A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
It makes no difference in terms of the economic impact on wages whether an employer exports the work to where the cheap labor is located, or takes advantage of cheap labor that comes to where the work is located.
The only difference is that one means used to drive wages lower and keep them low is legal, while the other means is not.
Think about it. Just about everyone on this forum hates what offshoring has done to OUR wages, and yet some support illegal and/or unrestricted immigration with not a moment's thought about what this does to the wages of citizens in our country who work at OTHER jobs.
Now, suppose all those illegal immigrants were medical transcriptionists. A lot of you would suddenly be singing a very different tune with regard to immigration, wouldn't you?! Of course you would (please don't lie to yourself). But, praise the Lord, they're not MTs, are they? This allows you to hold diametrically contradictory positions in your brain simultaneously, without experiencing the slightest twinge of cognitive dissonance.
What's even more odd is that people who want mandatory increases in the minimum wage will also support illegal/unrestricted immigration, which effectively damps the effect of competition for workers in the labor force, which in turn demonstrably drives wages higher precisely where wages should be higher due to demand for workers.
I just can't wrap my brain around this kind of thinking. It's the equivalent of Dr. Doolittle's push-me-pull-you. "I want mandatory minimum wage increases, but I support the influx of cheap labor that keeps wages in the very same income brackets lower than they woud be if employers had to compete vigorously among themselves for workers."
It simply boggles the mind.
;