The problem with our handling of nuclear weapons began - with the 1992 deconstruction of SAC.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

• I don't care who you are, - this is really scary. (Views: 137, 2018-09-12, 9:56 am)
  • Scientific American has been thoroughly politicized and, - as such, is worthless as a science (Views: 43, 2018-09-12, 10:20 am)
    • I remember when it was good, before it became political. - Same with NatGeo. Not the same (Views: 28, 2018-09-12, 10:22 am)
    • Los Alamos. Remember Bill Clinton giving China some nuclear - secrets by way of Los Alamos (Views: 35, 2018-09-12, 10:26 am)
    • Keep it up - just like Trump (Views: 53, 2018-09-12, 10:39 am)
      • It has nothing to do with Trump. "Cancellation of a directive - does not, by itself, modify or (Views: 40, 2018-09-12, 10:49 am)
      • Quit reading it years ago. Used to be very good. - No longer. (Views: 29, 2018-09-12, 11:11 am)
        • Still is good. Maybe it is just that you don't - like what science is saying. nm (Views: 34, 2018-09-12, 4:32 pm)
          • Social justice is not science. - nm (Views: 28, 2018-09-13, 2:28 am)
            • Nuclear bombs and nuclear power plants - were created by science. nm (Views: 16, 2018-09-13, 10:02 am)
    • Just swamp critters complaining again about losing jobs - and influence. Even the chairmain (Views: 31, 2018-09-12, 10:58 am)
    • Plus John Kerry worked with Iran to undermine America. - He broke the law! (Views: 27, 2018-09-13, 5:04 am)
  • They are not a technical organization. They are a political - organization. DNFSB, think EPA. (Views: 30, 2018-09-12, 10:28 am)
    • We stopped our subscription to Scientific America (which - was the first and ONLY subscription (Views: 38, 2018-09-12, 10:30 am)
  • The problem with our handling of nuclear weapons began - with the 1992 deconstruction of SAC.

• Latest Posts
• Unanswered
• Top Viewed
• Most Discussed