A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

anatomy of a landslide


Posted: Sep 6, 2012

In just three short minutes, Democrats handed the 2012 election to Republican Mitt Romney.

In a surreal floor vote at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., at 5:04 p.m., long before prime-time viewers flipped on their TVs, delegates split — hard — on whether to include a simple mention of God in their platform, and to declare that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel.

"Awkward," "embarrassing," "stupid," "unforced error," said Democrat Paul Begala. That doesn't even begin to capture what will be a game-changing event in the presidential election.

With no advance warning and no fanfare, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, a rising star in the party, took to the podium. He gave the floor to the head of the platform-drafting committee, former Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland.

"As an ordained United Methodist minister, I am here to attest and affirm that our faith and belief in God is central to the American story and informs the value we have expressed in our party's platform," he said. "In addition, President Obama recognizes Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, and our party's platform should as well."

Well. The delegates voted — by yelling 'yay' or 'no.'

Spotlight Mr. Villaraigosa. "In the opinion of the chair — let me do that again."

He did. Another vote, half yay, half no.

"I, uh, I guess — " said the by-now formerly rising party star, turning for help.

An unknown woman sidled up and told him, "You just gotta let them vote, and let them do what they're gonna do."

Finally, in vote 3, the "no's" clearly won, but the teleprompter said otherwise and the motion was deemed passed: God and Jerusalem as the capital of Israel were back in the party platform.

"In the opinion of the chair, two-thirds have voted in the affirmative, the motion is adopted and the platform has been amended," Mr. Villaraigosa said.

Delegates booed, hissed, jeered, howled, fumed.

Word later trickled out that Mr. Obama, who spends most Sundays on the golf course instead of in church, had personally intervened to get God and Jerusalem back into the platform. (The word came from, of course, the mainstream media; it was just that important to him, they said).

But the underlying motive was clear: The president is struggling to win support from white working-class (and religious) voters, and Jews, who have been wary from the outset of the Obama reign, are fleeing in droves.

The DNC quickly returned to its roots: college girls demanding more federal money for contraception, demurely coiffed middle-aged women pushing Planned Parenthood and abortion.

But the giant chasm within the Democratic Party — not to mention its wide divergence from mainstream America — was already exposed.

The true intent of the party — an America without God, that does not care about Israel, in fact supports the Palestinians — was out of the bag.

Mr. Romney pounced, saying omitting God "suggests a party that is increasingly out of touch with the mainstream of the American people. ... I think this party is veering further and further away into an extreme wing that Americans don't recognize."

It was just three minutes.

And yet the entire election changed. Mr. Romney, a Mormon who battled unsuccessfully for Christian support in 2008, just became the Christian candidate — and the Jewish candidate, to boot.

Team Obama is no doubt furiously rewriting the president's speech for Thursday night (now in a venue 50,000 seats smaller). With tonight's debacle, chances are his legion of supporters dropped by millions more.

When the landslide comes, Democrats will certainly point back to tonight — they won't now, they will then. Game-changers come when you least expect them.

Tonight changed everything.

P.S.  Video of the "vote" has yet to be shown on MSNBC
;

Amen. Pray, let it be so. - nm

[ In Reply To ..]
x

So you think national elections - are a referendum on God?.

[ In Reply To ..]
This isn't Iran, Hon. The DNC moved seamlessly through those few moments and onto the business at hand. Our party understands that individuals within our ranks don't always see eye-to-eye and cannot always agree on everything, but we're pretty good at keeping our eyes on the ball, pushing it toward the end game, and making it over the finish line.

Most Dems are Christian, but with about 10,000 religions - out there, not to mention non-faith

[ In Reply To ..]
beliefs, in order to properly represent all citizens we adhere to the principle of freedom of religion--i.e., freedom from government's interference in religion. It doesn't mean we're against religion, only government involvement in it.

As for including it in the platform, read the little article I copied on another thread about the GOP platform. It holds just as true for the Dems' representatives. We deal with the world we have, not the one we fantasize about. :)

split seams - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Seamlessly? Really? Well, Hon, I guess we were watching 2 different Dem conventions because I heard a lot of "boos" and saw the chairman doing a lot of squirming while trying to figure a way to make it a "yes" vote. Still didn't get the vote you want? Well, lets just take another vote! Pretty funny to watch, actually.

We'll see what happens in November, I guess.

Similar Messages:


Perhaps A Lesson In Anatomy?Feb 24, 2015
Idaho Rep. Vito Barbieri (R) asked what we MTs would generally consider to be a pretty funny question, but it made me wonder whether there are many men who really don't know how female anatomy works. He asked whether a woman could swallow a tiny camera that could be used for a female exam. Now, he did state later on that he meant the question to be rhetorical. I'm just wondering if he could have first stated beforehand, now, I know about female anatomy and that it is not connected to G ...

I'm Watching Old Episodes Of Grey's Anatomy, And (sm)Feb 12, 2015
I can't quite figure something out.  I know about what happened with Izzy and Denny. At least I know she stole a heart for him, but I don't know how.  But my question is, when he was "with" her and she kept telling him to go away, and he kept saying, "I'm here FOR you." did he mean that she is sick and is going to die?  Is that why she gave herself a bunch of tests?   ...

Anatomy Of A Democrat Party Mid-term Freakout (sm)Mar 17, 2014
Of course, even if Republicans take over the Senate and hold the House, o still has his little poison pen.  I just hope (no, I pray) that the country is left standing by the time his reign is over. Link ...

"A Landslide For Obama (If The World Got To Vote)Oct 30, 2012
A Landslide for Obama (If the World Got to Vote) By MARK MCDONALD Charlie Neibergall/The Associated PressA new global poll shows 50 percent of foreign respondents favoring President Barack Obama in the upcoming election. Nine percent prefer Mitt Romney, the Republican challenger. FACEBOOK TWITTER GOOGLE+ E-MAIL SHARE PRINT BBC poll: Rest of world favours Obama A BBC World Service opinion poll has found sharply higher overseas approval ratings for US President Bar ...