Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help M*Modal Nuance New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Games Faith Board Prayer Requests Health Issues


Politics Latest Messages: The Doctors Helper Transcription Serive..

Perhaps - but practially speaking

Posted: Oct 7th, 2018 - 8:32 am In Reply to: Neither did Jack the Ripper. A SC justice does not need to - be a lawyer. In fact, the

no one is going to be confirmed without legal qualifications. Apparently one cannot even be a little bit tongue-in-cheek on this board without being attacked. My point was that the party in power doesn't care if the allegations are true or false or whether there was a thorough investigation. They will confirm anyone the president names simply because of their party affiliation. It seemed that Kavanaugh was qualified but his demeanor during the hearings should have given one pause as to whether he has the right temperament to be on the SC.


Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Complete Discussion Below: ( marks the location of current message within thread)