Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

If he testifies to Congress, I'm sure someone will ask that. - sm

Posted: Apr 18th, 2019 - 4:37 pm In Reply to: I'd like to know when Mueller knew there was no collusion. - This whole thing could have ended

The more pressing question is did his waiting until after 2018 (and Dems having control of the House) help or hurt Trump?

I'd make the case that it actually helped Trump. With Dems in charge of the House investigations in their current deranged state of mind, the Trump investigations will continue. That's only going to help Trump. More investigations mean more exoneration.

Dems think more investigations will lead to some discovery of a crime. It won't.

1. Trump was a huge target for the Obama admin. That was an admin (as we've all seen) that had no issues weaponizing the IRS and other agencies against political enemies. They couldn't get Trump.

2. Trump had the money to hire people to keep his business dealings and taxes perfectly legal.

3. Trump made his money outside of politics. Unlike others in government, he had no reason to trade political favors in exchange for funding.

4. Trump knows he's under a microscope. He won't do anything in the future that could be considered corrupt.

They won't find anything. But the fact that they will keep looking will only help Trump.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Does this mean Trump is the most upstanding, non-corrupt President of all time? - sm (Views: 454, 2019-04-18, 3:03 pm)
- Sorry - but (Views: 303, 2019-04-18, 3:06 pm)
  - Yes, it's important that people actually commit a crime before being - convicted. sm (Views: 191, 2019-04-18, 3:20 pm)
    - Mueller is leaving it up to Congress to do something - or not. It is likely not (Views: 216, 2019-04-18, 3:39 pm)
    - I'd like to know when Mueller knew there was no collusion. - This whole thing could have ended (Views: 212, 2019-04-18, 4:08 pm)
      - If he testifies to Congress, I'm sure someone will ask that. - sm
  - That just the media narrative. - nm (Views: 203, 2019-04-18, 3:41 pm)
    - No it's not. Read the report. - nm (Views: 159, 2019-04-18, 3:55 pm)
      - Wrong again. The only factually provable crimes commited - were by OBAMA and Hillary (Views: 173, 2019-04-18, 7:18 pm)
    - I was listening to Rush the other day and he said this is - EXACTLY what the media would say. (Views: 250, 2019-04-18, 4:00 pm)
      - I think it's time to go after the REAL conspirators now - the root instigator is the Dem party (Views: 174, 2019-04-19, 4:19 am)
  - Media talking point by the fake news. They are proving - who we all knew they were. BIASED. (Views: 361, 2019-04-18, 3:45 pm)
    - Continual harassment of President Trump for 6 more years. - A person falsely accused of a crime (Views: 315, 2019-04-18, 3:57 pm)
    - M.A.in journalism here. The starkest example of bias is "Fair and Balanced" - SM (Views: 206, 2019-04-18, 4:18 pm)
    - The actual report is very eye opening! You should read it! - sm (Views: 172, 2019-04-18, 5:20 pm)
      - The president had the power to fire Mueller. It is perfectly - constitutional. Geez, no wonder (Views: 167, 2019-04-19, 7:00 am)
        Sorry if you can't grasp the meaning of the - statements in the report. (Views: 173, 2019-04-19, 7:33 am)
        Huh? I'm having trouble grasping the meaning of your - statement. (Views: 193, 2019-04-19, 8:09 am)
        As I am yours. - nm (Views: 195, 2019-04-19, 8:20 am)
        Repeating media talking points is not grasping the - meaning of a report, it's just their (Views: 185, 2019-04-19, 8:10 am)
      - This is just media talking points. The president could - have fired Mueller. (Views: 174, 2019-04-19, 7:01 am)
  - No collusion, no obstruction. Even if his staff carried out - what he said, the president has the (Views: 288, 2019-04-18, 3:53 pm)
- I guess you saw something we didn't because - I see a lot of "scath" in there. nm (Views: 235, 2019-04-18, 3:07 pm)
- Hardly. No one else has needed this level of scrutiny, and - SM (Views: 321, 2019-04-18, 3:19 pm)
  - OBAMA AND HILLARY NEED THIS SCRUTINY - BUT Liberal Fascists not interested in (Views: 201, 2019-04-18, 7:20 pm)
    - DITTO LF HATER...NM - Name (Views: 252, 2019-04-19, 5:44 am)
      - DITTO LEGAL USA CITIZEN HATER - ANONN (Views: 182, 2019-04-19, 1:30 pm)