This is just another name for National Health Service - and socialism, when people are told the Posted: Mar 19th, 2019 - 4:42 pm In Reply to: Why does Average person oppose - Medicare For All
hard truths such as the higher taxes, less provider choice, and increased wait times the approval for this drops 50%.
It's not really free stuff. The root of this problem was when medical “insurance” became part of employment in WW2 due to wage controls imposed by the feds. Any move towards further federalization of healthcare would be a disaster. Providers would face big cuts; that always happens with government programs. Right now, most independent providers don’t take Medicaid and many don’t take 0-care.
Many hospitals and providers would stop accepting government plans forcing patients into overcrowded hospitals and clinics that would ration care. If providers are forced to take government plans as a requirement to practice medicine or run a hospital, many would quit/go OOB.
Tack on the illegals getting "free stuff"
Proposed Amendment to the Constitution Elected officials and those appointed by said officials will not be exempt from any laws, rules, regulations, decrees, codes, statutes or ordinances that apply to any citizen or legal resident of the United States. In addition, elected officials or those appointed by said officials will not pass or implement any law, rule, regulation, decree, code, statute or ordinance that applies only to themselves and not the rest of the citizens or legal residents of the United States.
Post A Reply Reply By Email Options
Complete Discussion Below: (  marks the location of current message within thread)
- Why does Average person oppose - Medicare For All (Views: 366, 2019-03-19, 4:19 pm)
- This is just another name for National Health Service - and socialism, when people are told the
|
