Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

Scientific American has been thoroughly politicized and, - as such, is worthless as a science

Posted: Sep 12th, 2018 - 10:20 am In Reply to: I don't care who you are, - this is really scary.

magazine, for at least 25 years. My gut says the DNFSB is fertile ground for leaks. They mention Los Alamos. That place is a hotbed for breaches and espionage.

"...the administration cuts safety board access to nuclear facilities."
Such a board likely is composed of leftists who hate nukes and want to interfere with their very existence. Thus restricting them is restricting potential enemy spies.

"... “created by Congress in 1988 amid broad public concerns over...”

Congress passed DOMA and lots of other things that Obama ignored routinely. BUT, when the Left wants to add legitimacy to something, or an obscure agency, it trots out the ol’ “Congress did this or that” card as if they respected Congress. Yuck.

Scientific American has never liked the nuclear weapons program. They are probably throwing another nuclear pacifist fit, and Trump is a handy target.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

I don't care who you are, - this is really scary. (Views: 455, 2018-09-12, 9:56 am)
- Scientific American has been thoroughly politicized and, - as such, is worthless as a science
  - I remember when it was good, before it became political. - Same with NatGeo. Not the same (Views: 228, 2018-09-12, 10:22 am)
  - Los Alamos. Remember Bill Clinton giving China some nuclear - secrets by way of Los Alamos (Views: 266, 2018-09-12, 10:26 am)
  - Keep it up - just like Trump (Views: 213, 2018-09-12, 10:39 am)
    - It has nothing to do with Trump. "Cancellation of a directive - does not, by itself, modify or (Views: 218, 2018-09-12, 10:49 am)
    - Quit reading it years ago. Used to be very good. - No longer. (Views: 205, 2018-09-12, 11:11 am)
      - Still is good. Maybe it is just that you don't - like what science is saying. nm (Views: 221, 2018-09-12, 4:32 pm)
        Social justice is not science. - nm (Views: 230, 2018-09-13, 2:28 am)
        Nuclear bombs and nuclear power plants - were created by science. nm (Views: 164, 2018-09-13, 10:02 am)
  - Just swamp critters complaining again about losing jobs - and influence. Even the chairmain (Views: 212, 2018-09-12, 10:58 am)
  - Plus John Kerry worked with Iran to undermine America. - He broke the law! (Views: 270, 2018-09-13, 5:04 am)
- They are not a technical organization. They are a political - organization. DNFSB, think EPA. (Views: 220, 2018-09-12, 10:28 am)
  - We stopped our subscription to Scientific America (which - was the first and ONLY subscription (Views: 233, 2018-09-12, 10:30 am)
- The problem with our handling of nuclear weapons began - with the 1992 deconstruction of SAC. (Views: 234, 2018-09-12, 11:25 am)