Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help M*Modal Nuance New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Games Faith Board Prayer Requests Health Issues


ADVERTISEMENT



Politics

SF Bay area uses private TSA and so does Kansas City. - The airports with private security

Posted: Jan 15th, 2019 - 9:07 am In Reply to: Networks trashed Trump with over 95% negative reporting, - I voted for him because he's not

don't have anything to worry about.

Many of them went private because of the gross inefficiency of govt TSA workers. Some of them are calling in sick because of the shutdown.

From the linked article....But not everywhere: Security screenings are continuing without a hitch at a handful of airports, from San Francisco and Kansas City to Bradenton, Florida. That’s because private companies provide screenings there instead of federal TSA agents. And those agents are still getting paychecks.

“This is not having an effect,” Fredrick Piccolo, president and CEO for the Sarasota Bradenton International Airport, said in a phone interview. “They’re getting paid.”

TSA lists nearly two dozen U.S. airports that participate in the Screening Partnership Program, which allows commercial airports to apply for the opportunity to use qualified private companies for their security. Airports in Atlantic City, New Jersey; Bozeman, Montana; and Key West, Florida, all participate.



LINK/URL: SF Bay area uses private TSA and so does Kansas City.

ADVERTISEMENT


Post A Reply Reply By Email Options


Complete Discussion Below: ( marks the location of current message within thread)