accept it. When the Court says they will not hear the lawsuit it does not mean that they have not studied and investigated the issue. It just means that they have decided not to hear arguments in open court because they deem the lawsuit frivolous.
the poster did not tell you what you can or cannot write - golly
[ In Reply To ..]
"Stop with the insanity" She can write anything she wants - nm
[ In Reply To ..]
nm

No legal standing simply means... - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
that the court has judged Obama's BC to be authentic and the plaintiff therefore has no basis for the lawsuit. No legal standing gave rise to the saying, "not a leg to stand on".

Further, if Congress were to pass the so-called birther bill, Obama would be able to comply easily. The bill would require presidential campaigns to submit “a copy of the candidate’s birth certificate” to the Federal Election Commission. The certificate Obama has released publicly would meet this requirement.

That is not correct! Your definition is not right - ..it means it is none of their business..

[ In Reply To ..]
Not having legal standing means you do not have the legal right to be involved in the court case you are trying to be involved in..

So, the case cannot even be tried because the people bringing it have no legal standing. It has NOTHING to do with whether or not Obamas BC is authentic!
the definition provided was correct - fgs
[ In Reply To ..]
You have to have legal grounds on which to question something; that's what legal standing means. It has nothing to do with whether it is "your business" or not (for goodness sake).
I think that in this case...sm - VTMT
[ In Reply To ..]
the court is saying that it is not the plaintiff's job to decide where a person is born, whether the birth certificate is a forgery or not. That is the job of the state of Hawaii and they have certified that Obama's BC is not a forgery.

That's not what legal standing means - That is an opinion not a definition - nm

[ In Reply To ..]
nice try.

Similar Messages:


Obama Birth Certificate 'Raises Questions' Says Court JusticeApr 18, 2012
State Supreme Court Justice Declares "Serious Questions" About Obama's Birth Certificate -- Now Tell EVERY Secretary of State AND Attorney General to REMOVE Obama From their Ballot:https://secure.conservativedonations.com/rm_eligibility/?a=7578 ALERT: A Supreme Court Justice in Alabama has declared that, thanks to recent investigations into Barack Hussein Obama's alleged Constitutional ineligibility to be President of the United States, a filing that seeks to require an original c ...

U.S. Supreme Court Declines To Hear Jan 13, 2015
but apparently there is another attack in March to try to deny people the tax-credit subsidies offered by the law.  ...

Obama Show Us Your Birth CertificateOct 29, 2012
...

Appeals Court Refuses To Lift Hold On ObamaMay 26, 2015
A federal appeals court refused Tuesday to lift a temporary hold on President Obama's executive action that could shield as many as 5 million immigrants illegally living in the U.S. from deportation. The U.S. Justice Department had asked the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse a Texas judge who agreed to temporarily block the president's plan in February, after 26 states filed a lawsuit alleging Obama's action was unconstitutional. But two out of three judges on a c ...

President Obama Releases Birth Certificate!Apr 27, 2011
What will the birthers say now?  President Obama to brief press at 9:45 am.  ...

Obama Campaign Selling Birth CertificateMay 22, 2011
President Obama's reelection campaign is turning a conspiracy theory that had long dogged the president into a snarky fundraising tool, selling merchandise depicting Obama and his complete long form birth certificate. For a $25 donation, you can get a t-shirt that shows a smiling Obama above the phrase, "Made in the U.S.A" on the front, and the president's long-form birth certificate on the back. The campaign is also giving away coffee mugs with the same design scheme to sup ...

Sarah Palin Goes 'Birther':Obama Birth Certificate 'A Fair Question'Dec 04, 2009
Well then, she should be asked to disclose all info about Trig's birth too Sarah Palin declared on Thursday that the legitimacy of President Obama's birth certificate is "rightfully" an issue with the American public, and that it is "fair game" for politicians to question Obama's citizenship. The comments came during an interview with conservative radio host Rusty Humphries, who asked Palin whether she planned to "make the birth certificate an issue" if she runs for ...

The Real Skinny On The Birth CertificateSep 10, 2012
link ...

O Birth Certificate Law : Hawaii Can Now Ignore RequestsMay 19, 2010
OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE LAW: HAWAII CAN NOW IGNORE REQUESTS Maintenance man David Lee of Arvada, Colo., puts the finishing touches on a sign featuring President Barack Obama for a sales lot for pre-owned vehicles along Interstate 70 in the northwest Denver suburb of Wheat Ridge, Colo., on Friday, Nov. 20, 2009. The billboard, completed by an artist Thursday, shows a grinning cartoonish Obama wearing a turban. The billboard says, "PRESIDENT or JIHAD?" Underneath the picture is a yellow square wi ...

Jerome Corsi's 'where's The Birth Certificate?"May 18, 2011
pulled from the shelves and pulped by publisher. Refunds offered. Corsi is the same exalted author who produced the classic "Unfit for Command" about John Kerry. hAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA   ...

How 'bout Getting Off The Birth Certificate And Start Having Real Debates....but I Need Apr 27, 2011
to make 1 comment about the certificate. It wasn't the birthers that started this. They just ran with it all these years. It was Hillary's camp during the 2008 campaign that started all this, or did you all forget about that? That's all I have to say about that. Now, some facts about why I will not vote for Obama: 1. President Obama promised to close Gitmo. Did he? 2. President Obama promised in March that the Libyan War would be short term? Is it? 3. President Obama promised ...

But Go Ahead And Worry About A Birth Certificate Fairy TaleMay 30, 2012
In other words, congressional Republicans are taking the government’s creditworthiness hostage when they threaten not to increase the debt ceiling. Politically advantageous as this may be, it is terrible economics. To understand why, let us consider the economic effects of last year’s debt-ceiling debate. If we know our history, perhaps we will not be doomed to repeat it. ...

Supreme Court And DNAJun 03, 2013
http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/03/justice/supreme-court-dna-tests/index.html   What are your opinions on this ruling?  Is this constitutional or a 4th amendment violation? ...

Do You Trust The Supreme CourtMar 26, 2012
Before the decision even comes down from the Supreme Court on Obama's health care law I have to admit I have no confidence in them. It's all political. Giving the election to bush over Gore and allowing corporations to fund elections makes me think the court is not bipartisan. When the highest court in the land is partisan I have no hope. I feel sad for our country. Do you trust them? ...

Why The Supreme Court Will Strike Down All Of ObamacareApr 06, 2012
By Peter Ferrara Barack Obama made a national laughingstock out of himself with his recent comments on the Obamacare law now before the Supreme Court. Obama said on Monday, “I’m confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress.” (emphasis added). President Obama is not stupid. But he thinks you are. He knows the Obamacare heal ...

Breach Of Ethics--Supreme CourtJan 27, 2011
Where is the outrage?  Corruption at the highest levels--I hope they impeach this guy.  Source: Los Angeles Times\"Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas failed to report his wife\'s income from a conservative think tank on financial disclosure forms for at least five years, the watchdog group Common Cause said Friday.Between 2003 and 2007, Virginia Thomas, a longtime conservative activist, earned $686,589 from the Heritage Foundation, according to a Common Cause review of the fou ...

Supreme Court Potential JudgesApr 11, 2010
Ever since Barack Obama's election as president, there has been anticipation among scholars at the University of Chicago's Law School that one of their own could be headed to the U.S. Supreme Court bench in the next few years.That anticipation was heightened late last week with news that Obama, who taught constitutional law at the school from 1992 to 2004, soon will be making his first Supreme Court pick.Almost every short list of possible nominees to succeed Justice David Souter inclu ...

Supreme Court Overturns DOMAJun 26, 2013
A huge step in the right direction.   The legal challenge to Doma was brought by New York resident Edith Windsor, 83. She was handed a tax bill of $363,000 (£236,000) when she inherited the estate of her spouse Thea Speyer - a levy she would not have had to pay if she had been married to a man. "Doma writes inequality into the entire United States Code," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in Wednesday's ruling. "Under Doma, same-sex married couples have their lives burdened, ...

Will The Supreme Court Stop Cops From Sep 17, 2013
  In many states, police can rifle through your smart phone—even if you've just been arrested for not putting on your seat belt. —By Dana Liebelson | Tue Sep. 17, 2013 3:00 AM PDT 8   Rich Siegel/Flickr If you're like many Americans, your cell phone is overflowing with personal information—text messages, emails, photos of your friends and family, an organized history of who you've been calling, private notes, automatic logi ...

Republicans Are Screwed If The Supreme Court....smMay 20, 2015
guts Obamacare. I don't think they will rule that way; but, if they do, there will be big trouble if all those people lose their insurance.   ...

Supreme Court Expresses Skepticism Over ConstitutionalityMar 27, 2012
Lets hope they vote on the side of the law and vote it down.  If they do the right thing and vote against it, my trust in them may rise, but unsure.  Just unsure if they will do the right thing.  My take on the health care is this.  Those that want it should be able to get it.  Those that don't should not be forced to buy a product we don't wish to purchase every month.  And on top of that be told the product has to meet certain circumstances, whiich for m ...

Tea Party Rally Has Message For Supreme CourtMar 26, 2012
There are so many good things about the Affordable Health Care Act. It's hard for me to understand why someone would even think about going without insurance. Cain and the TBs are full of hot air.Two years ago, thousands of members of the tea party descended on Capitol Hill to protest the passage of President Barack Obama’s health care law.On Saturday, just two days before the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on the constitutionality of the law, hundreds of tea party supporters ...

Obamacare: Well Now, Isn't This An Interesting Bit Of Phrasing From The Supreme Court.Jul 25, 2014
Should Obamacare be sent to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) and should the SCOTUS actually decide to hear it, the 4 dissenters when the ACA was upheld by the court previously have already made clear in their dissent what they believed Congress' intent was in setting up the exchanges. National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (joint dissenting opinion of Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito) "...because Congress thought that some States might decline federal fu ...

Here's What The Supreme Court Could Do To Insurance Premiums In Your StateNov 13, 2014
More than 800,000 Floridians would see their monthly insurance premiums rise, from an average of around $70 to an average of around $350, or roughly a factor of five. More than 600,000 people in Texas, about 325,000 in North Carolina, and another 275,000 in Georgia would see insurance premiums soar by similar amounts. Nationwide, more than 4 million people living in 37 states would be in situations like these. Most would have no way to pay the higher bills, forcing them to drop insurance covera ...

How The Supreme Court Can Resolve The Debt Ceiling CrisisOct 14, 2013
Adam H. Rosenzweig from the Washington University School of Law proposes a different approach to ending the debt ceiling crisis: Let the Supreme Court resolve it as a Constitutional matter. What should happen when Congress and the President find themselves in a fiscal policy showdown resulting in a Constitutional violation? This question has risen to the fore in light of the recent political showdowns over the so-called “debt ceiling” crisis. Some scholars have argued that there ar ...

Mass. Supreme Court Ruled On Pledge Case..smMay 09, 2014
In this case, a family sued on the grounds that having the Pledge Allegiance recited in school everyday discriminated against their children because they did not follow/worship the Christian God. While their children (and all U.S. children) are free to not recite it, it was argued that non-pledgers were discriminated against, treated as un-American, and un-patriotic, and ridiculed as such. Additionally, even if they wanted to demonstrate their patriotism, these students could not because "Under ...

German Federal Supreme Court: Measles Is NOT A VirusJan 26, 2017
This is the strangest vaccine story I have ever come across.  Several scientists proved successfully in Germany that measles is NOT caused by a virus.  The case was heard before the German Federal Supreme Court (equivalent of our U.S. SupremeCourt).  The plaintiff was a biologist, and he was awarded monetary damages. Reseachers in the past decades committed a critical mistake:  They used no controls.  As a result, components of regular cells were misidentified as vira ...

Democrats Attempted To Filibuster Bush's Supreme CourtFeb 17, 2016
he would shift the balance of the court. What hypocrites they are and they get away with it. Apparently Harry Reid has forgotten his own role in trying to do so. Payback is a ....... Just two years ago Harry Reid went for the nuclear option eliminated the filibuster rule of 60-40 votes required to override one so he could pack the super-important DC Circuit Court with extreme leftist. The cool thing about having no moral values and no accountability is that you can lie without a guilty ...

Supreme Court Overturns Objection To Cross On Public LandApr 29, 2010
  By Robert Barnes Washington Post Staff Writer Thursday, April 29, 2010  A splintered Supreme Court displayed its deep divisions over the separation of church and state Wednesday, with the court's prevailing conservatives signaling a broader openness to the idea that the Constitution does not require the removal of religious symbols from public land. A 5 to 4 decision by the court overturns a federal judge's objection to a white cross erected more than 75 years ago on a ...

Supreme Court's Majority Sides With U.S. Chamber Of Commerce In Over 2/3 Of Cases Jun 10, 2010
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/10/supreme-courts-majority-s_n_607714.html ...