A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

Forbes says self-reliant homesteaders are "delusional"


Posted: Aug 5, 2017

It’s always interesting reading when someone smug and sanctimonious writes a clueless diatribe about another group of people being smug and sanctimonious. So when I saw that an economist for Moody’s and Forbes had written an op-ed calling self-reliant homesteaders “delusional,” I knew I’d be in for some misinformed hilarity. The article, entitled, “Dear Homesteaders, Self-Reliance Is a Delusion” was published a couple of days ago on the Forbes website. You’ll be forewarned that the article won’t be deep in the first paragraph, when the author presents his claim to knowledge about self-reliant living comes from the fact that he is “a big fan of shows about doomsday preppers, homesteaders, survivalists, generally people who live off the grid.”.... Since his entire argument is based on the tv programs he watches, the author doesn’t understand what self-reliance means to those of us who aren’t reality television stars. It means: •We provide a lot of our own food because we prefer to know where it comes from. •We raise our own meat because we object to the way factory-farmed animals are treated. •We use our own sources of power because maybe we’re green at heart or maybe we just prefer not to be tied into the “smart” grid. •We learn to make our own products for cleaning, bathing, and making life pleasant because we don’t want to bring chemical toxins into our homes. •We’d rather skip the middle man and spend our time actually making the things that most people work for hours to purchase from someone else who made them. •We are far less likely to spend time at the doctor’s office because a) we aren’t huge fans of pharmaceuticals, b) we can take care of small things ourselves, and c) our healthier lifestyle means we tend to be less likely to be ill. (Although this isn’t always the case – even self-reliant homesteaders can get sick. And when we do, we use our insurance or we pay for it with savings. Just like everyone else.) •We don’t need as much money because we just don’t need as much stuff. But to someone who buys all of their food and other goods from the store and gets all of their medicine from the pharmacy, it can be difficult to understand the satisfaction that comes from evading those places. ;

He seems to think homesteading people don't have - families, churches, investments, or

[ In Reply To ..]
savings to rely on, not to mention he forgets we pay taxes too...

The author, Adam Ozimek, did some in-depth research on the sybject:

Sitting in front of a TV watching staged “reality” shows.

Ozimek touts society/govt as being there when things go bad. - Those who are "self" reliant

[ In Reply To ..]
doesn't mean that they do things ALONE.

The Amish are a great example. Someone's house or barn burns down, the Amish community gathers together to build another.

Self reliant people look to other self reliant people to learn from and to get AND GIVE a helping hand.

It's people like Ozimek who have absolutely nothing to offer anybody else.

When a neighbor has a problem, it's the self reliant person, with a shed or garage full of tools, that comes over to help.

Go to a church with self reliant people and it's these same people who help others in their church, putting a new roof on, or a door in, or wiring a faucet, or plumbing an outlet.

Does anybody remember that PBS show Alone in the Wilderness? That guy was AMAZING!

His comments reinforce my belief that most people - miss the point of homesteading and

[ In Reply To ..]
modern self sufficiency. It's not about being totally independent of modern society. It's about being able to handle any problem that arises in your life with the tools and skills you have at hand. The difference between modern homesteaders and the population at large is that homesteaders have a bigger tool (skills, experience and stuff) box to go to on a daily basis. What does boggle my mind is why people that aren't homesteaders react so vehemently (the Forbes author) against the lifestyle.

Similar Messages:


Article From Forbes MagazineMar 26, 2010
http://www.forbes.com/2010/03/18/tea-party-ignorant-taxes-opinions-columnists-bruce-bartlett.html# ...

I Read This In Forbes, It A Moot Point Now...Oct 16, 2013
Don't Believe The Debt Ceiling Hype: The Federal Government Can Survive Without An Increase Are you sure T-bills are considered a super-safe asset? Have you checked our credit rating lately? Ignore what you hear and read in the news. The federal government actually reached the legal debt ceiling about four months ago. Since then, the government has been financing its monthly budget deficit by stealing/borrowing money from other government funds, like the federal government employee ...

Oh, Boy. This Forbes Article Hit The Nail On The Head!May 17, 2014
Obama's Executive Power Pen Is Already Worn Out Much has rightly been made of President Obama’s promise to bypass Congress and act unilaterally to get things done.  “I’ve got a pen and I’ve got a phone,” he said, threatening to sign more executive orders and blast more messages from his bully pulpit. Since then, defenders have argued that Obama has signed relatively few executive orders compared with other modern presidents.  But all exec ...

Forbes Says Wal-Mart Workers Cost Taxpayers $6.2 BillionNov 13, 2015
. ...

The Man Is Delusional. His Boy ScoutAug 02, 2017
Parents were pulling their kids out of scouts and calling with complaints.  Despite all that:   "Trump told The Wall Street Journal, "I got a call from the head of the Boy Scouts saying it was the greatest speech that was ever made to them, and they were very thankful." Politico published the transcript of the interview. On Wednesday, the Scouts responded, "We are unaware of any such call." It specified that neither of the organization's two top leaders - President Rand ...

Did You Hear The One About The Delusional President?Jul 28, 2015
He's telling the people of Africa that he, too, could get elected to a third term if such were available in the United States. Does he not know that his words, however stupid, are broadcast internationally? Oh, I really needed this laugh today. ...

Listening To The Most Delusional, Dishonest President Dec 01, 2015
Question:  Putin's objective in Syria is obviously different than yours with respect to propping up Asad, attacking insurgents who oppose him, etc.  What's your strategy with respect to Putin? Answer:  None.  At least five minutes of non-answer, basically nothing more than the hope that Putin will change his mind.  With respect to climate change, a boat-load of assumptions that the very bad science is good and assertions that everyone and every other country ...