I'm not sure what "it will take many election cycles - to get rid of much govt

Posted: Aug 7th, 2018 - 8:59 am In Reply to: The Deep State must be fully funded. It's going to take many more - election cycles to get rid of much govt

overspending" means. You say that yet seem to be implying that both parties are the problem. I do agree with both parties are responsible but I don't get the many election cycles thing.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

I wanted to answer - in a timely fashion (Views: 412, 2018-08-07, 7:35 am)
- The Deep State must be fully funded. It's going to take many more - election cycles to get rid of much govt (Views: 252, 2018-08-07, 8:00 am)
  - I'm not sure what "it will take many election cycles - to get rid of much govt
    - Voting for people who want to cut spending each election cyst, - and yes both parties are responsible. (Views: 258, 2018-08-07, 9:02 am)
      - cycle not cyst (I'm in the middle of a report) - LOL (Views: 192, 2018-08-07, 9:03 am)
      - Well that really hasn't started. You also have - to give it time to see (Views: 211, 2018-08-07, 9:07 am)
  - I like the streamlining and consolidation proposal, reorganizing - government functions to limit duplication. (Views: 181, 2018-08-07, 9:01 am)
- Obama never had a budget. He just kept doing ridiculous - continuing resolutions. (Views: 184, 2018-08-07, 9:04 am)
  - So what are the pubs doing different? - nm (Views: 197, 2018-08-07, 9:07 am)
  - Obama never had a clue. - About anything. (Views: 199, 2018-08-07, 9:57 am)
    - We really don't want to compare who is clueless here, do we? - I'm not (Views: 233, 2018-08-07, 2:30 pm)
  - Yeah, that's right.... - Mary (Views: 499, 2018-08-07, 3:04 pm)
    - Your friend's investments should be doing much better - under President Trump, but I thought (Views: 197, 2018-08-07, 4:12 pm)