A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

Czar


Posted: Oct 18, 2014

In 2009, Senator McCain complained that the Obama administration had "more czars that the Romanovs". It was a good zinger, and not altogether untrue.

But then a week ago, that same Senator McCain suggested that the administration needed someone at the forefront of the ebola issue, specifically calling for "some kind of a czar".

So which is it, Johhny? Do we have too many, or not enough?

Then, when the president appoints a person to that role, the republicans just about trample one another in their rush to condemn the person chosen. They don't think he has the right background for the job.

And maybe that's true. He might not. The right person for that job would be someone like a surgeon general. But hey, guess what, we don't have one of those right now. Why not? Because Rand Paul is blocking the current nominee, on orders from the NRA. That's right, the gun nut lobby is at least in part responsible for why we don't have a comprehensive plan for dealing with ebola.

Thank you, Republicans, for screwing the nation over once again.

 

;

A bit mixed up, eh? - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
While, yes, a surgeon general would be a good choice to handle the ebola catastrophe, no, Rand Paul is not responsible for blocking anything. The news states he is "trying" to block it. Also one man does not have the power to block a nomination of anyone. It must be agreed upon mutually by more than just one person.

Which by the way Rand Paul is 100% correct. The position of the surgeon general is to educate Americans to lead healthier lives among other things that pertain to health (hence the name Surgeon General). But instead BHO decides to try and slip in someone who has a political agenda and that is launch an attack on Americans who have the right to own a gun. It is not the Surgeon General's position to make gun confiscation/control his business.

I'll post the article below that explains this to help you understand it a little better.

Of course it has become the norm for BHO to be placing persons in positions they are not qualified for.

So the reality is that it is indeed BHO who is at fault as to why we don't have a Surgeon General.

Thank you democrats for screwing over the nation once again.

This is why it is vital and important to the future of our country if we want to have one to vote all democrats out this fall. They are destroying our country.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/02/26/sen-paul-voices-serious-concerns-about-obama-surgeon-general-nominee/

How crazy for a doctor to take the position that people get hurt by guns. - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Vivek Murthy's position on gun violence is not really that controversial. The American Medical Association supports restrictions on assault weapons. The Institute of Medicine has argued that "a public health approach" should be used to fight gun violence, very much like those used to reduce smoking and car accidents. The NRA's executive vice-president, Wayne LaPierre, has stated on many occasions that the gun violence problem in this country is because criminals and the dangerously ill can get their hands on guns. "We have a mental health system in this country that has completely and totally collapsed," Mr. LaPierre has said. He has also said "We have no national database of these lunatics... We have a completely cracked mentally ill system that's got these monsters walking the streets," and the NRA actually says it backs the FBI-run instant background checks system and supports putting all those adjudicated mentally incompetent into the system and complains that many states are still putting only a small number of records of criminally ill into the system.

The NRA clearly agrees that gun violence is caused by the mentally ill. So where is the disconnect? Maybe the NRA is afraid a Surgeon General like Murthy would call attention to their smokescreen and bait-and-switch tactics? The NRA's position is that crazy people with guns are the problem, the government will never try to do anything to protect you from the crazies so therefore you're going to need a gun to protect yourself from what the government won't protect you from. So the NRA blocking the government's attempt to appoint an actual Surgeon General that might actually attempt to do something, anything, to curtail gun violence would fly in the face of their "government won't do anything to fix the gun violence crazies out there" narrative so they'd naturally need to block the nomination by the government of a guy like that in order to keep that narrative alive and well.

Tune in to your conservative fear and smear network after the next mass murder shooting in America and listen to the talking entertainers posing as anchors exclaim something along the lines of "the government is doing nothing to protect us from the mentally ill acquiring guns," and "see, we told you the government will not do anything to protect you from gun nut lunatics" and "thanks, Obama!"

Superb post!!!!!!!!! - Thank you.

[ In Reply To ..]
Common sense appears go be lacking on Pennsylvania Avenue. Wish we could change that occupant, too, but changing the senate will have to suffice for now.

Would that be 1400 or 1600 Pennsylvania Ave? - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Silly Sarah's still dazed and confused about this.
Who cares what Silly Sarah does, says, wears, whatever. - What is your obsession?
[ In Reply To ..]
The only ones who seem to follow her are the libs. It's funny, actually.
Ask Never-Say-Never Sarah, who hasn't ruled out another - run in 2016.
[ In Reply To ..]
In the midst of her family's drunken brawl while angling for preferential treatment, she screeched "Don't you know who I am?" at officers investigating the melee. Evidently they didn't know or didn't care. Either way, SP does seem to have a pitiful and rather exaggerated sense of self-importance for which she has yet to seek narcissistic BPD and OCD therapy. Maybe you should drop her a line and gently break the nobody-cares news to her
Is it even remotely possible - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
that someone still feels threatened by her for some "pitiful and rather exaggerated sense of self-importance for which she has yet to seek narcissistic BPD and OCD therapy"?
Not even. Just enjoy the view every time she drives by in - her clown car motorcade. nm
[ In Reply To ..]
nm
True fact: We liberals are not threatened or intimidated by Sarah Palin in the least. - Yes, yes, yes to the Freedom Party
[ In Reply To ..]
Though I am not the poster you responded to, I feel compelled to inform conservatives regarding the truth about Sarah Palin. Far from feeling "threatened by her," we liberals endeavor valiantly to keep politicians relevant and in the spotlight like Stupid Sarah and the racist types like Chris McDaniel from Mississippi.

This is the fun stuff for us (see link).

Repeat: Liberals do NOT remotely feel threatened by Palin and are working tirelessly and just as hard as she is to keep her name relevant and in the press, although we do not charge $99.95 yearly or $9.95 monthly like Sarah does, and we will publicize Sarah and her ilk for nothing, free, payment not required at all.
I answered "No insult" in the wrong spot. - Sorry.
[ In Reply To ..]
The post noted below should go here...
Okay, thanks. - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
I guess I misunderstood what you meant there so I will edit my title.

Honestly, we liberals enjoy watching the conservatives fight each other. We must keep Sarah Palin relevant and in the news and fan those flames of the Freedom Party. In order for the GOP to get the votes they need to win the White House in the national election, they will have to change their rhetoric and compromise, which is a win for liberals, as indeed some conservatives are already changing.

Then there's the Tea Party who criticize anyone who wants to compromise. The obstructionists will kill the GOP if the GOP doesn't kill them first. They cannot coexist as long as some of them won't compromise. So it's either "one goes down" or the GOP splits into two.

If it's "one goes down," the Tea Party will be the one buried (see Mississippi Senate race and imagine that going national).

:)
No insult. - Re-read post.
[ In Reply To ..]
Someone feeling threatened by her for some "pitiful and rather exaggerated..." In other words, if someone thinks that of Sarah, why would they feel threatened and deem it necessary to keep bringing her up? But now we know why. You have explained it. Okay, enjoy yourselves. Bye.

Similar Messages:


Tweets From Our New Czar. Bet He Does Wish Oct 18, 2014
Disgraceful.  Not unusual for an Obama pick, though. Link ...

Safe School CzarOct 22, 2009
A teacher was told by a 15-year-old high school sophomore that he was having homosexual sex with an "older man." At the very least, statutory rape occurred. Fox News reported that the teacher violated a state law requiring that he report the abuse. That former teacher, Kevin Jennings, is President Obama's "safe school czar." It's getting hard to keep track of all of this president's problematic appointments. Clearly, the process for vetting White House employees has broken down. I ...

McCain: Where's The Ebola Czar?Oct 12, 2014
I think he should shuffle on over to the 3rd chamber of Congress and ask NRA Chairman Wayne LaPierre. Between them, maybe they can figure out how to fight ebola with those assault weapons they hug so tightly. The GOP is convinced LaPierre is imminently more qualified to choose a Surgeon General than the following organizations, just to name a few: The AIDS Institute AIDS United Alaska Public Health Association American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy American College of Clinical Pha ...

BO's Science Czar's COMMIE ConnectionsMar 05, 2010
Yet another (they are countless!) commie "friend" of B.O.'s, and this one serves in an (unconstitutional) advisory position to the interloper. You should pay attention to his ideology because this is the guy whose ideas shape "health care reform," or the socialized medicine/uber state-control GRID that we all are soon to be oppressed by.  Holdren, the "science czar," has wrtiten that eventually, once you are ASSIGNED YOUR FEDERAL NUMBER (which will in turn be used to MONITOR ever ...

Dr. Manny: An Open Letter To The Ebola Czar, Ron KlainOct 18, 2014
XO ...

Bush Terror Czar Richard Clarke: Bush, Cheney Are War Criminals. Dec 10, 2014
. ...