Latest Messages:

No, it's because there are laws to protect - the whistleblower's

Posted: Jan 31st, 2020 - 12:54 pm In Reply to: My secret speculation - Is

identify that Justice Roberts did not allow the question. Rand Paul did not lose his right to free speech. The logic of that argument is a bit twisted.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

CNN anchor John King says Republicans make 'legitimate point' about - whistleblower (Views: 329, 2020-01-31, 4:00 am)
- In this country you have the right to face your accuser. - Or we USED to. It must have (Views: 249, 2020-01-31, 4:02 am)
  - Great day for America when Trump is acquitted, great - day for Britain when they leave (Views: 306, 2020-01-31, 4:09 am)
    - The global elites lost. Let's just hope people wake - up. The same thing is happening (Views: 270, 2020-01-31, 4:22 am)
      - The Trumps are members of the "global elites" - T (Views: 329, 2020-01-31, 7:35 am)
        I will remember when I vote for Trump he cares about - America and talking care of us (Views: 323, 2020-01-31, 7:47 am)
        You're welcome - nm (Views: 236, 2020-01-31, 7:50 am)
        Trump cares about Americans. Dems care more - about illegals. If Trump was a globalist (Views: 300, 2020-01-31, 7:48 am)
        The wall is a marketing tool - T (Views: 277, 2020-01-31, 8:03 am)
        There's a big problem with that, Trump actually tried to - do what he said and the pro illegal (Views: 287, 2020-01-31, 11:55 am)
        Trump has you convinced that's what he tried to do - T (Views: 235, 2020-01-31, 1:02 pm)
        Speaking of a marketing tool, so is the "outrage" by - many Democrats about witnesses. (Views: 229, 2020-01-31, 12:17 pm)
        It's a trial and - trials have witnesses (Views: 230, 2020-01-31, 7:01 pm)
        You are so wrong hard to pick one issue. HOUSE was - supposed to call witnesses. Why do you ignore (Views: 236, 2020-01-31, 7:22 pm)
        Settle down Sally. Not selling any - dog "foot" here (Views: 221, 2020-01-31, 8:22 pm)
        Incredible resource of lies ---- ALL in the original - Attached (Views: 213, 2020-02-01, 6:49 am)
        Just because you do not understand - the law or the constitution (Views: 260, 2020-02-01, 7:44 pm)
        Just keep posting "Sally". Your posts speak to - your absurd, twisted, POV and spin. (Views: 197, 2020-02-01, 7:48 pm)
        I see you edited your post to read dog food - Instead of (Views: 164, 2020-02-02, 11:25 am)
        Big deal. At least she corrected her mistake - YOU, on the other hand, continue with yours (Views: 168, 2020-02-02, 11:41 am)
        And that mistake - would be? (Views: 185, 2020-02-02, 12:09 pm)
        He wants a wall because he is pandering - to his base. (Views: 236, 2020-01-31, 12:47 pm)
        MAGA ok with caging babies - If they didn't they would reject (Views: 182, 2020-01-31, 11:16 pm)
        OBAMA BUILT CAGES - Just another hateful post by LFs losing (Views: 237, 2020-02-01, 7:50 pm)
        Hahahaha..you are describing - Clintons and Obamas (Views: 225, 2020-01-31, 11:13 am)
        So sad that you don't understand how Trump loves America. - sm (Views: 341, 2020-01-31, 11:49 am)
        So sad you don't understand how Trump loves money - $$$$$$$ that is his vision (Views: 210, 2020-02-01, 6:57 am)
    - Welcome back to freedom Great Britain! At 4pm Mountain Time - we’ll be toasting the United Kingdom’s (Views: 186, 2020-01-31, 11:58 am)
  - Isn't it funny how the Dems are all saying exactly what - Rush predicted? The fix is in, (Views: 187, 2020-01-31, 11:25 am)
  - If a supreme court chief justice will eliminate the right - to free speech to a sitting U.S. (Views: 200, 2020-01-31, 11:30 am)
- Whistleblower was overheard in 2017 discussing with - ally how to remove Trump (Views: 378, 2020-01-31, 5:21 am)
  - Here's a good question for Democrats. Are you aware - that House intelligence committee (Views: 264, 2020-01-31, 11:29 am)
- My secret speculation - Is (Views: 231, 2020-01-31, 10:12 am)
  - No, it's because there are laws to protect - the whistleblower's
    - Logic doesn't factor in with a lot of things people post - on this board (Views: 204, 2020-01-31, 3:27 pm)
    - The "logic" of your post" is a bit "twisted" - Clearly you are not familiar (Views: 240, 2020-01-31, 6:12 pm)
    - No, federal law only protects a whistleblower from - getting blow back at work, not (Views: 288, 2020-02-01, 4:11 am)
      - Your post is spot on. Facts that Liberal fascists - that refuse to acknowledge. (Views: 192, 2020-02-01, 7:53 pm)
  - Nothing like a good old conspiracy theory to get - the nuts crawling out of the woodwork (Views: 215, 2020-01-31, 3:22 pm)
    - IS THAT YOU RACHEL MADCOW? - No one more conspiracy ridden than (Views: 177, 2020-01-31, 6:03 pm)
      - I rest my case - nm (Views: 316, 2020-02-01, 6:15 am)
        Good, then we should not be hearing any more - factless posts (Views: 156, 2020-02-01, 7:39 pm)