A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

Tea party rally has message for Supreme Court


Posted: Mar 26, 2012

There are so many good things about the Affordable Health Care Act. It's hard for me to understand why someone would even think about going without insurance. Cain and the TBs are full of hot air.

Two years ago, thousands of members of the tea party descended on Capitol Hill to protest the passage of President Barack Obama’s health care law.

On Saturday, just two days before the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on the constitutionality of the law, hundreds of tea party supporters rallied on Capitol Hill with the same message: Kill the bill.

Though the crowds for the “Road to Repeal” rally in Senate Park, near the Capitol, were smaller than they were two years ago, the passion was the same. People stood for hours in the pouring rain to deliver their message to the Supreme Court — and to Congress.

“Two years ago the momentum was a little bit different,” said Jenny Beth Martin, co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots. “There were months and months building up to the passage of the law, but right now this is more of a kicking off as we go into the week.”

Martin said the tea party would be around all week, but the rally was really to “send a message” to Washington that “the majority of Americans want the law repealed.”

And having some big-name speakers — like former Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain — certainly helped bring out supporters.

“The liberals and the establishment, they thought because of a few raindrops you were going to stay home today,” said Cain, who was greeted with massive applause when he took the stage. “I wanted to be here with you to deliver a message to the people in Washington, D.C., to deliver a message to Obama and his administration, we the people are here and we want our freedom back.”

Cain drew cheers as he ripped up pages of a copy of the law placed on stage. And he delivered a message he made many times on the presidential trail: If "Obamacare" had been law when he was diagnosed with stage four cancer, he would not be alive today.

“Imagine if a bureaucrat got a report on their desk trying to decide if I should be approved [for] my surgery, my chemotherapy … if they were to say, OK, he’s got a 30 percent chance of survival, I don't think the government would want to pay for his surgery and his chemotherapy,” Cain said. “That’s what Obamacare would do [to] you and me, and that’s why we’ve got to rip it up and repeal it.”

The crowd heard from dozens of prominent conservative speakers, including Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, who filed one of the first suits against the law, and Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas). While the majority of speakers declared their hope that the Supreme Court would find the law to be unconstitutional, they all said the real "road to repeal" would be at the ballot boxes in November.

“The next step here and my focus here is political,” Cuccinelli told POLITICO. “It’s to make this an issue, and [to make] the principles that underlie both the bill — and our concerns with the bill — election issues.”

Gohmert encouraged the crowd to march across to the Supreme Court when the rally was over and to “say a little prayer.”

Instead of praying silently, the crowd marched to the Court building following the rally, chanting “Stop the tyranny” and “Repeal Obamacare.”

“There comes a time in a man’s life where you have to step up for what you believe in,” said Dean McDonald, a business owner from Atlanta. “Now is one of those times.”

Like many of the other participants in the rally, it was not McDonald’s first time coming to D.C. to protest the law.
“I offer health care to my employees,” he said. “If this takes effect, that’s done. It’ll get too expensive, with too many mandates. Free enterprise needs to take over, not the government.”

The rally kicked off what will be a week filled with events outside the Supreme Court. Supporters of the law will hold daily news conferences on the steps each day of the arguments, and Martin said there would be another organized rally against the law on Tuesday.

Outside of the court, there was already a line — which had started forming on Friday — to get one of the few seats available to the public to watch the oral arguments.

Some were being paid to hold spots in line for others. But Kathie McClure, a lawyer who had traveled from Atlanta, had a different reason for being there. She was there to support the law — and she said her family’s personal stake in health reform was the reason she was willing to sleep on the sidewalk for the weekend.

“My son has diabetes and my daughter has epilepsy. They are uninsurable in the private insurance market. Now they will be able to get a policy, and insurance companies won’t be able to exclude them. For their future, this is a huge deal. That’s why I’m here,” she said.

Link
 

;

They got it right - KILL THE BILL

[ In Reply To ..]
Obama is still the ***** he stated he was in college. Only difference here, Obama threw a few free lines out to make you oblivious to the disaster about to be unleashed on the general public under Obamacare. Would bet every thing I have on the fact you did NOT read the bill. If you read anything, it was only the propaganda by Obama and his band of stooges and not the entire Obamacare law. Let me send you $5.00 so you can buy a clue.

Unneccessary personal attack. You can - VTMT

[ In Reply To ..]
state your opinion without insulting others. BTW, you are not the ONLY one who has read the bill. Why is it that whenever someone disagrees with you on this subject you accuse them of either not reading the bill or being stupid?

Unneccessary personal attack. You can - VTMT - As usual, U assume what is not in post

[ In Reply To ..]
Pray tell, how do you know which poster put up that message? I've read several of your posts where you repeatedly accuse posters that YOU think wrote something and you accused them incorrectly. Why is that you cannot ask a question without making an assumption that you are all knowing, all seeing and have every answer and know who every poster is? Why is that you cannot address a poster without making false accusations to them regarding some other poster?
Thou doest protest too much. nm - VTMT
[ In Reply To ..]
.
Thou doest protest too much. nm - VTMT - and YOU never post a facts-just slam *sigh*
[ In Reply To ..]
.

Agree... Obamacare is a major disaster. Wish - people could wake up!! nm

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

Please see message. - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
"Like many of the other participants in the rally, it was not McDonald’s first time coming to D.C. to protest the law.
“I offer health care to my employees,” he said. “If this takes effect, that’s done. It’ll get too expensive, with too many mandates. Free enterprise needs to take over, not the government.”

Free enterprise is exactly how the greedy insurance companies got to where they are today. If there was ever an industry that should be investigated, it's the insurance companies.

They want to repeal this law before the majority of citizens have had the opportunity to use it. Once you give something important to a citizen (something like REASONABLE rates), it's harder to take it away. The Republicans, who have never uttered one word about healthcare insurance, are the ones who messed up what could have been a single payor plan. But, as they continue to say, all they care about is making Obama fail. They don't care about anything else, and that's obvious from their words and deeds.
I don't even recognize my country any more. It's truly sad.

I will agree the insurance companies are - greedy and a pain to

[ In Reply To ..]
deal with, but give me the choice over dealing with a private insurance company versus the government, I will take the insurance company. Single payer would sound great unless you have ever worked in a department where you have to handle medical necessity or PAs for Medicare or Medicaid. It is like jumping through hoops just trying to get some blood tests covered or even a simple chest x-ray.

I am with you, though, with not recognizing my own country. Who would have thought 20 years ago any of this would be discussed?

Obamacare - me

[ In Reply To ..]
The worst part of this Obamacare is that the people who DO need it won't be able to afford it even if they wanted it. But, to be fined $3000 if you DON'T have insurance? How are they going to enforce that? If you can't afford the insurance, where the h**l are you gonna get $3000 to pay a fine? In this economy especially with all the jobs going to illegal immigrants in this country....which is a whole other bag of worms. This is no longer the land of liberty if you are a legal citizen, and that's about all I wanna say about that. Not another 4 - kick Obama out the door.
Obamacare - me - Loooove YOUR POST
[ In Reply To ..]
There are now estimates that a family plan is fast approaching $ 20,000 a year. Yet, you still have the people on here with such dimly lit bulbs they do not get it at all. Obamacare was specfically designed for complete, total control and had nothing to do with healthcare. Since they refuse to actually read the entire bill, rely only on their left wing anchors to provide daily talking points, they are clueless as to impact this will have on their finances, not to mention their LACK of health care. On top that, the illegal aliens face no fines, get complete total free healthcare and we have to pay for those millions of illegals, costing USA tax billions in a short period of time. Yeah - stack that cost up against those using the ER for healthcare. Yet, all you hear is the Hypos bellyaching about the people in the ER for healthcare and how it costs them. Do not agree with going to the ER for healthcare, but Obama has shot down every other solution presented to him, refusing to look at anything other than Obamacare. Now you libs who think are so socially elite and knowledgeable(NOT), flame away!
I'll say it again. READ THE BILL or get someone - to interpret for you! nm
[ In Reply To ..]
.
ever see A Fish Called Wanda? - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
Remember when Otto says apes don't read philosophy? And Wanda respondds with "yes they do, Otto, they just don't understand it!"

Don't assume people haven't read something just because you don't agree with them - and quit shouting!
ever see A Fish Called Wanda? - sm - Conservative
[ In Reply To ..]
Great post. This board is out of control with the screaming text anymore. Not sure why those thinking the do that convinces anyone of such bizarre statements. I would venture to guess 95% on here that claimed they read Obamacare never turned page 1 of that document. Since there is no way to verify the validity of their claims, their uninformed posts speak volumes.
Now you're calling all Democratic women who - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
say they read the law that they are "uninformed" liars, simply because they disagree with Your Highness?

Now you're calling all Democratic women who - sm - UR the only 1 that mentioned Dem women-Guess "
[ In Reply To ..]
all know what little you think of Dem women now. Thanks. OP never mentioned any party - only you.

actually... - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
My intention with posting the "Wanda" quote was to remind the shouting poster that reading a document is not the same as understanding it. Certainly, a caveat for both sides of the aisle.
Actually I got you loud and clear-LOLOL - Conservative
[ In Reply To ..]
Not so sure the screaming meamies did though...LOL. Thought it was a great line.
thanks - : )
[ In Reply To ..]
I'll say it again. READ THE BILL or get someone - to interpret for you - Sounds like you need the help *sigh*
[ In Reply To ..]
.
Here you go. - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
http://housedocs.house.gov/energycommerce/ppacacon.pdf
That's simply not true. - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
Obama hasn't "shot down every other solution presented to him, refusing to look at anything other than Obamacare."

We were well on our way to having a single payor program, but it was the REPUBLICANS who essentially ruined what could have been a good plan for the American people.

I now have Medicare, and I feel very fortunate because when I stopped being able to afford my health insurance (when it's $400 GREATER than my rent per month), I went without any kind of insurance for two years.

I would have liked to have had a single payor system. Maybe if Obama wins again all people will actually have the opportunity to receive healthcare insurance.

If one of these Republican clowns wins the general election, then they will make the USA a place that I don't want to live, and I may explore my opportunities as far as moving to another health-friendlier country.

The last paragraph says it all IMO. Why is it - a bad thing that SM

[ In Reply To ..]
this woman's children can now be covered? Why are people against this? As far as what Cain said about his cancer, isn't that just what insurance companies do now? Deny coverage for certain things to people? I have heard story after story of people getting cancer and being denied treatment. These are things that make me question the logic of being against this bill.

Last paragraph - to SM - Conservative

[ In Reply To ..]
Was reading your post and I have a question for you. Are you aware that under Obamacare, if you develop cancer and are 72 or older, all cancer treatment is denied, other than pain pills and comfort care? This is a sweeping denial, not isolated, and applies to any person over 72 with any type of cancer. Obamacare does not differentiate by classes of cancer but rather denies all types of cancer treatment.

Care to tell us where that appears? - I can't find it. nm

[ In Reply To ..]
.
see below nm - Page 272. section 1145: Cancer hospital will ratio
[ In Reply To ..]
.
cannot document that, even with the page number - ...
[ In Reply To ..]
Can't even document it when I search the entire bill for the terms. (?)

This is just another untruth like the one - indy

[ In Reply To ..]
last year that said anyone over 70 would be denied brain surgery.

I am going to research this and get back to you - find it hard to believe

[ In Reply To ..]

Just curious - mbmt

[ In Reply To ..]
Where did you find the information about people older than 72 who develop cancer being denied all treatment other than pain pills and comfort care?

Unable to find this information - mbmt

[ In Reply To ..]
I could not find anything (nothing even close) about people who develop cancer and are 72 or older being denied treatment other than pain pills and comfort care in the President's healthcare plan.
ditto - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
... and it doesn't mean I haven't read the bill. This would be a deal-breaker for me, so I would be grateful to be steered in the direction of documentation.
Dang right it would be a dealbreaker! - mbmt
[ In Reply To ..]
I don't think we both would have missed that kind of information when reading the bill. Actually, I don't think it's in there. Can you imagine the uproar if that was true that Americans over 72 diagnosed with cancer would not receive chemo and only pain pills and comfort care?

Similar Messages:


Supreme Court And DNAJun 03, 2013
http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/03/justice/supreme-court-dna-tests/index.html   What are your opinions on this ruling?  Is this constitutional or a 4th amendment violation? ...

Do You Trust The Supreme CourtMar 26, 2012
Before the decision even comes down from the Supreme Court on Obama's health care law I have to admit I have no confidence in them. It's all political. Giving the election to bush over Gore and allowing corporations to fund elections makes me think the court is not bipartisan. When the highest court in the land is partisan I have no hope. I feel sad for our country. Do you trust them? ...

Why The Supreme Court Will Strike Down All Of ObamacareApr 06, 2012
By Peter Ferrara Barack Obama made a national laughingstock out of himself with his recent comments on the Obamacare law now before the Supreme Court. Obama said on Monday, “I’m confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress.” (emphasis added). President Obama is not stupid. But he thinks you are. He knows the Obamacare heal ...

Breach Of Ethics--Supreme CourtJan 27, 2011
Where is the outrage?  Corruption at the highest levels--I hope they impeach this guy.  Source: Los Angeles Times\"Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas failed to report his wife\'s income from a conservative think tank on financial disclosure forms for at least five years, the watchdog group Common Cause said Friday.Between 2003 and 2007, Virginia Thomas, a longtime conservative activist, earned $686,589 from the Heritage Foundation, according to a Common Cause review of the fou ...

Supreme Court Potential JudgesApr 11, 2010
Ever since Barack Obama's election as president, there has been anticipation among scholars at the University of Chicago's Law School that one of their own could be headed to the U.S. Supreme Court bench in the next few years.That anticipation was heightened late last week with news that Obama, who taught constitutional law at the school from 1992 to 2004, soon will be making his first Supreme Court pick.Almost every short list of possible nominees to succeed Justice David Souter inclu ...

Supreme Court Overturns DOMAJun 26, 2013
A huge step in the right direction.   The legal challenge to Doma was brought by New York resident Edith Windsor, 83. She was handed a tax bill of $363,000 (£236,000) when she inherited the estate of her spouse Thea Speyer - a levy she would not have had to pay if she had been married to a man. "Doma writes inequality into the entire United States Code," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in Wednesday's ruling. "Under Doma, same-sex married couples have their lives burdened, ...

Will The Supreme Court Stop Cops From Sep 17, 2013
  In many states, police can rifle through your smart phone—even if you've just been arrested for not putting on your seat belt. —By Dana Liebelson | Tue Sep. 17, 2013 3:00 AM PDT 8   Rich Siegel/Flickr If you're like many Americans, your cell phone is overflowing with personal information—text messages, emails, photos of your friends and family, an organized history of who you've been calling, private notes, automatic logi ...

U.S. Supreme Court Declines To Hear Jan 13, 2015
but apparently there is another attack in March to try to deny people the tax-credit subsidies offered by the law.  ...

Republicans Are Screwed If The Supreme Court....smMay 20, 2015
guts Obamacare. I don't think they will rule that way; but, if they do, there will be big trouble if all those people lose their insurance.   ...

Supreme Court Expresses Skepticism Over ConstitutionalityMar 27, 2012
Lets hope they vote on the side of the law and vote it down.  If they do the right thing and vote against it, my trust in them may rise, but unsure.  Just unsure if they will do the right thing.  My take on the health care is this.  Those that want it should be able to get it.  Those that don't should not be forced to buy a product we don't wish to purchase every month.  And on top of that be told the product has to meet certain circumstances, whiich for m ...

Obamacare: Well Now, Isn't This An Interesting Bit Of Phrasing From The Supreme Court.Jul 25, 2014
Should Obamacare be sent to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) and should the SCOTUS actually decide to hear it, the 4 dissenters when the ACA was upheld by the court previously have already made clear in their dissent what they believed Congress' intent was in setting up the exchanges. National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (joint dissenting opinion of Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito) "...because Congress thought that some States might decline federal fu ...

Here's What The Supreme Court Could Do To Insurance Premiums In Your StateNov 13, 2014
More than 800,000 Floridians would see their monthly insurance premiums rise, from an average of around $70 to an average of around $350, or roughly a factor of five. More than 600,000 people in Texas, about 325,000 in North Carolina, and another 275,000 in Georgia would see insurance premiums soar by similar amounts. Nationwide, more than 4 million people living in 37 states would be in situations like these. Most would have no way to pay the higher bills, forcing them to drop insurance covera ...

How The Supreme Court Can Resolve The Debt Ceiling CrisisOct 14, 2013
Adam H. Rosenzweig from the Washington University School of Law proposes a different approach to ending the debt ceiling crisis: Let the Supreme Court resolve it as a Constitutional matter. What should happen when Congress and the President find themselves in a fiscal policy showdown resulting in a Constitutional violation? This question has risen to the fore in light of the recent political showdowns over the so-called “debt ceiling” crisis. Some scholars have argued that there ar ...

Mass. Supreme Court Ruled On Pledge Case..smMay 09, 2014
In this case, a family sued on the grounds that having the Pledge Allegiance recited in school everyday discriminated against their children because they did not follow/worship the Christian God. While their children (and all U.S. children) are free to not recite it, it was argued that non-pledgers were discriminated against, treated as un-American, and un-patriotic, and ridiculed as such. Additionally, even if they wanted to demonstrate their patriotism, these students could not because "Under ...

German Federal Supreme Court: Measles Is NOT A VirusJan 26, 2017
This is the strangest vaccine story I have ever come across.  Several scientists proved successfully in Germany that measles is NOT caused by a virus.  The case was heard before the German Federal Supreme Court (equivalent of our U.S. SupremeCourt).  The plaintiff was a biologist, and he was awarded monetary damages. Reseachers in the past decades committed a critical mistake:  They used no controls.  As a result, components of regular cells were misidentified as vira ...

Democrats Attempted To Filibuster Bush's Supreme CourtFeb 17, 2016
he would shift the balance of the court. What hypocrites they are and they get away with it. Apparently Harry Reid has forgotten his own role in trying to do so. Payback is a ....... Just two years ago Harry Reid went for the nuclear option eliminated the filibuster rule of 60-40 votes required to override one so he could pack the super-important DC Circuit Court with extreme leftist. The cool thing about having no moral values and no accountability is that you can lie without a guilty ...

Supreme Court Overturns Objection To Cross On Public LandApr 29, 2010
  By Robert Barnes Washington Post Staff Writer Thursday, April 29, 2010  A splintered Supreme Court displayed its deep divisions over the separation of church and state Wednesday, with the court's prevailing conservatives signaling a broader openness to the idea that the Constitution does not require the removal of religious symbols from public land. A 5 to 4 decision by the court overturns a federal judge's objection to a white cross erected more than 75 years ago on a ...

Supreme Court's Majority Sides With U.S. Chamber Of Commerce In Over 2/3 Of Cases Jun 10, 2010
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/10/supreme-courts-majority-s_n_607714.html ...

Soros Organization Tried To Influence Illegal Immigration Supreme CourtAug 19, 2016
Hungarian-born billionaire George Soros’ stated vehicle for progressive social change, orchestrated a well-funded attempt to secure a desired outcome in a U.S. Supreme Court case on illegal immigration enforcement, according to a newly discovered memo between the organization’s top U.S. officials and board members. Members of the advisory board include Soros family members, left-wing activists, Ivy League professors and columnists for The Washington Post and Foreign Policy magazine. The ...

Supreme Court Asked To Revive Virginia's Anti-sodomy Law. Aug 19, 2013
"the state wants to “wave a magic wand” and read the broad anti-sodomy law as protecting minors. But the law “does not mention the word ‘minor,’ "   From The Washington Post The High Court It is not the headline that Ken Cuccinelli II would have written, of course. But considering the flak Virginia’s attorney general has received for pressing his defense of the commonwealth’s “crimes against nature” law to the Supreme Court, C ...

Supreme Court Signals Support For Corporate Religious ClaimsMar 25, 2014
Maybe there is hope after all... ...

Liberals Lose Their Cool In The Supreme Court Fight Over ObamacareNov 18, 2014
On Nov. 7, the Supreme Court said it would entertain the latest legal assault on President Obama’s health-reform program. Leading liberal analysts worry—reasonably—that the justices will cripple Obamacare. Unfortunately, these defenders of the program are making their case by preemptively accusing right-leaning members of the high court of bad faith and rank partisanship. Paul Krugman of Princeton and the New York Times has has called the argument that a sy ...

Supreme Court Sends Redistricting Law Back To South Carolina. SmApr 20, 2015
A big victory for voting rights and against gerrymandering of voting districts! ...

Supreme Court Rejects Limits On Corporate Spending In Electoral CampaignsJan 21, 2010
Well, back to square 1. Wonder how many judges are in the pockets of corporations?   Supreme Court rejects limits on corporate spending in electoral campaigns Video   High court rolls back campaign spending limits The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that corporations may spend as freely as they like to support or oppose candidates for president and Congress, easing decades-old limits on business efforts to influence federal campaigns. » LAUNCH VIDEO PLAYER ...

Supreme Court Refuses To Hear Obama Birth Certificate ChallengeJun 11, 2012
WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court has refused to hear an appeal challenging President Barack Obama's U.S. citizenship and his eligibility to serve as commander in chief.Without comment, the high court on Monday refused to hear an appeal from Alan Keyes, Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson.The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the challengers did not have legal standing to file the lawsuit.The U.S. Constitution says only "a natural born citizen" may serve as president. The challengers alleg ...

Critics Say Supreme Court's Prop 8 Ruling Takes Power From VotersJul 01, 2013
      http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jun/30/critics-say-supreme-courts-proposition-8-ruling-ta/ ...

Senate Plans To Follow Biden’s Advice On Supreme Court VacancyFeb 23, 2016
Gotta love that man! LOL ...

Study: If Supreme Court Guts Obamacare, 9.6 Million Will Lose Health InsuranceJan 09, 2015
January 8, 2015:  As the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to hear a case that could prove to be a fatal blow against the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, a new study has concluded that the consequences of striking down the law's subsidies for low- and middle-income individuals will result in a sharp drop in the number of Americans with health insurance, as well as a steep rise in premiums.  Link:  http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-01-08/study- ...

If This Was As Tea Party Rally, There Would Be No Excuse But...Mar 03, 2011
it wasn't a tea party rally or protest. It could be a real reason, or just an excuse to blame someone else. MADISON, Wis. (AP) -- Police say they have found live ammunition scattered on the ground around the Wisconsin Capitol. University of Wisconsin Police Chief Susan Riseling says 41 rounds of .22-caliber ammunition were found Thursday morning scattered at several locations outside the Capitol. The revelation came as state attorneys asked a Dane County judge to order the Capitol closed ...

Critics: âDestructiveâ Supreme Court Decision âempowers CorruptionâJan 22, 2010
By Ron BrynaertThursday, January 21st, 2010 -- 12:17 pm Republicans say 'freedom won,' liberal jokes real winner is Satan Update: Obama vows 'forceful response' The US Supreme Court on Thursday lifted a 20-year ruling which had set limits on campaign financing by US businesses, and critics, including nonpartisan watchdogs and Congressional Democrats, are up in arms about the decision, which most had feared for a long time. Meanwhile, aside from Senator John McCain (R-AZ), ...