A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

"PC" or politically correct has always been around


Posted: Oct 14, 2013

People with class and manners and sensitivity have always known that slurs and insults and labels are unacceptable.

PC = Polite commentary

Because there is not a person in the world that we couldn't insult if we wanted to. 

Can you imagine a team called the WHITESKINS?  the BLACKSKINS?  How about the Whitetrailertrash-skins?  Etcetera ad nauseam.

Come on - we can evolve (grow up) and admit some things some terms, etc., are best left in the third grade where they belong.

 

 

 

 

;

You are confusing PC with character. It extends way beyond words. SM - anon

[ In Reply To ..]
Some school systems where I live cannot have Christmas plays because it might offend Muslims. Intelligent design is another thing under assault.

Sorry but i think you are actually confusing the law - with PC/words

[ In Reply To ..]
PUBLIC schools are restricted from Religious displays AS THEY SHOULD BE.

or would you be ok with EVERY RELIGION represented in school being able to have EQUAL time with regard to any and all religious actions? Fair question.

If I respond to this my post will be deleted because someone - anon

[ In Reply To ..]
will complain to the monitor about talking about religion on this board. But you made my point for me without me even trying.

"To learn who rules over you, find out who you - are not allowed to criticize"

[ In Reply To ..]
xxx
There is a difference between criticizing and - slurs. nm.
[ In Reply To ..]
.
There is nothing new under the sun. Bad behavior has been going on since - anon
[ In Reply To ..]
the beginning of time. If you want to teach a child why it's bad to mock someone, then you need to tell them why. That builds character. Doing it because you chose to is not the same as being forced.
If you want to teach a child not to mock some - have them come to this board
[ In Reply To ..]
They'll find out real quick how insulting and devastating it is to be called a terrorist, anarchist, hostage-holder, racist, etc all because they believe in fairness for everyone. They'll see real quick how one side responsible for terrible things in government like to blame the other side and take no responsibility. They learn real fast about negativity and the effects is has on people.
They will also learn how unbelievably SM - agree
[ In Reply To ..]
tough it is to negotiate with the other side because most of the time they seem to want to make sure that they aren’t losing, so they never agree to anything while blaming the opponent.
with the help of the media NM - agree
[ In Reply To ..]
xxx
Actually what they'd see (sadly) is some very - childish behavior, and some very bad MYOPIA
[ In Reply To ..]
If you read though the various posts on any given day you will see FAR MORE concessions and agreement on the side of progressives (aka scary liberals) than you will from the side that tends to whine about that group.

In other words almost without fail, a progressive will admit when the other side is right/has a point, etc., mainly because they tend not to be threatened by others with different ideas.

I disagree - by reading this board
[ In Reply To ..]
progressives never admit when the other side is right. It's always the blame game with them. Like for instance what is going on now. Harry Reid out there telling people "you're going to mess it up for us". They are not sitting down. Tables empty of democrats while the republicans sitting hoping the democrats will negotiate. Compromises have tried to be made by republicans, but the democrats are saying, no I want it ALL. I want it MY WAY, and I am not going to give you anything you want. I'll shut down the government until you cave in and give us our demands and then I'll blame it all on you.

Here on this board I see many conservative posters that say "I see your point". I see no progressives ever admitting they are wrong.
Time for new eyeglasses? :) - Cuz I RARELY ever see the neocons
[ In Reply To ..]
concede a point to the scary liberals.

When and if you are ever right, I'll say so.

And by the way, your 'for instance' (Like for instance what is going on now. Harry Reid out there telling people "you're going to mess it up for us". They are not sitting down. Tables empty of democrats ...)

What does THAT have to do with invididuals on a chat board demonstrating opening mindedness TO ONE ANOTHER'S POSTS by admitting when the other side has a point? It is completely off the point/subject and if you can't see THAT there is really not much point in a discussion.
Not all conservatives are neocons, just like not all liberals are - communists - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
You are the one who needs glasses.

Right now nobody is saying the other side is right. It's all a bickering with stupid comments trying to prove the other side is wrong. NOBODY is saying the other side is right. Progressive don't, but in the past I have seen conservatives say you may be right.

You'll say the other side is right, yeah sure. I don't believe you.

You must not be wearing any glasses. Otherwise if you've read the board you would not have written what you did.
Equating liberals to communists just proves that - you don't understand the meaning of either te
[ In Reply To ..]
Just sayin.
I understand it well more than you do if you think that - older than dirt
[ In Reply To ..]
You like to think that liberals and communists are so far from each other, when in fact they are of similar beliefs. Here is some information. Again, I will restate what I wrote. Not all conservatives are neocons (true), just like not all liberals are communists (true). Both statements are true. There are some neocons in the republican party and there are some communists in the democrat party (more than you want to admit).

"When the policies and principles of the Communist Party and liberal progressives are compared, it’s disturbingly apparent that both groups are scholars of the same school of big government and social justice."

So who are these modern-day comrades and what exactly do they want? According to the Communist Party USA’s “constitution,” they are a party “of and for the U.S working class” that believes abolishing capitalism and instituting a “socialist reorganization of society” will solve just about everything—“exploitation of human beings by others, the evils of oppression, war, racism, environmental degradation, and poverty.” The constitution goes on to state that the party “fights for jobs and economic security, a decent and rising standard of living, peace, justice, equality, a sustainable environment, gay rights, health care, education, affordable housing, the needs of seniors, democracy, and a fulfilling life for everyone, with socialism as our goal.” In short, they want it all. And the Party believes that by giving government control of major industries, redistributing wealth, and by keeping all citizens at the same level of mediocrity for the sake of fairness, this idealistic utopia can be attained.

Just those two paragraphs above are the progressive liberals.

Full article below:

http://thecollegeconservative.com/2012/04/26/communists-and-progressive-liberals-comrades-for-life/

In another article:

Liberals promise to act in an angelic manner "for the public good" if they are given enough power. Once attaining that power, as we are seeing now in the American system, liberals work to create within America the very philosophy we fought to defeat during the Cold War. Part of that philosophy is the General Will, which is a concept that was once promoted by a man named Jean Jacque Rousseau at about the same time as the founding of this nation.

http://politicalpistachio.blogspot.com/2011/06/liberalism-and-communism-same-side-of.html
Thanks for proving - my point
[ In Reply To ..]
and whats with all the " " ?
You didn't have a point to prove. And " " are called - "quotes"
[ In Reply To ..]
You really do need a dictionary.
I have been called all those things, xenophobe (sm) - proud conservative
[ In Reply To ..]
homophobe, bigot. My husband has worked with lots of liberals and they all despite the Tea Party. It's group think. I think anyone who stands up to them is lumped into this category. Oh, forgot global warming denier...

And we don’t smell very good either, and we have bad teeth, and we don't wear shoes. Just kidding.
Rand Paul performed pro bono surgery sm - proud conservative
[ In Reply To ..]
during August break, he's an eye doctor in Kentucky. Evil Conservative.
But he has lied about being a board-certified opthalmologist - me
[ In Reply To ..]
Why did he do that?
I'm not condoning it, I don't like the explanation - anon
[ In Reply To ..]
he gave for it either. But don't you at least think it was a nice thing to operate for free?
A board-certified what? - nm
[ In Reply To ..]
nm
the best way to teach a child is by example - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
imagine a child being told they don't believe in God because they think healthcare for all Americans is a bad idea?
Now let's add "domestic abuser" to the list, SM - Phew!
[ In Reply To ..]
but please don't say anything bad about people on food stamps in Walmart!
Like when Pelosi calls TP arsonists or B. Boxer calls them - domestic abusers?
[ In Reply To ..]
xxxx
I bet Pelosi sets fires and Boxer's husband beats her up. - nm
[ In Reply To ..]
nm

Meanwhile, Catholic Priest are not allowed to hold mass at - miltary bases.

[ In Reply To ..]
xxx

I would leave those negotiations to the Indian tribes - some things you and I will never understand

[ In Reply To ..]
Well being married to a Native American does give me a little more insight into how they feel, I believe talks about changing names should be discussed between the people whom it may be offensive to. It would be silly for a Caucasian person to discuss how African Americans really feel about certain slurs, I think it's best to be left up to those people who are affected by it.

I do know this topic of changing the Redskins name comes up quite often.

If you are going to tell one team to get rid of the name because you as a white or black or Asian person of heritage feel the Indian nation is insulted by it (after all we do know better than everyone else, don't we?), then are going to go to the Native American schools and ask them to get rid of the name of their sports team in their tribes. After all, we must teach them tolerance about their own heritage, right? Maybe we should also go to all the Native American outings and tell them to stop wearing the clothing to their heritage and to stop their dances because that is not PC.

I say if the Native Americans are okay with the name, then let it be okay. They are the best ones to decide what is offensive and not offensive to them.

Then of course we need to start taking a look at all the names of the streets, roads, schools, everything. I think there will be something offensive about everything, so lets just change all the names of everything.

http://newsok.com/no-consensus-among-indians-on-redskins-name/article/feed/601486


Similar Messages:


Politically ChallengedNov 11, 2014
Here is a video of students being asked some very basic political and historical questions. A big failure.  Some of the people I have am aquainted with from Europe have mentioned to me before that they are amazed at the lack of political/world knowledge of our youth.  I guess they are right.  ...

Illegals - Another Red Herring, PoliticallyMar 13, 2011
If the govt really wanted them out, they would be gone. If corporations/individuals want to cut costs where they can, what better way than to employ off-the-books workers to clean, for factory work, packing, slaughterhouse work, farm work, landscaping, restaurant work, house-cleaning. It's just like a tax break! Not only that, and the real reason no one is rushing them out the door, a stunning two-thirds of illegal immigrants pay Medicare, Social Security and personal income taxes. Yet, p ...

Politically Correctness Has To StopMar 19, 2015
I am so glad my daughter is so politically incorrect she keeps me almost rolling in the aisles laughing. I think I have heard it all only to hear something else. She leaves no one out, everyone can be a target. Refreshing! Ok, so I get it the fraternity singing on the bus about never letting N's join their fraternity. That was ridiculous because now everyone has cameras, something to record with so what you say can make it to the airways. The fraternity no more, disbanded, get that. J ...

Carson On Muslims Politically Expedient?Sep 20, 2015
sort of the way of some other documents...they pick and choose. Constitution doesn't work that way, particularly when running for POTUS. Now, this probably won't matter much, considering the audience he is playing to. In his NBC interview, Carson was asked: “So do you believe that Islam is consistent with the constitution?” “No,” he said, “I don’t, I do not.” Article VI of the US constitution states: “No religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualific ...

Attack Not Politically Motivated According To Jindal's Office. See FOX ArticleApr 17, 2010
New Orleans Cops Search for Assailants Who Attacked Jindal's Campaign Aide FOXNews.com Police are seeking help to track down the assailants who attacked a campaign aide to Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and her boyfriend after they left a GOP fundraiser in New Orleans, leaving her with a broken leg and him with a fractured jaw, broken nose and a black eye. Police are asking for help in tracking down the assailants who attacked a campaign aide to Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and her boy ...

Gay Teen Suicides (And Straight) More Common In Politically Conservative AreasApr 18, 2011
By LINDSEY TANNER 04/18/11 06:28 AM ET CHICAGO -- Suicide attempts by gay teens – and even straight kids – are more common in politically conservative areas where schools don't have programs supporting gay rights, a study involving nearly 32,000 high school students found. Those factors raised the odds and were a substantial influence on suicide attempts even when known risk contributors like depression and being bul ...

LMAO Politically "dumbest Thing On Earth"Jul 27, 2017
I feel sorry for these Republicans working on this.  Disagree with them on almost everything, but they are after all just people.  Look at their faces.  It's like they're in the Twilight Zone.  If only they had a real president.  Next, vote-a-rama! It's like watching the Muppets. ...

How To Correct Words From KeyboardJul 29, 2015
Hello all I am using emdate for couple of months as per my knowledge all good except one thing correct words from keyboard as we do in ms word easily. This v annyoing i search alot but yet could not find any solution. So if anyone intellegent know the solution or any way plz tell me will b glad if resolve this issue. Tnx agn guyz ...

Stephen Colbert Had To Correct His Audience When TheyMay 10, 2017
they hadn't been told what to think yet. The sheeple had not yet been apprised of the latest DNC talking points. I'm "glad" Colbert straightened them out. ...

Colbert: Scalia Correct That A Cross Has Nothing To Do With Christianity.Oct 15, 2009
Not Friday yet, but Colbert does it again!  http://rawstory.com/2009/10/scalia-says-cross-no-longer-represents-christians/   ...

I Think A Couple Of Paid Trolls From Correct The Record Have FoundNov 04, 2016
Sudden uptick in ridiculous attacks on Trump, denials and crappy excuses for Hillary, a noticeable trend in post like/dislikes, etc. All in about the last 10 days, I'd say. Well, that's how Hillary rolls. ...

Giuliani Slams 'racial Arsonists,' Calls Ferguson Grand Jury's Decision 'correctNov 25, 2014
'The racial arsonists, who enjoyed last night — this was their day of glory,' former NYC mayor says. Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani said the grand jury'sdecision not to indict white police officer Darren Wilson in the fatal shooting of an unarmed black teenager, Michael Brown, was "correct" and the only one they could have reached in the racially charged case. "I believe it was a correct verdict," Giuliani said on CNN Tuesday. "In fact, I think it was t ...