Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help M*Modal Nuance New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Games Faith Board Prayer Requests Health Issues


ADVERTISEMENT



Politics Latest Messages: Hi Linda Andrews..

SCOTUS said Clinton had no immunity vs. Jones because it was a civil case - sm for link

Posted: Jun 5th, 2018 - 5:02 pm In Reply to: SCOTUS unanimously said differrent in the Clinton v Jones - case. So what is the distinction

Yes, I know it's Wikipedia and anyone can edit it. But the article is full of links to the original documentation. Use them if you want to dig deeper.

"Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997)[1], was a landmark United States Supreme Court case establishing that a sitting President of the United States has no immunity from civil law litigation, in federal court, against him or her, for acts done before taking office and unrelated to the office."



LINK/URL: SCOTUS said Clinton had no immunity vs. Jones because it was a civil case

ADVERTISEMENT


Post A Reply Reply By Email Options


Complete Discussion Below: ( marks the location of current message within thread)